skip to main content
10.1145/3322276.3322307acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

"Co-riding With My eBike to Get Green Lights"

Published:18 June 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Researchers are increasingly exploring interactive technology supporting human-system partnership in an exertion context, such as cycling. So far, most investigations have supported the rider cognitively, by the system "sensing and presenting" information to assist the rider to make informed decisions. In contrast, we propose systems that promote user-system co-operation, by "sensing and acting" on information to assist the rider, not only "cognitively" but also "physically", with the aim of facilitating user-system co-operation in an exertion context. Our prototype, "Ari", is a novel augmented eBike designed to facilitate user-system co-operation, where the information that each party can sense is used in regulating the speed to cross all traffic lights on green. A study with 20 bike riders resulted in five themes and six design tactics to further the design of interactive systems at the intersection of human-computer integration in an exertion context, thereby facilitating user-system co-operation to augment the exertion experience.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

disfp1184.mp4

mp4

54.3 MB

References

  1. Julio Abascal and Colette Nicolle. Moving Towards Inclusive Design Guidelines for Socially and Ethically Aware HCI. Interacting with computers 17, 5 (2005), 484--505 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Josh Andres, Julian de Hoog and Florian Mueller. "I Had Super-Powers When Ebike Riding" Towards Understanding the Design of Integrated Exertion. Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (2018). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Josh Andres, Julian de Hoog, Jürg von Känel, Julian Berk, Bach Le, Xizi Wang, Marcus Brazil and Florian Mueller. 2016. Exploring Human: Ebike Interaction to Support Rider Autonomy. In Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play Companion Extended Abstracts. ACM, 85--92. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Giancarlo Bacchieri, Aluísio JD Barros, Janaina V Dos Santos and Denise P Gigante. Cycling to Work in Brazil: Users Profile, Risk Behaviors, and Traffic Accident Occurrence. Accident Analysis & Prevention 42, 4 (2010), 1025--1030.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Cobi Bike. 2018. Cobi Bike. https://cobi.bike/product.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77--101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Tadej Brezina and Bernd Hildebrandt. 2013. Where Do Cyclists Run Red Lights? An Investigation into Infrastructural Circumstances. In Proceedings of ICTTE-International Conference on Traffic and Transport Engineering, COKORILO, O.(Ed.) Beograd, Srbija: City Net Scientific Research Center Ltd., Beograd. 109--114.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Andrew J Cowell and Kay M Stanney. 2003. Embodiment and Interaction Guidelines for Designing Credible, Trustworthy Embodied Conversational Agents. In Proceedings of International Workshop on Intelligent Virtual Agents. Springer, 301--309.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. CycleLabs. 2015. Smarthalo. https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1106460188/smarthalo-turn-your-bike-into-a-smart-bike/description.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Alexandru Dancu, Velko Vechev, Adviye Ay, Simon Nilson, Oscar Nygren, Simon Eliasson, Jean-Elie Barjonet, Joe Marshall and Morten Fjeld. 2015. Gesture Bike: Examining Projection Surfaces and Turn Signal Systems for Urban Cycling. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Interactive Tabletops & Surfaces. ACM, 2817748, 151--159.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Daniel H De La Iglesia, Juan F De Paz, Gabriel Villarrubia González, Alberto L Barriuso, Javier Bajo and Juan M Corchado. Increasing the Intensity over Time of an Electric-Assist Bike Based on the User and Route: The Bike Becomes the Gym. Sensors 18, 1 (2018), 220.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Digitsole. 2018. Digitsole AI Powered Insoles for Cyling. https://www.digitsole.com/connected-insoles-cycling-run-profiler-cycling/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Anne Donnellon, Barbara Gray and Michel G Bougon. Communication, Meaning, and Organized Action. Administrative Science Quarterly (1986), 43--55.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Jim E Doran, SRJN Franklin, Nicholas R Jennings and Timothy J Norman. On Cooperation in Multi-Agent Systems. The Knowledge Engineering Review 12, 3 (1997), 309--314. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Umer Farooq and Jonathan Grudin. Human-Computer Integration. Interactions 23, 6 (2016), 26--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Umer Farooq and Jonathan T. Grudin. 2017. Paradigm Shift from Human Computer Interaction to Integration. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3049285, 1360--1363.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Elliot Fishman and Christopher Cherry. E-Bikes in the Mainstream: Reviewing a Decade of Research. Transport Reviews 36, 1 (2016), 72--91.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Richard Byrne Florian Mueller, Josh Andres, Rakesh Patibanda. 2018. Experiencing the Body as Play. In Proceedings of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Akiko Fujise. 2018. Investigation of Practical Compensation Method for Bone Conduction Headphones with a Focus on Spatialization. In Proceedings of Audio Engineering Society Conference: 2018 AES International Conference on Spatial Reproduction-Aesthetics and Science. Audio Engineering Society.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Alberto Gallace and Charles Spence. The Cognitive and Neural Correlates of Tactile Memory. Psychological bulletin 135, 3 (2009), 380.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Kathrin M Gerling, Conor Linehan, Ben Kirman, Michael R Kalyn, Adam B Evans and Kieran C Hicks. Creating Wheelchair-Controlled Video Games: Challenges and Opportunities When Involving Young People with Mobility Impairments and Game Design Experts. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 94 (2016), 64--73. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Martine Hausberger, Hélène Roche, Séverine Henry and E Kathalijne Visser. A Review of the Human-Horse Relationship. Applied animal behaviour science 109, 1 (2008), 1--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Chandrika Jayant, Christine Acuario, William Johnson, Janet Hollier and Richard Ladner. 2010. V-Braille: Haptic Braille Perception Using a Touch-Screen and Vibration on Mobile Phones. In Proceedings of the 12th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility. ACM, 295--296. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. M Johnson and G Rose. Report on Safety Implications of E-Bikes. 2015. Victoria, Australia: Royal Automobile Club of Victoria (RACV).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Marilyn Johnson, Judith Charlton, Jennifer Oxley and Stuart Newstead. Why Do Cyclists Infringe at Red Lights? An Investigation of Australian Cyclists' Reasons for Red Light Infringement. Journal of Accident Analysis & Prevention 50 (2013), 840--847.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Paul G Keil. Human-Sheepdog Distributed Cognitive Systems: An Analysis of Interspecies Cognitive Scaffolding in a Sheepdog Trial. Journal of Cognition and Culture 15, 5 (2015), 508--529.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Brian Casey Langford, Jiaoli Chen and Christopher R Cherry. Risky Riding: Naturalistic Methods Comparing Safety Behavior from Conventional Bicycle Riders and Electric Bike Riders. Accident Analysis & Prevention 82 (2015), 220--226.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. SpeedX Leopard. 2016. Speedx Aero Leopard. https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/speedx/speedx-leopard-the-first-ever-smart-aero-road-bike?ref=most_funded.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. PR Lowrie. Scats, Sydney Co-Ordinated Adaptive Traffic System: A Traffic Responsive Method of Controlling Urban Traffic (1990).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Joe Marshall, Alexandru Dancu and Florian Floyd Mueller. 2016. Interaction in Motion: Designing Truly Mobile Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, 215--228. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. K McAuliffe and A Thornton. The Psychology of Cooperation in Animals: An Ecological Approach. Journal of Zoology 295, 1 (2015), 23--35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Katina Michael. Science Fiction Is Full of Bots That Hurt People:... But These Bots Are Here Now. IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine 5, 4 (2016), 112--117.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Falco Motors. 2014. Falco Electric Wheel Heartbeat. https://www.fastcompany.com/3035452/this-electric-bike-is-controlled-by-your-heartbeat-for-the-perfect-workout.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Prakash Murugesan, Norman J Weigert, Mark A Manickaraj and Jarvis Chau. 2017. Automated E-Assist Adjustment to Prevent User Perspiration. https://patents.google.com/patent/US9828060B2/en.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Sz Naderi, Ádam Miklósi, Antal Dóka and Vilmos Csányi. Co-Operative Interactions between Blind Persons and Their Dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 74, 1 (2001), 59--80.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Donald A Norman. The "Problem'with Automation: Inappropriate Feedback and Interaction, Not "over-Automation'. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 327, 1241 (1990), 585--593.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Marianna Obrist, Sue Ann Seah and Sriram Subramanian. 2013. Talking About Tactile Experiences. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1659--1668. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Mariella Pazzaglia and Marco Molinari. The Embodiment of Assistive Devices-from Wheelchair to Exoskeleton. Physics of life reviews 16 (2016), 163--175.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Tibor Petzoldt, Katja Schleinitz, Sarah Heilmann and Tina Gehlert. Traffic Conflicts and Their Contextual Factors When Riding Conventional Vs. Electric Bicycles. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour 46 (2017), 477--490.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Paul A Plazier, Gerd Weitkamp and Agnes E van den Berg. "Cycling Was Never So Easy!" an Analysis of E-Bike Commuters' Motives, Travel Behaviour and Experiences Using Gps-Tracking and Interviews. Journal of transport geography 65 (2017), 25--34.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. IBM Research. Trusting AI - The new frontiers of AI, Selected IBM Research AI publications from 2018. https://www.research.ibm.com/artificial-intelligence/publications/2018/trusting-ai/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Duncan Rowland, Martin Flintham, Leif Oppermann, Joe Marshall, Alan Chamberlain, Boriana Koleva, Steve Benford and Citlali Perez. 2009. Ubikequitous Computing: Designing Interactive Experiences for Cyclists. In Proceedings of 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. ACM, 1613886, 1--11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Esther Salmeron-Manzano and Francisco Manzano-Agugliaro. The Electric Bicycle: Worldwide Research Trends. Energies 11, 7 (2018), 1894.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Iulian Vlad Serban, Alessandro Sordoni, Yoshua Bengio, Aaron C Courville and Joelle Pineau. 2016. Building End-to-End Dialogue Systems Using Generative Hierarchical Neural Network Models. In Proceedings of AAAI. arXiv:1507.04808. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Keng Siau and Weiyu Wang. Building Trust in Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Robotics. Cutter Business Technology Journal 31, 2 (2018), 47--53.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Superhuman Sports. 2018. "Super Sports" Re-Invent Sports with Modern Technology. https://superhuman-sports.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Shaun Sweeney, Rodrigo Ordonez-Hurtado, Francesco Pilla, Giovanni Russo, David Timoney and Robert Shorten. Cyberphysics, Pollution Mitigation, and Pedelecs. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.00646 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. P Vermesch. L'entretien D'explicitation En Formation Initiale Et En Formation Continue. Collection pédagogies. ESF éditeur (1994).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Liam Richard West. Strava: Challenge Yourself to Greater Heights in Physical Activity/Cycling and Running. British journal of sports medicine 49, 15 (2015), 1024--1024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Jason Wuertz, Sultan A Alharthi, William A Hamilton, Scott Bateman, Carl Gutwin, Anthony Tang, Zachary Toups and Jessica Hammer. 2018. A Design Framework for Awareness Cues in Distributed Multiplayer Games. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 243. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Hongtai Yang, Xiaohan Liu, Fan Su, Christopher Cherry, Yugang Liu and Yanlai Li. Predicting E-Bike Users' Intention to Run the Red Light: An Application and Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour 58 (2018), 282--291.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Yiqi Zhang and Changxu Wu. The Effects of Sunshields on Red Light Running Behavior of Cyclists and Electric Bike Riders. Accident Analysis & Prevention 52 (2013), 210--218.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. "Co-riding With My eBike to Get Green Lights"

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        DIS '19: Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference
        June 2019
        1628 pages
        ISBN:9781450358507
        DOI:10.1145/3322276

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 18 June 2019

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        DIS '19 Paper Acceptance Rate105of415submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate1,158of4,684submissions,25%

        Upcoming Conference

        DIS '24
        Designing Interactive Systems Conference
        July 1 - 5, 2024
        IT University of Copenhagen , Denmark

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader