Tracy Hresko Pearl
ABSTRACT
Over the last five years, a small but growing number of vehicle accidents involving fully or partially autonomous vehicles have raised a new and profoundly novel legal issue: who should be liable (if anyone) and how victims should be compensated (if at all) when a vehicle controlled by an algorithm rather than a human driver causes injury. The answer to this question has implications far beyond the resolution of individual autonomous vehicle crash cases. Whether the American legal system is capable of handling these cases fairly and efficiently implicates the likelihood that (a) consumers will adopt autonomous vehicles, and (b) the rate at which they will (or will not) do so. These implications should concern law and policy makers immensely. If autonomous cars stand to drastically reduce the number of fatalities and injuries on U.S. roadways-and virtually every scholar believes that they will-getting the adjudication and compensation aspect of autonomous vehicle injuries "wrong," so to speak, risks stymieing adoption of this technology and leaving more Americans at risk of dying at the hands of human drivers.
- Jeremy Levy, No Need to Reinvent the Wheel: Why Existing Liability Law Does Not Need to Be Preemptively Altered to Cope with the Debut of the Driverless Car, 9 J. BUS. ENTREPRENEURSHIP & L. 355, 357 (2016).Google Scholar
- JOHN FRANK WEAVER, ROBOTS ARE PEOPLE TOO: HOW SIRI, GOOGLE CAR, AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE WILL FORCE US TO CHANGE OUR LAWS 56 (Praeger 2014).Google Scholar
- Neal Katyal, Disruptive Technologies and the Law, 102 GEO L.J. 1685, 1689 (2014).Google Scholar
- For a more thorough treatment of this topic, please refer to Tracy Hresko Pearl, Compensation at the Crossroads: Autonomous Vehicles and Alternative Compensation Schemes, 60 WM. & MARY L.R. 1 (2019).Google Scholar
- F. Patrick Hubbard, "Sophisticated Robots": Balancing Liability, Regulation, and Innovation, 66 FLA. L. REV. 1803, 1811--12 (2014).Google Scholar
- Carrie Schroll, Splitting the Bill: Creating a National Car Insurance Fund to Pay for Accidents in Autonomous Vehicles, 109 N.W. U. L. Rev. 803, 805 (2015).Google Scholar
- Tom Vanderbilt, Navigating the Legality of Autonomous Vehicles, WIRED (Feb. 7, 2012).Google Scholar
- Bryan Walker Smith, Automated Driving and Product Liability, 2018 MICH. ST. L. R. 1, 15 (2017).Google Scholar
- Joan Flocks, James Davies, The Deepwater Horizon Disaster Compensation Process As Corrective Justice: Views from the Ground Up, 84 MISS. L.J. 1, 37 (2014).Google Scholar
- Francis E. McGovern, The What and Why of Claims Resolution Facilities, 57 STAN. L. REV. 1361, 1375 (2005).Google Scholar
- Michael D. Stovsky, Product Liability Barriers to the Commercialization of Biotechology: Improving the Competitiveness of the U.S. Biotechnology Industry, 6 HIGH TECH. L.J. 363, 373--74 (1991).Google Scholar
- Orly Ravid, Don't Sue Me, I Was Just Lawfully Texting & Drunk When My Autonomous Car Crashed Into You, 44 SW. L. Rev. 175, 199 (2014).Google Scholar
- NHTSA, About NHTSA, NHTSA.gov, https://www.nhtsa.gov/about-nhtsa.Google Scholar
- NHTSA, NHTSA's Mission, NHTSA.gov, https://www.nhtsa.gov/about-nhtsa/nhtsas-core-values.Google Scholar
- Mike Steenson & Joseph Michael Sayler, The Legacy of the 9/11 Fund and the Minnesota I-35W Bridge-Collapse Fund: Creating a Template for Compensating Victims of Future Mass-Tort Catastrophes, 35 WM. MITCHELL L. REV. 524, 544 (2009).Google Scholar
- Michael J. Donovan, The Impact of "Hurricane" Hannah: The Government's Decision to Compensate One Girl's Vaccine Injury Case Could Drastically Alter the Face of Public Health, 50 JURISMETRICS J. 229, 232 (2010).Google Scholar
- Steenson & Sayler, supra note 22, at 528.Google Scholar
- Tracy Hresko, Restoration and Relief: Procedural Justice and the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund, 42 GONZ. L. REV. 95, 102 (2007).Google Scholar
- Tesla's Autopilot: Too Much Autonomy Too Soon, CONSUMER REPORTS (July 14, 2016), http://www.consumerreports.org/tesla/tesla-autopilot-too-much-autonomy-too-soon/.Google Scholar
- Stephen Selander, Docket Number NHTSA 2016-0090-Comments on Federal Automated Vehicle Policy, SELANDER LAW OFFICE (Nov. 22, 2016) 1 https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=NHTSA-2016-0090--1114.Google Scholar
- Patrick Hall, The Return of King Solomon: The Gulf Coast Claims Facility From the Perspective of the 9/11 Fund, 1 ARIZ. J. ENVTL. L & POLY 1, 1 (2010).Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Compensation at the Crossroads: Autonomous Vehicles and Alternative Victim Compensation Schemes
Recommendations
Are automated vehicles safer than manually driven cars?
AbstractAre automated vehicles really safer than manually driven vehicles? If so, how would we know? Answering this question has spurred a contentious debate. Unfortunately, several issues make answering this question difficult for the foreseeable future. ...
Geospatial Analytics to Improve the Safety of Autonomous Vehicles
Finding the costs and risks associated with highway traffic routes would allow companies and people alike to find routes that offer a comfortable amount of risk. With the amount of traffic data being collected at a more granular level the ability to ...
Which Factors Influence Attitudes Towards Using Autonomous Vehicles?
AutomotiveUI '17: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications AdjunctIn recent years, autonomous driving has emerged as an explicit technological objective of many players in the automobile market. How will these novel developments be accepted and which factors may determine their acceptance? In an exploratory study we ...
Comments