skip to main content
10.1145/3306618.3314233acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaiesConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

AI + Art = Human

Authors Info & Claims
Published:27 January 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Over the past few years, specialised online and offline press blossomed with articles about art made "with" Artificial Intelligence (AI) but the narrative is rapidly changing. In fact, in October 2018, the auction house Christie's sold an art piece allegedly made "by" an AI. We draw from philosophy of art and science arguing that AI as a technical object is always intertwined with human nature despite its level of autonomy. However, the use of creative autonomous agents has cultural and social implications in the way we experience art as creators as well as audience. Therefore, we highlight the importance of an interdisciplinary dialogue by promoting a culture of transparency of the technology used, awareness of the meaning of technology in our society and the value of creativity in our lives.

References

  1. Memo Akten. 2016. All watched over by machines of loving grace: Deep dreamedition. https://goo.gl/Ut33ha.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Colin Allen, Gary Varner, and Jason Zinser. 2000. Prolegomena to any future artificial moral agent. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 12, 3 (2000), 251--261.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Charles Altieri. 1987. Style as the Man: What Wittgenstein offers for speculating on Expressive Activity. The Journal of aesthetics and art criticism46 (1987),177--192.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Rui Filipe Antunes, Frederic Fol Leymarie, and William Latham. 2014. Two decades of evolutionary art using computational ecosystems and its potential for virtual worlds. Journal For Virtual Worlds Research 7, 3 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Jason Bailey. 2018. The AI Art At Christie's Is Not What You Think. https://goo.gl/CS8fiS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. W. Benjamin. 2008. The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. Penguin Books Limited. https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ZucuzeiI-24CGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Margaret A Boden. 1992. The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. Cardinal. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Margaret A Boden and Ernest A Edmonds. 2009. What is generative art? Digital Creativity 20, 1--2 (2009), 21--46.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Matthew Botvinick, David GT Barrett, Peter Battaglia, Nando de Freitas, Darshan Kumaran, Joel Z Leibo, Timothy Lillicrap, Joseph Modayil, Shakir Mohamed,Neil C Rabinowitz, et al.2017. Building machines that learn and think for themselves. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Christies. 2018. Is artificial intelligence set to become art's next medium? https://goo.gl/4LDZjX.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Richard E Clark. 2014. Resistance to change: Unconscious knowledge and the challenge of unlearning. In Fostering change in institutions, environments, and people. Routledge, 83--102.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Mark Coeckelbergh. 2017. Can Machines Create Art? Philosophy & Technology 30, 3 (2017), 285--303.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Harold Cohen. 1988. How to Draw Three People in a Botanical Garden. In AAAI, Vol. 89. 846--855. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Simon Colton. 2012. The painting fool: Stories from building an automated painter. In Computers and creativity. Springer, 3--38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Simon Colton, John William Charnley, and Alison Pease. 2011. Computational Creativity Theory: The FACE and IDEA Descriptive Models. In ICCC. 90--95.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Simon Colton, Michel F Valstar, and Maja Pantic. 2008. Emotionally aware automated portrait painting. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Digital Interactive Media in Entertainment and Arts. ACM, 304--311. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Michael Cook, Simon Colton, and Jeremy Gow. 2017. The ANGELINA Videogame Design System-Part II. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games 9, 3 (2017), 254--266.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Benedetto Croce. 1904. Estetica come scienza dell'espressione e linguistica generale: teoria e storia. R. Sandron.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Antonio Daniele. 2016. This Is Not Private. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3831--3834. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Arthur Danto. 1964. The artworld.The journal of philosophy 61, 19 (1964),571--584.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Stephen Davies. 2012. The artful species: aesthetics, art, and evolution. OUP Oxford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Terrence W Deacon. 1998.The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain. WW Norton & Company.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Judy S DeLoache. 2004. Becoming symbol-minded. Trends in cognitive sciences 8,2 (2004), 66--70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. George Dickie. 1969. Defining art. American philosophical quarterly 6, 3 (1969),253--256.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Ellen Dissanayake. 2001. Homoaestheticus: Where art comes from and why. University of Washington Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Chris Donahue, Julian McAuley, and Miller Puckette. 2018. Synthesizing Audio with Generative Adversarial Networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.04208(2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Ahmed M. Elgammal, Bingchen Liu, Mohamed Elhoseiny, and Marian Mazzone. 2017. CAN: Creative Adversarial Networks, Generating "Art" by Learning About Styles and Deviating from Style Norms. CoRRabs/1706.07068 (2017). arXiv:1706.07068 http://arxiv.org/abs/1706.07068Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Rebecca Fiebrink, Dan Trueman, and Perry R Cook. 2009. A Meta-Instrument for Interactive, On-the-Fly Machine Learning. In NIME. 280--285.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Leon A. Gatys, Alexander S. Ecker, and Matthias Bethge. 2016. Image Style Transfer Using Convolutional Neural Networks. In The IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Ian Goodfellow, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Mehdi Mirza, Bing Xu, David Warde-Farley, Sherjil Ozair, Aaron Courville, and Yoshua Bengio. 2014. Generative adversarial nets. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 2672--2680. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Susan Greenfield. 2004. Tomorrow's people: how 21st-century technology is changing the way we think and feel. Penguin UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. David Ha and Douglas Eck. 2018. A Neural Representation of Sketch Drawings. In International Conference on Learning Representations. https://openreview.net/forum?id=Hy6GHpkCWGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. N Katherine Hayles. 2014. Cognition everywhere: The rise of the cognitive nonconscious and the costs of consciousness. New Literary History 45, 2 (2014),199--220.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. N Katherine Hayles. 2017. Unthought: The power of the cognitive nonconscious. University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Martin Heidegger. 1977.The question concerning technology, and other essays. Garland Publishing, INC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Aaron Hertzmann. 2018. Can Computers Create Art?. In Arts, Vol. 7. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Eileen John. 2001. Art and knowledge. The Routledge Companion to Aesthetics(2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Christopher Johnson. 2011. Leroi-Gourhan and the Limits of the Human. French studies 65, 4 (2011), 471--487.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Wang-Cheng Kang, Chen Fang, Zhaowen Wang, and Julian McAuley. 2017. Visually-aware fashion recommendation and design with generative image models. In Data Mining (ICDM), 2017 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 207--216.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Scott Kuindersma, Robin Deits, Maurice Fallon, Andrés Valenzuela, Hongkai Dai, Frank Permenter, Twan Koolen, Pat Marion, and Russ Tedrake. 2016. Optimization-based locomotion planning, estimation, and control design for the atlas humanoid robot. Autonomous Robots 40, 3 (01 Mar 2016), 429--455. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Brenden M Lake, Tomer D Ullman, Joshua B Tenenbaum, and Samuel J Gershman. 2017. Building machines that learn and think like people.Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Shane Legg, Marcus Hutter, et al. 2007. A collection of definitions of intelligence. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and applications 157 (2007), 17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. André Leroi-Gourhan. 1993. Gesture and speech. miT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. André Leroi-Gourhan. 2012.Milieu et techniques: évolution et techniques. Albin Michel.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Joseph Levine. 1983. Materialism and qualia: The explanatory gap. Pacific philosophical quarterly 64, 4 (1983), 354--361.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Zach Lieberman, Theodore Watson, Arturo Castro, et al.2009. Openframeworks. https://goo.gl/41tycE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Zachary C Lipton. 2018. The mythos of model interpretability. Queue 16, 3 (2018),30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Pamela McCorduck. 1991. Aaron's code: meta-art, artificial intelligence, and the work of Harold Cohen. Macmillan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. D. Moffat and M. Kelly. 2006. An investigation into people's bias against computational creativity in music composition. In The Third Joint Workshop on Computational Creativity (ECAI 2006). Universita di Trento, Universita di Trento, Trento, Italy.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Vera Molnar. 1975. Toward aesthetic guidelines for paintings with the aid of a computer. Leonardo(1975), 185--189.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Alexander Mordvintsev, Christopher Olah, and Mike Tyka. 2015. Inceptionism: Going deeper into neural networks. https://goo.gl/W5hjt3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Danil Nagy, Damon Lau, John Locke, Jim Stoddart, Lorenzo Villaggi, Ray Wang,Dale Zhao, and David Benjamin. 2017. Project Discover: An application of generative design for architectural space planning. In SimAUD 2017 Conference proceedings: Symposium on Simulation for Architecture and Urban Design. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. A Michael Noll. 1994. The beginnings of computer art in the United States: Amemoir. Leonardo(1994), 39--44.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. David Novitz. 1987.Knowledge, Fiction, and Imagination. Temple University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Casey Reas and Ben Fry. 2007.Processing: a programming handbook for visual designers and artists. Number 6812. Mit Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Frank Schirrmacher. 2010.La libertà ritrovata. Come (continuare a) pensare nell'eradigitale. Codice Edizioni.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Gilbert Simondon. 1980. On the mode of existence of technical objects. Translated from the French by Ninian Mellamphy. University of Western Ontario(1980).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Deepak Somaya and Lav R Varshney. 2018. Embodiment, Anthropomorphism, and Intellectual Property Rights for AI Creations. In AAAI/ACM Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Ethics and Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Betsy Sparrow, Jenny Liu, and Daniel M Wegner. 2011. Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips.science (2011), 1207745.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Jerome Stolnitz. 1992. On the cognitive triviality of art. Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art: The Analytic Tradition: An Anthology 32, 3 (1992), 191--200.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Atau Tanaka. 2000. Musical performance practice on sensor-based instruments. Trends in Gestural Control of Music13, 389--405 (2000), 284.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Patrick Tresset and Frederic Fol Leymarie. 2013. Portrait drawing by Paul the robot. Computers & Graphics37, 5 (2013), 348--363. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Kendall L Walton. 1978. Fearing fictions.The Journal of Philosophy75, 1 (1978),5--27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Morris Weitz. 1956. The role of theory in aesthetics.The journal of aesthetics and art criticism15, 1 (1956), 27--35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Geraint A Wiggins. 2006. A preliminary framework for description, analysis and comparison of creative systems.Knowledge-Based Systems 19, 7 (2006), 449--458. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. AI + Art = Human

                Recommendations

                Comments

                Login options

                Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                Sign in

                PDF Format

                View or Download as a PDF file.

                PDF

                eReader

                View online with eReader.

                eReader