skip to main content
10.1145/3308558.3313681acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Adversarial Adaptation of Scene Graph Models for Understanding Civic Issues

Published:13 May 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Citizen engagement and technology usage are two emerging trends driven by smart city initiatives. Typically, citizens report issues, such as broken roads, garbage dumps, etc. through web portals and mobile apps, in order for the government authorities to take appropriate actions. Several mediums - text, image, audio, video - are used to report these issues. Through a user study with 13 citizens and 3 authorities, we found that image is the most preferred medium to report civic issues. However, analyzing civic issue related images is challenging for the authorities as it requires manual effort. In this work, given an image, we propose to generate a Civic Issue Graph consisting of a set of objects and the semantic relations between them, which are representative of the underlying civic issue. We also release two multi-modal (text and images) datasets, that can help in further analysis of civic issues from images. We present an approach for adversarial adaptation of existing scene graph models that enables the use of scene graphs for new applications in the absence of any labelled training data. We conduct several experiments to analyze the efficacy of our approach, and using human evaluation, we establish the appropriateness of our model at representing different civic issues.

References

  1. 2016. FixMyStreet. (2016). https://www.fixmystreet.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2017. Mayor's Management Report. https://www1.nyc.gov/assets/operations/downloads/pdf/mmr2017/2017_mmr.pdf. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Deborah Agostino. 2013. Using social media to engage citizens: A study of Italian municipalities. Public Relations Review39, 3 (2013), 232-234.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Shubham Atreja, Pooja Aggarwal, Prateeti Mohapatra, Amol Dumrewal, Anwesh Basu, and Gargi B Dasgupta. 2018. Citicafe: An Interactive Interface for Citizen Engagement. In 23rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. ACM, 617-628. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Tseng-Hung Chen, Yuan-Hong Liao, Ching-Yao Chuang, Wan Ting Hsu, Jianlong Fu, and Min Sun. 2017. Show, Adapt and Tell: Adversarial Training of Cross-Domain Image Captioner.. In ICCV. 521-530.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Tseng-Hung Chen, Yuan-Hong Liao, Ching-Yao Chuang, Wan Ting Hsu, Jianlong Fu, and Min Sun. 2017. Show, Adapt and Tell: Adversarial Training of Cross-Domain Image Captioner.. In ICCV. 521-530.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Yuhua Chen, Wen Li, Christos Sakaridis, Dengxin Dai, and Luc Van Gool. 2018. Domain Adaptive Faster R-CNN for Object Detection in the Wild. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Annalisa Cocchia. 2014. Smart and digital city: A systematic literature review. In Smart city. Springer, 13-43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Peter Dahlgren. 2011. Parameters of online participation: Conceptualising civic contingencies. Communication management quarterly21, 4 (2011), 87-110.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Yaroslav Ganin and Victor Lempitsky. 2015. Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Backpropagation. In Proceedings of the 32Nd International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning - Volume 37(ICML'15). JMLR.org, 1180-1189. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3045118.3045244 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Ian Goodfellow, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Mehdi Mirza, Bing Xu, David Warde-Farley, Sherjil Ozair, Aaron Courville, and Yoshua Bengio. 2014. Generative Adversarial Nets. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 27, Z. Ghahramani, M. Welling, C. Cortes, N. D. Lawrence, and K. Q. Weinberger (Eds.). Curran Associates, Inc., 2672-2680. http://papers.nips.cc/paper/5423-generative-adversarial-nets.pdf Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Lushan Han, Abhay L Kashyap, Tim Finin, James Mayfield, and Jonathan Weese. 2013. UMBC_EBIQUITY-CORE: Semantic textual similarity systems. In Second Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics (* SEM), Volume 1: Proceedings of the Main Conference and the Shared Task: Semantic Textual Similarity, Vol. 1. 44-52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Justin Johnson, Ranjay Krishna, Michael Stark, Li-Jia Li, David Shamma, Michael Bernstein, and Li Fei-Fei. 2015. Image retrieval using scene graphs. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 3668-3678.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Maria Karakiza. 2015. The impact of social media in the public sector. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences175 (2015), 384-392.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Matthew Klawonn and Eric Heim. 2018. Generating Triples with Adversarial Networks for Scene Graph Construction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.02598(2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Ranjay Krishna, Yuke Zhu, Oliver Groth, Justin Johnson, Kenji Hata, Joshua Kravitz, Stephanie Chen, Yannis Kalantidis, Li-Jia Li, David A Shamma, and others. 2017. Visual genome: Connecting language and vision using crowdsourced dense image annotations. International Journal of Computer Vision123, 1 (2017), 32-73. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Shanu Kumar, Shubham Atreja, Anjali Singh, and Mohit Jain. 2019. Adversarial Adaptation of Scene Graph Models for Understanding Civic Issues. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.10124(2019). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Kongming Liang, Yuhong Guo, Hong Chang, and Xilin Chen. 2018. Visual Relationship Detection with Deep Structural Ranking. (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Hiroya Maeda, Yoshihide Sekimoto, Toshikazu Seto, Takehiro Kashiyama, and Hiroshi Omata. 2018. Road Damage Detection Using Deep Neural Networks with Images Captured Through a Smartphone. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.09454(2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Christopher Manning, Mihai Surdeanu, John Bauer, Jenny Finkel, Steven Bethard, and David McClosky. 2014. The Stanford CoreNLP natural language processing toolkit. In Proceedings of 52nd annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics: system demonstrations. 55-60.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Graeme Mearns, Rebecca Simmonds, Ranald Richardson, Mark Turner, Paul Watson, and Paolo Missier. 2014. Tweet my street: a cross-disciplinary collaboration for the analysis of local twitter data. Future Internet6, 2 (2014), 378-396.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Ines Mergel. 2012. Distributed democracy: Seeclickfix. com for crowdsourced issue reporting. (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Gaurav Mittal, Kaushal B Yagnik, Mohit Garg, and Narayanan C Krishnan. 2016. Spotgarbage: smartphone app to detect garbage using deep learning. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 940-945. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Nitish Mittal, Swati Agarwal, and Ashish Sureka. 2016. Got a Complaint?-Keep Calm and Tweet It!. In International Conference on Advanced Data Mining and Applications. Springer, 619-635.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Taewoo Nam and Theresa A Pardo. 2011. Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. In Proceedings of the 12th annual international digital government research conference: digital government innovation in challenging times. ACM, 282-291. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Paolo Neirotti, Alberto De Marco, Anna Corinna Cagliano, Giulio Mangano, and Francesco Scorrano. 2014. Current trends in Smart City initiatives: Some stylised facts. Cities38(2014), 25-36.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Maxime Oquab, Leon Bottou, Ivan Laptev, and Josef Sivic. 2014. Learning and transferring mid-level image representations using convolutional neural networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 1717-1724. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Zhongyi Pei, Zhangjie Cao, Mingsheng Long, and Jianmin Wang. 2018. Multi-Adversarial Domain Adaptation. In AAAI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Sebastian Schuster, Ranjay Krishna, Angel Chang, Li Fei-Fei, and Christopher D Manning. 2015. Generating semantically precise scene graphs from textual descriptions for improved image retrieval. In Proceedings of the fourth workshop on vision and language. 70-80.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Eric Tzeng, Judy Hoffman, Kate Saenko, and Trevor Darrell. 2017. Adversarial discriminative domain adaptation. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Vol. 1. 4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Danfei Xu, Yuke Zhu, Christopher B Choy, and Li Fei-Fei. 2017. Scene graph generation by iterative message passing. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Vol. 2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Rowan Zellers, Mark Yatskar, Sam Thomson, and Yejin Choi. 2018. Neural Motifs: Scene Graph Parsing with Global Context. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 5831-5840.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Bohan Zhuang, Qi Wu, Chunhua Shen, Ian D Reid, and Anton van den Hengel. 2018. HCVRD: A Benchmark for Large-Scale Human-Centered Visual Relationship Detection.. In AAAI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    WWW '19: The World Wide Web Conference
    May 2019
    3620 pages
    ISBN:9781450366748
    DOI:10.1145/3308558

    Copyright © 2019 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 13 May 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format