skip to main content
10.1145/3290607.3313028acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Push Away the Smartphone: Investigating Methods to Counter Problematic Smartphone Use

Published:02 May 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

There is a growing need to support people to counter problematic smartphone use. We analyse related research in methods to address problematic usage and identify a research gap in off-device retraining. We ran a pilot to address this gap, targeting automatic approach biases for smartphones, delivered on a Tabletop surface. Our quantitative analysis (n=40) shows that self-report and response-time based measures of problematic smartphone usage diverge. We found no evidence that our intervention altered reaction time-based measures. We outline areas of discussion for further research in the field.

References

  1. Seungwoo Choi, Hayeon Jeong, Minsam Ko, and Uichin Lee. 2016. LockDoll. In CHI EA '16. ACM Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexis Hiniker, Sungsoo (Ray) Hong, Tadayoshi Kohno, and Julie A. Kientz. 2016. MyTime. In CHI '16. ACM Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. International Data Corporation (IDC). 2018. Smartphone Shipments Expected to Further Decline in 2018 Before Returning to Growth in 2019. https://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS44529618.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Naomi Kakoschke, Eva Kemps, and Marika Tiggemann. 2017. Approach bias modification training and consumption: A review of the literature. Addictive Behaviors 64 (2017), 21--28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Jaejeung Kim, Chiwoo Cho, and Uichin Lee. 2017. Technology Supported Behavior Restriction for Mitigating SelfInterruptions in Multi-device Environments. IMWUT'17 1, 3 (2017), 64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Minsam Ko, Subin Yang, Joonwon Lee, et al. 2015. NUGU: a group-based intervention app for improving self-regulation of limiting smartphone use. In CSCW '15. ACM, 1235--1245. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Min Kwon, Dai-Jin Kim, Hyun Cho, and Soo Yang. 2013. The smartphone addiction scale: development and validation of a short version for adolescents. PloS one 8, 12 (2013), e83558.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Dr Martin Lee. 2017. No Phone Zone. https://www.nophonezone.co.uk/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Markus Löchtefeld, Matthias Böhmer, and Lyubomir Ganev. 2013. AppDetox. In MUM'13. ACM Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Colin MacLeod, Ernst H W Koster, and Elaine Fox. 2009. Whither cognitive bias modification research? Commentary on the special section articles. , 89--99 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. World Health Organization et al. 2015. Public health implications of excessive use of the internet, computers, smartphones and similar electronic devices. World Health Organization.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Antti Oulasvirta, Tye Rattenbury, Lingyi Ma, and Eeva Raita. 2011. Habits make smartphone use more pervasive. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 16, 1 (jun 2011), 105--114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Charlie Pinder, Rowanne Fleck, Rosa Lilia Segundo Díaz, et al. 2016. Accept the Banana. In CHI EA '16. ACM Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Charlie Pinder, Jo Vermeulen, Benjamin R Cowan, et al. 2018. Digital Behaviour Change Interventions to Break and Form Habits. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 25, 3, Article 15 (June 2018), 66 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. RescueTime. 2019. RescueTime : Time management software for staying productive and happy in the modern workplace. https://www.rescuetime.com/. (Accessed on 01/02/2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. John Rooksby, Parvin Asadzadeh, Mattias Rost, et al. 2016. Personal Tracking of Screen Time on Digital Devices. In CHI '16. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Maya Samaha and Nazir S. Hawi. 2016. Relationships among smartphone addiction, stress, academic performance, and satisfaction with life. Computers in Human Behavior 57 (apr 2016), 321--325. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Sophie E. Schumacher, Eva Kemps, and Marika Tiggemann. 2016. Bias modification training can alter approach bias and chocolate consumption. Appetite 96 (jan 2016), 219--224.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Kenneth C Scott-Brown, Marjon van der Pol, Claire Moncrieffe, et al. 2012. Service-please: an interactive healthy eating serious game application for tablet computer. In BCSHCI. British Computer Society, 381--385. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Lynette Vernon, Kathryn L. Modecki, and Bonnie L. Barber. 2017. Mobile Phones in the Bedroom. Child Development 89, 1 (2017), 66--77.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Adrian F. Ward, Kristen Duke, Ayelet Gneezy, et al. 2017. Brain Drain: The Mere Presence of One's Own Smartphone Reduces Available Cognitive Capacity. JACR 2, 2 (apr 2017), 140--154.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Reinout W. Wiers, Carolin Eberl, Mike Rinck, et al. 2011. Retraining Automatic Action Tendencies Changes Alcoholic Patients' Approach Bias for Alcohol and Improves Treatment Outcome. Psychological Science 22, 4 (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Claire A Wolniewicz, Mojisola F Tiamiyu, JW Weeks, et al. 2018. Problematic smartphone use and relations with negative affect, fear of missing out, and fear of negative and positive evaluation. Psychiatry Research 262 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Push Away the Smartphone: Investigating Methods to Counter Problematic Smartphone Use

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '19: Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2019
      3673 pages
      ISBN:9781450359719
      DOI:10.1145/3290607

      Copyright © 2019 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 May 2019

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • abstract

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format