skip to main content
10.1145/3290607.3313012acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Hands-On Math: A Training System for Children with Dyscalculia

Published:02 May 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Dyscalculia affects comprehension of numerical mathematical problems, working with numbers and arithmetics. We describe our work on a training system for an exercise that trains connections between verbal and numerical representations of numbers and finger counting. Fingers support embodied cognition and constitute a natural numerical representation. We describe the design rationale and iterative development process, and first evaluation results for our system that enables children to train without guidance and feedback by a trainer.

References

  1. Jo Boaler, Lang Chen, Cathy Williams, and Montserrat Cordero. 2016. Seeing as Understanding: The Importance of Visual Mathematics for our Brain and Learning. Journal of Applied & Computational Mathematics 5, 5 (2016), 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Brian Butterworth, Sashank Varma, and Diana Laurillard. 2011. Dyscalculia: From brain to education. Science 332, 6033 (2011), 1049--1053.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Nick S. Dalton. 2013. Neurodiversity HCI. ACM interactions 20, 2 (2013), 72--75. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. S. Dehaene, E. Spelke, P. Pinel, R. Stanescu, and S. Tsivkin. 1999. Sources of Mathematical Thinking: Behavioral and Brain-Imaging Evidence. Science 284, 5416 (1999), 970--974.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Min Fan, Alissa Antle, and Emily S. Cramer. 2016. Design Rationale: Opportunities and Recommendations for Tangible Reading Systems for Children. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '16). ACM, NY, USA, 101--112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Min Fan, Alissa Antle, Maureen Hoskyn, Carman Neustaedter, and Emily S. Cramer. 2017. Why Tangibility Matters: A Design Case Study of At-Risk Children Learning to Read and Spell. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, NY, USA, 1805--1816. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Karen C. Fuson, John Richards, and Diane J. Briars. 1982. The Acquisition and Elaboration of the Number Word Sequence. In Brainerd (ed.) Children's Logical and Mathematical Cognition. Springer, NY, USA, 33--92.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Kaasa Health GmbH. {n. d.}. Meister Cody. Retrieved 29.8.2018 from https://www.meistercody.com/?lang=en.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Maria Gracia-Bafalluy and Marie-Pascale Noël. 2008. Does finger training increase young children's numerical performance? Cortex 44, 4 (2008), 368 -- 375.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. ICD10data.com. 2018. 2018/2019 ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Code F81.2. Retrieved 25.11.2018 from https://www.icd10data. com/ICD10CM/Codes/F01-F99/F80-F89/F81-/F81.2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Tim Jay and Julie Betenson. 2017. Mathematics at Your Fingertips: Testing a Finger Training Intervention to Improve Quantitative Skills. Frontiers in Education 2 (2017), 22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Tanja Käser, Gian-Marco Baschera, Juliane Kohn, Karin Kucian, Verena Richtmann, Ursina Grond, Markus Gross, and Michael von Aster. 2013. Design and evaluation of the computer-based training program calcularis for enhancing numerical cognition. Frontiers in Psychology 4:489 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Andrew Manches and Claire O'Malley. 2016. The Effects of Physical Manipulatives on Children's Numerical Strategies. Cognition and Instruction 34, 1 (2016), 27--50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Sumit Pandey and Swati Srivastava. 2011. Tiblo: A Tangible Learning Aid for Children with Dyslexia. In Procedings of Creativity and Innovation in Design (DESIRE '11). ACM, NY, USA, 211--220. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Janet C. Read and Stuart MacFarlane. 2006. Using the Fun Toolkit and Other Survey Methods to Gather Opinions in Child Computer Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '06). ACM, NY, USA, 81--88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Hands-On Math: A Training System for Children with Dyscalculia

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            CHI EA '19: Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
            May 2019
            3673 pages
            ISBN:9781450359719
            DOI:10.1145/3290607

            Copyright © 2019 Owner/Author

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 2 May 2019

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • abstract

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format