skip to main content
10.1145/3300115.3309534acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescompedConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Five Years of Graduate CS Education Online and at Scale

Published:09 May 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

In 2014, Georgia Tech launched an online campus for its Master of Science in Computer Science program. The degree, equal in stature and accreditation to its on-campus counterpart, offered a notably lower cost of attendance. Its design emphasized flexibility in both geography and time, allowing students from around the world to earn a highly-ranked MSCS without taking time off work or moving to campus. Five years later, the program enrolls over 8000 students per semester and has graduated 1500 alumni. It is believed to be the largest program of its kind and has received recognition from national organizations on professional education. Existing research on the pro-gram has focused on challenges and opportunities to scale that are agnostic to the content itself. In this reflection, we look at the creation and growth of the program as it relates to graduate-level CS instruction. In particular, we note a unique and powerful unity of content and platform: the online delivery of the program dovetails with the technical skillsets of the professors and students that it draws, putting both in the position to contribute and innovate.

References

  1. Aleksi Ahtiainen, Sami Surakka, and Mikko Rahikainen (2006). Plaggie: GNU-licensed source code plagiarism detection engine for Java exercises. In Proceedings of the 6th Baltic Sea Conference on Computing Education Research: Koli Calling 2006, 141--142. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Marc Beylerian & Brian H. Kleiner (2003). The downsized workplace. Manage-ment Research News, 26(2/3/4), 97--108.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ida Camacho & Ashok Goel. (2018, June). Longitudinal trends in sentiment polarity and readability of an Online Masters of Computer Science course. In Proceedings of the Fifth Annual ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Georgina Cosma & Mike Joy (2012). An approach to source-code plagiarism detection and investigation using latent semantic analysis. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 61(3), 379--394. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Kushal Dave, Martin Wattenberg & Michael Muller (2004, November). Flash forums and forum Reader: navigating a new kind of large-scale online discussion. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 232--241. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Ashok Goel & David A. Joyner (2016). An Experiment in Teaching Cognitive Systems Online. In Haynes, D. (Ed.) International Journal for Scholarship of Technology-Enhanced Learning 1(1).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Ashok Goel & David A. Joyner (2017). Using AI to Teach AI: Lessons from an Online AI Class. AI Magazine 38(2), 48--59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Ashok Goel, Maithilee Kunda, David A. Joyner & Swaroop Vattam (2013). Learning about Representational Modality: Design and Programming Projects for Knowledge-Based AI. In Fourth AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence, 1586--1591. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Ashok Goel & Lalith Polepeddi (2016). Jill Watson: A Virtual Teaching Assistant for Online Education. Georgia Institute of Technology Technical Report. Retrieved from https://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/59104Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Joshua Goodman, Julia Melkers & Amanda Pallais (2019). Can online delivery increase access to education? Journal of Labor Economics, 37(1), 1--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Niall Hayes & Lucas D. Introna (2005). Cultural values, plagiarism, and fairness: When plagiarism gets in the way of learning. Ethics & Behavior, 15(3), 213--231.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. David A. Joyner, Wade Ashby, Liam Irish, Yeeling Lam, Jacob Langston, Isabel Lupiani, Mike Lustig, Paige Pettoruto, Dana Sheahen, Angela Smiley, Amy Bruckman, & Ashok Goel (2016). Graders as Meta-Reviewers: Simultaneously Scal-ing and Improving Expert Evaluation for Large Online Classrooms. In Proceedings of the Third Annual ACM Conference on Learning at Scale. Edinburgh, Scotland. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. David A. Joyner, Darren Bedwell, Chris Graham, Warren Lemmon, Oscar Martinez & Ashok Goel (2015). Using Human Computation to Acquire Novel Methods for Addressing Visual Analogy Problems in Intelligence Tests. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Computational Creativity. Provo, Utah.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. David A. Joyner, Ashok Goel & Charles Isbell (2016). The Unexpected Pedagogical Benefits of Making Higher Education Accessible. In Proceedings of the Third Annual ACM Conference on Learning at Scale. Edinburgh, Scotland. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. David A. Joyner (2017). Scaling Expert Feedback: Two Case Studies. In Proceedings of the Fourth Annual ACM Conference on Learning at Scale. Cambridge, Massachusetts. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. David A. Joyner (2018). Squeezing the Limeade: Policies and Workflows for Scalable Online Degrees. In Proceedings of the Fifth Annual ACM Conference on Learning at Scale. London, United Kingdom. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. David A. Joyner (2018). Toward CS1 at Scale: Building and Testing a MOOC-for-Credit Candidate. In Proceedings of the Fifth Annual ACM Conference on Learning at Scale. London, United Kingdom. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Rita Kirshstein (2013). Rising tuition and diminishing state funding: An overview. Journal of Collective Bargaining in the Academy, (8), 14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Pushkar Kolhe, Michael L. Littman & Charles L. Isbell (2016, April). Peer Reviewing Short Answers using Comparative Judgement. In Proceedings of the Third Annual ACM Conference on Learning at Scale. Edinburgh, Scotland. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Chinmay E. Kulkarni, Michael S. Bernstein, & Scott R. Klemmer (2015, March). PeerStudio: rapid peer feedback emphasizes revision and improves performance. In Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, 75--84. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Cynthia Kustanto & Inggriani Liem (2009, May). Automatic source code plagiarism detection. In Proceedings of the 10th ACIS International Conference on Soft-ware Engineering, Artificial Intelligences, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing, 481--486. IEEE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Frank Levy & Richard J. Murnane (2005). The new division of labor: How computers are creating the next job market. Princeton University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Margaret Mazzolini & Sarah Maddison (2003). Sage, guide or ghost? The effect of instructor intervention on student participation in online discussion forums. Computers & Education, 40(3), 237--253. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Heather Newman & David A. Joyner (2018). Sentiment Analysis of Student Evalua-tions of Teaching. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. London, United Kingdom. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Elvira Nica & Catalina-Oana Mirica (2017). Is higher education still a wise investment? Evidence on rising student loan debt in the US. Psychosociological Issues in Human Resource Management, 5(1), 235.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. DFO Onah, Jane E. Sinclair & Russell Boyatt (2014, November). Exploring the use of MOOC discussion forums. In Proceedings of London International Conference on Education, 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Chaohua Ou, Ashok Goel, David A. Joyner & Daniel Haynes (2016). Designing Videos with Pedagogical Strategies: Online Students' Perceptions of Their Effectiveness. In Proceedings of the Third Annual ACM Conference on Learning at Scale. Edinburgh, Scotland. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Laura Pappano (2012, November 4). The Year of the MOOC. The New York Times (p. ED26).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Cathy Sandeen (2013). Integrating MOOCs into traditional higher education: The emerging "MOOC 3.0" era. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 45(6), 34--39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Saul Schleimer, Daniel S. Wilkerson & Alex Aiken (2003, June). Winnowing: local algorithms for document fingerprinting. In Proceedings of the 2003 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, 76--85. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Michael Schubert, Damian Durruty, & David A. Joyner (2018). Measuring Learner Tone and Sentiment at Scale via Text Analysis of Forum Posts. In Proceedings of the 8th Edition of the International Workshop on Personalization Approach-es in Learning Environments (PALE). London, United Kingdom.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Klaus Schwab (2017). The fourth industrial revolution. Crown Business. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Dana Sheahen & David A. Joyner (2016). TAPS: A MOSS Extension for Detecting Software Plagiarism at Scale. In Proceedings of the Third Annual ACM Conference on Learning at Scale. Edinburgh, Scotland. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Hoi K. Suen (2014). Peer assessment for massive open online courses (MOOCs). The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(3).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Leslie Waguespack, Jeffry Stephen Babb & David Yates (2018). Triangulating Coding Bootcamps in IS Education: Bootleg Education or Disruptive Innovation?. Information Systems Education Journal, 16(6), 48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Five Years of Graduate CS Education Online and at Scale

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CompEd '19: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Global Computing Education
        May 2019
        260 pages
        ISBN:9781450362597
        DOI:10.1145/3300115

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 9 May 2019

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        CompEd '19 Paper Acceptance Rate33of100submissions,33%Overall Acceptance Rate33of100submissions,33%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader