skip to main content
10.1145/3306500.3306515acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesic4eConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An artificial intelligence case based approach to motivational students assessment in (e)-learning environments

Authors Info & Claims
Published:10 January 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

In the last decades effective teaching and learning and e-learning environments have been performed in order to construct courses jointly with the collaboration with Industry and High-Level Educational Institutions. On another way there are several terminologies that attempt to specify the best teaching and learning methods applied to engineering, from problem-based learning, project-based learning, work-based learning, team-learning, self-direct learning for example. However motivational studies and motivational scales typically discard uncertainty characteristic in for quantitatively evaluating the different dimensions on student's motivational assessment in (e)-learning environments. This paper presents a computerized framework grounded on Artificial Intelligence techniques, namely the Case Based Reasoning approach for problem solving, complemented with a Knowledge Representation and Reasoning method that considers unknown, incomplete or even self-contradictory data or knowledge in the motivational student's assessment.

References

  1. Hmelo-Silver C. E. 2004. Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn?. Educational Psychology Review. 16, 3, 235--266.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Pike, J., Spangler, W., Williams, V., and Kollar, R. 2017. Role-Playing and Problem-Based Learning: The Use of Cross-Functional Student Teams in Business Application Development. Information Systems Education Journal 15, 4 (July 2017), 75--83.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Requies, J., Agirre, I., Barrio, L., and Graells, M. 2018. Evolution of Project-Based Learning in Small Groups in Environmental Engineering Courses. Journal of Technology and Science Education 8, 1 (), 45--62.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Stolk, J., and Martello, R. 2015. Can Disciplinary Integration Promote Students' Lifelong Learning Attitudes and Skills in Project-Based Engineering Courses?. International Journal of Engineering Education, 31, 1B, 434--449.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. European Commission 2013. Work-Based Learning in Europe - Practices and Policy Pointers in Vocational Education and Training. http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/education_culture/repository/education/policy/vocational-policy/doc/alliance/work-based-learning-in-europe_en.pdf. Last accessed 2018/06/15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Stefanou, C., Stolk, J., Prince, M., Chen, J., and Lord, S. 2013. Self-regulation and autonomy in problem- and project-based learning environments. Active Learning in Higher Education 14, 2, 109--122.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Lord, S., Prince, M., Stefanou C., Stolk, J., and Chen, J. 2012. The Effect of Different Active Learning Environments on Students Outcomes Related to Lifelong Learning. International Journal of Engineering Education 28, 3, 606--620.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Hattinger, M., and Eriksson, K. 2018. Co-construction of Knowledge in Work-Integrated E-learning Courses in Joint Industry-University Collaboration. International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning 11, 1, 10--16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Spector, J. 2016. Smart Learning Environments: Concepts and Issues. In Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (Savannah, GA, USA, March 21, 2016). G. Chamblee and L. Langub Eds. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, Chesapeake, VA, 2728--2737.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Shrivastava, R., Jain, Y. K., and Sachan, A. K. 2013. Designing and Developing e-Learning Solution: Study on Moodle 2.0. International Journal of Machine Learning and Computing 3, 3 (June 2013), 305--308.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Stolk, J., and Harari, J. 2014. Student motivations as predictors of high-level cognitions in project based classrooms. Active Learning in Higher Education Journal 15, 3, 231.247.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Efklides, A. 2011. Interactions of Metacognition with Motivation and Affect in Self-Regulated Learning: The MASRL Model. Educational Psychologist Journal 46, 1, 6--25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Butz, N., and Stupnisky, R. 2016. A mixed methods study of graduate students' self-determined motivation in synchronous hybrid learning environments. Internet and Higher Education 28, 85--95.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Maferima T., and Ayelet, F. 2014. How to Measure Motivation: A Guide for the Experimental Social Psychologist. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 8/7, 328--341Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Bernik, A., Bubaš, G., and Radošević, D. 2018. Measurement of the effects of e-learning courses gamification on motivation and satisfaction of students. In Proceedings of the 41st International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (Opatija, Croatia, May 21 -- 25, 2018) MTPRO' 2018. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 806--811.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Fryer, L., and Bovee, N. 2016. Supporting students' motivation for e-learning: Teachers matter on and offline. The Internet and Higher Education Journal 30, 21--29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Neves, J., Vicente, H., Ferraz, F., Leite, A.C., Rodrigues, A.R., Cruz, M., Machado, J., Neves, J., and Sampaio, L. 2018. A Deep Learning approach to Case Based Reasoning to the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Cervical Carcinoma. In Modern Approaches to Intelligent Information and Database Systems. Springer Studies in Computational Intelligence Series. Springer, Cham, 185--197.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Richter, M., and Weber, R. 2013. Case-Based Reasoning: A Textbook. Springer, Berlin. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Chen, K., Stolk, J., and Herter, R. 2015. Moving from Quantitative to Qualitative Analysis to Capture the Development of Self-Directed Learning for a Cohort of Engineering Students. In Proceedings of the 122<sup>nd</sup> ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (Seattle, WA, June 14 - 17, 2015). American Society for Engineering Education, USA, Paper ID #13425.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Fernandes, F., Vicente, H., Abelha, A., Machado, J., Novais, P., and Neves J. 2015. Artificial Neural Networks in Diabetes Control. In Proceedings of the 2015 Science and Information Conference (London, United Kindgon, July 28 - 30, 2015). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 362--370.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. An artificial intelligence case based approach to motivational students assessment in (e)-learning environments

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Other conferences
              IC4E '19: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management and E-Learning
              January 2019
              469 pages
              ISBN:9781450366021
              DOI:10.1145/3306500

              Copyright © 2019 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 10 January 2019

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader