skip to main content
10.1145/3303772.3303788acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageslakConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Investigating the Usage Patterns of Algebra Nation Tutoring Platform

Authors Info & Claims
Published:04 March 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

We study the usage of a self-guided online tutoring platform called Algebra Nation, which is widely by middle school and high school students who take the End-of-Course Algebra I exam at the end of the school year. This article aims to study how the platform contributes to increasing students' exam scores by examining users' logs over a three year period. The platform under consideration was used by more than 36,000 students in the first year, to nearly 67,000 by the third year, thus enabling us to examine how usage patterns evolved and influenced students' performance at scale. We first identify which Algebra Nation usage factors in conjunction with math overall preparation and socioeconomic factors contribute to the students' exam performance. Subsequently, we investigate the effect of increased teacher familiarity level with the Algebra Nation on students' scores across different grades through mediation analysis. The results show that the indirect effect of teacher's familiarity with the platform through increasing student's usage dosage is more significant in higher grades.

References

  1. Dhammika Amaratunga and Javier Cabrera. 2001. Analysis of Data From Viral DNA Microchips. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 96 (2001), 1161--1170. Issue 456.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Reuben M. Barron and David A. Kenny. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51, 6 (1986), 1173--1182.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Andrew U Dane and Barry H. Schneider. 1998. Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: are implementation effects out of control? Clinical Psychology Review 18, 1 (1998), 23--45.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Mingyu Feng, Jeremy Roschelle, Neil Heffernan, Janet Fairman, and Robert Murphy. 2014. Implementation of an Intelligent Tutoring System for Online Homework Support in an Efficacy Trial. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 561--566. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Leo A. Goodman. 2012. On the exact variance of products. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 55, 292 (2012), 708--713.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Heewon Lee Gray, Isobel R. Contento, and Pamela A. Koch. 2015. Linking implementation process to intervention outcomes in a middle school obesity prevention curriculum: Choice, Control and Change. Health Education Research 30 (2015), 248--261. Issue 2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Kosuke Imai, Luke Keele, and Teppei Yamamoto. 2010. Identification, Inference and Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Mediation Effects. Statist. Sci. 25, 1 (2010), 51--71.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Rita Karam, John F. Pane, Beth Ann Griffin, Abby Robyn, Andrea Phillips, and Lindsay Daugherty. 2017. Examining the implementation of technology-based blended algebra I curriculum at scale. Education Technology Research and Development 65 (2017), 399--425. Issue 2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Jennifer L. Krull and David P. MacKinnon. 1999. Multilevel Mediation Modeling in Group-based Intervention Studies. Evaluation Review 23, 4 (1999), 418--444.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Jennifer L. Krull and David P. MacKinnon. 2001. Multilevel Modeling of Individual and Group Level Mediated Effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research 36 (2001), 249--277. Issue 2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Heewon Lee, Isobel R. Contento, and Pamela Koch. 2013. Using a Systematic Conceptual Model for a Process Evaluation of a Middle School Obesity Risk-Reduction Nutrition Curriculum Intervention: Choice, Control and Change. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior 45 (2013), 126--136. Issue 2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Lindsay Clare Matsumura, Helen E. Garnier, and Lauren B. Resnick. 2010. Implementing Literacy Coaching: The Role of School Social Resources. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 32 (2010), 249--272. Issue 2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. R. Murphy, L. Gallagher, A. Krumm, J. Mislevy, and A. Hafter. 2014. Research on the Use of Khan Academy in Schools.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Sahba Akhavan Niaki, Clint P. George, George Michailidis, and Carole R. Beal. 2017. The Impact of an Online Tutoring Program for Algebra Readiness on Mathematics Achievements; Results of a Randomized Experiment. Technical report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Florida Dept. of Education. 2017. Florida Standards Assessments: English Language Arts and Mathematics. http://www.fldoe.org/core/fileparse.php/5668/urlt/89FSAPacket.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. S. W. Raudenbush and A. S. Bryk. 2000. Sage Publictions, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Louise Ann Rohrbach, Melissa Gunning, Ping Sun, and Steve Sussman. 2010. The Project Towards No Drug Abuse (TND) dissemination trial: implementation fidelity and immediate outcomes. Prevention Science 11 (2010), 77--88. Issue 1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Michael E. Sobel. 1982. Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models. Sociological Methodology 13 (1982), 290--312.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Investigating the Usage Patterns of Algebra Nation Tutoring Platform

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      LAK19: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge
      March 2019
      565 pages
      ISBN:9781450362566
      DOI:10.1145/3303772

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 March 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate236of782submissions,30%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader