skip to main content
10.1145/3290605.3300569acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Human-Computer Insurrection: Notes on an Anarchist HCI

Published:02 May 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

The HCI community has worked to expand and improve our consideration of the societal implications of our work and our corresponding responsibilities. Despite this increased engagement, HCI continues to lack an explicitly articulated politic, which we argue re-inscribes and amplifies systemic oppression. In this paper, we set out an explicit political vision of an HCI grounded in emancipatory autonomy-an anarchist HCI, aimed at dismantling all oppressive systems by mandating suspicion of and a reckoning with imbalanced distributions of power. We outline some of the principles and accountability mechanisms that constitute an anarchist HCI. We offer a potential framework for radically reorienting the field towards creating prefigurative counterpower-systems and spaces that exemplify the world we wish to see, as we go about building the revolution in increment.

References

  1. Martha Ackelsberg. 2013. Queering Anarchism: Addressing and undressing power and desire. AK Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Philip Agre. 1997. Toward a Critical Technical Practice: Lessons Learned in Trying to reform AI. Social Science, Technical Systems and Cooperative Work: Beyond the Great Divide. Erlbaum (1997).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Alex Ahmed. 2018. Beyond diversity. Commun. ACM 61, 7 (June 2018), 30--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Alex A Ahmed. 2017. Trans Competent Interaction Design: A Qualitative Study on Voice, Identity, and Technology. Interacting with Computers 30, 1 (Nov. 2017), 53--71.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Alex A. Ahmed, Teresa Almeida, Judeth Oden Choi, Jon Pincus, and Kelly Ireland. 2018. What's at Issue: Sex, Stigma, and Politics in ACM Publishing. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article alt07, 10 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Sara Ahmed. 2012. On being included: Racism and diversity in institutional life. Duke University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, Nusrat Jahan Mim, and Steven J. Jackson. 2015. Residual Mobilities: Infrastructural Displacement and PostColonial Computing in Bangladesh. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 437--446. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Yoko Akama, Seth Keen, and Peter West. 2016. Speculative Design and Heterogeneity in Indigenous Nation Building. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 895--899. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Tamara Alsheikh, Jennifer A Rode, and Siân E Lindley. 2011. (Whose) value-sensitive design - a study of long-distance relationships in an Arabic cultural context. ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Gustavo Amagno. 2012. The Role of HCI in the Construction of Disability. BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference (Aug. 2012), 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Panayotis Antoniadis. 2016. Local networks for local interactions: Four reasons why and a way forward. First Monday 21, 12 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Mariam Asad, Christopher A. Le Dantec, Becky Nielsen, and Kate Diedrick. 2017. Creating a Sociotechnical API: Designing City-Scale Community Engagement. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2295--2306. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Seyram Avle, Silvia Lindtner, and Kaiton Williams. 2017. How Methods Make Designers. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 472--483. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Normand Baillargeon. 2014. Order Without Power. Seven Stories Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Jefrey Bardzell and Shaowen Bardzell. 2015. Humanistic HCI. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics 8, 4 (2015), 1--185.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Jefrey Bardzell and Shaowen Bardzell. 2016. Humanistic HCI. interactions 23, 2 (Feb. 2016), 20--29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Shaowen Bardzell. 2010. Feminist HCI: Taking Stock and Outlining an Agenda for Design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1301--1310. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Eric P.S. Baumer and M. Six Silberman. 2011. When the Implication is Not to Design (Technology). In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2271--2274. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Laura Beckwith and Margaret M Burnett. 2004. Gender - An Important Factor in End-User Programming Environments?.. In 2004 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC). IEEE, 107--114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Niko Besnier and Kalissa Alexeyef. 2014. Gender on the Edge. University of Hawaii Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Saugata Bhaduri and Indrani Mukherjee. 2015. Transcultural Negotiations of Gender. Springer, New Delhi.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Nicola J Bidwell. 2016. Decolonising HCI and interaction design discourse. XRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students 22, 4 (June 2016), 22--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Wiebe E Bijker. 1997. Of bicycles, bakelites, and bulbs: Toward a theory of sociotechnical change. MIT press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Murray Bookchin. 1995. Social anarchism or lifestyle anarchism: an unbridgeable chasm. AK Press Edinburgh.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Chiara Bottici. 2017. Bodies in plural: Towards an anarcha-feminist manifesto. Thesis Eleven 142, 1 (Oct. 2017), 91--111.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Geofrey C Bowker and Susan Leigh Star. 2000. Invisible Mediators of Action: Classifcation and the Ubiquity of Standards. Mind, Culture, and Activity 7, 1--2 (May 2000), 147--163.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Samantha Breslin and Bimlesh Wadhwa. 2014. Exploring Nuanced Gender Perspectives Within the HCI Community. In Proceedings of the India HCI 2014 Conference on Human Computer Interaction (IndiaHCI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 45, 10 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Émilie Breton, Sandra Jeppesen, Anna Kruzynski, and Rachel Sarrasin. 2012. Prefgurative self-governance and self-organization: the infuence of antiauthoritarian (pro) feminist, radical queer and antiracist networks in Quebec. Organize (2012), 156--173.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Meredith Broussard. 2018. Artifcial Unintelligence: How Computers Misunderstand the World. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Margaret Burnett, Robin Counts, Ronette Lawrence, and Hannah Hanson. 2017. Gender HCl and microsoft: Highlights from a longitudinal study. In 2017 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC). IEEE, 139--143.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Margaret Burnett, Anicia Peters, Charles Hill, and Noha Elarief. 2016. Finding Gender-Inclusiveness Software Issues with GenderMag: A Field Investigation. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2586--2598. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Judith Butler. 2005. Giving an account of oneself. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. CHIuXiD. 2018. Schedule. Retrieved September 18, 2018 from https://web.archive.org/web/20180919072618/http://2018. chiuxid.org/schedule/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Sasha Costanza-Chock. 2018. Design Justice, AI, and Escape from the Matrix of Domination. Journal of Design and Science (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Sasha Costanza-Chock. 2018. Design Justice: towards an intersectional feminist framework for design theory and practice. Design Research Society (March 2018), 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Kate Crawford and Vladan Joler. 2018. Anatomy of an AI System. Retrieved September 18, 2018 from https://anatomyof.ai/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Kimberle Crenshaw. 1989. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum (1989), 139.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Roderic N. Crooks. 0. Times Thirty: Access, Maintenance, and Justice. Science, Technology, & Human Values 0, 0 (0), 0162243918783053. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243918783053Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Jill Patrice Dimond. 2012. Feminist HCI for Real. Ph.D. Dissertation. Georgia Institute of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Jill P. Dimond, Michaelanne Dye, Daphne Larose, and Amy S. Bruckman. 2013. Hollaback!: The Role of Storytelling Online in a Social Movement Organization. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 477--490. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Paul Dourish. 2010. HCI and Environmental Sustainability: The Politics of Design and the Design of Politics. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Paul Dourish and Scott D. Mainwaring. 2012. Ubicomp's Colonial Impulse. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 133--142. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Francis Dupuis-Déri. 2016. Is the State Part of the Matrix of Domination and Intersectionality? An Anarchist Inquiry. Anarchist Studies 24, 1 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Sheena Erete, Aarti Israni, and Tawanna Dillahunt. 2018. An Intersectional Approach to Designing in the Margins. Interactions 25, 3 (April 2018), 66--69. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Daniel Fallman. 2011. The New Good: Exploring the Potential of Philosophy of Technology to Contribute to Human-computer Interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1051--1060. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Andrew Feenberg. 2010. Between Reason and Experience: Essays in Technology and Modernity. MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Tom Feltwell, Shaun Lawson, Enrique Encinas, Conor Linehan, Ben Kirman, Deborah Maxwell, Tom Jenkins, and Stacey Kuznetsov. 2018. "Grand Visions" for Post-Capitalist Human-Computer Interaction. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article W04, 8 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Harald Fischer-Tiné. 2015. Shyamji Krishnavarma: Sanskrit, Sociology and Anti-Imperialism. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Eran Fisher. 2010. Media and New Capitalism in the Digital Age. Springer, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Christiane Floyd, Wolf-Michael Mehl, Fanny-Michaela Reisin, Gerhard Schmidt, and Gregor Wolf. 1989. Out of Scandinavia: Alternative Approaches to Software Design and System Development. HumanComputer Interaction 4, 4 (1989), 253--350. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Sarah Fox and Christopher Le Dantec. 2014. Community Historians: Scafolding Community Engagement Through Culture and Heritage. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 785--794. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Sarah Fox and Daniela K Rosner. 2016. Continuing the Dialogue: Bringing Research Accounts Back into the Field. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1426--1430. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Benjamin Franks, Nathan Jun, and Leonard Williams. 2018. Anarchism: A Conceptual Approach. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Lessie Jo Frazier. 2007. Salt in the Sand: Memory, Violence, and the Nation-state in Chile, 1890 to the Present. Duke University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Miranda Fricker. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Batya Friedman, David G Hendry, and Alan Borning. 2017. A Survey of Value Sensitive Design Methods. Foundations and Trends in Human--Computer Interaction 11, 2 (2017), 63--125. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Batya Friedman, Peter H Kahn Jr, and Alan Borning. 2002. Value Sensitive Design: Theory and Methods. Technical Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Jane Gavin-Hebert. 2011. Plural Desires: Feminist Epistemology as Anarchist Praxis. Ph.D. Dissertation. Saint Mary's University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Peter Gelderloos. 2018. Anarchy Works. The Anarchist Library.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Juan Gentina and Fernando Acevedo. 2016. Copper Bioleaching in Chile. Minerals 6, 1 (March 2016), 23--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Emma Goldman, Voltairine de Cleyre, Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz, and Jo Freeman. 2012. Quiet Rumours: An Anarcha-Feminist Reader. AK Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Alfredo Gómez-Muller. 2008. Anarquismo y anarcosindicalismo en América Latina. La Carreta Editores EU.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Uri Gordon. 2009. Anarchism and the Politics of Technology. WorkingUSA 12, 3 (Sept. 2009), 489--503.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. David Graeber. 2013. The democracy project: A history, a crisis, a movement. Spiegel & Grau.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Benjamin Greschbach, Gunnar Kreitz, and Sonja Buchegger. 2012. The devil is in the metadata - New privacy challenges in Decentralised Online Social Networks. PerCom Workshops (2012), 333--339.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Daniel Guerin and Mary Klopper. 1970. Anarchism. NYU Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Ian Hacking. 1996. The looping efects of human kinds. In Causal Cognition. Oxford University Press, 351--383.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. David Hankerson, Jennifer A Rode, Andrea R Marshall, Jennifer Booker, Houda El Mimouni, and Imani Walker. 2016. Does Technology Have Race?. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 473--486. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Donna Haraway. 1988. Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist studies 14, 3 (1988), 575--599.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Steve Harrison, Phoebe Sengers, and Deborah Tatar. 2011. Making epistemological trouble: Third-paradigm HCI as successor science. Interacting with Computers 23, 5 (2011), 385--392. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Gillian R Hayes and Oliver L Haimson. 2015. Toward Trans Inclusion in Feminist HCI. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 8--11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Rose Erin Holyoak. 2015. Young Women's Gendered Subjectivity and Agency in Social Movement Activism Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Leicester by Rose Erin Holyoak BA (Derby), MA (Nottingham) Department of Sociology University of Leicester March 2015. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Leicester.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Dongyoun Hwang. 2016. Anarchism in Korea: Independence, Transnationalism, and the Question of National Development, 1919--1984. SUNY Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Ivan Illich. 1968. To hell with good intentions. In Conference on Inter-American Student Projects.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Anthony James Elliot Ince. 2010. Organising anarchy: spatial strategy prefguration and the politics of everyday life. Ph.D. Dissertation. Queen Mary, University of London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Comité invisible. 2009. The coming insurrection. Semiotext.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Lilly Irani. 2018. "Design Thinking": Defending Silicon Valley at the Apex of Global Labor Hierarchies. Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience 4, 1 (May 2018), 1--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Lilly Irani, Janet Vertesi, Paul Dourish, Kavita Philip, and Rebecca E. Grinter. 2010. Postcolonial Computing: A Lens on Design and Development. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1311--1320. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  79. Lilly C. Irani and M. Six Silberman. 2016. Stories We Tell About Labor: Turkopticon and the Trouble with "Design". In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 4573--4586. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. Sandra Jeppesen. 2010. Queer anarchist autonomous zones and publics: Direct action vomiting against homonormative consumerism. Sexualities 13, 4 (2010), 463--478.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  81. Theodore John Kaczynski. 1995. Industrial society and its future. Washington Post.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. Gopinaath Kannabiran. 2011. Themself: Critical Analysis of Gender in Facebook. CHI (2011), 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. Kim Kelly. 2018. Anarchy: What It Is and Why Pop Culture Loves It. Retrieved September 12, 2018 from https://www.teenvogue.com/ story/anarchy-explained-what-it-is-why-pop-culture-loves-itGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. Os Keyes. 2018. The Misgendering Machines: Trans/HCI Implications of Automatic Gender Recognition. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW, Article 88 (Nov. 2018), 22 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  85. Terence Kissack. 2008. Free Comrades: Anarchism and Homosexuality in the United States, 0895-0907. AK Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. Brian Larkin. 2013. The Politics and Poetics of Infrastructure. Annual Review of Anthropology 42, 1 (Oct. 2013), 327--343.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  87. Jackie Lasky. 2011. Indigenism, anarchism, feminism: an emerging framework for exploring post-imperial futures. Afnities: A Journal of Radical Theory, Culture, and Action (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  88. Bruno Latour. 1992. Where are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts. In Shaping Technology - Building Society. Studies in Sociotechnical Change. MIT Press, 225--259.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  89. Jonathan Lazar, Julio Abascal, Simone Barbosa, Jeremy Barksdale, Batya Friedman, Jens Grossklags, Jan Gulliksen, Jef Johnson, Tom McEwan, Loïc Martínez-Normand, Wibke Michalk, Janice Tsai, Gerrit van der Veer, Hans Axelson, Ake Walldius, Gill Whitney, Marco Winckler, Volker Wulf, Elizabeth F Churchill, Lorrie Cranor, Janet Davis, Alan Hedge, Harry Hochheiser, Juan Pablo Hourcade, Clayton Lewis, Lisa Nathan, Fabio Paterno, Blake Reid, Whitney Quesenbery, Ted Selker, and Brian Wentz. 2016. Human--Computer Interaction and International Public Policymaking: A Framework for Understanding and Taking Future Actions. Foundations and Trends in Human--Computer Interaction 9, 2 (2016), 69--149. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  90. Ursula K Le Guin. 2015. The dispossessed. Hachette UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  91. Michiel Leezenberg. 2017. The ambiguities of democratic autonomy: the Kurdish movement in Turkey and Rojava. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies (Feb. 2017), 0--0.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  92. Ann Light. 2011. HCI as heterodoxy: Technologies of identity and the queering of interaction with computers. Interacting with Computers 23, 5 (Sept. 2011), 430--438. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  93. Ann Light, Alison Powell, and Irina Shklovski. 2017. Design for Existential Crisis in the Anthropocene Age. In ACM International Conference on Communities & Technology. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 270--279. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  94. Albert S Lindemann. 1984. A history of European socialism. Yale University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  95. Conor Linehan and Ben Kirman. 2014. Never mind the bollocks, i wanna be anarCHI. In the extended abstracts of the 32nd annual ACM conference. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 741--748. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  96. Staughton Lynd and Andrej Grubacic. 2008. Wobblies and Zapatistas. PM Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  97. David Lyon. 2003. Surveillance technology and surveillance society. Modernity and technology (2003), 161--83.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  98. Astrid Mager. 2012. Algorithmic ideology: How capitalist society shapes search engines. Information, Communication & Society 15, 5 (June 2012), 769--787.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  99. Peter Marshall. 2018. Demanding the Impossible: A History of Anarchism. (Sept. 2018), 1--1169.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  100. Luiza Prado de O Martins. 2014. Privilege and oppression: Towards a feminist speculative design. Proceedings of DRS (2014), 980--990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  101. Ashwin J Mathew. 2016. The myth of the decentralised internet. Internet Policy Review (Sept. 2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  102. Sam Mbah and Chaz Bufe. 2014. African Anarchism. See Sharp Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  103. Paul McLaughlin. 2016. Anarchism and Authority. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  104. Helena Mentis. 2017. Executive Committee Meeting Notes. Retrieved September 18, 2018 from https://web.archive.org/web/ 20180919075058-/https://sigchi.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/ SIGCHI-EC-meeting-notes-201507-presentation.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  105. Cindy Milstein. 2010. Anarchism and Its Aspirations. AK Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  106. F Musiani. 2014. Decentralised Internet governance: The case of a 'peer-to-peer cloud'. Internet Policy Review (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  107. Robert Nozick. 1974. Anarchy, State and Utopia. Basic Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  108. Oyèrónké Oywùmí. 1997. The Invention of Women. U of Minnesota. Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  109. Elena Parmiggiani and Helena Karasti. 2018. Surfacing the Arctic: Politics of Participation in Infrastructuring. In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Situated Actions, Workshops and Tutorial - Volume 2 (PDC '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 7, 5 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  110. Joshua M Pearce. 2012. The case for open source appropriate technology. Environment, Development and Sustainability 14, 3 (Jan. 2012), 425--431.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  111. Kavita Philip, Lilly Irani, and Paul Dourish. 2010. Postcolonial Computing. Science, Technology, & Human Values 37, 1 (Nov. 2010), 3--29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  112. Jenny Pickerill and Paul Chatterton. 2016. Notes towards autonomous geographies: creation, resistance and self-management as survival tactics. Progress in Human Geography 30, 6 (July 2016), 730--746.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  113. James Pierce. 2012. Undesigning Technology: Considering the Negation of Design by Design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 957--966. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  114. Mark Purcell. 2016. For democracy: Planning and publics without the state. Planning Theory 15, 4 (Oct. 2016), 386--401.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  115. Mark Purcell. 2017. Our Own Power to Act. Planning Theory & Practice (Oct. 2017), 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  116. Jonathan Purkis and James Bowen. 2013. Changing Anarchism. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  117. Jennifer A. Rode. 2011. A Theoretical Agenda for Feminist HCI. Interact. Comput. 23, 5 (Sept. 2011), 393--400. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  118. Yvonne Rogers. 2012. HCI Theory: Classical, Modern, and Contemporary. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics 5, 2 (2012), 1--129. arXiv:http://dx.doi.org/10.2200/S00418ED1V01Y201205HCI014 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  119. J Rogue and Abbey Volcano. 2012. Insurrection at the intersections: Feminism, intersectionality, and anarchism. In Quiet rumors: An anarcha-feminist reader, Jan Fagerberg, David C. Mowery, and Richard R. Nelson (Eds.). AK Press Oakland, CA, 43--46.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  120. Daniela K Rosner. 2018. Critical Fabulations: Reworking the Methods and Margins of Design. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  121. Arundhati Roy. 2003. War Talk. South End Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  122. Arjuna Sathiaseelan, Liang Wang, Andrius Aucinas, Gareth Tyson, and Jon Crowcroft. 2015. SCANDEX: Service Centric Networking for Challenged Decentralised Networks. In Proceedings of the 2015 Workshop on Do-it-yourself Networking: An Interdisciplinary Approach (DIYNetworking '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 15--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  123. Ari Schlesinger, W. Keith Edwards, and Rebecca E. Grinter. 2017. Intersectional HCI: Engaging Identity Through Gender, Race, and Class. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 5412--5427. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  124. Michael Schmidt. 2009. Black Flame: The Revolutionary Class Politics of Anarchism and Syndicalism (Counter-Power, Volume 1). (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  125. Michael Schmidt. 2013. Cartography of Revolutionary Anarchism. AK Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  126. Deric Shannon. 2016. Intersectionality, ecology, food: Confict theory's missing lens. In Emergent Possibilities for Global Sustainability: Intersections of Race, Class and Gender. Routledge, 39--49.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  127. Grace Shaw, Margot Brereton, and Paul Roe. 2014. Mobile Phone Use in Australian Indigenous Communities: Future Pathways for HCI4D. In Proceedings of the 26th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on Designing Futures: The Future of Design (OzCHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 480--483. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  128. Shemaya. 189. Pirkei Avot. In Mishnah, Judah HaNasi (Ed.). Chapter 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  129. Katie Shilton. 2018. Values and Ethics in Human-Computer Interaction. Foundations and Trends in Human--Computer Interaction 12, 2 (2018), 107--171. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  130. Kristen Shinohara, Cynthia L. Bennett, and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2016. How Designing for People With and Without Disabilities Shapes Student Design Thinking. In Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 229--237. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  131. SIGCHI. 2018. Internationalisation, Diversity and Inclusion events at Sponsored Conferences. Retrieved September 18, 2018 from https://web.archive.org/web/20180919195612/https: //sigchi.org/2017/06/internationalisation%2Ddiversity%2Dand% 2Dinclusion%2Devents%2Dat%2Dsponsored-conferences/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  132. SIGCHI. 2018. SIGCHI Conferences Report. Retrieved September 19, 2018 from https://web.archive.org/web/ 20180920073001/'-'https://sigchi.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/ SIGCHI-Conferences-Report-for-Members-May-2018.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  133. SIGCHI. 2018. SIGCHI EC Values and Strategic Initiatives. Retrieved September 18, 2018 from https: //web.archive.org/web/20180919195610/'-'https://sigchi.org/ 2018/09/sigchi-ec-values-and-strategic-initiatives/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  134. M. Six Silberman, Lisa Nathan, Bran Knowles, Roy Bendor, Adrian Clear, Maria Håkansson, Tawanna Dillahunt, and Jennifer Mankof. 2014. Next Steps for Sustainable HCI. interactions 21, 5 (Sept. 2014), 66--69. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  135. Else SKJOLD and Frederik LARSEN. {n. d.}. Design for Proft or Prosperity? Proceedings of DRS2018 ({n. d.}), 158.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  136. Thomas Smyth and Jill Dimond. 2014. Anti-oppressive Design. interactions 21, 6 (Oct. 2014), 68--71. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  137. Fiona Ssozi-Mugarura, Thomas Reitmaier, Anja Venter, and Edwin Blake. 2016. Enough with 'In-The-Wild'. In Proceedings of the First African Conference on Human Computer Interaction (AfriCHI'16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 182--186. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  138. Judith Suissa. 2018. Anarchism and Education: A philosophical perspective. (Sept. 2018), 1--252.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  139. Huatong Sun. 2013. Critical Design Sensibility in Postcolonial Conditions. AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research 3, 0 (Oct. 2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  140. Loren Terveen, Helena Mentis, Aaron Quigley, and Philippe Palanque. 2018. The evolution of SIGCHI conferences and the future of CHI. Interactions 25, 5 (Aug. 2018), 84--85. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  141. Siva Vaidhyanathan. 2012. The Googlization of Everything. University of California Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  142. Lucien van der Walt. 2005. Towards a history of anarchist antiimperialism. Against the War and Terrorism (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  143. Peter-Paul Verbeek. 2011. Moralizing technology: Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things. University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  144. Mihaela Vorvoreanu, Lingyi Zhang, Yun-Han Huang, Claudia Hilderbrand, Zoe Steine-Hanson, and Margaret Burnett. 2019. rom Gender Biases to Gender-Inclusive Design: An Empirical Investigation. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  145. Robert White. 2004. Post Colonial Anarchism: Essays on Race, Repression and Culture in Communities of Color, 1999--2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  146. Richard J White and Colin C Williams. 2012. The Pervasive Nature of Heterodox Economic Spaces at a Time of Neoliberal Crisis: Towards a "Postneoliberal" Anarchist Future. Antipode 44, 5 (July 2012), 1625-- 1644.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  147. Matthew Wilson. 2014. Rules Without Rulers: The Possibilities and Limits of Anarchism. John Hunt Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  148. Langdon Winner. 1980. Do Artifacts Have Politics? Daedalus 109, 1 (1980), 121--136.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  149. Langdon Winner. 2010. The Whale and the Reactor. University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  150. Heike Winschiers-Theophilus and Nicola J Bidwell. 2013. Toward an Afro-Centric Indigenous HCI Paradigm. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 29, 4 (March 2013), 243--255.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  151. Robert Paul Wolf. 1970. In Defense of Anarchism. University of California Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  152. International Workers of the World. 2018. Preamble, Constitution and General Bylaws of the International Workers of the World. Retrieved September 21, 2018 from https://web.archive.org/web/20180606234641/https: //www.iww.org/PDF/Constitutions/CurrentIWWConstitution.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Human-Computer Insurrection: Notes on an Anarchist HCI

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Conferences
                CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
                May 2019
                9077 pages
                ISBN:9781450359702
                DOI:10.1145/3290605

                Copyright © 2019 Owner/Author

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 2 May 2019

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • research-article

                Acceptance Rates

                CHI '19 Paper Acceptance Rate703of2,958submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

                Upcoming Conference

                CHI '24
                CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
                May 11 - 16, 2024
                Honolulu , HI , USA

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader

              HTML Format

              View this article in HTML Format .

              View HTML Format