skip to main content
10.1145/3290605.3300565acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Personas and Identity: Looking at Multiple Identities to Inform the Construction of Personas

Published:02 May 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Personas are valuable tools to help designers get to know their users and adopt their perspectives. Yet people are complex and multiple identities have to be considered in their interplay to account for a comprehensive representation otherwise, personas might be superficial and prone to activate stereotypes. Therefore, the way users' identities are presented in a limited set of personas is crucial to account for diversity and highlight facets which otherwise would go unnoticed. In this paper, we introduce an approach to the development of personas informed by social identity theory. The effectiveness of this approach is investigated in a qualitative study in the context of the design process for an e-learning platform for women in tech. The results suggest that considering multiple identities in the construction of personas adds value when designing technologies.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. J. Grudin, 2006. Why personas work: The psychological evidence, in The Persona Lifecycle, Keeping People in Mind Throughout Product Design, J. Pruitt and T. Adlin, Eds., ed San Francisco: Kaufmann Publisher, pp. 642--663.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. L. Nielsen, 2013. Personas - User Focused Design: Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. J. Pruitt and J. Grudin, Year. Personas: practice and theory, in Proceedings of the Conference on Designing for User Experience (DUX '03), pp. 1--15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. A. Cooper, 1999. The inmates are running the asylum: Why hightech products drive us crazy and how to restore the sanity. Indianapolis: Sams. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. C. Jones, I. R. Floyd, and M. B. Twidale, 2008. Teaching design with personas, Proceedings of the Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in Education (HCIed '08), pp. 75--82.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. J. Pruitt and T. Adlin, 2006. The persona lifecycle: Keeping people in mind throughout the design process, ed. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. R. D. Ashmore, K. Deaux, and T. McLaughlin-Volpe, 2004. An organizing framework for collective identity: articulation and significance of multidimensionality, Psychological bulletin, Vol. 130, pp. 80--114.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. M. A. Hogg and D. I. Terry, 2000. Social identity and selfcategorization processes in organizational contexts, Academy of management review, Vol. 25, pp. 121--140.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. M. A. Hogg, D. Abrams, S. Otten, and S. Hinkle, 2004. The social identity perspective: Intergroup relations, self-conception, and small groups, Small Group Research, Vol. 35, pp. 246--276.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. A. van Dommelen, K. Schmid, M. Hewstone, K. Gonsalkorale, and M. Brewer, 2015. Construing multiple ingroups: Assessing social identity inclusiveness and structure in ethnic and religious minority group members, European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 45, pp. 386--399.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. E. M. Trauth, C. C. Cain, K. D. Joshi, L. Kvasny, and K. M. Booth, 2016. The influence of gender-ethnic intersectionality on gender stereotypes about IT skills and knowledge, The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, Vol. 47, pp. 9--39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. G. Cooper and J. Bowers, 1995. Representing the user: Notes on the disciplinary rhetoric of human-computer interaction, Cambridge Series on Human Computer Interaction, pp. 48--66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. N. Marsden and M. Haag, 2016. Stereotypes and Politics: Reflections on Personas, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16), pp. 4017--4031. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. T. Adlin, J. Pruitt, K. Goodwin, C. Hynes, K. McGrane, A. Rosenstein, and M. J. Muller, 2006. Putting personas to work, Extended Abstracts of the 2006 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '06), pp. 13--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. J. A. Rode, 2011. A theoretical agenda for feminist HCI, Interacting with Computers, Vol. 23, pp. 393--400. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. J. Bardzell and S. Bardzell, 2016. Cover story: Humanistic HCI, interactions, Vol. 23, pp. 20--29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. N. Oudshoorn, E. Rommes, and M. Stienstra, 2004. Configuring the User as Everybody: Gender and Design Cultures in Information and Communication Technologies, Science, Technology & Human Values, Vol. 29, pp. 30--63.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. N. Oudshoorn, L. Neven, and M. Stienstra, 2016. How diversity gets lost: Age and gender in design practices of information and communication technologies, Journal of women & aging, Vol. 28, pp. 170--185.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. C. Draude and G. Klumbyte, 2018. Acceptability by Design: Integrating Gender Research in HCI, Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18),Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. K. Crenshaw, 1991. Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color, Stanford law review, pp. 1241--1299.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. N. M. Else-Quest and J. S. Hyde, 2016. Intersectionality in Quantitative Psychological Research I. Theoretical and Epistemological Issues, Psychology of Women Quarterly, Vol. 40, pp. 319--336.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. R. Bivens and O. L. Haimson, 2016. Baking Gender Into Social Media Design: How Platforms Shape Categories for Users and Advertisers, Social Media+ Society, Vol. 2, pp. 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. S. Roccas and M. B. Brewer, 2002. Social identity complexity, Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 6, pp. 88--106.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. E. R. Cole, 2009. Intersectionality and research in psychology, American psychologist, Vol. 64, p. 170.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. S. Jung, An, J., Kwak, H. Ahmad, M., Nielsen, L., Jansen, B. J., 2017. Persona Generation from Aggregated Social Media Data, ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2017 (CHI '17), Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. J. Clifford and G. E. Marcus, 1986. Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography: Univ of California Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. D. Cabrero, H. Winschiers-Theophilus, and H. Mendonca, 2015. User-Created Personas -- A Micro-cultural Lens into Informal Settlement's Youth Life, in Human Work Interaction Design. Work Analysis and Interaction Design Methods for Pervasive and Smart Workplaces. vol. 468, J. Abdelnour Nocera, B. R. Barricelli, A. Lopes, P. Campos, and T. Clemmensen, Eds., ed: Springer International Publishing, pp. 57--70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. A. Jansen, M. Van Mechelen, and K. Slegers, Year. Personas and Behavioral Theories: A Case Study Using Self-Determination Theory to Construct Overweight Personas, in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17), pp. 2127--2136. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. S. Maaß, C. Schirmer, S. Buchmüller, A. Bötcher, D. Koch, and R. Schumacher, 2016. Cultural Probes, Personas und Szenarien als Third Space, in Mensch und Computer 2016 - Tagungsband, J. B. W. Prinz, M. Ziefle, Ed., ed.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. D. G. Cabrero, H. Winschiers-Theophilus, and J. Abdelnour-Nocera, Year. A Critique of Personas as representations of "the other" in Cross-Cultural Technology Design, in Proceedings of the First African Conference on Human Computer Interaction (AfriCHI '16), pp. 149--154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. D. Norman. 2004. Ad-Hoc Personas & Empathetic Focus. http://jnd.org/dn.mss/ad-hoc_personas_empathetic_focus.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. M. A. Blythe and P. C. Wright, 2006. Pastiche scenarios: Fiction as a resource for user centred design, Interacting with Computers, Vol. 18, pp. 1139--1164. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. J. P. Djajadiningrat, W. W. Gaver, and J. W. Fres, Year. Interaction relabelling and extreme characters: methods for exploring aesthetic interactions, in Proceedings of the 3rd conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '00), pp. 66--71. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Å. Wikberg Nilsson, E. Källhammer, Y. Fältholm, and L. Abrahamsson, 2010. Personas as a method for applying gender theory in Triple Helix constellations--experiences from two research projects, Conference paper for the 8th Triple Helix Conference, Madrid 20--22 Oct 2010. Gender in Innovation Policy, Innovation Systems and Triple Helix, Thematic Workshop 1: Gender mainstreaming in innovation systems and Triple Helix constellations,Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. C. N. Chapman and R. P. Milham, Year. The personas' new clothes: methodological and practical arguments against a popular method, in Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, pp. 634--636.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. A. Cooper, R. Reimann, D. Cronin, and C. Noessel, 2014. About face: The essentials of interaction design: John Wiley & Sons. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. S. Mulder and Z. Yaar, 2007. The user is always right: A practical guide to creating and using personas for the web. Berkeley, CA: New Riders. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. T. Adlin and J. Pruitt, 2010. The essential persona lifecycle: Your guide to building and using personas: Morgan Kaufmann. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. M. Burnett, S. Stumpf, J. Macbeth, S. Makri, L. Beckwith, I. Kwan, A. Peters, and W. Jernigan, 2016. GenderMag: A Method for Evaluating Software's Gender Inclusiveness, Interacting with Computers, p. iwv046.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. A. Giboin, 2011. From Individual to Collective Personas Modeling Realistic Groups and Communities of Users (and not Only Realistic Individual Users), The Fourth International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interaction (ACHI 2011), pp. 132135.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. K. Kuutti and L. J. Bannon, Year. The Turn to Practice in HCI: Towards a Research Agenda, in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14), pp. 3543--3552. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. H. Tajfel, 1978. Social categorization, social identity, and social comparisons, in Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations, H. Tajfel, Ed., ed: Academic Press London, pp. 61--76.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. D. G. Cabrero, H. Winschiers-Theophilus, and J. A. Nocera, 2016. Re-Conceptualising Personas across Cultures: Archetypes, Stereotypes and Collective Personas in Two Locales in Pastoral Namibia, Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Culture, Technology, Communication (CaTaC '16), pp. 35--48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. E. Källhammer and Å. Wikberg Nilsson, 2012. Gendered Innovative Design - Critical Reflections stimulated by Personas, in Promoting Innovation - Policies, practices and procedures. vol. VR 2012:08, S. Andersson, K. Berglund, E. Gunnarsson, and E. Sundin, Eds., ed Sweden: VINNOVA --Verket för Innovationssystem/Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation System, pp. 328--350.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. I. R. Floyd, M. Cameron Jones, and M. B. Twidale, 2008. Resolving incommensurable debates: a preliminary identification of persona kinds, attributes, and characteristics, Artifact, Vol. 2, pp. 12--26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. L. Nielsen, 2004. Engaging personas and narrative scenarios. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. M. Pröbster, J. Hermann, and N. Marsden, 2018. Digitale Weiterbildung in der IT -- Eine Frage des Geschlechts, 4th Gender & IT Conference (GenderIT'18), pp. 11--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. N. Iivari and K. Kuutti, Year. Critical Design Research and Information Technology: Searching for Empowering Design, in Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '17), pp. 983--993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. V. Hämäläinen, 2016. In and out of the boys' club -- women's narratives from the ICT industry, Aalto University, AaltoGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. D. M. Hatmaker, 2013. Engineering identity: Gender and professional identity negotiation among women engineers, Gender, Work & Organization, Vol. 20, pp. 382--396.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. S. Gherardi and B. Poggio, 2001. Creating and recreating gender order in organizations, Journal of World Business, Vol. 36, pp. 245259.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. S. Faily, D. Power, and I. Fléchais, 2016. Gulfs of expectation: eliciting and verifying differences in trust expectations using personas, Journal of Trust Management, Vol. 3, p. 4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. T. Dresing, T. Pehl, and C. Schmieder. Manual (on) transcription: Transcription conventions, software guides and practical hints for qualitative researchers. 3rd Edition {Online}. http://www.audiotranskription.de/english/manual-ontranscription.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. C. Helfferich, 2014. Leitfaden- und Experteninterviews, in Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung, N. Baur and J. Blasius, Eds., ed: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, pp. 559--574.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. V. Braun and V. Clarke, 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qualitative research in psychology, Vol. 3, pp. 77--101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. A. Cuddy, S. Fiske, and P. Glick, 2008. Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map, Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 40, pp. 61--149.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. K. Holtzblatt, J. B. Wendell, and S. Wood, 2005. Rapid Contextual Design. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. W. Faulkner, 2014. Can Women Engineers be 'Real Engineers' and 'Real Women'?, in Gender in Science and Technology, W. Ernst and I. Horwath, Eds., ed Bielefeld: transcript, pp. 187--203.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. N. Marsden, J. Link, and E. Büllesfeld, 2015. Geschlechterstereotype in Persona-Beschreibungen, in Mensch und Computer 2015 Tagungsband, S. Diefenbach, N. Henze, and M. Pielot, Eds., ed Stuttgart: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag, pp. 113--122.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. S. A. Hewlett, C. B. Luce, L. J. Servon, L. Sherbin, P. Shiller, E. Sosnovich, and K. Sumberg, 2008. The Athena Factor: Reversing the Brain Drain in Science, Engineering and Technology HBR (Harvard Business Review) Report. Harvard: Center for Work-Life Policy,Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. W. Faulkner, 2009. Doing gender in engineering workplace cultures. I. Observations from the field, Engineering Studies, Vol. 1, pp. 3--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. H. Tajfel and J. C. Turner, 1986. The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior, in Psychology of Intergroup Relations, W. G. Austin and S. Worchel, Eds., ed Chicago: Nelson-Hall Publishers, pp. 7--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. R. Gibson, J. B. Hester, and S. Stewart, 2001. Pull quotes shape reader perceptions of news stories, Newspaper Research Journal, Vol. 22, pp. 66--78.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. E. Zell, J. E. Strickhouser, T. N. Lane, and S. R. Teeter, 2016. Mars, Venus, or Earth? Sexism and the Exaggeration of Psychological Gender Differences, Sex Roles, Vol. 75, pp. 287--300.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Personas and Identity: Looking at Multiple Identities to Inform the Construction of Personas

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2019
      9077 pages
      ISBN:9781450359702
      DOI:10.1145/3290605

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 May 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '19 Paper Acceptance Rate703of2,958submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format