skip to main content
10.1145/3290605.3300389acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

WhatFutures: Designing Large-Scale Engagements on WhatsApp

Authors Info & Claims
Published:02 May 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

WhatsApp, as the world's most popular messaging application, offers significant opportunities for improving the reach and effectiveness of engagement projects. In collaboration with the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) we designed WhatFutures, a collaborative future forecasting engagement for global youth using WhatsApp. WhatFutures was successfully deployed with 487 players across 5 countries (Kenya, Bulgaria, Finland, Australia and Hong Kong) to inform strategic change within the IFRC. Based on our analysis of the activity - including 16,100 messages, 95 multimedia artifacts, and a post-engagement survey - we present a reflection upon the design decisions underpinning WhatFutures and identify how decisions made around group structures, processes and externalization of outputs influenced engagement and data quality. We conclude with the wider implications of our findings for the design of engagements that best utilize the affordances of existing messaging applications.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

paper159.mp4

mp4

244.9 MB

References

  1. Amazon. 2018. Amazon Comprehend. https://aws.amazon.com/comprehend/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Michael Baker, Université Lumiè re Lyon F, Richard Joiner, and David Traum. 1999. The Role of Grounding in Collaborative Learning Tasks. Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (1999), 63.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. J Biggs and K. F. Collis. 1982. Evaluating the Quality of Learning: The SOLO Taxonomy. 13 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Elizabeth Bonsignore, Vicki Moulder, Carman Neustaedter, Derek Hansen, Kari Kraus, and Allison Druin. 2014. Design Tactics for Authentic Interactive Fiction: Insights from Alternate Reality Game Designers. Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '14 February 2016 (2014), 947--950. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Dan Bouhnik and Mor Deshen. 2014. WhatsApp Goes to School: Mobile Instant Messaging between Teachers and Students. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, Vol. 13 (2014), 217--231.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Hanna Celina, Clement Lee, Patrick Olivier, and Ahmed Kharrufa. 2018. LearningCircle. io : Lessons Learned from Organising Courses with and without a Dedicated Platform. The Learning Circle platform : from idea to implementation .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Justin Cheng and Michael S Bernstein. 2014. Catalyst: Triggering Collective Action with Thresholds. Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '14) (2014), 1211--1221. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Henry Chesbrough, Wim Vanhaverbeke, and Joel West. 2006. Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. 373 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Elizabeth G Cohen and Rachel A. Lotan. 2014. Designing groupwork: Strategies for the heterogeneous classroom. Vol. 2nd. Teachers College Press, NY. 202 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. D.L. De Vries and R.E. Slavin. 1978. Teams-Games-Tournaments (TGT): Review of Ten Classroom Experiments. Journal of Research and Development in Education,, Vol. 12(1) (1978), 28--38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Sebastian Deterding, Dan Dixon, Rilla Khaled, and Lennart Nacke. 2011. From game design elements to gamefulness. Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference on Envisioning Future Media Environments - MindTrek '11 (2011), 9--11. arxiv: ACM 978--1--4503-0816--8/11/09 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Oswald Devisch, Alenka Poplin, and Simona Sofronie. 2016. The Gamification of Civic Participation: Two Experiments in Improving the Skills of Citizens to Reflect Collectively on Spatial Issues. Journal of Urban Technology, Vol. 732, June (2016), 1--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Andrea Forte, Niki Kittur, Vanessa Larco, and H Zhu. 2012. Coordination and beyond: social functions of groups in open content production. Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (2012), 417--426. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Rosemary Garris and Robert Ahlers. 2002. Games, Motivation, and Learning: A Research and Practice Model. Simulation and Gaming, Vol. 33, 4 (2002), 441--467.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. James Paul Gee. 2003. What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Computers in Entertainment, Vol. 1, 1 (2003), 20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Eric Gordon and Jessica Baldwin-Philippi. 2014. Playful civic learning: Enabling reflection and lateral trust in game-based public participation. International Journal of Communication, Vol. 8, 1 (2014), 759--786.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Eric Gordon, Stephen Walter, and Pablo Suarez. 2016. Engagement Games: a case for designing games to facilliate real-world action ., bibinfonumpages27 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Hellmann's. {n. d.}. WhatsCook. http://cubo.cc/whatscook/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Nassim JafariNaimi and Eric M Meyers. 2015. Collective Intelligence or Group Think? Engaging Participation Patterns in World without Oil. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing - CSCW '15 (2015), 1872--1881. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. N JafariNaimi, E M Meyers, and A Trumble. 2014. Designing meaningful participation: Analyzing contribution patterns in an alternate reality game. Proceedings of the International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work (2014), 306--309. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Jesse Schell. 2014. The Art of Game Design: A book of lenses .AK Peters/CRC Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. David W. Johnson and Roger T. Johnson. 1999. Making cooperative learning work. Theory Into Practice, Vol. 38, 2 (1999), 67--73.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Paul Kariuki and Lizzy Oluwatoyin Ofusori. 2017. WhatsApp-Operated Stokvels Promoting Youth Entrepreneurship in Durban, South Africa. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance - ICEGOV '17 (2017), 253--259. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Jeffrey Y Kim, Jonathan P Allen, and Elan Lee. 2008. ALTERNATE REALITY GAMING. (cover story). Commun. ACM, Vol. 51, 2 (2008), 36--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Sunyoung Kim, Jennifer Mankoff, and Eric Paulos. 2013. Sensr. Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work - CSCW '13 (2013), 1453.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Aniket Kittur. 2010. Crowdsourcing, collaboration and creativity. XRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students, Vol. 17, 2 (2010), 22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. a Kittur, J Nickerson, and M Bernstein. 2013. The Future of Crowd Work. Proc. CSCW '13 (2013), 1--17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Shirlee-Ann Knight and Janice Burn. 2005. Developing a framework for assessing information quality on the World Wide Web. Informing Science Journal, Vol. 8, 3 (2005), 159 -- 172.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Edith Law, Andrea Wiggins, Mary L Gray, and Alex Williams. 2017. Crowdsourcing as a Tool for Research : Implications of Uncertainty. (2017), 1544--1561. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Haley MacLeod, Ben Jelen, Annu Prabhakar, Lora Oehlberg, Katie Siek, and Kay Connelly. 2017. Asynchronous Remote Communities (ARC) for Researching Distributed Populations. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Pervasive Health and Technology, Vol. 3, 11 (2017), 152898.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Haley MacLeod, Kim Oakes, Danika Geisler, Kay Connelly, and Katie Siek. 2015. Rare World: Towards Technology for Rare Diseases. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '15 (2015), 1145--1154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Juan F Maestre, Haley Macleod, Ciabhan L Connelly, Julia C Dunbar, Jordan Beck, Katie A Siek, and Patrick C Shih. 2018. Defining Through Expansion : Conducting Asynchronous Remote Communities ( ARC ) Research with Stigmatized Groups. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI'18 (2018), 1--13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Jane McGonigal. 2011. Reality is broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the world. (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. D. L. Morgan. 1997. Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Sage Publications (1997), 32--46.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Lizzy Oluwatoyin Ofusori and Paul Kariuki. 2017. The Power of WhatsApp as a Communication Tool for Elections Observation and Monitoring in KwaZulu-Natal. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance - ICEGOV '17 (2017), 536--537. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Tamara Peyton, Alyson L. Young, and Wayne Lutters. 2013. Playing with leadership and expertise. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '13 (2013), 715. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Yusuf Pisan. 2007. My guild, my people: role of guilds in massively multiplayer online games. Proceedings of the 4th Australasian conference on Interactive entertainment (2007), 20. http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1367976 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Annu Sible Prabhakar, Lucia Guerra-Reyes, Vanessa M. Kleinschmidt, Ben Jelen, Haley MacLeod, Kay Connelly, and Katie A. Siek. 2017. Investigating the Suitability of the Asynchronous, Remote, Community-based Method for Pregnant and New Mothers. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '17 (2017), 4924--4934. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Pybossa. 2018. Pybossa. https://pybossa.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Katharina Reinecke, Ann Arbor, and Krzysztof Z Gajos. 2015. LabintheWild : Conducting Large-Scale Online Experiments With Uncompensated Samples. Cscw (2015), 1364--1378. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Daniela Retelny, Sé bastien Robaszkiewicz, Alexandra To, Walter S. Lasecki, Jay Patel, Negar Rahmati, Tulsee Doshi, Melissa Valentine, and Michael S. Bernstein. 2014. Expert crowdsourcing with flash teams. In Proceedings of the 27th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology - UIST '14. 75--85. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Katie Salen. 1995. The Ecology of Games. Communication Theory, Vol. 13, 3 (1995).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Katie Salen and Eric Zimmerman. 2003. Rules of Play: Game Design Fundamentals. MIT Press, Vol. 2004 (2003), 688. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. AF Seay, William J Jerome, Kevin Sang Lee, and Robert E Kraut. 2004. Project Massive: A Study of Online Gaming Communities. Extended abstracts of the 2004 conference on Human factors and computing systems - CHI '04 (2004), 1421. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Ethan Seltzer and Dillon Mahmoudi. 2013. Citizen Participation, Open Innovation, and Crowdsourcing: Challenges and Opportunities for Planning. Journal of Planning Literature, Vol. 28, 1 (2013), 3--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Amy Soller. 2007. Supporting Social Interaction in an Intelligent Collaborative Learning System. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, Vol. 12 (2007), 40--62.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Statista. {n. d.}. Most Popular Mobile Messaging Apps Worldwide. https://www.statista.com/statistics/258749/most-popular-global-mobile-messenger-apps/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Besiki Stvilia, Les Gasser, Michael B. Twidale, and Linda C. Smith. 2007. A framework for information quality assessment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and TechnologyJASIST, Vol. 58, 12 (2007), 1720--1733. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Ajay Sura. {n. d.}. In a first, court to send summons via WhatsApp. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chandigarh/in-a-first-court-to-send-summons-via-whatsapp/articleshow/58074835.cmsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. K Toyama. 2011. Technology as amplifier in international development. Proceedings of the 2011 iConference on - iConference '11 (2011), 75--82. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Zach Waggoner. 2009. My avatar, my self : identity in video role-playing games. McFarland & Company, Jefferson. 201 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Alyson Young, Tamara Peyton, and Wayne Lutters. 2013. Understanding Situated Action in Ludic Ecologies. Proc. Intl. Conf. on Communities and Technologies (C&T) (2013), 100--109. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. WhatFutures: Designing Large-Scale Engagements on WhatsApp

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2019
      9077 pages
      ISBN:9781450359702
      DOI:10.1145/3290605

      Copyright © 2019 Owner/Author

      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 May 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '19 Paper Acceptance Rate703of2,958submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format