skip to main content
10.1145/3291533.3291562acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Calling HCI professionals into health research: patient safety and health equity at stake

Published:29 November 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

The paper describes the need for expansion of the role of human-computer interaction (HCI) professionals into the field of e-health interventions, including games, virtual reality, and social media. Authors summarize critical practical, methodological, and philosophical gaps that prevent further synergy and collaboration. The necessity for closing these gaps is guided through a discussion on ethics and a health equity framework.

References

  1. 2018 Theme - Design for Good or Evil - World Usability Day: https://worldusabilityday.org/portfolio-item/2018-theme-design-for-good-or-evil/. Accessed: 2018-10-12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Addiss, D.G. 2017. Mindfulness, Compassion, and the Foundations of Global Health Ethics. Practitioner's Guide to Ethics and Mindfulness-Based Interventions. L. Monteiro et al., eds. Springer, Cham. 295--322.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Adler, N.E. and Stead, W.W. 2015. Patients in Context --- EHR Capture of Social and Behavioral Determinants of Health. New England Journal of Medicine. 372, 8 (Feb. 2015), 698--701.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Back, A.L. et al. 2009. Compassionate Silence in the Patient-Clinician Encounter: A Contemplative Approach. Journal of Palliative Medicine. 12, 12 (Dec. 2009), 1113--1117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Bailey, K. et al. 2011. The Influence of Video Games on Social, Cognitive, and Affective Information Processing. The Oxford Handbook of Social Neuroscience. J. Decety and J.T. Caccioppo, eds. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bate, P. and Robert, G. 2006. Experience-based design: From redesigning the system around the patient to co-designing services with the patient. Quality and Safety in Health Care. 15, 5 (2006), 307--310.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Bavelier, D. and Davidson, R.J. 2013. Brain training: Games to do you good. Nature. 494, 7438 (Feb. 2013), 425--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Borsci, S. et al. 2014. How many testers are needed to assure the usability of medical devices? Expert review of medical devices. 11, 5 (Sep. 2014), 513--25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Center on the Developing Child at Harvard University 2011. Building the Brain's "Air Traffic Control" System: How Early Experiences Shape the Development of Executive Function: Working Paper No. 11. (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Cotton, V. and Patel, M.S. 2018. Gamification Use and Design in Popular Health and Fitness Mobile Applications. American Journal of Health Promotion. (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Cummings, J.J. and Bailenson, J.N. 2016. How Immersive Is Enough? A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Immersive Technology on User Presence. Media Psychology. 19, 2 (2016), 272--309.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Design Thinking Is Fundamentally Conservative and Preserves the Status Quo: 2018. https://hbr.org/2018/09/design-thinking-is-fundamentally-conservative-and-preserves-the-status-quo. Accessed: 2018-10-08.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Desurvire, H. and Kreminski, M. 2018. Are Game Design and User Research Guidelines Specific to Virtual Reality Effective in Creating a More Optimal Player Experience? Yes, VR PLAY. Design, User Experience, and Usability: Theory and Practice. DUXU 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 10918. A. Marcus and W. Wang, eds. Springer, Cham. 40--59.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Douglas, S. and Namioka, A. 1993. Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. Routledge. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Duncan, L.R. et al. 2014. Game playbooks: tools to guide multidisciplinary teams in developing videogame-based behavior change interventions. Translational Behavioral Medicine. (Feb. 2014), 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Ellsworth, M.A. et al. 2017. An appraisal of published usability evaluations of electronic health records via systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 24, 1 (2017), 218--226.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Elson, M. and Ferguson, C.J. 2014. Twenty-Five Years of Research on Violence in Digital Games and Aggression. European Psychologist. 19, 1 (2014), 33--46.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Eysenbach, G. 2001. What is e-health? Journal of Medical Internet Research. 3, 2 (Jun. 2001), e20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Ferguson, C.J. and Ceranoglu, T.A. 2014. Attention problems and pathological gaming: Resolving the "chicken and egg" in a prospective analysis. Psychiatric Quarterly. 85, 1 (2014), 103--110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Frankel, L. and Racine, M. 2010. The complex field of research: For design, through design, and about design. Proceedings of Design Research Society. D. Durling, ed.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Gentile, D.A. et al. 2017. Internet Gaming Disorder in Children and Adolescents. Pediatrics. 140, Supplement 2 (2017), S81--S85.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Goldberg, L. et al. 2011. Usability and Accessibility in Consumer Health Informatics. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 40, 5 (May 2011), S187--S197.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Gotsis, M. et al. 2014. A transtheoretical heuristic for design and evaluation of interactive entertainment for health and happiness. Poster session presented at the Jacquelyn Perry Research Symposium (Los Angeles, CA, 2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Gotsis, M. 2009. Games, Virtual Reality, and the Pursuit of Happiness. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. 29, 5 (Sep. 2009), 14--19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Gotsis, M. et al. 2014. Skyfarer: design case study of a mixed reality rehabilitation video game. HCI International 2014. A. Marcus, ed. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 669--710. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Gotsis, M. and Baron, D.A. 2015. The Role of Video Games and Virtual Reality in Psychiatric Treatment. Psychiatry Advisor. Psychiatry Advisor.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Granic, I. et al. 2014. The benefits of playing video games. The American psychologist. 69, 1 (Jan. 2014), 66--78.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Hall, K.L. et al. 2018. The science of team science: A review of the empirical evidence and research gaps on collaboration in science. American Psychologist. 73, 4 (2018), 532--548.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Hamari, J. and Sarsa, H. 2014. Does Gamification Work? --- A Literature Review of Empirical Studies on Gamification. (2014), 3025--3034. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Holley, K.A. 2009. Understanding interdisciplinary challenges and opportunities in higher education. Innovations in Higher Education. 34, (2009), 1--131.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Holone, H. and Herstad, J. 2013. Three tensions in participatory design for inclusion. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '13 (New York, New York, USA, 2013), 2903. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. How AI is helping to predict and prevent suicides: http://theconversation.com/how-ai-is-helping-to-predict-and-prevent-suicides-91460.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Hughes, K. et al. 2017. The effect of multiple adverse childhood experiences on health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Public Health. 2, 8 (Aug. 2017), e356--e366.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Jones, N. and Moffitt, M. 2016. Ethical Guidelines for Mobile App Development Within Health and Mental Health Fields. Professional Psychology-Research and Practice. 47, 2 (2016), 155--162.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Korhonen, H. and Koivisto, E.M.I. 2006. Playability heuristics for mobile games. Proceedings of the 8th conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services - MobileHCI '06 (New York, New York, USA, Sep. 2006), 9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Kuipers, D.A. et al. 2017. The Role of Transfer in Designing Games and Simulations for Health: Systematic Review. JMIR Serious Games. 5, 4 (Nov. 2017), e23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Landers, R.N. 2018. Gamification Misunderstood: How Badly Executed and Rhetorical Gamification Obscures Its Transformative Potential. Journal of Management Inquiry. (Aug. 2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Lewis, J.R. 2014. Usability: Lessons learned ... and yet to be learned. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 30, 9 (Sep. 2014), 663--684.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Liang, Y. and Lau, P.W.C. 2014. Effects of Active Videogames on Physical Activity and Related Outcomes Among Healthy Children: A Systematic Review. Games for Health Journal. 3, 3 (Jun. 2014), 122--144.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Lieberoth, A. 2015. Shallow Gamification Testing Psychological Effects of Framing an Activity as a Game. Games and Culture. 10, 3 (2015), 229--248.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Madary, M. and Metzinger, T.K. 2016. Recommendations for Good Scientific Practice and the Consumers of VR-Technology. Frontiers in Robotics and AI. 3, February (2016), 1--23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Mahrer, N.E. and Gold, J.I. 2009. The use of virtual reality for pain control: a review. Current pain and headache reports. 13, 2 (Apr. 2009), 100--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Marczewski, A. 2017. The ethics of gamification. XRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students. 24, 1 (2017), 56--59. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Medlock, M.C. et al. 2002. Using the RITE method to improve products: A definition and a case study. Usability Professionals Association (Orlando, Florida, 2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Megna, M. et al. 2018. Smartphone and video games overuse effects on hand joints: time for screening interventions? Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. (May 2018).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Mozilla challenges educators to integrate ethics into STEM: 2018. https://www.fastcompany.com/90248074/mozillas-ambitious-plan-to-teach-ethics-in-the-age-of-evil-tech. Accessed: 2018-10-14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Muller, M.J. et al. 1993. Participatory design. Communications of the ACM. 36, 6 (Jun. 1993), 24--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Mummah, S.A. et al. 2016. IDEAS (Integrate, Design, Assess, and Share): A Framework and Toolkit of Strategies for the Development of More Effective Digital Interventions to Change Health Behavior. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 18, 12 (2016), e317.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Nancarrow, S.A. et al. 2013. Ten principles of good interdisciplinary team work. Hum Resources Health. 11, 1 (2013), 19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. National Research Council 2015. Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science. The National Academies Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Number of Children - Child Trends: https://www.childtrends.org/indicators/number-of-children. Accessed: 2018-10-14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Ono, S. et al. 2017. Effect of Pokémon GO on incidence of fatal traffic injuries: a population-based quasi-experimental study using the national traffic collisions database in Japan. Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention. (Oct. 2017), injuryprev-2017-042503.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Pashler, H. and Wagenmakers, E. 2012. Editors' Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 7, 6 (Nov. 2012), 528--530.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Patsopoulos, N.A. 2011. A pragmatic view on pragmatic trials. Dialogues in clinical neuroscience. 13, 2 (2011), 217--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Pourchon, R. et al. 2017. Is Augmented Reality Leading to More Risky Behaviors? An Experiment with Pokémon Go. Springer, Cham. 354--361.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Rabipour, S. and Raz, A. 2012. Training the brain: fact and fad in cognitive and behavioral remediation. Brain and cognition. 79, 2 (Jul. 2012), 159--79.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Ratwani, R.M. et al. 2018. A usability and safety analysis of electronic health records: a multi-center study. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 25, July (2018), 1197--1201.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Ratwani, R.M. et al. 2015. Electronic health record usability: analysis of the user-centered design processes of eleven electronic health record vendors. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 22, 6 (Nov. 2015), 1179--1182.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Read the Belmont Report | HHS.gov: https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/read-the-belmont-report/index.html. Accessed: 2018-10-14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Van Rijnsoever, F.J. and Hessels, L.K. 2011. Factors associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary research collaboration. Research Policy. 40, 3 (2011), 463--472.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Rizzo, A. et al. 2011. Virtual reality applications for addressing the needs of those aging with disability. Studies in health technology and informatics. 163, (Jan. 2011), 510--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Rizzo, A. "Skip" and Koenig, S.T. 2017. Is clinical virtual reality ready for primetime? Neuropsychology. 31, 8 (Nov. 2017), 877--899.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. VAN Rooij, A.J. et al. 2014. The (co-)occurrence of problematic video gaming, substance use, and psychosocial problems in adolescents. Journal of behavioral addictions. 3, 3 (Sep. 2014), 157--65.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Shea, S. et al. eds. 2014. Providing compassionate health care: Challenges in policy and practice. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Shifrin, D. et al. 2015. Growing Up Digital : Media Research Symposium. Growing up digital: Media research symposium (Rosemont, IL, 2015), 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Siedlok, F. et al. 2015. From practice to collaborative community in interdisciplinary research contexts. Research Policy. 44, 1 (Feb. 2015), 96--107.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. Simons, D.J. et al. 2016. Do Brain-Training Programs Work? Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 17, 3 (2016), 103--186.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Springett, J. 2017. Impact in participatory health research: what can we learn from research on participatory evaluation? Educational Action Research. 25, 4 (2017), 560--574.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Stanford University. and Center for the Study of Language and Information (U.S.) 1997. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Teddlie, C. and Yu, F. 2007. Mixed Methods Sampling. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 1, 1 (2007), 77--100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. Thornicroft, G. et al. 2011. The place of implementation science in the translational medicine continuum. Psychological medicine. 41, 10 (Oct. 2011), 2015--21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Ushering In The New Era Of Health Equity: 2016. https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20161031.057296/full/. Accessed: 2018-10-12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Vines, J. et al. 2013. Designing for- and with- vulnerable people. CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems on - CHI EA '13 (New York, New York, USA, 2013), 3231. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Vogt, K.M. 2011. All Sense-Perceptions are True : Epicurean Responses to Skepticism and Relativism. Lucretius and Modernity (New York, New York, USA, 2011), 1--23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Wallace, S. et al. 2013. Culture and the importance of usability attributes. Information Technology and People. 26, 1 (2013), 77--93.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  76. Wallerstein, N. and Duran, B. 2010. Community-Based Participatory Research Contributions to Intervention Research: The Intersection of Science and Practice to Improve Health Equity. American Journal of Public Health. 100, S1 (Apr. 2010), S40--S46.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  77. Wilkinson, N. et al. 2008. Online video game therapy for mental health concerns: A review. International journal of social ... . 54, 4 (2008), 370--382.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Woodcock, J. and Johnson, M.R. 2018. Gamification: What it is, and how to fight it. The Sociological Review. 66, 3 (May 2018), 542--558.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Calling HCI professionals into health research: patient safety and health equity at stake

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      PCI '18: Proceedings of the 22nd Pan-Hellenic Conference on Informatics
      November 2018
      336 pages
      ISBN:9781450366106
      DOI:10.1145/3291533

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 29 November 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      PCI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate57of105submissions,54%Overall Acceptance Rate190of390submissions,49%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader