skip to main content
10.1145/3288155.3288172acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicibeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Sentence-Level Sarcasm Detection in English and Filipino Tweets

Published:24 October 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Sarcasm is a special form of sentiment which defines as "a nuanced form of language in which individuals say the opposite of what is implied". In this study, the researchers collected 6,000 Tagalog tweets and 6,000 English tweets from the microblogging site, Twitter, and annotated it by linguistic experts. Tweets were classified using Naïve Bayesian, Support Vector Machine and Maximum Entropy supervised machine learning algorithms to develop a model. The study focused on sentence-level sarcasm detection that includes lexical, pragmatic, hyperbole, quotations and punctuation marks as the features extracted in the tweets. The tweets collected were about government, politics, weather, social media, and public transport that are within 2 to 5 years from the course of this research. English and Filipino tweets classification show significant on results of the experiments done. Each algorithm demonstrates its own distinct weakness and strength in both English and Filipino datasets. It is concluded that expert annotation and balanced dataset plays an important role in the results of sarcasm detection.

References

  1. Rajadesingan, A., Zafarani, R. and Liu, H., 2015. Sarcasm detection on twitter: A behavioral modeling approach. In Proceedings of the Eighth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, (pp. 97--106. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Joshi, A. Sharma, V. and Bhattacharyya, P. 2015. Harnessing context incongruity for sarcasm detection. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 2: Short Papers), Vol. 2, pp. 757--762.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Fersini, E., Pozzi, F.A. and Messina, E., 2015. Detecting irony and sarcasm in microblogs: The role of expressive signals and ensemble classifiers. In IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA), 2015. 36678, pp. 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Barbieri, F. and Saggion, H., 2014. Modelling irony in twitter. In Proceedings of the Student Research Workshop at the 14th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 56--64.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Farías, D.I.H., Sánchez-Vega, F., Montes-y-Gómez, M. and Rosso, P., 2018. INAOE-UPV at SemEval-2018 Task 3: An Ensemble Approach for Irony Detection in Twitter. In Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, pp. 594--599.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Mishra, A., Kanojia, D., Nagar, S., Dey, K. and Bhattacharyya, P., 2017. Harnessing cognitive features for sarcasm detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.05574.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Ptácek, T., Habernal, I. and Hong, J., 2014. Sarcasm Detection on Czech and English Twitter. In COLING, pp. 213--223.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Reyes, A., Rosso, P. and Veale, T., 2013. A multidimensional approach for detecting irony in twitter. Language resources and evaluation, 47(1), pp.239--268. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Bamman, D. and Smith, N.A., 2015, April. Contextualized Sarcasm Detection on Twitter. In ICWSM (pp. 574--577).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Bouazizi, M. and Ohtsuki, T., 2015, December. Sarcasm Detection in Twitter:" All Your Products Are Incredibly Amazing!!!"-Are They Really?. In IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), 2015 IEEE, pp. 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Schifanella, R., de Juan, P., Tetreault, J. and Cao, L., 2016, October. Detecting Sarcasm in Multimodal Social Platforms. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on Multimedia Conference, pp. 1136--1145. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Liebrecht, C.C., Kunneman, F.A. and van den Bosch, A.P.J., 2013. The perfect solution for detecting sarcasm in tweets #not. Balahur, A.; Goot, E. van der; Montoyo, A. (ed.), Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment and Social Media Analysis, pp. 29--37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Maynard, D.G. and Greenwood, M.A., 2014. Who cares about sarcastic tweets? Investigating the impact of sarcasm on sentiment analysis. In LREC 2014 Proceedings. ELRA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Whittaker, E. and Kowalski, R.M., 2015. Cyberbullying via social media. Journal of School Violence, 14(1), pp.11--29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. OMG. Retrieved May 20, 2017 from http://www.macmillandictionary.com/us/buzzword/entries/omg.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. LOL dictionary definition | LOL defined. Retrieved May 20, 2017 from http://www.yourdictionary.com/lolGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Bharti, S.K., Babu, K.S. and Jena, S.K., 2015. Parsing-based sarcasm sentiment recognition in Twitter data. In 2015 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), pp. 1373--1380. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Chatterji, S., Rahul, R.K. and Arora, A., 2015. A hybrid approach for identifying sentiments around aspects. In Recent Trends in Information Systems (ReTIS), 2015 IEEE 2nd International Conference on (pp. 33--37).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Samonte, M.J.C., Garcia, J.M.R., Lucero, V.J.L. and Santos, S.C.B., 2017. Sentiment and opinion analysis on Twitter about local airlines. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Communication and Information Processing, pp. 415--422. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Forslid, E. and Wikén, N., 2015. Automatic irony-and sarcasm detection in Social media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Muhammad, A., Wiratunga, N. and Lothian, R., 2015. Context-aware sentiment analysis of social media. In Advances in Social Media Analysis (pp. 87--104). Springer, Cham.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Anderson, A.A. and Huntington, H.E., 2017. Social Media, Science, and Attack Discourse: How Twitter Discussions of Climate Change Use Sarcasm and Incivility. Science Communication, 39(5), pp.598--620.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Keyling, T. and Jünger, J., 2013. Facepager 3. Tool for Downloading API Data. Online at https://github. com/strohne/Facepager.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Almagrabi, H., Malibari, A. and McNaught, J., 2018. Corpus Analysis and Annotation for Helpful Sentences in Product Reviews. Computer and Information Science, 11(2), p.76.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Potharaju, S.P. and Sreedevi, M., 2017. A Novel Cluster of Feature Selection Method Based on Information Gain. IJCTA, 10(14), pp.9--16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Sentence-Level Sarcasm Detection in English and Filipino Tweets

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICIBE '18: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Industrial and Business Engineering
      October 2018
      303 pages
      ISBN:9781450365574
      DOI:10.1145/3288155

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 24 October 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader