skip to main content
10.1145/3287324.3287426acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Stitching the Loop with Electronic Textiles: Promoting Equity in High School Students' Competencies and Perceptions of Computer Science

Published:22 February 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Many efforts of curricula design have concentrated on expanding participation in K-12 CS education by introducing innovative approaches but few have focused on addressing longstanding equity issues through their choices of culturally relevant materials and activities. In this paper, we describe our efforts in using electronic textiles which include Arduino-based microcontrollers that are sewn with conductive thread on fabrics to connect actuators and sensors and create interactive wearables. We report on the implementation of an electronic textiles curricular unit in the Exploring Computer Science introductory computing course in 13 high schools involving 272 high school students largely from underrepresented groups in a major metropolitan school district. We examined two issues relevant to broadening equitable participation in CS: (1) students' changed perceptions of computing, and (2) students' depth of learning of computing, circuitry and crafting in the final project. Pre/post surveys on students' perceptions of computing showed positive, significant gains in students' self-confidence in solving CS problems, fascination with computing and ability to be creative with computing. Teacher evaluations of students' final projects revealed robust learning in the areas of basic programming and computational circuitry as well as strong learning across more challenging computational concepts, with room for growth. We discuss factors that impacted student outcomes and outline steps for further analysis.

References

  1. Activation Lab. 2018. Retrieved on August 20, 2018 from http://activationlab.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Beth Buchholz, Kate Shively, Kylie Peppler, and Karen Wohlwend. 2014. Hands on, hands off: Gendered access in crafting and electronics practices. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 21, 4, (July 2014) 278--297.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Leah Buechley, Mike Eisenberg, Jaime Catchen, and Ali Crockett. 2008. The LilyPad Arduino: using computational textiles to investigate engagement, aesthetics, and diversity in computer science education. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 423--432. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Leah Buechley and Benjamin Mako Hill. 2010. LilyPad in the wild: how hardware's long tail is supporting new engineering and design communities. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 199--207. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1858171.1858206 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. College Board. 2017. Advanced Placement Computer Science Principles. Retrieved on April 20, 2018 from https://apcentral.collegeboard.org/courses/ap-computer-science-principles.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Jan Cuny. 2015. Transforming K-12 computing education: an update and a call to action. ACM Inroads 6, 3 (August 2015), 54--57. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Leigh Ann Delyser, Joanna Goode, Mark Guzdial, Yasmin Kafai, Aman Yadav. 2018. Priming the computer science teacher pump: Integrating computer science education into schools of education. CSforAll, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ron Eglash, Juan E. Gilbert, and Ellen Foster. 2013. Toward culturally responsive computing education. Commun. ACM 56, 7 (July 2013), 33--36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Deborah A. Fields, Yasmin Kafai, Tomoko Nakajima, Joanna Goode, and Jane Margolis. 2018. Putting Making into High School Computer Science Classrooms: Promoting Equity in Teaching and Learning with Electronic Textiles in Exploring Computer Science. Equity & Excellence in Education, 51, 1 (May 2018): 21--35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Deborah A. Fields, Debora Lui, and Yasmin B. Kafai. 2017. Teaching computational thinking with electronic textiles: High school teachers' contextualizing strategies in Exploring Computer Science. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Thinking Education (CTE '17), The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China, pp. 67--72.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Deborah A. Fields, Debora Lui, and Yasmin B. Kafai, Y. B. (in press). Teaching practices that support iterative design in the electronic textiles Exploring Computer Science unit. In S. C. Hong and H. Abelson (Eds.) Computational Thinking, Education. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Joanna Goode, Gail Chapman, and Jane Margolis. 2012. Beyond curriculum: the exploring computer science program. ACM Inroads 3, 2 (June 2012), 47--53. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Joanna Goode and Jane Margolis. 2011. Exploring Computer Science: A Case Study of School Reform. Trans. Comput. Educ. 11, 2, Article 12 (July 2011), 16 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Joanna Goode, Jane Margolis, and Gail Chapman. 2014. Curriculum is not enough: the educational theory and research foundation of the exploring computer science professional development model. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 493--498. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Gayithri Jayathirtha and Yasmin B. Kafai. (in press). Electronic Textiles in Computer Science Education: A Synthesis of Efforts to Broaden Participation, Increase Interest, and Deepen Learning. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCSE conference (SIGCSE '19). ACM, Minneapolis, MN USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Gayithri Jayathirtha, Deborah A. Fields, and Yasmin B. Kafai. 2018. Computational concepts, practices, and collaboration in high school students' debugging electronic textile projects. Conference Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Thinking Education 2018, Hong Kong: The Education University of Hong Kong.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Yasmin B. Kafai, and Deborah A. Fields. 2018. Some Reflections on Designing Constructionist Activities for Classrooms. In Proceedings of the Constructionism Conference 2018. Vilnius, Lithuania.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Yasmin B. Kafai, Deborah A. Fields, and Kristin A. Searle. 2014. Electronic textiles as disruptive designs in schools: Supporting and challenging maker activities for learning. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 532--556.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Yasmin B. Kafai, Eunkyoung Lee, Kristin Searle, Deborah Fields, Eliot Kaplan, and Debora Lui. 2014. A Crafts-Oriented Approach to Computing in High School: Introducing Computational Concepts, Practices, and Perspectives with Electronic Textiles. Trans. Comput. Educ. 14, 1, Article 1 (March 2014), 20 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Victor R. Lee and Deborah A. Fields. 2017. Changes in undergraduate student competencies in the areas of circuitry, crafting, and computation after a course using e-textiles. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 34, 5 (2017), 372--384.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Breanne. K. Litts, Yasmin B. Kafai, Debora A. Lui, Justice T. Walker, and Sari A. Widman. 2017. Stitching Codeable Circuits: High School Students' Learning About Circuitry and Coding with Electronic Textiles. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26, 5 (May 2017), 494--507.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Debora Lui, Justice T. Walker, Sherry Hanna, Yasmin B. Kafai, Deborah A. Fields, & Gayithri Jayathirtha, (in press). Communicating computational concepts and practices within high school students' portfolios of making electronic textiles. Interactive Learning Environments.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Jane Margolis, Rachel Estrella, Joanna Goode, Jennifer J. Holme, & Kimberly Nao. 2017. Stuck in the Shallow End: Education, Race and Computing, updated ed. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Steven McGee, Randi McGee-Tekula, Jennifer Duck, Catherine McGee, Lucia Dettori, Ronald I. Greenberg, Eric Snow, Daisy Rutstein, Dale Reed, Brenda Wilkerson, Don Yanek, Andrew M. Rasmussen, and Dennis Brylow. 2018. Equal Outcomes 4 All: A Study of Student Learning in ECS. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 50--55. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Douglas L. Medin, and Megan Bang. 2014. Who's asking?: Native science, western science, and science education. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Moore, D. W., Bathgate, M. E., Chung, J., & Cannady, M. A. (2011). Technical report: Measuring activation and engagement; Activation Lab, Enables Success Study. Retrieved July 21, 2018 from http://activationlab.org/wp-content/resources/aera2013/aera_research/AERA_2013_0_1_ALES2011_TechReport.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. David. B. Palumbo. 1990. Programming language/problem-solving research: A review of relevant issues. Review of Educational Research, 60, 1 (March 1990), 65--89.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Rozsika Parker. 1984. The subversive stitch: Embroidery and the making of the feminine. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Kylie Peppler and Diane Glosson. 2013. Stitching circuits: Learning about circuitry through e-textile materials. Journal of Science Education and Technology 22, 5 (2013), 751--763.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Alexander Repenning, David Webb, and Andri Ioannidou. 2010. Scalable game design and the development of a checklist for getting computational thinking into public schools. In Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 265--269. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Mike Rose. 2014. Why school? Reclaiming education for all of us. The New Press, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Emmanuel Schanzer, Kathi Fisler, Shriram Krishnamurthi, and Matthias Felleisen. 2015. Transferring Skills at Solving Word Problems from Computing to Algebra Through Bootstrap. In Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 616--621. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Kimberly A. Scott, Kimberly M. Sheridan, and Kevin Clark. 2014. Culturally responsive computing: a theory revisited. Learning, Media and Technology 40, 4 (June 2014), 412--436.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Mia S. Shaw, Deborah A. Fields, and Yasmin B. Kafai, Y. B. (under review). Crafting identities: Portfolios as meta-artifacts for narrating selves in portfolios in an e-textiles class.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Susan A. Yoon, Emma Anderson, Jessica Koehler-Yom, Chad Evans, Miyoung Park, Josh Sheldon, Ilana Schoenfeld, Daniel Wendel, Hal Scheintaub, and Eric Klopfer. Teaching about complex systems is no simple matter: building effective professional development for computer-supported complex systems instruction. Instructional Science 45, 1 (Feb. 2017), 99--121.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Stitching the Loop with Electronic Textiles: Promoting Equity in High School Students' Competencies and Perceptions of Computer Science

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SIGCSE '19: Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
          February 2019
          1364 pages
          ISBN:9781450358903
          DOI:10.1145/3287324

          Copyright © 2019 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 22 February 2019

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          SIGCSE '19 Paper Acceptance Rate169of526submissions,32%Overall Acceptance Rate1,595of4,542submissions,35%

          Upcoming Conference

          SIGCSE Virtual 2024
          SIGCSE Virtual 2024: ACM Virtual Global Computing Education Conference
          November 30 - December 1, 2024
          Virtual Event , USA

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader