skip to main content
10.1145/3279720.3279737acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pageskoli-callingConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Drafting a Data Science Curriculum for Secondary Schools

Published:22 November 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Data science as the art of generating information and knowledge from data is increasingly becoming an important part of most operational processes. But up to now, data science is hardly an issue in German computer science education at secondary schools. For this reason, we are developing a data science curriculum for German secondary schools, which first guidelines and ideas we present in this paper. The curriculum is designed as interdisciplinary approach between maths and computer science education, with also a strong focus on societal aspects. After a brief discussion of important concepts and challenges in data science, a first draft of the curriculum and an outline of a data science course for upper secondary schools accompanying the development are presented.

References

  1. Rolf Biehler, Lea Budde, Daniel Frischemeier, Birte Heinemann, Susanne Podworny, Carsten Schulte, and Thomas Wassong (Eds.). 2018. Paderbon Symposium on Data Science Education at School Level 2017: The Collected Extended Abstracts. Universitätsbibliothek Paderborn.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Syed Ahsan and Abad Shah. 2006. Data, information, knowledge, wisdom: A doubly linked chain. In the proceedings of the 2006 international conference on information knowledge engineering. Citeseer, 270--278.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Scrum Alliance. 2015. The 2015 State of Scrum Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Paul Anderson, James Bowring, Renée McCauley, George Pothering, and Christopher Starr. 2014. An undergraduate degree in data science: curriculum and a decade of implementation experience. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education. ACM, New York, 145--150. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Phillipa Arnold. 2013. Statistical investigative questions - An enquiry into posing and answering investigative questions from existing data. Ph.D. Dissertation. The University of Auckland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Elena Bender, Niclas Schaper, Michael E. Caspersen, Melanie Margaritis, and Peter Hubwieser. 2016. Identifying and formulating teachers' beliefs and motivational orientations for computer science teacher education. Studies in Higher Education 41, 11 (2016), 1958--1973.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Michael R. Berthold, Christian Borgelt, Frank Höppner, and Frank Klawonn. 2010. Guide to intelligent data analysis: how to intelligently make sense of real data. Springer Science & Business Media, London. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Torsten Brinda, Hermann Puhlmann, and Carsten Schulte. 2009. Bridging ICT and CS: educational standards for computer science in lower secondary education. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 41, 3 (2009), 288--292. 00034. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Gail Burrill and Rolf Biehler. 2011. Fundamental Statistical Ideas in the School Curriculum and in Training Teachers. Vol. 14. Springer, London, 57--69.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. George W. Cobb and David S. Moore. 1997. Mathematics, statistics, and teaching. The American Mathematical Monthly 104, 9 (1997), 801--823.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Paul Cobb, Jere Confrey, Andrea diSessa, Richard Lehrer, and Leona Schauble. 2003. Design Experiments in Educational Research. Educational Researcher 32, 1 (2003), 9--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Paul Curzon. 2016. Brain in a Bag, A CS4FN Computing Acivity. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lux_ybamClU. Accessed: 2018-06-15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Richard D De Veaux, Mahesh Agarwal, Maia Averett, Benjamin S Baumer, Andrew Bray, Thomas C Bressoud, Lance Bryant, Lei Z Cheng, Amanda Francis, Robert Gould, et al. 2017. Curriculum guidelines for undergraduate programs in data science. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application 4 (2017), 15--30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Boris Delibašić, Milan Vukićević, Miloš Jovanović, and Milija Suknović. 2013. White-Box or Black-Box Decision Tree Algorithms: Which to Use in Education? IEEE Transactions on Education 56, 3 (Aug 2013), 287--291. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Yuri Demchenko, Adam Belloum, Wouter Los, Tomasz Wiktorski, Andrea Manieri, Holger Brocks, Jana Becker, Dominic Heutelbeck, Matthias Hemmje, and Steve Brewer. 2016. EDISON Data Science Framework: A Foundation for Building Data Science Profession for Research and Industry. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science (CloudCom). 620--626.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Jan H. van Driel, Astrid M. W. Bulte, and Nico Verloop. 2008. Using the curriculum emphasis concept to investigate teachers' curricular beliefs in the context of educational reform. 40, 1 (2008), 107--122. 00071.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Joachim Engel. 2017. Statistical literacy for active citizenship: A call for data science education. Statistics Education Research Journal 16, 1 (2017), 44--49.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Tim Erickson, Bill Finzer, Frieda Reichsman, and Michelle Wilkerson. 2018. Data Moves: one key to data science at school level. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Teaching Statistics (ICOTS-10). 6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Carl Benedikt Frey and Michael A. Osborne. 2017. The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change 114 (2017), 254--280.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Andreas Grillenberger and Ralf Romeike. 2017. Key concepts of data management: an empirical approach. In Proceedings of the 17th Koli Calling Conference on Computing Education Research, Mike Suero Montero, Calkin; Joy (Ed.). ACM, New York, 30--39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Yuval Noah Harari. 2017. Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow. Vintage, London.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Yann LeCun, Corinna Cortes, and Christopher J.C. Burges. 1998. MNIST handwritten digit database. http://yann.lecun.com/exdb/mnist/. Accessed: 2018-06-15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Andrea Manieri, Steve Brewer, Ruben Riestra, Yuri Demchenko, Matthias Hemmje, Tomasz Wiktorski, Tiziana Ferrari, and Jeremy Frey. 2015. Data Science Professional uncovered: How the EDISON Project will contribute to a widely accepted profile for Data Scientists. In Cloud Computing Technology and Science (CloudCom), 2015 IEEE 7th International Conference on. IEEE, 588--593. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Silvija Markic, Ingo Eilks, Jan van Driel, and Bernd Ralle. 2009. Vorstellungen deutscher Chemielehrkräfte über die Bedeutung und Ausrichtung des Chemielernens. CHEMKON 16, 2 (2009), 90--95.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Ben Pring, Robert H. Brown, Euan Davis, Manish Bahl, and Michael Cook. 2017. 21 jobs of the future.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Jim Ridgway. 2016. Implications of the Data Revolution for Statistics Education. International Statistical Review 84, 3 (2016), 528--549.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Chantel Ridsdale, James Rothwell, Michael Smit, Hossam Ali-Hassan, Michael Bliemel, Dean Irvine, Daniel Kelley, Stan Matwin, and Bradley Wuetherick. 2015. Strategies and best practices for data literacy education: knowledge synthesis report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Jennifer Rowley. 2007. The wisdom hierarchy: representations of the DIKW hierarchy. Journal of Information Science 33, 2 (2007), 163--180. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Sue Sentance, Erik Barendsen, and Carsten Schulte. 2018. Computer Science Education: Perspectives on Teaching and learning in school. Bloomsbury Academic, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Matti Tedre and Peter J. Denning. 2016. The Long Quest for Computational Thinking. In Proceedings of the 16th Koli Calling Int. Conference on Computing Education Research (Koli Calling '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 120--129. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Annette Thijs and Jan van den Akker. 2009. Curriculum in development. SLO - Netherlands Institute for curriculum development.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Jan Alexander Wirwahn and Thomas Bartoschek. 2015. Usability Engineering For Successful Open Citizen Science. Free and Open Source Software for Geospatial (FOSS4G) Conference Proceedings 15, 1 (2015), 54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Drafting a Data Science Curriculum for Secondary Schools

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      Koli Calling '18: Proceedings of the 18th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research
      November 2018
      207 pages
      ISBN:9781450365352
      DOI:10.1145/3279720
      • Conference Chairs:
      • Mike Joy,
      • Petri Ihantola

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 November 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate80of182submissions,44%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader