skip to main content
10.1145/3278721.3278760acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaiesConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Jill Watson Doesn't Care if You're Pregnant: Grounding AI Ethics in Empirical Studies

Published:27 December 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Jill Watson is our name for a virtual teaching assistant for a Georgia Tech course on artificial intelligence: Jill answers routine, frequently asked questions on the class discussion forum. In this paper, we outline some of the ethical issues that arose in the development and deployment of the virtual teaching assistant. We posit that experiments such as Jill Watson are critical for deeply understanding AI ethics.

References

  1. Simon Baron-Cohen, Sally Wheelwright, Jacqueline Hill, Yogini Raste, and Ian Plumb. 2001. The ?Reading the Mind in the Eyes" Test Revised Version: A Study with Normal Adults, and Adults with Asperger Syndrome or High-functioning Autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry , Vol. 42, 2 (2001), 241--251.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Douglas Belkin. 2013. College Offers Online Master's Degree for $6,000. https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887324031404578483670125295836 Accessed: 2017--11--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bobbie Eicher, Kathryn Cunningham, Sydni Peterson Marissa Gonzales, and Ashok Goel. 2017. Toward Mutual Theory of Mind as a Foundation for Co-Creation. Presented to the International Conference on Computational Creativity, Co-Creation Workshop, June 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. David Engel, Anita Williams Woolley, Lisa X. Jing, Christopher F. Chabris, and Thomas W. Malone. 2014. Reading the Mind in the Eyes or Reading between the Lines? Theory of Mind Predicts Collective Intelligence Equally Well Online and Face-To-Face. PLoS ONE , Vol. 9, 12 (2014), 1 -- 16. http://prx.library.gatech.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=100187217&site=ehost-liveGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Orin Etzioni. 2017. How to Regulate Artificial Intelligence. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/01/opinion/artificial-intelligence-regulations-rules.html . Accessed: 2017--10--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Georgia Tech 2017. The Numbers. https://www.omscs.gatech.edu/prospective-students/numbers. Accessed: 2017-10-27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Jim Giles. 2012. Why Google will soon answer your questions directly. https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21428676--400-why-google-will-soon-answer-your-questions-directly/. Accessed: 2017--10--29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ashok Goel and David Joyner. 2016. An Experiment in Teaching Artificial Intelligence Online. Journal for Scholarship of Technology-Enhanced Learning , Vol. 1, 1 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Ashok Goel and David Joyner. 2017. Using AI to Teach AI . AI Magazine , Vol. 38, 2 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Ashok Goel and Lalith Polepeddi. 2017. Jill Watson: A Virtual Teaching Assisant for Online Education. Presented to the Learning Engineering for Online Learning Workshop, Harvard University, June 2017. To appear as a chapter in Dede, C., Richards, J., & Saxberg, B., Editors (in preparation), Education at scale: Engineering online teaching and learning. NY: Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Judy Goldsmith and Emanuelle Burton. 2017. Why Teaching Ethics to AI Practitioners Is Important. https://aaai.org/ocs/index.php/WS/AAAIW17/paper/view/15210/14652 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Joshua Goodman, Julia Melkers, and Amanda Pallais. 2016. Can Online Delivery Increase Access to Education? Technical Report. Harvard University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Jason Maderer. 2016. Artificial Intelligence Course Creates AI Teaching Assistant. http://www.news.gatech.edu/2016/05/09/artificial-intelligence-course-creates-ai-teaching-assistant Accessed: 2017--11--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. John Markoff. 2017. Automated Pro-Trump Bots Overwhelmed Pro-Clinton Messages, Researchers Say. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/18/technology/automated-pro-trump-bots-overwhelmed-pro-clinton-messages-researchers-say.html . Accessed: 2017--11--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Paul Miller. 2016. Professor Pranksman fools his students with a TA powered by IBM's Watson . https://www.theverge.com/2016/5/6/11612520/ta-powered-by-ibm-watson . (Accessed 2017--10--27).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Clifford Nass and Youngme Moon. 2000. Machines and Mindlessness: Social Responses to Computers. Journal of Social Issues , Vol. 56, 1 (2000), 81--103.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Linda J Sax. {n. d.}. Cracking the Code: Making the CS Degree Accessible for All Students. http://womenintech.ucla.edu/articles/cracking-code-making-cs-degree-accessible-all-studentsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Marisa Schultz. 2017. Twitter uncovered more than 200 Russia-linked bots. http://nypost.com/2017/09/28/twitter-uncovered-more-than-200-russia-linked-bots/. Accessed: 2017--10--29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Herbert A. Simon. 1995. Artificial intelligence: an empirical science. Artificial Intelligence , Vol. 77, 1 (1995), 95--127. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Joy Teague. 2002. Women in computing: what brings them to it, what keeps them in it? ACM SIGCSE Bulletin , Vol. 34, 2 (June 2002), 147--158. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Jill Watson Doesn't Care if You're Pregnant: Grounding AI Ethics in Empirical Studies

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          AIES '18: Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society
          December 2018
          406 pages
          ISBN:9781450360128
          DOI:10.1145/3278721

          Copyright © 2018 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 27 December 2018

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          AIES '18 Paper Acceptance Rate61of162submissions,38%Overall Acceptance Rate61of162submissions,38%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader