skip to main content
research-article
Public Access

Personal Curation in a Museum

Published:01 November 2018Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

An established body of work in CSCW and related communities studies social and cooperative interaction in museums and cultural heritage sites. A separate and growing body of research in these same communities is developing ways to understand the design and use of social media from a curating perspective. A curating perspective focuses on how social media is designed and used by people to develop and manage their own digital archives. This paper uses a cultural heritage museum as the empirical basis and setting along with new information visualization methods we have developed to better integrate these bodies of work and introduce the concept of personal curation; a socio-technical practice in which people collect, edit, and share information using personal information devices and social media as they move through physical environments rich with meaning potential. In doing so this paper makes three contributions. First, it illustrates how to combine a spatial focus on people's movement and interaction through the physical environment with an analysis of social media use in order to gain a deeper understanding of practices such as personal curation. Second, it shows in greater detail how visitors to museums and cultural heritage sites use and link digital information with physical information to shape others' understandings of cultural heritage. Third, it suggests how museums and cultural heritage sites may leverage personal curation to support more expansive learning opportunities for visitors.

References

  1. S. Allen. 2002. Looking for learning in visitor talk: A methodological exploration. In Learning Conversations in Museums, G Leinhardt, K. Crowley and K. Knutson (Eds.), Learning conversations in museums, 259--303.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. L. B. Allen and K. Crowley. 2017. Moving beyond scientific knowledge: Leveraging participation, relevance, and interconnectedness for climate education. International Journal of Global Warming, 12(3 & 4), 299--312.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. S. Bayne, J. Ross, and Z. Williamson. 2009. Objects, subjects, bits and bytes: learning from the digital collections of the National Museums. Museum and Society 7(2), 110--124.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. S. Bitgood. 2000. The role of attention in designing effective interpretive labels. Journal of Interpretation Research, 5(2), 31--45.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. S. Bitgood. 2006. An analysis of visitor circulation: movement patterns and the general value principle. Curator: The Museum Journal, 49(4), 463--475.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Magdalena Blöckner, Svetlana Danti, Jennifer Forrai, Gregor Broll, and Alexander De Luca. 2009. Please touch the exhibits!: using NFC-based interaction for exploring a museum. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. T. Boon. 2011. Co-Curation and the Public History of Science and Technology. Curator: The Museum Journal, 54(4), 383--387.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. D. Boyd, and N. Ellison. 2007. Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 13(1): 210--230. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. A. S. Bruckman, C. Fiesler, J. Hancock, and C. Munteanu. 2017. CSCW Research Ethics Town Hall: Working Towards Community Norms. In Companion of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17 Companion). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 113--115. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. S. Chang, V. Kumar, E. Gilbert, and L. G. Terveen. 2014. Specialization, homophily, and gender in a social curation site: findings from pinterest. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. ACM, 674--686. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. K. Charmaz. 2006. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. D. Christidou. Art on the move: The role of joint attention in visitors' encounters with artworks. 2018. Journal of Learning, Culture and Social Interaction.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. L. Ciolfi. 2013. The collaborative work of heritage : open challenges for CSCW. In: Bertelson, Olav W., Ciolfi, Luigina, GRASSO, Maria Antonietta and Papadopoulos, George Angelos, (Eds.), ECSCW 2013: Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. London, Springer, 83--101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. K. Crowley and M. Jacobs. 2002. Building islands of expertise in everyday family activity. In G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley, and K. Knutson (Eds.), Learning conversations in museums (pp. 333--356). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. E. Dawson and E. Jensen. 2011. Towards a contextual turn in visitor studies: evaluating visitor segmentation and identity-related motivations. Visitor Studies, 14, 127--140.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. M. A. DeVito, J. Birnholtz, and J. T. Hancock. 2017. Platforms, People, and Perception: Using Affordances to Understand Self-Presentation on Social Media. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 740--754. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. K.M. Ellenbogen, J.J. Luke, and L.D. Dierking. 2004. Family learning research in museums: An emerging disciplinary matrix? Science Education, 88(S1), S48-S58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. N. B. Ellison and D. Boyd. 2013. Sociality through Social Network Sites. In Dutton, W. H. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 151--172.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. N. B. Ellison, C. Steinfield, and C. Lampe. 2011. Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media and Society, 13(6), 873--892.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. N. B. Ellison, R. Heino, and J. Gibbs. 2006. Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 415--441.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. M. Eslami et al. 2015. "I Always Assumed That I Wasn't Really That Close to {Her}": Reasoning About Invisible Algorithms in News Feeds. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, 153--162. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. J.H. Falk and L.D. Dierking. 1992. The Museum Experience, Whalesback Books, Washington.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. C. Fiesler, A. Young, T. Peyton, A. S. Bruckman, Mary Gray, Jeff Hancock, and Wayne Lutters. 2015. Ethics for Studying Online Sociotechnical Systems in a Big Data World. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference Companion on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW'15 Companion). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 289--292. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. A. Fletcher and M. J. Lee. 2012. Current social media uses and evaluations in American museums. Museum Management and Curatorship, 27(5), 505--521.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. L. Fosh, S. Benford, and B. Koleva. 2016. Supporting Group Coherence in a Museum Visit. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. H. Fuks et al. 2012. Collaborative museums: an approach to co-design. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 681--684. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. E. Giaccardi. 2012. Heritage and social media: Understanding heritage in a participatory culture, Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. B.G. Glaser and A.L. Strauss. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. K.D. Good. 2013. From scrapbook to Facebook: A history of personal media assemblage and archives. New Media and Society, 15(4), 557--573.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. R. E. Grinter et al. 2002. Revisiting the visit: understanding how technology can shape the museum visit, In Proceedings of the ACM 2002 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '02). ACM, New York, 146--155. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. T. Hagerstrand. 1970. What about people in regional science? Papers in regional science, 24(1), 7--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. R. Hall, and R. Stevens. 2015. Interaction analysis approaches to knowledge in use. Knowledge and Interaction: A Synthetic Agenda for the Learning Sciences, 72--108.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. C. Heath and D. vom Lehn. 2008. Configuring 'Interactivity' enhancing engagement in science centres and museums. Social Studies of Science, 38(1), 63--91.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. B. Hogan. 2010. The presentation of self in the age of social media: distinguishing performances and exhibitions online. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 30, 377--386.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Y. L. Huang, K. Starbird, M. Orand, S. A. Stanek, and H. T. Pedersen. 2015. Connected Through Crisis: Emotional Proximity and the Spread of Misinformation Online. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 969--980. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. M. Ito et al. 2013. Connected learning: An agenda for research and design. Digital Media and Learning Research Hub.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. B. Jordan and A. Henderson. 1995. Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The journal of the learning sciences, 4(1), 39--103.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. D. Merritt, J. Jones, M. S. Ackerman, and W. S. Lasecki. 2017. Kurator: Using The Crowd to Help Families With Personal Curation Tasks. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1835--1849. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. J. Lanir, T. Kuflik, J. Sheidin, N. Yavin, K. Leiderman, and M. Segal. 2017. Visualizing museum visitors' behavior: Where do they go and what do they do there? Personal Ubiquitous Computing, 21(2), 313--326. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. J. Lave, M. Murtaugh, and O. de la Rocha. 1984. The dialectics of arithmetic in grocery shopping. In B. Rogoff and J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 67--94). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. S. Lindley, C. C. Marshall, R. Banks, A. Sellen, and T. Regan. 2013. Rethinking the web as a personal archive. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web (WWW '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 749--760. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. J. Kaye et al. 2006. To have and to hold: exploring the personal archive. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '06), 275--284. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. S.B. Liu. 2010. Trends in Distributed Curatorial Technology to Manage Data Deluge in a Networked World. The European Journal for the Informatics Professional, XI(4).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. C. Marshall, R. McCown, and M.L., Nelson. 2007. Evaluating personal archiving strategies for internet-based information. In Proc. Archiving, 151- 56.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. A. E. Marwick and D. Boyd. 2010. I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media and Society, 13(1), 114--133.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. W. Odom, A. Sellen, R. Harper and E. Thereska. Lost in translation: Understanding the possession of digital things in the cloud. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12), 781--790. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. K. O'Hara, T. Kindberg, M. Glancy, L. Baptista, B. Sukumaran, G. Kahana, and J. Rowbotham. 2007. Social practices in location-based collecting. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1225--1234. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. R. Parry (Ed.). 2010. Museums in a Digital Age. New York, NY, Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. E. Rader and R. Gray. 2015. Understanding User Beliefs About Algorithmic Curation in the Facebook News Feed. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, 173--182. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. S. Reeves and B. Brown. 2016. Embeddedness and sequentiality in social media. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1052--1064. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. J. Roberts and L. Lyons. 2017. The value of learning talk: applying a novel dialogue scoring method to inform interaction design in an open-ended, embodied museum exhibit. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 12(4), 343--376.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. S. M. Rowe, J. V. Wertsch, and T. Y. Kosyaeva. 2002. Linking Little Narratives to Big Ones: Narrative and Public Memory in History Museums. Culture and Psychology, 8(1), 96--112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. L. Schauble, G. Leinhardt, and Laura Martin. 1997. A framework for organizing a cumulative research agenda in informal learning contexts. Journal of Museum Education, 22, 3--7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. R. Schwartz and G. R. Halegoua. 2014. The spatial self: Location-based identity performance on social media. New Media and Society, 17(10), 1643--1660.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. B. Serrell. 1994. The Question of Visitor Styles. In: S. Bitgood (Ed.). Visitor Studies: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6(1), 48--53. Jacksonville AL.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. B.R. Shapiro, R. Hall, and D. Owens. 2017. Developing and Using Interaction Geography in a Museum. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 12(4), 377--399.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. B.R. Shapiro and R. Hall. 2017. Making Engagement Visible: The Use of Mondrian Transcripts in a Museum. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference for Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, (Vol. 1, pp. 33--40). Philadelphia, PA: International Society of the Learning Sciences.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. B.R. Shapiro and Francis A. Pearman II. 2017. Using the Interaction Geography Slicer to Visualize New York City Stop and Frisk. In Proceedings of the IEEE VIS 2017 Arts Program, VISAP'17. Phoenix, AZ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. B.R. Shapiro. 2017. Using Space Time Visualization in Learning Environment Design. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '17). ACM, Denver, CO, USA. 178--183. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. L. F. Smith, J. K. Smith, P. P. L. Tinio. 2017. Time spent viewing art and reading labels. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(1), 77--85.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. R. Steier. 2014. Posing the question: Visitor posing as embodied interpretation in an art museum. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 21(2), 148--170.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. P. Tolmie, S. Benford, C. Greenhalgh, T. Rodden, and S. Reeves. 2014. Supporting group interactions in museum visiting. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work and social computing. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1049--1059. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. K. Tzortzi. 2014. Movement in museums: mediating between museum intent and visitor experience. Museum Management and Curatorship, 29(4), 327--348.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. N.A. Van House. 2011. Personal photography, digital technologies and the uses of the visual. Visual Studies, 26(2), 125--134.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. D. vom Lehn, C. Heath, and J. Hindmarsh. 2002. Exhibiting Interaction: Conduct and Collaboration in Museums and Galleries. Symbolic Interaction, 24(2), 189--216.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Y. Wang, M. Niiya, G. Mark, S. Reich, and M. Warschauer. 2015. Coming of age (digitally): An ecological view of social media use among college students. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work and social computing. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 571--582. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. R. D. Watkins, A. Sellen, and S. E. Lindley. 2015. Digital collections and digital collecting practices. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15), 3423--3432. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. R. Wilken. 2015. Mobile media and ecologies of location. Communication Research and Practice, 1, 42--57.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. S. S. Yalowitz, K. Bronnenkant. 2009. Timing and tracking: unlocking visitor behavior. Visitor Studies, 12, 47--64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. X. Zhao and S. Lindley. 2014. Curation through use: Understanding the personal value of social media. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2431--2440. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. X. Zhao, N. Salehi, S. Naranjit, S. Alwaalan, S. Voida, and D. Cosley. 2013. The many faces of Facebook: Experiencing social media as performance, exhibition, and personal archive. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Personal Curation in a Museum

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader