skip to main content
research-article

People Tend to Wind Down, Not Up, When They Browse Social Media

Published:01 November 2018Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Researchers have focused intensively on the emotional effects of browsing social media, with many emphasizing possible negative effects and others suggesting the positive emotions in status updates are contagious. Despite this focus, however, very few studies have investigated the actual emotional experience of browsing social media in the moment, and none with more than a few emotions, making it difficult to understand the effects research should endeavor to explain. To address this gap, I use experience sampling with diverse samples of Facebook (N = 362) and Twitter (N = 416) users, assessing the browsing experience across a wide range of emotions. Surprisingly, results provide little evidence of robust positive or negative effects, suggesting instead that the primary effect of browsing social media is a lessening of arousal. That is, contrary to stereotype, people tend to wind down - feel more relaxed, sleepy, bored and so on - not wind up.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Emma K. Adam. 2005. Momentary emotion and cortisol levels in the everyday lives of working parents. In B. Schneider, & L. J. Waite (Eds.), Being together, working apart: Dual-career families and the work-life balance. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 105--133.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Lisa G. Aspinwall and Shelley E. Taylor. 1993. Effects of social comparison direction, threat, and self-esteem on affect, self-evaluation, and expected success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64, 5: 708--722.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Lars Backstrom. 2013. News Feed FYI: A window into News Feed. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/business/news/News-Feed-FYI-A-Window-Into-News-FeedGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Lisa Feldman Barrett. 2009. Variety is the spice of life: A psychological construction approach to understanding variability in emotion. Cognition & Emotion 23, 7: 1284--1306.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Lisa Feldman Barrett, Eliza Bliss-Moreau, Seth L. Duncan, Scott L. Rauch, and Christopher I. Wright. 2007. The amygdala and the experience of affect. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 2, 2: 73--83.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Lisa Feldman Barrett and Thyra Fossum. 2001. Mental representations of affect knowledge. Cognition and Emotion 15, 3: 333--363.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Lisa Feldman Barrett and Paula M. Niedenthal. 2004. Valence focus and the perception of facial affect. Emotion 4, 3: 266--274.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Lisa Feldman Barrett and James A. Russell. 1998. Independence and bipolarity in the structure of current affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74, 4: 967--984.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Jonah Berger. 2011. Arousal increases social transmission of information. Psychological Science 22, 7: 891--893.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Jonah Berger and Katherine L. Milkman. 2012. What makes online content viral? Journal of Marketing Research 49, 2: 192--205.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. danah boyd. 2014. It's complicated: the social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jonathon D. Brown, Natalie J. Novick, Kelley A. Lord, and Jane M. Richards. 1992. When Gulliver travels: Social context, psychological closeness, and self-appraisals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 62, 5: 717--727.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Moira Burke. 2011. Reading, writing, relationships: The impact of social network sites on relationships and well-being. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. Retrieved from http://repository.cmu.edu/dissertations/185Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Moira Burke and Mike Develin. 2016. Once more with feeling: Supportive responses to social sharing on Facebook. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing - CSCW '16, 1460--1472. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Moira Burke and Robert Kraut. 2013. Using Facebook after losing a job: Differential benefits of strong and weak ties. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work - CSCW '13, 1419. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Moira Burke and Robert E. Kraut. 2014. Growing closer on Facebook: Changes in tie strength through social network site use. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '14, 4187--4196. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Moira Burke and Robert E. Kraut. 2016. The relationship between Facebook use and well-being depends on communication type and tie strength. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 21, 4: 265--281. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Moira Burke, Robert Kraut, and Cameron Marlow. 2011. Social capital on Facebook: Differentiating uses and users. In Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '11, 571. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Thomas F. Cash, Diane Walker Cash, and Jonathan W. Butters. 1983. "Mirror, mirror, on the wall...?": Contrast effects and self-evaluations of physical attractiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 9, 3: 351--358.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Hui-Tzu Grace Chou and Nicholas Edge. 2012. "They are happier and having better lives than I am": The impact of using Facebook on perceptions of others' lives. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 15, 2: 117--121.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Tamlin Conner and Lisa Feldman Barrett. 2005. Implicit self-attitudes predict spontaneous affect in daily life. Emotion 5, 4: 476--488.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi and Jeremy Hunter. 2003. Happiness in everyday life: The uses of experience sampling. Journal of Happiness Studies 4, 2: 185--199.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi and Reed Larson. 1987. Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 175, 9: 526--536.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Jan-Emmanuel De Neve, Ed Diener, Louis Tay, and Cody Xuereb. 2013. The objective benefits of subjective well-being. In J. Helliwell, R. Layard, & J. Sachs (Eds.), World happiness report. Sustainable Development Solutions Network, New York, NY, 54--79.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Ed Diener, Robert A. Emmons, Randy J. Larsen, and Sharon Griffin. 1985. The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment 49, 1: 71--75.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Ed Diener, Satoshi Kanazawa, Eunkook M. Suh, and Shigehiro Oishi. 2015. Why people are in a generally good mood. Personality and Social Psychology Review 19, 3: 235--256.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Ed Diener, Shigehiro Oishi, and Richard Lucas. 2009. Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and life satisfaction. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 185--194.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Thomas Dohmen, Armin Falk, Klaus Fliessbach, Uwe Sunde, and Bernd Weber. 2011. Relative versus absolute income, joy of winning, and gender: Brain imaging evidence. Journal of Public Economics 95, 3--4: 279--285.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. William W. Eaton, Corey Smith, Michele Ybarra, Carles Muntaner, and Allen Tien. Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale: Review and revision (CESD and CESD-R). In M. E. Maruish (Ed.), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 363--377.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Amir Efrati. 2016. Facebook Struggles to Stop Decline in "Original" Sharing. The Information. Retrieved from https://www.theinformation.com/facebook-struggles-to-stop-decline-in-original-sharingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Panteleimon Ekkekakis. 2013. The measurement of affect, mood, and emotion: A guide for health-behavioral research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK; New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Paul Ekman. 1992. An argument for basic emotions. Cognition and Emotion 6, 3--4: 169--200.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Paul Ekman. 1999. Basic emotions. In T. Dalgleish & M. Power (Eds.), Handbook of Cognition and Emotion. John Wiley & Sons, Sussex, U.K., 45--60.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Sonja Entringer, Claudia Buss, Judith Andersen, Aleksandra Chicz-DeMet, and Pathik D. Wadhwa. 2011. Ecological momentary assessment of maternal cortisol profiles over a multiple-day period predicts the length of human gestation. Psychosomatic Medicine 73, 6: 469--474.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Leon Festinger. 1954. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations 7, 2: 117--140.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Jesse Fox and Jennifer J. Moreland. 2015. The dark side of social networking sites: An exploration of the relational and psychological stressors associated with Facebook use and affordances. Computers in Human Behavior 45: 168--176. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Barbara L. Fredrickson. 2001. The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist 56, 3: 218--226.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. David Ginsberg and Moira Burke. 2017. Hard questions: Is spending time on social media bad for us? Retrieved from https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2017/12/hard-questions-is-spending-time-on-social-media-bad-for-us/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Shannon Greenwood, Andrew Perrin, and Maeve Duggan. 2016. Social media update 2016: Facebook usage and engagement is on the rise, while adoption of other platforms holds steady. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/11/11/social-media-update-2016Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. June Gruber, Iris B. Mauss, and Maya Tamir. 2011. A dark side of happiness? How, when, and why happiness is not always good. Perspectives on Psychological Science 6, 3: 222--233.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Michael R. Hagerty. 2000. Social comparisons of income in one's community: Evidence from national surveys of income and happiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78, 4: 764--771.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Joel M. Hektner, Jennifer A. Schmidt, and Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. 2007. Experience sampling method: measuring the quality of everyday life. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Christian Hinsch and Kennon M. Sheldon. 2013. The impact of frequent social Internet consumption: Increased procrastination and lower life satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 12, 6: 496--505.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Marlin C. Hoover. 1983. Individual differences in the relation of heart rate to self-reports. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Daniel Kahneman and Alan B. Krueger. 2006. Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives 20, 1: 3--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Daniel Kahneman, Alan B. Krueger, David A. Schkade, Norbert Schwarz, and Arthur A. Stone. 2004. A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The Day Reconstruction Method. Science 306, 5702: 1776--1780.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Adam D. I. Kramer, Jamie E. Guillory, and Jeffrey T. Hancock. 2014. Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, 24: 8788--8790.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Hanna Krasnova, Helena Wenninger, Thomas Widjaja, and Peter Buxmann. 2013. Envy on Facebook: A hidden threat to users' life satisfaction? In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Hanna Krasnova, Thomas Widjaja, Peter Buxmann, Helena Wenninger, and Izak Benbasat. 2015. Why following friends can hurt you: An exploratory investigation of the effects of envy on social networking sites among college-age users. Information Systems Research 26, 3: 585--605. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Ethan Kross, Philippe Verduyn, Emre Demiralp, Jiyoung Park, David Seungjae Lee, Natalie Lin, Holly Shablack, John Jonides, and Oscar Ybarra. 2013. Facebook use predicts declines in subjective well-being in young adults. PLoS ONE 8, 8: e69841.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Richard J. Larsen and Ed Diener. 1992. Promises and problems with the circumplex model of emotion. In M. S. Clark (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology: Emotion. Sage, Newbury Park, CA, 25--59.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Joseph E. LeDoux. 2014. Comment: What's basic about the brain mechanisms of emotion? Emotion Review 6, 4: 318--320.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Sang Yup Lee. 2014. How do people compare themselves with others on social network sites? The case of Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior 32: 253--260.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Paul Lewis. 2017. "Our minds can be hijacked": The tech insiders who fear a smartphone dystopia. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/oct/05/smartphone-addiction-silicon-valley-dystopiaGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Lilly F. Lin and James A. Kulik. 2002. Social comparison and women's body satisfaction. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 24, 2: 115--123.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Sonja Lyubomirsky and Lee Ross. 1997. Hedonic consequences of social comparison: A contrast of happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73, 6: 1141--1157.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Maurizio Mauri, Pietro Cipresso, Anna Balgera, Marco Villamira, and Giuseppe Riva. 2011. Why is Facebook so successful? Psychophysiological measures describe a core flow state while using Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 14, 12: 723--731.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Dan P. McAdams and Carol A. Constantian. 1983. Intimacy and affiliation motives in daily living: An experience sampling analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45, 4: 851--861.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Matthias R. Mehl and Tamlin S. Conner (eds.). 2012. Handbook of research methods for studying daily life. Guilford Press, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Stan Morse and Kenneth J. Gergen. 1970. Social comparison, self-consistency, and the concept of self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 16, 1: 148--156.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Galen Panger. 2014. Social comparison in social media: A look at Facebook and Twitter. In Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA '14, 2095--2100. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Galen Panger. 2016. Reassessing the Facebook experiment: Critical thinking about the validity of Big Data research. Information, Communication & Society 19, 8: 1108--1126.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Leonard Reinecke and Wilhelm Hofmann. 2016. Slacking off or winding down? An experience sampling study on the drivers and consequences of media use for recovery versus procrastination. Human Communication Research 42, 3: 441--461.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Michael D. Robinson and Gerald L. Clore. 2002. Belief and feeling: Evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report. Psychological Bulletin 128, 6: 934--960.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. James A. Russell. 1980. A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39, 6: 1161--1178.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. James A. Russell. 2003. Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review 110, 1: 145--172.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. James A. Russell. 2009. Emotion, core affect, and psychological construction. Cognition & Emotion 23, 7: 1259--1283.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. John Sabini and Maury Silver. 2005. Ekman's basic emotions: Why not love and jealousy? Cognition & Emotion 19, 5: 693--712.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Christina Sagioglou and Tobias Greitemeyer. 2014. Facebook's emotional consequences: Why Facebook causes a decrease in mood and why people still use it. Computers in Human Behavior 35: 359--363.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Peter Salovey and Judith Rodin. 1984. Some antecedents and consequences of social-comparison jealousy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47, 4: 780--792.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. Lauren Scissors, Moira Burke, and Steven Wengrovitz. 2016. What's in a Like? Attitudes and behaviors around receiving Likes on Facebook. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing - CSCW '16, 1499--1508. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Christine N. Scollon, Ed Diener, Richard Lucas, Shigehiro Oishi, and Robert Biswas-Diener. 2001. Accentuate the positive: Exploring memory for emotions. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Richard H. Smith and Sung Hee Kim. 2007. Comprehending envy. Psychological Bulletin 133, 1: 46--64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. Joshua Smyth, Margit C Ockenfels, Laura Porter, Clemens Kirschbaum, Dirk H. Hellhammer, and Arthur A. Stone. 1998. Stressors and mood measured on a momentary basis are associated with salivary cortisol secretion. Psychoneuroendocrinology 23, 4: 353--370.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Mieke Sonnenschein, Paula M. C. Mommersteeg, Jan H. Houtveen, Marjolijn J. Sorbi, Wilmar B. Schaufeli, and Lorenz J. P. van Doornen. 2007. Exhaustion and endocrine functioning in clinical burnout: An in-depth study using the experience sampling method. Biological Psychology 75, 2: 176--184.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  76. Andrew Steptoe, E. Leigh Gibson, Mark Hamer, and Jane Wardle. 2007. Neuroendocrine and cardiovascular correlates of positive affect measured by ecological momentary assessment and by questionnaire. Psychoneuroendocrinology 32, 1: 56--64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  77. Edson C. Tandoc, Patrick Ferrucci, and Margaret Duffy. 2015. Facebook use, envy, and depression among college students: Is Facebooking depressing? Computers in Human Behavior 43: 139--146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  78. Jessica L. Tracy. 2014. An evolutionary approach to understanding distinct emotions. Emotion Review 6, 4: 308--312.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  79. Morten Tromholt. 2016. The Facebook experiment: Quitting Facebook leads to higher levels of well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 19, 11: 661--666.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  80. Marleen M. Van Eck and Nancy A. Nicolson. 1994. Perceived stress and salivary cortisol in daily life. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 16, 3: 221--227.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. Lawrence F. Van Egeren and Suthep Madarasmi. 1992. Blood pressure and behavior: Mood, activity and blood pressure in daily life. In M. W. de Vries (Ed.), The experience of psychopathology: Investigating mental disorders in their natural settings. 240--254.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. Philippe Verduyn, David Seungjae Lee, Jiyoung Park, Holly Shablack, Ariana Orvell, Joseph Bayer, Oscar Ybarra, John Jonides, and Ethan Kross. 2015. Passive Facebook usage undermines affective well-being: Experimental and longitudinal evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 144, 2: 480--488.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  83. Erin A. Vogel, Jason P. Rose, Lindsay R. Roberts, and Katheryn Eckles. 2014. Social comparison, social media, and self-esteem. Psychology of Popular Media Culture 3, 4: 206--222.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  84. David Watson, Lee Anna Clark, and Auke Tellegen. 1988. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54, 6: 1063--1070.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  85. David Watson and Auke Tellegen. 1999. Issues in dimensional structure of affect-Effects of descriptors, measurement error, and response formats: Comment on Russell and Carroll (1999). Psychological Bulletin 125, 5: 601--610.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  86. Ladd Wheeler and Kunitate Miyake. 1992. Social comparison in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 62, 5: 760--773.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  87. Michelle Yik, James A. Russell, and James H. Steiger. 2011. A 12-point circumplex structure of core affect. Emotion 11, 4: 705--731.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. People Tend to Wind Down, Not Up, When They Browse Social Media

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          • Published in

            cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
            Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 2, Issue CSCW
            November 2018
            4104 pages
            EISSN:2573-0142
            DOI:10.1145/3290265
            Issue’s Table of Contents

            Copyright © 2018 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 1 November 2018
            Published in pacmhci Volume 2, Issue CSCW

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader