Xunru Che
ABSTRACT
Since the 2016 U.S. election cycle, "fake news" (a term describing verifiably false and misleading news articles) has garnered increasing public attention. This work sheds insight onto this phenomenon by examining the way 10 popular partisan media sites discuss "fake news". We use linguistic analysis techniques including Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC), word embedding models, and supervised learning classifiers to analyze news stories containing the phrase "fake news" from left- and right-leaning news sites. Our results yield several insights, including that article text can be used to classify political affiliation with high accuracy, and that left-leaning sites focus on specific fake news stories and individuals involved, while right-leaning sites shift the focus to a narrative of mainstream media dishonesty more broadly.
Supplemental Material
Available for Download
Poster
- Hunt Allcott and Matthew Gentzkow. 2017. Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election. Journal of Economic Perspectives 31, 2 (May 2017), 211--36.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Yochai Benkler, Robert Faris, Hal Roberts, and Ethan Zuckerman. 2017. Study: Breitbart-led right-wing media ecosystem altered broader media agenda. Columbia Journalism Review (2017).Google Scholar
- Matthew Gentzkow, Jesse M. Shapiro, and Matt Taddy. 2016. Measuring Polarization in High-Dimensional Data: Method and Application to Congressional Speech. Working Paper 22423. National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
- Alice Marwick and Rebecca Lewis. 2015. Media Manipulation and Disinformation Online. Technical Report. Data & Society Research Institute.Google Scholar
- Tomas Mikolov, Ilya Sutskever, Kai Chen, Greg Corrado, and Jeffrey Dean. 2013. Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and Their Compositionality. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems - Volume 2 (NIPS'13). Curran Associates Inc., USA, 3111--3119. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Craig Silverman. 2016. This Analysis Shows how Fake Election News Stories Outperformed Real News on Facebook. Buzzfeed News (2016).Google Scholar
- Craig Silverman and Jeremy Singer-Vine. 2016. Most Americans Who See Fake News Believe It, New Survey Says. BuzzFeed News (2016).Google Scholar
- Yla R. Tausczik and James W. Pennebaker. 2010. The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 29, 1 (2010), 24--54.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Fake News in the News: An Analysis of Partisan Coverage of the Fake News Phenomenon
Recommendations
Falling for Fake News: Investigating the Consumption of News via Social Media
CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsIn the so called 'post-truth' era, characterized by a loss of public trust in various institutions, and the rise of 'fake news' disseminated via the internet and social media, individuals may face uncertainty about the veracity of information available, ...
Fake News Research: Theories, Detection Strategies, and Open Problems
KDD '19: Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data MiningFake news has become a global phenomenon due its explosive growth, particularly on social media. The goal of this tutorial is to (1) clearly introduce the concept and characteristics of fake news and how it can be formally differentiated from other ...
What happened? The Spread of Fake News Publisher Content During the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
WWW '19: The World Wide Web ConferenceThe spread of content produced by fake news publishers was one of the most discussed characteristics of the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Yet, little is known about the prevalence and focus of such content, how its prevalence changed over time, and ...
Comments