No longer 'somewhat arbitrary': calculating salience in GTTM-style reduction

ABSTRACT

Following earlier work on the formalisation of Lerdahl and Jack-endoff's Generative Theory of Tonal Music (GTTM), we present a measure of the salience of events in a reduction tree, based on calculations relating the duration of time-spans to the structure of the tree. This allows for the proper graphical rendition of a tree on the basis of its time-spans and topology alone. It also has the potential to contribute to the development of sophisticated digital library systems able to operate on music in a musically intelligent manner. We present results of an empirical study of branch heights in the figures in GTTM which shows that salience calculated according to our proposals correlates better with branch height than alternatives. We also discuss the possible musical significance of this measure of salience. Finally we compare some results using salience in the calculation of melodic similarity on the basis of reduction trees to earlier results using time-span. While the correlation between these measures and human ratings of the similarity of the melodies is poor, using salience shows a definite improvement. Overall, the results suggest that the proposed definition of salience gives a potentially useful measure of an event's importance in a musical structure.

References

1. Nicola Dibben. 1994. The Cognitive Reality of Hierarchic Structure in Tonal and Atonal Music. Music Perception 12, 1 (1994), 1--25.
2. B. Efron and C. Stein. 1981. The Jackknife Estimate of Variance. The Annals of Statistics 9, 3 (1981), 586--596.
3. Mark Gotham. 2017. Hierarchy and position usage in 'mixed' metrical structures. Journal of New Music Research 46, 2 (2017), 103--117.
4. Masatoshi Hamanaka, Keiji Hirata, and Satoshi Tojo. 2015. Structural Similarity Based on Time-Span Sub-Trees. In Mathematics and Computation in Music, Tom Collins, David Meredith, and Anja Volk (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 187--192.
5. Niels Chr. Hansen. 2011. The Legacy of Lerdahl & JackendoffâĂŹs A Generative Theory of Tonal Music: Bridging a significant event in the history of music theory and recent developments in cognitive music research. Danish Yearbook of Musicology 38 (2011), 33--55.
6. Keiji Hirata, Satoshi Tojo, and Masatoshi Hamanaka. 2014. Cognitive Similarity Grounded by Tree Distance from the Analysis of K.265/300e. In Sound, Music, and Motion: 10th International Symposium, CMMR 2013, Marseille, France, October 15--18, 2013. Revised Selected Papers, Richard Kronland-Martinet Mitsuko Aramaki, Olivier Derrien and Sølvi Ystad (Eds.). Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 589--605.
7. Keiji Hirata, Satoshi Tojo, and Masatoshi Hamanaka. 2016. An Algebraic Approach to Time-Span Reduction. In Computational Music Analysis, David Meredith (Ed.). Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 251--270.
8. Michel Imberty. 2000. The Question of Innate Competencies in Musical Communication. In The Origins of Music, Björn Merker Nils L. Wallin and Steven Brown (Eds.). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 449--462.
9. Fred Lerdahl and Ray Jackendoff. 1983. A Generative Theory of Tonal Music. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
10. Fred Lerdhal. 2001. Tonal Pitch Space. Oxford University Press, New York.
11. Alan Marsden. 2005. Generative structural representation of tonal music. Journal of New Music Research 34, 4 (2005), 409--428.
12. Alan Marsden. 2010. Recognition of Variations Using Automatic Schenkerian Reduction. In Proceedings of the 11th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR 2010). International Society for Information Retrieval, 501--506.
13. Yoko Oura and Giyoo Hatano. 1991. Identifying Melodies from Reduced Pitch Patterns. Psychologica Belgica 31, 2 (1991), 217--237.
14. David Rizo and Alan Marsden. 2016. A Standard Format Proposal for Hierarchical Analyses and Representations. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Digital Libraries for Musicology (DLfM 2016). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 25--32.
15. Heinrich Schenker. 1979/1935. Free Composition (Der Freie Satz). Longman, New York.
16. Claude E. Shannon and Warren Weaver. 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
17. John A. Sloboda and David H. H. Parker. 1985. Immediate Recall of Melodies. In Music Structure and Cognition, Ian Cross Peter Howell and Robert West (Eds.). Academic Press, London, UK, 143--167.
18. Satoshi Tojo and Keiji Hirata. 2013. Structural Similarity Based on Time-Span Tree. In From Sounds to Music and Emotions: 9th International Symposium CMMR, London, UK, June 19--22, 2012, Revised Selected Papers, Richard Kronland-Martinet Mitsuko Aramaki, Mathieu Barthet and Sølvi Ystad (Eds.). Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 400--421.
19. Satoshi Tojo, Alan Marsden, and Keiji Hirata. 2017. On Linear Algebraic Representation of Time-span and Prolongational Trees. In Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Computer Music Multidisciplinary Research (CMMR). Matosinhos, Portugal.

Index Terms

• Applied computing

  • Arts and humanities

    • Sound and music computing