Improving Spatial Orientation in Immersive Environments

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we present a comparative evaluation of three different approaches to improving users' spatial awareness in virtual reality environments, and consequently their user experience and productivity. Using a scientific visualization task, we test the performance of 21 participants to navigate around a virtual immersive environment. Our results suggest that using landmarks, a 3D minimap, and waypoint navigation all contribute to improved spatial orientation, while the macroscopic view of the environment provided by the 3D minimap has the greatest positive impact on spatial orientation. Users also prefer the 3D minimap for usability and immersion by a wide margin over the other techniques.

References

1. Bernard Bigot. 2017. ITER: A unique international collaboration to harness the power of the stars. Comptes Rendus Physique 18, 7--8 (2017), 367--371.
2. Doug A Bowman, David Koller, and Larry F Hodges. 1997. Travel in immersive virtual environments: An evaluation of viewpoint motion control techniques. In Virtual Reality (VR 1997). IEEE, 45--52.
3. Doug A Bowman, David Koller, and Larry F Hodges. 1998. A methodology for the evaluation of travel techniques for immersive virtual environments. IEEE Virtual reality (VR) 3, 2 (1998), 120--131.
4. Evren Bozgeyikli, Andrew Raij, Srinivas Katkoori, and Rajiv Dubey. 2016. Point & Teleport Locomotion Technique for Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (CHI PLAY '16). ACM, 205--216.
5. Steve Bryson. 1996. Virtual Reality in Scientific Visualization. Commun. ACM 39, 5 (1996), 62--71.
6. Sue VG Cobb, Sarah Nichols, Amanda Ramsey, and John R Wilson. 1999. Virtual reality-induced symptoms and effects (VRISE). Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 8, 2 (1999), 169--186.
7. Dane Coffey, Nicholas Malbraaten, Trung Bao Le, Iman Borazjani, Fotis Sotiropoulos, Arthur G Erdman, and Daniel F Keefe. 2012. Interactive Slice WIM: Navigating and Interrogating Volume Data Sets Using a Multisurface, Multitouch VR Interface. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (TVCG) 18, 10 (2012), 1614--1626.
8. Michael de Ridder, Younhyun Jung, Robin Huang, Jinman Kim, and David Dagan Feng. 2015. Exploration of virtual and augmented reality for visual analytics and 3d volume rendering of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. In Big Data Visual Analytics (BDVA 2015). IEEE, 1--8.
9. EUROfusion. 2011. JET Tokamak. https://www.euro-fusion.org/news/detail/the-virtual-vessel-with-plasma/. (2011). Accessed: 2018-06-30.
10. BoYu Gao, HyungSeok Kim, Byungmoon Kim, and Jee-In Kim. 2018. Artificial Landmarks to Facilitate Spatial Learning and Recalling for Curved Visual Wall Layout in Virtual Reality. In International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing (BigComp 2018). IEEE, 475--482.
11. Jacob Habgood, David Moore, David Wilson, and Sergio Alapont. 2018. Rapid, continuous movement between nodes as an accessible virtual reality locomotion technique. IEEE Virtual Reality (VR) (2018).
12. Robert Hager and CS Chang. 2016. Gyrokinetic neoclassical study of the bootstrap current in the tokamak edge pedestal with fully non-linear Coulomb collisions. Physics of Plasmas 23, 4 (2016), 042503.
13. Regis Kopper, Tao Ni, Doug A Bowman, and Marcio Pinho. 2006. Design and evaluation of navigation techniques for multiscale virtual environments. In Virtual Reality (VR 2006). IEEE, 175--182.
14. Yinggang Li, Chi-Wing Fu, and Andrew Hanson. 2006. Scalable WIM: Effective exploration in large-scale astrophysical environments. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (TVCG) 12, 5 (2006), 1005--1012.
15. Hai-Ning Liang, Feiyu Lu, Yuwei Shi, Vijayakumar Nanjappan, and Konstantinos Papangelis. 2018. Evaluating the effects of collaboration and competition in navigation tasks and spatial knowledge acquisition within virtual reality environments. Future Generation Computer Systems (2018).
16. Jock D Mackinlay, Stuart K Card, and George G. Robertson. 1990. Rapid Controlled Movement Through a Virtual 3D Workspace. SIGGRAPH Comput. Graph. 24, 4 (1990), 171--176.
17. Katerina Mania, Shahrul Badariah, Matthew Coxon, and Phil Watten. 2010. Cognitive transfer of spatial awareness states from immersive virtual environments to reality. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP) 7, 2 (2010), 9.
18. Michael E McCauley and Thomas J Sharkey. 1992. Cybersickness: Perception of self-motion in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 1, 3 (1992), 311--318.
19. Thinh Nguyen-Vo, Bernhard E Riecke, and Wolfgang Stuerzlinger. 2018. Simulated Reference Frame: A Cost-Effective Solution to Improve Spatial Orientation in VR. IEEE Virtual Reality (VR) (2018).
20. Iulian Radu, Erica Southgate, Francisco Ortega, and Shamus Smith. 2017. Summary: 2017 IEEE virtual reality second workshop on K-12 embodied learning through Virtual & Augmented Reality (KELVAR). In Virtual Reality Workshop on K-12 Embodied Learning through Virtual & Augmented Reality (KELVAR 2017). IEEE, 1--2.
21. Eric D Ragan, Siroberto Scerbo, Felipe Bacim, and Doug A Bowman. 2017. Amplified head rotation in virtual reality and the effects on 3d search, training transfer, and spatial orientation. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics (TVCG) 23, 8 (2017), 1880--1895.
22. Sharif Razzaque, Zachariah Kohn, and Mary C Whitton. 2001. Redirected walking. In Proceedings of EUROGRAPHICS (short presentation), Vol. 9. 105--106.
23. Paul-Henri Rebut. 2017. The Joint European Torus (JET). The European Physical Journal H (2017), 1--39.
24. Bernhard E Riecke, Douglas W Cunningham, and Heinrich H Bülthoff 2007. Spatial updating in virtual reality: the sufficiency of visual information. Psychological research 71, 3 (2007), 298--313.
25. Bhuvaneswari Sarupuri, Simon Hoermann, Frank Steinicke, and Robert W Lindeman. 2017. Triggerwalking: a biomechanically-inspired locomotion user interface for efficient realistic virtual walking. In Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Spatial User Interaction. ACM, 138--147.
26. Franz Sauer, Yubo Zhang, Weixing Wang, Stéphane Ethier, and Kwan-Liu Ma. 2016. Visualization Techniques for Studying Large-Scale Flow Fields from Fusion Simulations. Computing in Science Engineering 18, 2 (2016), 68--77.
27. G Schussman, Kwan-Liu Ma, D Schissel, and T Evans. 2000. Visualizing DIII-D Tokamak magnetic field lines. In Proceedings Visualization 2000. VIS 2000 (Cat. No.00CH37145). 501--504.
28. Richard Stoakley, Matthew J. Conway, and Randy Pausch. 1995. Virtual Reality on a WIM: Interactive Worlds in Miniature. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '95). ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., New York, NY, USA, 265--272.
29. Evan A Suma, David M Krum, Samantha Finkelstein, and Mark Bolas. 2011. Effects of Redirection on Spatial Orientation in Real and Virtual environments. In Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI 2011). IEEE, 35--38.
30. Will Usher, Pavol Klacansky, Frederick Federer, Peer-Timo Bremer, Aaron Knoll, Jeff Yarch, Alessandra Angelucci, and Valerio Pascucci. 2018. A virtual reality visualization tool for neuron tracing. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 24, 1 (2018), 994--1003.
31. Dimitar Valkov and Steffen Flagge. 2017. Smooth immersion: the benefits of making the transition to virtual environments a continuous process. In Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Spatial User Interaction. ACM, 12--19.
32. Andries Van Dam, Andrew S Forsberg, David H Laidlaw, Joseph J LaViola, and Rosemary M Simpson. 2000. Immersive VR for scientific visualization: A progress report. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 20, 6 (2000), 26--52.
33. Chadwick A Wingrave, Yonca Haciahmetoglu, and Doug A Bowman. 2006. Overcoming world in miniature limitations by a scaled and scrolling WIM. In Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI 2006). IEEE, 11--16.
34. Michael Zyda. 2005. From visual simulation to virtual reality to games. Computer 38, 9 (2005), 25--32.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)

    • HCI design and evaluation methods

      • User studies

    • Interaction paradigms

      • Virtual reality

  • Visualization

    • Visualization application domains

      • Scientific visualization