skip to main content
10.1145/3267242.3267272acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A five-year review of methods, purposes and domains of the international symposium on wearable computing

Published:08 October 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a structured survey of 119 publications from the proceedings of the International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC) from 2013 to 2017. This survey on research methods and purposes is based upon a classification schema used by many others in HCI research. An extra dimension was added to the classification of research methods pertaining to the Research Domains, in order to provide a more insightful overview of the field. An analysis of the research methods and purposes, and domains of ISWC is presented. Additionally, the citation impact of ISWC publications is evaluated and compared over these dimensions. Current tendencies of the research presented at ISWC are identified with focus on the contextual setting of the research. Opportunities for future research at ISWC are identified.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Izak Benbasat. 1985. An analysis of research methodologies. Boston: Harvard Business Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Mary Ellen Berglund, Julia Duvall, and Lucy E Dunne. 2016. A survey of the historical scope and current trends of wearable technology applications. In Proc. of ISWC '16, 40--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Lucy E Dunne, Halley Profita, Clint Zeagler, James Clawson, Scott Gilliland, Ellen Yi-Luen Do, and Jim Budd. 2014. The social comfort of wearable technology and gestural interaction. In Proc. of EMBC '14 IEEE, 4159--4162.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. William Gaver. 2012. What should we expect from research through design? In Proc. of CHI '12, 937. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. Jackson, C. Zeagler, G. Valentin, A. Martin, V. Martin, A. Delawalla, W. Blount, S. Eiring, R. Hollis, Y. Kshirsagar, and T. Starner. 2013. FIDO. In Proc. of ISWC '13, 81--88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Jj Jensen and Mb Skov. 2005. A review of research methods in children's technology design. Proc. of IDC '05: 318--324. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Hsin-Liu Cindy Kao, Christian Holz, Asta Roseway, Andres Calvo, and Chris Schmandt. 2016. DuoSkin: rapidly prototyping on-skin user interfaces using skin-friendly materials. In Proc. of ISWC '16, 16--23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Jesper Kjeldskov and Connor Graham. 2003. A Review of Mobile HCI Research Methods. Proc. of Mobile HCI '03: 317--335.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Jesper Kjeldskov and Jeni Paay. 2012. A Longitudinal Review of Mobile HCI Research Methods. Proc. of Mobile HCI '14, September: 69--78. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Ilpo Koskinen, John Zimmerman, Thomas Binder, Johan Redström, and Stephan Wensveen. 2012. Design Research Through Practice. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Kent Lyons. 2015. What can a dumb watch teach a smartwatch? In Proc. of ISWC '15, 3--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Angella Mackey, Ron Wakkary, Stephan Wensveen, and Oscar Tomico. 2017. "Can I Wear This?" Blending Clothing and Digital Expression. International Journal of Design 11, 3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Sergio R. Munoz and Shrikant I. Bangdiwala. 1997. Interpretation of Kappa and B statistics measures of agreement. Journal of Applied Statistics 24, 1: 105--112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Troy Nachtigall. 2017. EVA Moccasin: creating a research archetype to explore shoe use. In Adj. Proc. of ISWC '17, 197--202. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. William Odom, Ron Wakkary, Youn-kyung Lim, Audrey Desjardins, Bart Hengeveld, and Richard Banks. 2016. From Research Prototype to Research Product. In Proc. of CHI '16, 2549--2561. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Halley P. Profita, James Clawson, Scott Gilliland, Clint Zeagler, Thad Starner, Jim Budd, and Ellen Yi-Luen Do. 2013. Don't mind me touching my wrist: a case study of interacting with on-body technology in public. In Proc. of ISWC '13, 89--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Gabriel Reyes, W Keith Edwards, Dingtian Zhang, Sarthak Ghosh, Pratik Shah, Jason Wu, Aman Parnami, Bailey Bercik, Thad Starner, and Gregory D Abowd. 2016. Whoosh: non-voice acoustics for low-cost, handsfree, and rapid input on smartwatches. In Proc. of ISWC '16, 120--127. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Daniel Tetteroo and Panos Markopoulos. 2015. A Review of Research Methods in End User Development. IS-EUD '15 9083: 58--75.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Bruce H. Thomas. 2012. Have we achieved the ultimate wearable computer? In Proc. of ISWC '12, 104--107. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Oscar Tomico, Lars Hallnäs, Rung-Huei Liang, and Stephan Wensveen. 2017. Towards a next wave of wearable and fashionable interactions. International Journal of Design 11, 3: 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Oscar Tomico and Danielle Wilde. 2016. Soft, embodied, situated & connected: enriching interactions with soft wearables. mUX: The Journal of Mobile User Experience 5, 1: 3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Giancarlo Valentin, Joelle Alcaidinho, Ayanna Howard, Melody M. Jackson, and Thad Starner. 2016. Creating collar-sensed motion gestures for dog-human communication in service applications. In Proc. of ISWC '16, 100--107. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Ron Wakkary, Doenja Oogjes, Henry W J Lin, and Sabrina Hauser. 2018. Philosophers Living with the Tilting Bowl. In Proc. of CHI '18, 94. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Stephan Wensveen and Ben Matthews. 2015. Prototypes and Prototyping in Design Research. Routledge Companion to Design Research: 262--76.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. J L Wynekoop and S Conger. 1990. A review of computer aided software engineering research methods. The Information Systems Research Arena of the 90s Challenges Perceptions and Alternative Approaches 1:129--154.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Robert K. Yin. 2012. Case Study Research Design and Methods. Sage Publications Sage UK: London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Clint Zeagler. 2017. Where to Wear It. In Proc. of ISWC '17, 150--157. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    ISWC '18: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers
    October 2018
    307 pages
    ISBN:9781450359672
    DOI:10.1145/3267242

    Copyright © 2018 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 8 October 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate38of196submissions,19%

    Upcoming Conference

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader