skip to main content
10.1145/3264996.3264998acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Quantifying the Signal Quality of Low-cost Respiratory Effort Sensors for Sleep Apnea Monitoring

Published:15 October 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) is a common, but severely under-diagnosed sleep disorder characterized by recurring periods of shallow or paused breathing during sleep. It is our long-term goal to allow people to perform the first step towards a sleep apnea detection at home by utilizing smartphones, low-cost consumer-grade sensors, and data mining techniques. In this work, we evaluate the signal quality of four respiratory effort sensors (BITalino, FLOW, RespiBAN, and Shimmer), using a RIP sensor from NOX Medical as the gold standard. We design a sixteen-minute signal capture procedure to simulate epochs of disrupted breathing, and capture data from twelve (BITalino and Shimmer) and eleven (RespiBAN and FLOW) subjects during wakefulness. Our signal quality evaluation approach is based on the breath detection accuracy metrics sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV), along with the breath amplitude accuracy metric weighted absolute percentage error (WAPE). These metrics are closely related to how apneic and hypopneic episodes are scored by medical personnel, making it straightforward to reason about their interpretation. Our results show that false breaths are the primary concern affecting the breath detection accuracy of BITalino, Shimmer, and RespiBAN. Respectively, the sensitivity of BITalino, Shimmer, RespiBAN, and FLOW is 99.61%, 98.53%, 98.41%, and 98.91%. Their PPV is 96.28%, 96.58%, 90.81%, and 98.81%. Finally, their WAPE is 13.82%, 16.89%, 13.60%, and 8.75%. The supine (back) position is consistently showing the overall best signal quality compared to the side position.

References

  1. Richard B. Berry and Mary H. Wagner. 2014. Sleep Medicine Pearls, 1--690. isbn: 9781455770519.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Richard B. Berry et al. 2012. Rules for scoring respiratory events in sleep: Update of the 2007 AASM manual for the scoring of sleep and associated events. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 8, 5, 597--619. issn: 15509389.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. biosignalsplux. 2018. Respiban researcher. Retrieved Mar. 1, 2018 from http: //biosignalsplux.com/en/respiban-researcher.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. BITalino. 2018. Plugged kit ble. Retrieved Mar. 1, 2018 from http://bitalino.com/ en/plugged-kit-ble.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. J. P. Cantineau, P. Escourrou, R. Sartene, C. Gaultier, and M. Goldman. 1992. Accuracy of respiratory inductive plethysmography during wakefulness and sleep in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Chest, 102, 4, 1145--1151. issn: 00123692.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Harald Hrubos-Strøm et al. 2011. A Norwegian population-based study on the risk and prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea The Akershus Sleep Apnea Project (ASAP). Journal of Sleep Research, 20, 1 PART II, 162--170. issn: 09621105.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. K Konno and Jere Mead. 1967. Measurement of the separate volume changes of rib cage and abdomen during breathing. Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985), 22, 3, 407--422. issn: 0021--8987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Stein Kristiansen, Mari Sønsteby Hugaas, Vera Goebel, Thomas Plagemann, Konstantinos Nikolaidis, and Knut Liestøl. 2018. Data Mining for Patient Friendly Apnea Detection. submitted to IEEE Access, May 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. NOX Medical. 2018. Nox t3. Retrieved Jan. 27, 2018 from http : / / www . noxmedical.com/products/nox-t3-sleep-monitor.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. N. M. Punjabi. 2008. The Epidemiology of Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society, 5, 2, (Feb. 2008), 136--143. issn: 1546--3222.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Shimmer. 2018. Shimmer ecg. Retrieved Jan. 27, 2018 from http : / / www . shimmersensing.com/products/ecg-development-kit.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. SweetZpot. 2018. Flow. Retrieved Apr. 25, 2018 from https://www.sweetzpot. com/flow.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Manjari Tripathi. 2008. Technical notes for digital polysomnography recording in sleep medicine practice. Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology, 11, 2, (Apr. 2008), 129--138. issn: 1998--3549.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. K F Whyte, M Gugger, G A Gould, J Molloy, P K Wraith, and N J Douglas. 1991. Accuracy of respiratory inductive plethysmograph in measuring tidal volume during sleep. Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985), 71, 5, (Nov. 1991), 1866--1871. issn: 01617567.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Quantifying the Signal Quality of Low-cost Respiratory Effort Sensors for Sleep Apnea Monitoring

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      HealthMedia'18: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Multimedia for Personal Health and Health Care
      October 2018
      77 pages
      ISBN:9781450359825
      DOI:10.1145/3264996

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 October 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Upcoming Conference

      MM '24
      MM '24: The 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia
      October 28 - November 1, 2024
      Melbourne , VIC , Australia

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader