skip to main content
research-article
Open Access

Managing In-home Environments through Sensing, Annotating, and Visualizing Air Quality Data

Published:18 September 2018Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Air quality is important, varies across time and space, and is largely invisible. Pioneering past work deploying air quality monitors in residential environments found that study participants improved their awareness of and engagement with air quality. However, these systems fielded a single monitor and did not support user-specified annotations, inhibiting their utility. We developed MAAV -- a system to Measure Air quality, Annotate data streams, and Visualize real-time PM2.5 levels -- to explore how participants engage with an air quality system addressing these challenges. MAAV supports collecting data from multiple air quality monitors, annotating that data through multiple modalities, and sending text message prompts when it detects a PM2.5 spike. MAAV also features an interactive tablet interface for displaying measurement data and annotations. Through six long-term field deployments (20-47 weeks, mean 37.7 weeks), participants found these system features important for understanding the air quality in and around their homes. Participants gained new insights from between-monitor comparisons, reflected on past PM2.5 spikes with the help of their annotations, and adapted their system usage as they familiarized themselves with their air quality data and MAAV. These results yield important insights for designing residential sensing systems that integrate into users' everyday lives.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. 2014 Smoothed Z Score Algorithm, Stack Overflow. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/22583391/peak-signal-detection-in-real-time-timeseries-data/22640362#22640362. Accessed: 2017-05-15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2016. How To Install Google Play Store on FireOS(5.x). https://forum.xda-developers.com/amazon-fire/general/how-to-install-google-play-store-fire-t3486603. Accessed: 2017-06-01.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Eileen Abt, Helen H. Suh, Paul Catalano, and Petros Koutrakis. 2000. Relative contribution of outdoor and indoor particle sources to indoor concentrations. Environmental Science 8 Technology 34, 17 (2000), 3579--3587.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. American Lung Association. 2015. State of the Air 2015. Technical Report. American Lung Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Michelle L. Bell, Keita Ebisu, and Roger D. Peng. 2011. Community-level spatial heterogeneity of chemical constituent levels of fine particulates and implications for epidemiological research. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology 21, 4 (07 2011), 372--384.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Michael Bostock, Vadim Ogievetsky, and Jeffrey Heer. 2011. D3 data-driven documents. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 17, 12 (2011), 2301--2309. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Xuxu Chen, Yu Zheng, Yubiao Chen, Qiwei Jin, Weiwei Sun, Eric Chang, and Wei-Ying Ma. 2014. Indoor air quality monitoring system for smart buildings. In Proceedings of the ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 471--475. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Yun Cheng, Xiucheng Li, Zhijun Li, Shouxu Jiang, Yilong Li, Ji Jia, and Xiaofan Jiang. 2014. AirCloud: a cloud-based air-quality monitoring system for everyone. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems. ACM, 251--265. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Victoria Clarke and Virginia Braun. 2014. Thematic Analysis. Springer New York, New York, NY, 1947--1952.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Enrico Costanza, Sarvapali D. Ramchurn, and Nicholas R. Jennings. 2012. Understanding domestic energy consumption through interactive visualisation: a field study. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 216--225. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Anind K. Dey, Katarzyna Wac, Denzil Ferreira, Kevin Tassini, Jin-Hyuk Hong, and Julian Ramos. 2011. Getting closer: an empirical investigation of the proximity of user to their smart phones. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 163--172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Naihua Duan. 1982. Models for human exposure to air pollution. Environment International 8, 1-6 (1982), 305--309.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Prabal Dutta, Paul M. Aoki, Neil Kumar, Alan Mainwaring, Chris Myers, Wesley Willett, and Allison Woodruff. 2009. Common sense: participatory urban sensing using a network of handheld air quality monitors. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. ACM, 349--350. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Daniel Epstein, Felicia Cordeiro, Elizabeth Bales, James Fogarty, and Sean Munson. 2014. Taming data complexity in lifelogs. Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems - DIS '14 (2014), 667--676. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Daniel A. Epstein, An Ping, James Fogarty, and Sean A. Munson. 2015. A lived informatics model of personal informatics. In Proceedings of the ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. 731--742. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Biyi Fang, Qiumin Xu, Taiwoo Park, and Mi Zhang. 2016. AirSense: an intelligent home-based sensing system for indoor air quality analytics. In Proceedings of the ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 109--119. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Corinna Fischer. 2008. Feedback on household electricity consumption: A tool for saving energy? Energy Efficiency 1, 1 (2008), 79--104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Jon Froehlich, Leah Findlater, Marilyn Ostergren, Solai Ramanathan, Josh Peterson, Inness Wragg, Eric Larson, Fabia Fu, Mazhengmin Bai, Shwetak Patel, and James A. Landay. 2012. The design and evaluation of prototype eco-feedback displays for fixture-level water usage data. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2367--2376. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Jon Froehlich, Eric Larson, Sidhant Gupta, Gabe Cohn, Matthew Reynolds, and Shwetak Patel. 2011. Disaggregated end-use energy sensing for the smart grid. IEEE Pervasive Computing 10, 1 (2011), 28--39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Dawson R. Hancock and Bob Algozzine. 2016. Doing case study research: A practical guide for beginning researchers. Teachers College Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. David Hasenfratz, Olga Saukh, Silvan Sturzenegger, and Lothar Thiele. 2012. Participatory air pollution monitoring using smartphones. Mobile Sensing 1 (2012), 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Shruti Hegde, Kyeong Min, Jimmy Moore, Kerry Kelly, Scott Collingwood, Neal Patwari, and Philip Lundrigan. in submission. Household indoor particulate matter measurement using a network of low-cost sensors. In Environmental Pollution.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Yen-Chia Hsu, Paul Dille, Jennifer Cross, Beatrice Dias, Randy Sargent, and Illah Nourbakhsh. 2017. Community-empowered air quality monitoring system. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1607--1619. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Yang Huang, Liang Hu, Disheng Yang, and Hengchang Liu. 2017. AirSense: indoor environment monitoring evaluation system based on ZigBee network. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Vol. 81. IOP Publishing, 012208.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Karol Jabłoński and Tomasz Grychowski. 2017. Fuzzy inference system for the assessment of indoor environmental quality in a room. Indoor and Built Environment (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Yifei Jiang, Kun Li, Lei Tian, Ricardo Piedrahita, Xiang Yun, Omkar Mansata, Qin Lv, Robert P. Dick, Michael Hannigan, and Li Shang. 2011. MAQS: A personalized mobile sensing system for indoor air quality monitoring. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 271--280. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Ming Jin, Nikolaos Bekiaris-Liberis, Kevin Weekly, Costas Spanos, and Alexandre Bayen. 2015. Sensing by proxy: Occupancy detection based on indoor CO2 concentration. UBICOMM 2015 14 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Jung-Yoon. Kim, Chao-Hsien Chu, and Sang-Moon Shin. 2014. ISSAQ: An integrated sensing systems for real-time indoor air quality Monitoring. IEEE Sensors Journal 14, 12 (Dec 2014), 4230--4244.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Sunyoung Kim and Eric Paulos. 2009. inAir: Measuring and Visualizing Indoor Air Quality. Proceedings of The International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (2009), 81--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Sunyoung Kim and Eric Paulos. 2010. InAir: sharing indoor air quality measurements and visualizations. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing (CHI) (2010), 1861--1870. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Sunyoung Kim, Eric Paulos, and Jennifer Mankoff. 2013. inAir: a longitudinal study of indoor air quality measurements and visualizations. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2013), 2745. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Neil E Klepeis, William C Nelson, Wayne R Ott, John P Robinson, Andy M Tsang, Paul Switzer, Joseph V Behar, Stephen C Hern, and William H Engelmann. 2001. The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology 11, 3 (2001), 231.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Ismo K Koponen, Ari Asmi, Petri Keronen, Katri Puhto, and Markku Kulmala. 2001. Indoor air measurement campaign in Helsinki, Finland 1999--the effect of outdoor air pollution on indoor air. Atmospheric Environment 35, 8 (2001), 1465--1477.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Pramod Kulkarni, Paul A Baron, and Klaus Willeke. 2011. Aerosol measurement: principles, techniques, and applications. John Wiley 8 Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Stacey Kuznetsov, Scott E Hudson, and Eric Paulos. 2014. A low-tech sensing system for particulate pollution. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction. ACM, 259--266. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Johanna Lepeule, Francine Laden, Douglas Dockery, and Joel Schwartz. 2012. Chronic exposure to fine particles and mortality: An extended follow-up of the Harvard six cities study from 1974 to 2009. Environmental Health Perspectives 120, 7 (2012), 965--970.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Ian Li, Anind Dey, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2010. A stage-based model of personal informatics systems. In Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '10. 557. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. P. Lundrigan, K. Min, N. Patwari, S. Kasera, K. Kelly, J. Moore, M. Meyer, S. C. Collingwood, F. Nkoy, B. Stone, and K. Sward. 2017. EpiFi: An In-Home Sensor Network Architecture for Epidemiological Studies. ArXiv e-prints (Sept. 2017). arXiv:cs.NI/1709.02233Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Qing Yu Meng, Barbara J Turpin, Leo Korn, Clifford P Weisel, Maria Morandi, Steven Colome, Junfeng Zhang, Thomas Stock, Dalia Spektor, Arthur Winer, et al. 2005. Influence of ambient (outdoor) sources on residential indoor and personal PM2. 5 concentrations: analyses of RIOPA data. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology 15, 1 (2005), 17--28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Christian Monn. 2001. Exposure assessment of air pollutants: a review on spatial heterogeneity and indoor/outdoor/personal exposure to suspended particulate matter, nitrogen dioxide and ozone. Atmospheric environment 35, 1 (2001), 1--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Engineering National Academies of Sciences, Medicine, et al. 2016. Health Risks of Indoor Exposure to Particulate Matter: Workshop Summary. National Academies Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Nima Nikzad, Nakul Verma, Celal Ziftci, Elizabeth Bales, Nichole Quick, Piero Zappi, Kevin Patrick, Sanjoy Dasgupta, Ingolf Krueger, Tajana Šimunić Rosing, and William G. Griswold. 2012. CitiSense: Improving Geospatial Environmental Assessment of Air Quality Using a Wireless Personal Exposure Monitoring System. In Proceedings of the Conference on Wireless Health (WH '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 11, 8 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering. 2015. Pediatric Research Using Integrated Sensor Monitoring Systems. https://www.nibib.nih.gov/research-funding/prismsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. World Health Organisation. 2016. Ambient Air Pollution: A Global Assessment of Exposure and Burden of Disease. Working Papers. eSocialSciences. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:11368Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Annette Peters, Emerson Liu, Richard L Verrier, Joel Schwartz, Diane R Gold, Murray Mittleman, Jeff Baliff, J Annie Oh, George Allen, Kevin Monahan, and Douglas W Dockery. 2000. Air pollution and incidence of cardiac arrhythmia. Epidemiology 11, 1 (2000). http://journals.lww.com/epidem/Fulltext/2000/01000/Air{_}Pollution{_}and{_}Incidence{_}of{_}Cardiac{_}Arrhythmia.5.aspxGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. A.C. Pope, Richard T. Burnett, Michelle C. Turner, Aaron Cohen, Daniel Krewski, Michael Jerrett, Susan M. Gapstur, and Michael J. Thun. 2011. Lung cancer and cardiovascular disease mortality associated with ambient air pollution and cigarette smoke: Shape of the exposure-response relationships. Environmental Health Perspectives 119, 11 (2011), 1616--1621.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. O. A. Postolache, J. M. Dias Pereira, and P. M. B. Silva Girao. 2009. Smart Sensors Network for Air Quality Monitoring Applications. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 58, 9 (2009), 3253--3262.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. PurpleAir. 2017. PurpleAir Air Quality Monitoring: An air quality monitoring network built on a new generation of "Internet of Things" sensors (http://map.purpleair.org/) Accessed 2017-11-13. https://www.purpleair.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Shaharil Saad, Allan Andrew, Ali Shakaff, Abdul Saad, Azman Kamarudin, and Ammar Zakaria. 2015. Classifying Sources Influencing Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) Using Artificial Neural Network (ANN). Sensors 15, 5 (May 2015), 11665--11684.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. I Salma, K Dosztály, T Borsós, B Söveges, T Weidinger, G Kristóf, N Péter, and Zs Kertész. 2013. Physical properties, chemical composition, sources, spatial distribution and sinks of indoor aerosol particles in a university lecture hall. Atmospheric environment 64 (2013), 219--228.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Hillol Sarker, Moushumi Sharmin, Amin Ahsan Ali, Md Mahbubur Rahman, Rummana Bari, Syed Monowar Hossain, and Santosh Kumar. 2014. Assessing the availability of users to engage in just-in-time intervention in the natural environment. In Proceedings of the ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 909--920. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Daniel L Schacter. 1999. The seven sins of memory: Insights from psychology and cognitive neuroscience. American psychologist 54, 3 (1999), 182.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Liuhua Shi, Antonella Zanobetti, Itai Kloog, Brent A Coull, Petros Koutrakis, Steven J Melly, and Joel D Schwartz. 2016. Low-Concentration PM(2.5) and Mortality: Estimating Acute and Chronic Effects in a Population-Based Study. Environmental Health Perspectives 124, 1 (01 2016), 46--52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Susanne Steinle, Stefan Reis, and Clive Eric Sabel. 2013. Quantifying human exposure to air pollution--moving from static monitoring to spatio-temporally resolved personal exposure assessment. The Science of the Total Environment 443 (jan 2013), 184--93.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Peter Tolmie, Andy Crabtree, Tom Rodden, James Colley, and Ewa Luger. 2016. "This Has to Be the Cats": Personal Data Legibility in Networked Sensing Systems. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 8 Social Computing. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 491--502. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Robert J. Vercellino, Darrah K. Sleeth, Rodney G. Handy, Kyeong T. Min, and Scott C. Collingwood. 2018. Laboratory evaluation of a low-cost, real-time, aerosol multisensor. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 15, 7 (2018), 559--567.arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2018.1468565 PMID: 29683781.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. LA Wallace, ED Pellizzari, TD Hartwell, C Sparacino, R Whitmore, L Sheldon, H Zelon, and R Perritt. 1987. The TEAM (Total Exposure Assessment Methodology) Study: personal exposures to toxic substances in air, drinking water, and breath of 400 residents of New Jersey, North Carolina, and North Dakota. Environmental research 43, 2 (August 1987), 290--307.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Tae-Jung Yun Tae-Jung Yun, Hee Young Jeong Hee Young Jeong, Hee Rin Lee Hee Rin Lee, Rosa I. Arriaga, and Gregory D. Abowd. 2010. Assessing asthma management practices through in-home technology probes. Proceedings of the 4th International ICST Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (2010), 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Managing In-home Environments through Sensing, Annotating, and Visualizing Air Quality Data

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader