skip to main content
10.1145/3241539.3241561acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobicomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Challenge: RFID Hacking for Fun and Profit

Published:15 October 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Passive radio frequency identification (RFID) tags are ubiquitous today due to their low cost (a few cents), relatively long communication range ($\sim$7-11~m), ease of deployment, lack of battery, and small form factor. Hence, they are an attractive foundation for environmental sensing. Although RFID-based sensors have been studied in the research literature and are also available commercially, manufacturing them has been a technically-challenging task that is typically undertaken only by experienced researchers. In this paper, we show how even hobbyists can transform commodity RFID tags into sensors by physically altering (`hacking') them using COTS sensors, a pair of scissors, and clear adhesive tape. Importantly, this requires no change to commercial RFID readers. We also propose a new legacy-compatible tag reading protocol called Differential Minimum Response Threshold (DMRT) that is robust to the changes in an RF environment. To validate our vision, we develop RFID-based sensors for illuminance, temperature, touch, and gestures. We believe that our approach has the potential to open up the field of batteryless backscatter-based RFID sensing to the research community, making it an exciting area for future work.

References

  1. Teemu Ainasoja. 2018. Sensors, Healthcare IoT and Pigeon Races - Review of RAIN RFID Research. (March 2018). Retrieved June 27, 2017 from http://voyantic.com/blog/posts/sensors-healthcare-iot-and-pigeon-races-review-of-rain-rfid-research-in-2017Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Daniel Alonso, Qianyun Zhang, Yue Gao, and Daniel Valderas. 2017. UHF passive RFID-based sensor-less system to detect humidity for irrigation monitoring . Microwave and Optical Technology Letters , Vol. 59, 7 (2017), 1709--1715.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Santiago Capdevila, Lluis Jofre, Jordi Romeu, and Jean-Charles Bolomey. 2011. Passive RFID based sensing. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on RFID-Technologies and Applications. 507--512.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. RFMicron Corp. 2018. RFM3200 Wireless Flexible Temperature Sensor. (March 2018). Retrieved June 27, 2017 from http://rfmicron.com/rfm3200-wireless-flexible-temperature-sensor/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Chuhan Gao, Yilong Li, and Xinyu Zhang. 2018. LiveTag: Sensing Human-Object Interaction through Passive Chipless WiFi Tags. In Proc. USENIX NSDI . 533--546.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Xianjun Huang, Ting Leng, Thanasis Georgiou, Jijo Abraham, Rahul Raveendran Nair, Kostya S Novoselov, and Zhirun Hu. 2018. Graphene oxide dielectric permittivity at GHz and its applications for wireless humidity sensing. Scientific reports , Vol. 8, 1 (2018), 43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Digikey Inc. 2016. Phototransistors. (March 2016). Retrieved June 20, 2018 from https://www.digikey.com/products/en/sensors-transducers/optical-sensors-phototransistors/544Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Digikey Inc. 2017. Thermistors. (July 2017). Retrieved June 20, 2018 from https://www.digikey.com/products/en/sensors-transducers/temperature-sensors-ntc-thermistors/508Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Impinj Inc. 2010. R420 Readers. (mar 2010). Retrieved June 27, 2017 from http://www.Impinj.com/products/readers/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. SkyRFID Inc. 2018. RFID Tag Maximum Read Distance. (March 2018). Retrieved June 27, 2017 from http://www.skyrfid.com/RFID_Tag_Read_Ranges.phpGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Vikram Iyer, Justin Chan, and Shyamnath Gollakota. 2017. 3D printing wireless connected objects. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) , Vol. 36, 6 (2017), 242--251. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Vincent Liu, Aaron Parks, Vamsi Talla, Shyamnath Gollakota, David Wetherall, and Joshua R Smith. 2013. Ambient backscatter: wireless communication out of thin air. In ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, Vol. 43. 39--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Xiao Lu, Dusit Niyato, Hai Jiang, Dong In Kim, Yong Xiao, and Zhu Han. 2017. Ambient Backscatter Networking: A Novel Paradigm to Assist Wireless Powered Communications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.09615 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Gaetano Marrocco. 2010. Pervasive electromagnetics: Sensing paradigms by passive RFID technology. IEEE Wireless Communications , Vol. 17, 6 (2010), 10--17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Matthai Philipose, Joshua R Smith, Bing Jiang, Alexander Mamishev, Sumit Roy, and Kishore Sundara-Rajan. 2005. Battery-free wireless identification and sensing. IEEE Pervasive computing , Vol. 4, 1 (2005), 37--45. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Swadhin Pradhan, Eugene Chai, Karthikeyan Sundaresan, Lili Qiu, Mohammad A Khojastepour, and Sampath Rangarajan. 2017. RIO: A Pervasive RFID-based Touch Gesture Interface. In Proc. ACM MobiCom . 261--274. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Radio-Electronics.com. 2018. Phototransistor Tutorial. (March 2018). Retrieved June 27, 2017 from https://preview.tinyurl.com/7yy5lakGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Xianwei Shi, Fan Yang, Shenheng Xu, and Maokun Li. 2017. A Passive Temperature-Sensing Antenna Based on a Bimetal Strip Coil. Sensors , Vol. 17, 4 (2017), 665--672.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Nguyen Van Huynh, Dinh Thai Hoang, Xiao Lu, Dusit Niyato, Ping Wang, and Dong In Kim. 2017. Ambient Backscatter Communications: A Contemporary Survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.04804 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Ju Wang, Jie Xiong, Xiaojiang Chen, Hongbo Jiang, Rajesh Krishna Balan, and Dingyi Fang. 2017a. TagScan: Simultaneous target imaging and material identification with commodity RFID devices. In Proc. ACM MobiCom. 288--300. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Ju Wang, Jie Xiong, Hongbo Jiang, Xiaojiang Chen, and Dingyi Fang. 2017b. D-Watch: Embracing `Bad' Multipaths for Device-Free Localization With COTS RFID Devices. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking , Vol. 25, 6 (2017), 3559--3572. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Roy Want. 2006. An introduction to RFID technology . IEEE Pervasive Computing , Vol. 5, 1 (2006), 25--33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Fan Yang, Qian Qiao, Juha Virtanen, Atef Z Elsherbeni, Leena Ukkonen, and Lauri Sydanheimo. 2012. Reconfigurable sensing antenna: A slotted patch design with temperature sensation. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters , Vol. 11 (2012), 632--635.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Pengyu Zhang, Pan Hu, Vijay Pasikanti, and Deepak Ganesan. 2014. Ekhonet: High speed ultra low-power backscatter for next generation sensors. In Proc. ACM MobiCom . 557--568. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Challenge: RFID Hacking for Fun and Profit

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MobiCom '18: Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking
      October 2018
      884 pages
      ISBN:9781450359030
      DOI:10.1145/3241539

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 October 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      MobiCom '18 Paper Acceptance Rate42of187submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate440of2,972submissions,15%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    ePub

    View this article in ePub.

    View ePub