skip to main content
survey
Open Access

Engagement in HCI: Conception, Theory and Measurement

Authors Info & Claims
Published:19 November 2018Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Engaging users is a priority for designers of products and services of every kind. The need to understand users’ experiences has motivated a focus on user engagement across computer science. However, to date, there has been limited review of how Human--Computer Interaction and computer science research interprets and employs the concept. Questions persist concerning its conception, abstraction, and measurement. This article presents a systematic review of engagement spanning a corpus of 351 articles and 102 definitions. We map the current state of engagement research, including the diverse interpretation, theory, and measurement of the concept. We describe the ecology of engagement and strategies for the design of engaging experiences, discuss the value of the concept and its relationship to other terms, and present a set of guidelines and opportunities for future research.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Ernest Adams. 1999. Three problems for interactive storytellers. Designer’s Notebook Column, Gamasutra 144 (1999). Retrieved on October 12, 2018 from https://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/131821/the_designers_notebook_three_.php.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ioannis Arapakis, Mounia Lalmas, and George Valkanas. 2014. Understanding within-content engagement through pattern analysis of mouse gestures. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. ACM, 1439--1448. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Simon Attfield, Gabriella Kazai, Mounia Lalmas, and Benjamin Piwowarski. 2011. Towards a science of user engagement. In Proceedings of the WSDM Workshop on User Modelling for Web Applications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Kirsten Boehner, Rogério DePaula, Paul Dourish, and Phoebe Sengers. 2005. Affect: From information to interaction. In Proceedings of the 4th Decennial Conference on Critical Computing: Between Sense and Sensibility. ACM, 59--68. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Gordon Calleja. 2007. Digital games as designed experience: Reframing the concept of immersion (unpublished) .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Carleton Coffrin, Linda Corrin, Paula de Barba, and Gregor Kennedy. 2014. Visualizing patterns of student engagement and performance in MOOCs. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge. ACM, 83--92. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Mauro José de Oliveira, Melby Karina Zuniga Huertas, and Zhibin Lin. 2016. Factors driving young users’ engagement with Facebook: Evidence from Brazil. Comput. Hum. Behav. 54 (2016), 54--61. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Daniel C. Dennett. 1971. Intentional systems. J. Philos. 68, 4 (1971), 87--106.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Daniel C. Dennett. 1988. Quining qualia. Consciousness in Modern Science (1988).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Kevin Doherty and Gavin Doherty. 2018. The construal of experience in HCI: Understanding self-reports. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 110 (2018), 63--74. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Alexey Drutsa, Gleb Gusev, and Pavel Serdyukov. 2015. Engagement periodicity in search engine usage: Analysis and its application to search quality evaluation. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. ACM, 27--36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Daniel A. Epstein, Jennifer H. Kang, Laura R. Pina, James Fogarty, and Sean A. Munson. 2016. Reconsidering the device in the drawer: Lapses as a design opportunity in personal informatics. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 829--840. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Alexandra Eveleigh, Charlene Jennett, Ann Blandford, Philip Brohan, and Anna L. Cox. 2014. Designing for dabblers and deterring drop-outs in citizen science. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2985--2994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Rebecca Ferguson and Doug Clow. 2015. Examining engagement: Analysing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses (MOOCs). In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge. ACM, 51--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Arlene Fink. 2013. Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper. Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. William Fleeson. 2007. Situation-based contingencies underlying trait-content manifestation in behavior. J. Pers. 75, 4 (2007), 825--862.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Jennifer A. Fredricks, Phyllis C. Blumenfeld, and Alison H. Paris. 2004. School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Rev. Educ. Res. 74, 1 (2004), 59--109.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Erving Goffman et al. 1978. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Harmondsworth.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Charles A. E. Goodhart. 1975. Problems of monetary management: The UK experience. In Papers in Monetary Economics, Volume I. Reserve Bank of Australia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Jonathan Grix. 2010. The Foundations of Research. Palgrave Macmillan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Mohammad Reza Habibi, Michel Laroche, and Marie-Odile Richard. 2014. The roles of brand community and community engagement in building brand trust on social media. Comput. Hum. Behav. 37 (2014), 152--161. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Juho Hamari, David J. Shernoff, Elizabeth Rowe, Brianno Coller, Jodi Asbell-Clarke, and Teon Edwards. 2016. Challenging games help students learn: An empirical study on engagement, flow and immersion in game-based learning. Comput. Human Behav. 54 (2016), 170--179. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Chris Hart. 2001. Doing a Literature Search: A Comprehensive Guide for the Social Sciences. Sage. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Kasper Hornbæk. 2006. Current practice in measuring usability: Challenges to usability studies and research. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 64, 2 (2006), 79--102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Eva Hudlicka. 2008. What are we modeling when we model emotion? In Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium: Emotion, Personality, and Social Behavior. 52--59.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Christopher D. Hundhausen, Sarah A. Douglas, and John T. Stasko. 2002. A meta-study of software visualization effectiveness. J. Vis. Lang. Comput. 13, 3 (2002), 259--290.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Heekyoung Jung, Erik Stolterman, Will Ryan, Tonya Thompson, and Marty Siegel. 2008. Toward a framework for ecologies of artifacts: How are digital artifacts interconnected within a personal life? In Proceedings of the 5th Nordic Conference on Human-computer Interaction: Building Bridges. ACM, 201--210. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Song Jung and Sangwon Lee. 2016. Developing a model for continuous user engagement in social media. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication. ACM, 19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Avinash Kaushik. 2007. Engagement Is Not A Metric, It’s An Excuse. Retrieved May 8, 2016 from http://www.kaushik.net/avinash/engagement-is-not-a-metric-its-an-excuse/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Matthew A. Killingsworth and Daniel T. Gilbert. 2010. A wandering mind is an unhappy mind. Science 330, 6006 (2010), 932--932.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Barbara Kitchenham, O. Pearl Brereton, David Budgen, Mark Turner, John Bailey, and Stephen Linkman. 2009. Systematic literature reviews in software engineering--a systematic literature review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 51, 1 (2009), 7--15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Alfred Korzybski. 1958. Science and Sanity: An Introduction to Non-Aristotelian Systems and General Semantics. Institute of GS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Brenda Laurel. 1991. Computers as theatre. 1991. Addison-Wesley, New York, NY. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Joon Soo Lim, YoungChan Hwang, Seyun Kim, and Frank A. Biocca. 2015. How social media engagement leads to sports channel loyalty: Mediating roles of social presence and channel commitment. Comput. Hum. Behav. 46 (2015), 158--167. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Gitte Lindgaard and Cathy Dudek. 2003. What is this evasive beast we call user satisfaction? Interact. Comput. 15, 3 (2003), 429--452.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Gloria Mark, Shamsi T. Iqbal, Mary Czerwinski, and Paul Johns. 2014. Bored mondays and focused afternoons: The rhythm of attention and online activity in the workplace. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3025--3034. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. John McCarthy and Peter Wright. 2004. Technology as Experience. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Mark McGill, Daniel Boland, Roderick Murray-Smith, and Stephen Brewster. 2015. A dose of reality: Overcoming usability challenges in vr head-mounted displays. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2143--2152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. David Moher, Alessandro Liberati, Jennifer Tetzlaff, and Douglas G. Altman. 2009. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Ann. Internal Med. 151, 4 (2009), 264--269.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Rosalind W. Picard. 2000. Affective Computing. MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Isabella Poggi. 2007. Mind, Hands, Face and Body. A Goal and Belief View of Multimodal Communication. Weidler.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Karl R. Popper. 1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Hutchinson, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Chris Preist, Elaine Massung, and David Coyle. 2014. Competing or aiming to be average?: Normification as a means of engaging digital volunteers. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work 8 Social Computing. ACM, 1222--1233. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Whitney Quesenbury. 2002. The five dimensions of usability. Content and Complexity: Information Design in Technical Communication, Michael J. Albers and Mary Beth Mazur (Eds.). Routledge, 81--102.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Dimitrios Raptis, Jesper Kjeldskov, Mikael B. Skov, and Jeni Paay. 2014. What is a digital ecology?: Theoretical foundations and a unified definition. Austr. J. Intell. Inf. Process. Syst. 13, 4 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Soumya Ray, Sung S. Kim, and James G. Morris. 2014. The central role of engagement in online communities. Inf. Syst. Res. 25, 3 (2014), 528--546. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Horst W. J. Rittel and Melvin M. Webber. 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci. 4, 2 (1973), 155--169.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Yvonne Rogers. 2006. Moving on from Weiser’s vision of calm computing: Engaging ubicomp experiences. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp’06). Springer, 404--421. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Natasha Dow Schüll. 2012. Addiction by Design: Machine Gambling in Las Vegas. Princeton University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Herbert A. Simon. 1969. The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge. MIT Press Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Paul Thomas, Heather O’Brien, and Tom Rowlands. 2016. Measuring engagement with online forms. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval. ACM, 325--328. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. David Zyngier. 2007. Listening to teachers--listening to students: Substantive conversations about resistance, empowerment and engagement. Teach. Teach. Theory Pract. 13, 4 (2007), 327--347.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. David Zyngier. 2008. (Re) conceptualising student engagement: Doing education not doing time. Teach. Teach. Educ. 24, 7 (2008), 1765--1776.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. <b>REVIEW CORPUS REFERENCES</b>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Mojtaba Khomami Abadi, Jacopo Staiano, Alessandro Cappelletti, Massimo Zancanaro, and Nicu Sebe. 2013. Multimodal engagement classification for affective cinema. In Proceedings of the 2013 Humaine Association Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction. IEEE, 411--416 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Alex Abreu, Gye Won Gho, and Daragh Byrne. 2013. Scatter&excl;: A mobile non-parallel multiplayer exertion game. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC’13). ACM Press, 632. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Rieks Akker, Dennis Hofs, Hendri Hondorp, Harm Akker, Job Zwiers, and Anton Nijholt. 2009. Supporting engagement and floor control in hybrid meetings. In Cross-Modal Analysis of Speech, Gestures, Gaze and Facial Expressions. Vol. 5641. Springer, Berlin, 276--290. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Stylianos Asteriadis, Kostas Karpouzis, and Stefanos Kollias. 2009. Feature extraction and selection for inferring user engagement in an HCI environment. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Part I: New Trends, Vol. 5610. Springer, Berlin, 22--29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Ron Baecker, Melanie Baran, Jeremy Birnholtz, Clarence Chan, Joe Laszlo, Kelly Rankin, Russ Schick, and Peter Wolf. 2006. Enhancing interactivity in webcasts with VoIP. In Proceedings of the CHI’06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’06). ACM Press, 235. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Ricardo Baeza-Yates and Mounia Lalmas. 2012. User engagement: The network effect matters&excl; In Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM’12). ACM Press, 1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Rafael Ballagas, Thérèse E. Dugan, Glenda Revelle, Koichi Mori, Maria Sandberg, Janet Go, Emily Reardon, and Mirjana Spasojevic. 2013. Electric agents: Fostering sibling joint media engagement through interactive television and augmented reality. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW’13). ACM Press, 225. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Alex Barco, Jordi Albo-Canals, and Carles Garriga. 2014. Engagement based on a customization of an iPod-LEGO robot for a long-term interaction for an educational purpose. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot Interaction (HRI’14). ACM Press, 124--125. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Jeffrey Bardzell, Shaowen Bardzell, Tyler Pace, and Jeremi Karnell. 2008. Making user engagement visible: A multimodal strategy for interactive media experience research. In Proceeding of the 26th annual CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’08). ACM Press, 3663. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Anastasios (Tasos) Barkatsas, Katerina Kasimatis, and Vasilis Gialamas. 2009. Learning secondary mathematics with technology: Exploring the complex interrelationship between students’ attitudes, engagement, gender and achievement. Comput. Educ. 52, 3 (Apr. 2009), 562--570. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Carole R. Beal, Lei Qu, and Hyokyeong Lee. 2006. Classifying learner engagement through integration of multiple data sources. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Press, 151--156. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Russell Beale and Chris Creed. 2009. Affective interaction: How emotional agents affect users. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 67, 9 (Sept. 2009), 755--776. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Ashwin Belle, Rosalyn Hobson, and Kayvan Najarian. 2011. A physiological signal processing system for optimal engagement and attention detection. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine Workshops (BIBMW’11). IEEE, 555--561. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Sebastian Hurup Bevensee, Kasper Alexander Dahlsgaard Boisen, Mikael Peter Olsen, Henrik Schoenau-Fog, and Luis Emilio Bruni. 2012. Aporia—Exploring continuation desire in a game focused on environmental storytelling. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Interactive Storytelling, Vol. 7648. Springer, Berlin, 42--47. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze, Whan Woong Kim, and Darshak Patel. 2007. Does body movement engage you more in digital game play? and why? In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII’07), Vol. 4738. Springer, Berlin, 102--113. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Timothy Bickmore, Daniel Schulman, and Langxuan Yin. 2010. Maintaining engagement in long-term interventions with relational agents. Appl. Artif. Intell. 24, 6 (Jul. 2010), 648--666. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Timothy W. Bickmore, Sunny Consolvo, and Stephen S. Intille. 2009. Engagement by design. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’09). ACM Press, 4807. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Cezary Biele, Agata Kopacz, and Krzysztof Krejtz. 2013. Shall we care about the user’s feelings?: Influence of affect and engagement on visual attention. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimedia, Interaction, Design and Innovation (MIDI’13). ACM Press, 1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Stacey Birkett, Adam Galpin, Simon Cassidy, Lynne Marrow, and Sarah Norgate. 2011. How revealing are eye-movements for understanding web engagement in young children. In Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’11). ACM Press, 2251. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Jeremy Birnholtz, Jeff Hancock, and Daniela Retelny. 2013. Tweeting for class: Co-construction as a means for engaging students in lectures. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’13). ACM Press, 797. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. Robert Bixler and Sidney D’Mello. 2013. Detecting boredom and engagement during writing with keystroke analysis, task appraisals, and stable traits. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI’13). ACM Press, 225. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. Benjamin Blankertz, Michael Tangermann, Carmen Vidaurre, Siamac Fazli, Claudia Sannelli, Stefan Haufe, Cecilia Maeder, Lenny Ramsey, Irene Sturm, Gabriel Curio, et al. 2010. The Berlin brain--computer interface: Non-medical uses of BCI technology. Front. Neurosci. 4 (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Lorena Blasco-Arcas, Isabel Buil, Blanca Hernández-Ortega, and F. Javier Sese. 2013. Using clickers in class. The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning and engagement in learning performance. Comput. Educ. 62 (Mar. 2013), 102--110.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Dan Bohus and Eric Horvitz. 2009a. Dialog in the open world: Platform and applications. In Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (ICMI-MLMI’09). ACM Press, 31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  79. Dan Bohus and Eric Horvitz. 2009b. Learning to predict engagement with a spoken dialog system in open-world settings. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue (SIGDIAL’09). Association for Computational Linguistics, 244--252. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. Dan Bohus and Eric Horvitz. 2009c. Models for multiparty engagement in open-world dialog. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue (SIGDIAL’09). Association for Computational Linguistics, 225--234. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  81. Francesca Bonin, Ronald Bock, and Nick Campbell. 2012. How do we react to context? Annotation of individual and group engagement in a video corpus. In Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2012 International Conference on Social Computing. IEEE, 899--903. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. Hara Bouta and Symeon Retalis. 2013. Enhancing primary school children collaborative learning experiences in maths via a 3D virtual environment. Educ. Inf. Technol. 18, 4 (May 2013), 571--596. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. Elizabeth A. Boyle, Thomas M. Connolly, Thomas Hainey, and James M. Boyle. 2012. Engagement in digital entertainment games: A systematic review. Comput. Hum. Behav. 28, 3 (May 2012), 771--780. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  84. Jeanne H. Brockmyer, Christine M. Fox, Kathleen A. Curtiss, Evan McBroom, Kimberly M. Burkhart, and Jacquelyn N. Pidruzny. 2009. The development of the game engagement questionnaire: A measure of engagement in video game-playing. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 45, 4 (2009), 624--634.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  85. Eva Petersson Brooks. 2013. Ludic engagement designs: Creating spaces for playful learning. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction (UAHCI’13), Vol. 8011. Springer, Berlin, 241--249. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  86. Emily Brown and Paul Cairns. 2004. A grounded investigation of game immersion. In Extended Abstracts of the 2004 Conference on Human Factors and Computing Systems (CHI’04). ACM Press, 1297. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  87. Nick Bryan-Kinns. 2013. Mutual engagement and collocation with shared representations. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 71, 1 (Jan. 2013), 76--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  88. Agnese Caglio and Jacob Buur. 2012. Creating engagement with old research videos. In Proceedings of the 2012 International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (PerDis’12). ACM Press, 1--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  89. Hua Cai and Yingzi Lin. 2012. Coordinating cognitive assistance with cognitive engagement control approaches in human-machine collaboration. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet. A 42, 2 (Mar. 2012), 286--294. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  90. Tara Carrigy, Katsiaryna Naliuka, Natasa Paterson, and Mads Haahr. 2010. Design and evaluation of player experience of a location-based mobile game. In Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction Extending Boundaries (NordiCHI’10). ACM Press, 92. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  91. Ginevra Castellano, André Pereira, Iolanda Leite, Ana Paiva, and Peter W. McOwan. 2009. Detecting user engagement with a robot companion using task and social interaction-based features. In Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (ICMI-MLMI’09). ACM Press, 119. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  92. Mark Chen, Beth E. Kolko, Elisabeth Cuddihy, and Eliana Medina. 2011. Modeling but NOT measuring engagement in computer games. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Games + Learning + Society. ETC Press, 55--63. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  93. Vinay Chilukuri and Bipin Indurkhya. 2011. An algorithm to generate engaging narratives through non-linearity. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (HT’11). ACM Press, 291. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  94. Ahyoung Choi, Celso De Melo, Woontack Woo, and Jonathan Gratch. 2012. Affective engagement to emotional facial expressions of embodied social agents in a decision-making game. Comput. Anim. Virt. Worlds 23, 3--4 (May 2012), 331--342. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  95. Jung Ju Choi, Yunkyung Kim, and Sonya S. Kwak. 2014. Are you embarrassed?: The impact of robot types on emotional engagement with a robot. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot interaction (HRI’14). ACM Press, 138--139. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  96. Chun-Juei Chou and Chris Conley. 2011. Investigating users’ interaction with physical products applying qualitative and quantitative methods. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Human Centered Design. Springer-Verlag, 3--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  97. Hsin-Kai Chou, I-Chun Lin, Lin-Chung Woung, and Ming-Tsu Tsai. 2012. Engagement in E-learning opportunities: An empirical study on patient education using expectation confirmation theory.J. Med. Syst. 36, 3 (Jun. 2012), 1697--706. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  98. Elizabeth F. Churchill. 2010. Enticing engagement. Interactions 17, 3 (May 2010), 82. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  99. Mihaela Cocea and Stephan Weibelzahl. 2007. Cross-system validation of engagement prediction from log files. Creating New Learning Experiences on a Global Scale, Erik Duval, Ralf Klamma, and Martin Wolpers (Eds.). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 14--25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  100. Martin Colbert and Angela Boodoo. 2011. Does ‘Letting Go of the Words’ increase engagement: A traffic study. In Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’11). ACM Press, 655. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  101. Luca Colombo and Monica Landoni. 2011. Towards an engaging e-reading experience. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM Workshop on Online Books, Complementary Social Media and Crowdsourcing (BooksOnline’11). ACM Press, 61. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  102. Thomas M. Connolly, Elizabeth A. Boyle, Ewan MacArthur, Thomas Hainey, and James M. Boyle. 2012. A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Comput. Educ. 59, 2 (Sept. 2012), 661--686. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  103. Lee J. Corrigan, Christina Basedow, Dennis Küster, Arvid Kappas, Christopher Peters, and Ginevra Castellano. 2014. Mixing implicit and explicit probes: Finding a ground truth for engagement in social human-robot interactions. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot Interaction (HRI’14). ACM Press, 140--141. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  104. Lee J. Corrigan, Christopher Peters, and Ginevra Castellano. 2013. Identifying task engagement: Towards personalised interactions with educational robots. In Proceedings of the 2013 Humaine Association Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction. IEEE, 655--658. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  105. Ben Cowley, Darryl Charles, Michaela Black, and Ray Hickey. 2008. Toward an understanding of flow in video games. Comput. Entertain. 6, 2 (Jul. 2008), 1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  106. Peter Dalsgaard, Christian Dindler, and Kim Halskov. 2011. Understanding the dynamics of engaging interaction in public spaces. In Proceedings of the 13th IFIP TC 13 International Conference on Human-computer Interaction (INTERACT’11). Springer-Verlag, 212--229. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  107. Anirban Dasgupta, Kunal Punera, Justin M. Rao, and Xuanhui Wang. 2012. Impact of spam exposure on user engagement. In Proceedings of the 21st USENIX Conference on Security Symposium (Security’12). USENIX Association, 3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  108. Chris H. J. Davies. 2002. Student engagement with simulations: A case study. Comput. Educ. 39, 3 (Nov. 2002), 271--282. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  109. Kristine Deray and Simeon Simoff. 2012. Framing interaction through engagement in interactive open ended environments. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Information Visualisation. IEEE, 534--539. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  110. Christian Dindler, Ole Sejer Iversen, and Peter Gall Krogh. 2011. Engagement through mixed modalities. Interactions 18, 4 (Jul. 2011), 34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  111. Sidney D’Mello, Patrick Hays, Claire Williams, Whitney Cade, Jennifer Brown, and Andrew Olney. 2010. Collaborative lecturing by human and computer tutors. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS’10), Vol. 6095. Springer, Berlin, 178--187. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  112. Florin Dobrian, Asad Awan, Dilip Joseph, Aditya Ganjam, Jibin Zhan, Vyas Sekar, Ion Stoica, and Hui Zhang. 2013. Understanding the impact of video quality on user engagement. Commun. ACM 56, 3 (Mar. 2013), 91. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  113. Adrián Domínguez, Joseba Saenz-de Navarrete, Luis De-Marcos, Luis Fernández-Sanz, Carmen Pagés, and José-Javier Martínez-Herráiz. 2013. Gamifying learning experiences: Practical implications and outcomes. Comput. Educ. 63 (Apr. 2013), 380--392. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  114. Claire Dormann, Pippin Barr, and Robert Biddle. 2006. Humour theory and videogames: Laughter in the slaughter. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Videogames (Sandbox’06). ACM Press, 95--98. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  115. Yellowlees Douglas and Andrew Hargadon. 2000. The pleasure principle: Immersion, engagement, flow. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM on Hypertext and hypermedia (HYPERTEXT’00). ACM Press, 153--160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  116. Steven Dow. 2007. User engagement in physically embodied narrative experiences. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity & Cognition (C&C’’’07). ACM Press, 280. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  117. Steven Dow, Manish Mehta, Ellie Harmon, Blair MacIntyre, and Michael Mateas. 2007. Presence and engagement in an interactive drama. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’07). ACM Press, 1475. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  118. Georges Dupret and Mounia Lalmas. 2013. Absence time and user engagement: Evaluating ranking functions. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM’13). ACM Press, 173. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  119. Wade Fagen and Samuel Kamin. 2013. Measuring increased engagement using tablet PCs in a code review class. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE’13). ACM Press, 465. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  120. Stephen H. Fairclough, Kiel Gilleade, Katie C. Ewing, and Jenna Roberts. 2013. Capturing user engagement via psychophysiology: Measures and mechanisms for biocybernetic adaptation. Int. J. Auton. Adapt. Commun. Syst. 6, 1 (Dec. 2013), 63. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  121. Shelly Farnham, David Keyes, Vicky Yuki, and Chris Tugwell. 2012. Puget sound off: Fostering youth civic engagement through citizen journalism. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW’12). ACM Press, 285. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  122. Alessandro Febretti and Franca Garzotto. 2009. Usability, playability, and long-term engagement in computer games. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’09). ACM Press, 4063. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  123. Joel E. Fischer and Steve Benford. 2009. Inferring player engagement in a pervasive experience. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’09). ACM Press, 1903. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  124. James Fogarty, Andrew J. Ko, Htet Htet Aung, Elspeth Golden, Karen P. Tang, and Scott E. Hudson. 2005. Examining task engagement in sensor-based statistical models of human interruptibility. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’05). ACM Press, 331. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  125. Mary Ellen Foster, Andre Gaschler, and Manuel Giuliani. 2013. How can I help you?: Comparing engagement classification strategies for a robot bartender. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM on International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (ICMI’13). ACM Press, 255--262. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  126. Jill Freyne, Michal Jacovi, Ido Guy, and Werner Geyer. 2009. Increasing engagement through early recommender intervention. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys’09). ACM Press, 85. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  127. Federico Cirett Galán and Carole R. Beal. 2012. EEG estimates of engagement and cognitive workload predict math problem solving outcomes. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization, Vol. 7379. Springer, Berlin, 51--62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  128. Merve Gençer, Gökhan Bilgin, Özgür Zan, and Tansel VoyvodaoÄlu. 2013. A new framework for increasing user engagement in mobile applications using machine learning techniques. In Proceedings of the International Conference of Design, User Experience, and Usability. Springer, 651--659. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  129. James Glasnapp and Oliver Brdiczka. 2009. A human-centered model for detecting technology engagement. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Part III: Ubiquitous and Intelligent Interaction, Vol. 5612. Springer, Berlin, 621--630. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  130. Benjamin S. Goldberg, Robert A. Sottilare, Keith W. Brawner, and Heather K. Holden. 2011. Predicting learner engagement during well-defined and Ill-defined computer-based intercultural interactions. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction—Volume Part I. Springer-Verlag, 538--547. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  131. Douglas Grimes, Mark Warschauer, Tara Hutchinson, and Falko Kuester. 2005. Computer graphics instruction in VizClass. J. Educ. Resourc. Comput. 5, 4 (Dec. 2005), 1--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  132. Sofiane Gueddana and Nicolas Roussel. 2006. Pêle-Mêle, a video communication system supporting a variable degree of engagement. In Proceedings of the 2006 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW’06). ACM Press, 423. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  133. Hayrettin Gürkök, Gido Hakvoort, and Mannes Poel. 2011. Evaluating user experience in a selection based brain-computer interface game: A comparative study. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Entertainment Computing, Vol. 6972. Springer, Berlin, 77--88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  134. Lynne Hall, Sarah Woods, Ruth Aylett, Lynne Newall, and Ana Paiva. 2005. Achieving empathic engagement through affective interaction with synthetic characters. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII’05), Vol. 3784. Springer, Berlin, 731--738. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  135. Stuart Hansen and Erica Eddy. 2007. Engagement and frustration in programming projects. ACM SIGCSE Bull. 39, 1 (Mar. 2007), 271. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  136. Jennefer Hart, Alistair Sutcliffe, and Antonella De Angeli. 2012. Using affect to evaluate user engagement. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Annual Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts (CHIEA‘12). ACM Press, 1811. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  137. Casper Harteveld, Eleonore ten Thij, and Marinka Copier. 2011. Design for engaging experience and social interaction. Simul. Gam. 42, 5 (Nov. 2011), 590--595. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  138. Patrick Hennig, Philipp Berger, Christoph Meinel, Maria Graber, Jens Hildebrandt, Stefan Lehmann, and Cathleen Ramson. 2013. Tracking visitor engagement in the blogosphere for leveraging rankings. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Social Computing. IEEE, 365--372. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  139. J. M. Houtkamp, A. Toet, and F. A. Bos. 2012. Task-relevant sound and user experience in computer-mediated firefighter training. Simul. Gam. 43, 6 (May 2012), 778--802. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  140. Paul Jen-Hwa Hu and Wendy Hui. 2012. Examining the role of learning engagement in technology-mediated learning and its effects on learning effectiveness and satisfaction. Decis. Support Syst. 53, 4 (Nov. 2012), 782--792. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  141. Jessica Hullman, Eytan Adar, and Priti Shah. 2011. Benefitting InfoVis with visual difficulties. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 17, 12 (Dec. 2011), 2213--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  142. Mark I. Hwang and Ron G. Thorn. 1999. The effect of user engagement on system success: A meta-analytical integration of research findings. Inf. Manage. 35, 4 (Apr. 1999), 229--236. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  143. Ioanna Iacovides. 2009. Exploring the link between player involvement and learning within digital games. In Proceedings of the 23rd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Celebrating People and Technology. British Computer Society, 29--34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  144. Ryo Ishii and Yukiko I. Nakano. 2008. Estimating user’s conversational engagement based on gaze behaviors. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents, Vol. 5208. Springer, Berlin, 200--207. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  145. Ryo Ishii and Yukiko I. Nakano. 2010. An empirical study of eye-gaze behaviors: Towards the estimation of conversational engagement in human-agent communication. In Proceedings of the 2010 Workshop on Eye Gaze in Intelligent Human Machine Interaction (EGIHMI’10). ACM Press, 33--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  146. Carolina Islas Sedano, Verona Leendertz, Mikko Vinni, Erkki Sutinen, and Suria Ellis. 2013. Hypercontextualized learning games: Fantasy, motivation, and engagement in reality. Simul. Gam. 44, 6 (Dec. 2013), 821--845. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  147. Essi Isohanni and Maria Knobelsdorf. 2011. Students’ long-term engagement with the visualization tool VIP. In Proceedings of the 11th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research (Koli Calling’11). ACM Press, 33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  148. Giulio Jacucci, Ann Morrison, Gabriela T. Richard, Jari Kleimola, Peter Peltonen, Lorenza Parisi, and Toni Laitinen. 2010. Worlds of information: Designing for engagement at a public multi-touch display. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’10). ACM Press, 2267. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  149. Alejandro Jaimes, Mounia Lalmas, and Yana Volkovich. 2011a. First international workshop on social media engagement (SoME 2011). In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference companion on World Wide Web (WWW’11). ACM Press, 309. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  150. Alejandro Jaimes, Mounia Lalmas, and Yana Volkovich. 2011b. First international workshop on social media engagement (SoME 2011) (report). ACM SIGIR Forum 45, 1 (May 2011), 56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  151. Leon A. Kappelman. 1995. Measuring user involvement: A diffusion of innovation perspective. ACM SIGMIS Database 26, 2--3 (May 1995), 65--86. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  152. Ville Karavirta and Ari Korhonen. 2006. Automatic tutoring question generation during algorithm simulation. In Proceedings of the 6th Baltic Sea Conference on Computing Education Research (Koli Calling’06). ACM Press, 95. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  153. B. Joon Kim and Stephen W. Kleinschmit. 2012. A logistic multilevel model for civic engagement and community group impact in the digital age. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV’12). ACM Press, 34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  154. Young Hoon Kim, Dan J. Kim, and Kathy Wachter. 2013. A study of mobile user engagement (MoEN): Engagement motivations, perceived value, satisfaction, and continued engagement intention. Decis. Support Syst. 56 (Dec. 2013), 361--370.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  155. Samuel O. King and Carol L. Robinson. 2009. ‘Pretty Lights’ and maths&excl; Increasing student engagement and enhancing learning through the use of electronic voting systems. Comput. Educ. 53, 1 (Aug. 2009), 189--199. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  156. Ben Kirman, Shaun Lawson, Conor Linehan, Francesco Martino, Luciano Gamberini, and Andrea Gaggioli. 2010. Improving social game engagement on facebook through enhanced socio-contextual information. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’10). ACM Press, 1753. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  157. Michel Klein and Rianne Van Lambalgen. 2011. Design of an optimal automation system: Finding a balance between a human’s task engagement and exhaustion. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Other Applications of Applied Intelligent Systems Conference on Modern Approaches in Applied Intelligence,Volume Part II. Springer-Verlag, 98--108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  158. Natalia Kucirkova, David Messer, Kieron Sheehy, and Carmen Fernández Panadero. 2014. Children’s engagement with educational iPad apps: Insights from a Spanish classroom. Comput. Educ. 71 (Feb. 2014), 175--184. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  159. Stacey Kuznetsov, Will Harrigan-Anderson, Haakon Faste, Scott E. Hudson, and Eric Paulos. 2013. Community engagements with living sensing systems. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Creativity & Cognition (C&C’’’13). ACM Press, 213. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  160. Chih-Hui Lai. 2014. An integrated approach to untangling mediated connectedness with online and mobile media. Comput. Hum. Behav. 31 (Feb. 2014), 20--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  161. K. K. Lamberty. 2004. Sustaining student engagement with a constructionist design tool for craft and math. In Proceeding of the 2004 Conference on Interaction Design and Children Building a Community (IDC’04). ACM Press, 165--166. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  162. Celine Latulipe, Erin A. Carroll, and Danielle Lottridge. 2011. Love, hate, arousal and engagement: Exploring audience responses to performing arts. In Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’11). ACM Press, 1845. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  163. Raymond S. T. Lee, James N. K. Liu, Karo S. Y. Yeung, Alan H. L. Sin, and Dennis T. F. Shum. 2009. Agent-based web content engagement time (WCET) analyzer on e-publication system. In Proceedings of the 2009 9th International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications. IEEE, 67--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  164. Scott LeeTiernan and Jonathan Grudin. 2003. Supporting engagement in asynchronous education. In Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’03). ACM Press, 888. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  165. Janette Lehmann, Mounia Lalmas, Ricardo Baeza-Yates, and Elad Yom-Tov. 2013a. Networked user engagement. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on User Engagement Optimization (UEO’13). ACM Press, 7--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  166. Janette Lehmann, Mounia Lalmas, Georges Dupret, and Ricardo Baeza-Yates. 2013b. Online multitasking and user engagement. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Conference on Information & Knowledge Management (CIKM’13). ACM Press, 519--528. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  167. Janette Lehmann, Mounia Lalmas, Elad Yom-Tov, and Georges Dupret. 2012. Models of user engagement. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization (UMAP’12), Vol. 7379. Springer, Berlin, 164--175. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  168. Gilly Leshed, Theresa Velden, Oya Rieger, Blazej Kot, and Phoebe Sengers. 2008. In-car gps navigation: Engagement with and disengagement from the environment. In Proceeding of the 26th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’08). ACM Press, 1675. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  169. Aleck C. H. Lin, Walter D. Fernandez, and Shirley Gregor. 2012. Understanding web enjoyment experiences and informal learning: A study in a museum context. Decis. Support Syst. 53, 4 (Nov. 2012), 846--858. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  170. Siân E. Lindley, James Le Couteur, and Nadia L. Berthouze. 2008. Stirring up experience through movement in game play: Effects on engagement and social behaviour. In Proceeding of the 26th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’08). ACM Press, 511. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  171. Micah Linnemeier, Yi-Ying Lin, Gierad Laput, and Ramachandra Vijjapurapu. 2012. StoryCubes: Connecting elders in independent living through storytelling. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Annual Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts (CHI EA’12). ACM Press, 1321. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  172. Yefeng Liu, Todorka Alexandrova, and Tatsuo Nakajima. 2011. Gamifying intelligent environments. In Proceedings of the 2011 International ACM Workshop on Ubiquitous Meta User Interfaces (Ubi-MUI’11). ACM Press, 7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  173. Derek Lomas, John Stamper, Ryan Muller, Kishan Patel, and Kenneth R. Koedinger. 2012. The effects of adaptive sequencing algorithms on player engagement within an online game. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS’12), Vol. 7315. Springer, Berlin, 588--590. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  174. Luca Longo. 2011. Human-computer interaction and human mental workload: Assessing cognitive engagement in the world wide web. In Proceedings of the IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer-Verlag, 402--405. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  175. Bride Mallon and Brian Webb. 2000. Structure, causality, visibility and interaction: Propositions for evaluating engagement in narrative multimedia. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 53, 2 (Aug. 2000), 269--287. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  176. Tim Marsh, Michael Nitsche, Wei Liu, Peichi Chung, Jay D. Bolter, and Adrian D. Cheok. 2008. Film informing design for contemplative gameplay. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Video Games (Sandbox’08). ACM Press, 99. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  177. Francesco Martino, Roberto Baù, Anna Spagnolli, and Luciano Gamberini. 2009. Presence in the age of social networks: Augmenting mediated environments with feedback on group activity. Virt. Real. 13, 3 (Jul. 2009), 183--194. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  178. Lori McCay-Peet, Mounia Lalmas, and Vidhya Navalpakkam. 2012. On saliency, affect and focused attention. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’12). ACM Press, 541. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  179. Elisabeth McClure. 2013. Infant emotional engagement in video mediated interactions. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC’13). ACM Press, 655. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  180. Olivia Metcalf and Kristen Pammer. 2011. Attentional bias in excessive massively multiplayer online role-playing gamers using a modified Stroop task. Comput. Hum. Behav. 27, 5 (Sept. 2011), 1942--1947. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  181. Niko Myller, Roman Bednarik, Erkki Sutinen, and Mordechai Ben-Ari. 2009. Extending the engagement taxonomy: Software visualization and collaborative learning. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 9, 1 (Mar. 2009), 1--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  182. Yukiko Nakano and Yuji Yamaoka. 2009. Information state based multimodal dialogue management: Estimating conversational engagement from gaze information. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA’09), Vol. 5773. Springer, Berlin, 531--532. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  183. Thomas L. Naps, Susan Rodger, J. Ángel Velázquez-Iturbide, Guido Rößling, Vicki Almstrum, Wanda Dann, Rudolf Fleischer, Chris Hundhausen, Ari Korhonen, Lauri Malmi, and Myles McNally. 2002. Exploring the role of visualization and engagement in computer science education. ACM SIGCSE Bull. 35, 2 (Jun. 2002), 131. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  184. Surya Nepal, Wanita Sherchan, and Cecile Paris. 2012. Building trust communities using social trust. Adv. User Model. 7138 (Jul. 2012), 243--255. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  185. Mark Notess. 2008. The e-Learning Rules of Engagement. eLearn 2008, 11 (Nov. 2008), 2. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  186. Heather L. O’Brien and Elaine G. Toms. 2008. What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 59, 6 (Apr. 2008), 938--955. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  187. Heather L. O’Brien and Elaine G. Toms. 2010a. Is there a universal instrument for measuring interactive information retrieval? In Proceeding of the 3rd Symposium on Information Interaction in Context (IIiX’10). ACM Press, 335. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  188. Heather L. O’Brien and Elaine G. Toms. 2010b. The development and evaluation of a survey to measure user engagement. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 61, 1 (Jan. 2010), 50--69. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  189. Heather L. O’Brien and Elaine G. Toms. 2013. Examining the generalizability of the user engagement scale (UES) in exploratory search. Inf. Process. Manage. 49, 5 (Sept. 2013), 1092--1107. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  190. Catharine Oertel. 2013. Towards developing a model for group involvement and individual engagement. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM on International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (ICMI’13). ACM Press, 349--352. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  191. Catharine Oertel and Giampiero Salvi. 2013. A gaze-based method for relating group involvement to individual engagement in multimodal multiparty dialogue. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM on International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (ICMI’13). ACM Press, 99--106. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  192. Kimmo Oksanen. 2013. Subjective experience and sociability in a collaborative serious game. Simul. Gam. 44, 6 (Dec. 2013), 767--793. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  193. Ryota Ooko, Ryo Ishii, and Yukiko I. Nakano. 2011. Estimating a user’s conversational engagement based on head pose information. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA’11). Springer-Verlag, 262--268. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  194. Sharon Oviatt, Colin Swindells, and Alex Arthur. 2008. Implicit user-adaptive system engagement in speech and pen interfaces. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’08). ACM Press, 969. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  195. Hun Myoung Park. 2006. The impacts of digital government on civic engagement: A typology of information technology use. In Proceedings of the 2006 National Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o’06). ACM Press, 440. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  196. Jon Pearce and Sofia Pardo. 2008. To search or to explore -- that is the question: A study in mindful engagement. In Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction Designing for Habitus and Habitat (OZCHI’08). ACM Press, 251. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  197. Christopher Peters, Ginevra Castellano, and Sara de Freitas. 2009. An exploration of user engagement in HCI. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Affective-Aware Virtual Agents and Social Robots (AFFINE’09). ACM Press, 1--3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  198. Henning Pohl and Roderick Murray-Smith. 2013. Focused and casual interactions: Allowing users to vary their level of engagement. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’13). ACM Press, 2223. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  199. Charles Rich, Brett Ponsleur, Aaron Holroyd, and Candace L. Sidner. 2010. Recognizing engagement in human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot Interaction. IEEE Press, 375--382. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  200. Marco C. Rozendaal, David V. Keyson, and Huib de Ridder. 2007. Product behavior and appearance effects on experienced engagement during experiential and goal-directed tasks. In Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces (DPPI’07). ACM Press, 181. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  201. Marco C. Rozendaal, David V. Keyson, and Huib Ridder. 2008. Product features and task effects on experienced richness, control and engagement in voicemail browsing. Pers. Ubiq. Comput. 13, 5 (Jun. 2008), 343--354. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  202. Marco C. Rozendaal, David V. Keyson, Huib Ridder, and Peter O. Craig. 2009. Game feature and expertise effects on experienced richness, control and engagement in game play. AI Soc. 24, 2 (Mar. 2009), 123--133. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  203. Jyotirmay Sanghvi, Ginevra Castellano, Iolanda Leite, André Pereira, Peter W. McOwan, and Ana Paiva. 2011. Automatic analysis of affective postures and body motion to detect engagement with a game companion. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-robot Interaction (HRI’11). ACM Press, 305. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  204. Henrik Schoenau-Fog. 2011. Hooked&excl; - Evaluating engagement as continuation desire in interactive narratives. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Interactive Digital Storytelling (ICIDS’11), Vol. 7069. Springer, Berlin, 219--230. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  205. Henrik Schoenau-Fog, Alexander Birke, and Lars Reng. 2012. Evaluation of continuation desire as an iterative game development method. In Proceeding of the 16th International Academic MindTrek Conference (MindTrek’12). ACM Press, 241. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  206. Ellen Lisette Schuurink, Joske Houtkamp, and Alexander Toet. 2008. Engagement and EMG in serious gaming: Experimenting with sound and dynamics in the levee patroller training game. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Fun and Games, Vol. 5294. Springer, Berlin, 139--149. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  207. May-li Seah and Paul Cairns. 2008. From immersion to addiction in videogames. In Proceedings of the 22nd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Culture, Creativity, Interaction (BCS-HCI’08), Volume 1. British Computer Society, 55--63. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  208. Kathy Seddon, Nigel C. Skinner, and Keith C. Postlethwaite. 2008. Creating a model to examine motivation for sustained engagement in online communities. Educ. Inf. Technol. 13, 1 (Aug. 2008), 17--34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  209. Soonhwa Seok and Boaventura DaCosta. 2012. The world’s most intense online gaming culture: Addiction and high-engagement prevalence rates among South Korean adolescents and young adults. Comput. Hum. Behav. 28, 6 (Nov. 2012), 2143--2151. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  210. C. L. Sidner and M. Dzikovska. 2002. Human-robot interaction: Engagement between humans and robots for hosting activities. In Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces. IEEE Comput. Soc., 123--128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  211. Candace L. Sidner, Cory D. Kidd, Christopher Lee, and Neal Lesh. 2004. Where to look: A study of human-robot engagement. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Intelligent User Interface (IUI’04). ACM Press, 78. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  212. Candace L. Sidner, Christopher Lee, Cory D. Kidd, Neal Lesh, and Charles Rich. 2005. Explorations in engagement for humans and robots. Artif. Intell. 166, 1-2 (Aug. 2005), 140--164. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  213. Bradley A. Singletary and Thad E. Starner. 2001. Learning visual models of social engagement. In Proceedings of the IEEE ICCV Workshop on Recognition, Analysis, and Tracking of Faces and Gestures in Real-Time Systems, 2001. IEEE Computer Society, 141. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  214. Stephen Snow, Laurie Buys, Paul Roe, and Margot Brereton. 2013. Curiosity to cupboard: Self reported disengagement with energy use feedback over time. In Proceedings of the 25th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on Augmentation, Application, Innovation, Collaboration (OzCHI’13). ACM Press, 245--254. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  215. Social Computing Research Group. 2005. Understanding computer mediated social experience: Implications for CSCL. In Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Learning 2005: The Next 10 years&excl; International Society of the Learning Sciences, 617--621. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  216. Yang Song, Xiaolin Shi, and Xin Fu. 2013. Evaluating and predicting user engagement change with degraded search relevance. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 1213--1224. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  217. Itana Stiubiener, Regina M. Silveira, Reinaldo Matushima, Graca Bressan, and Wilson V. Ruggiero. 2012. Evaluating the effectiveness of the use of teaching materials in video format in distance learning environments. In Proceedings of the 2012 Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings. IEEE, 1--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  218. Jerry Chih-Yuan Sun. 2014. Influence of polling technologies on student engagement: An analysis of student motivation, academic performance, and brainwave data. Comput. Educ. 72 (Mar. 2014), 80--89.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  219. S. Shyam Sundar, Jeeyun Oh, Saraswathi Bellur, Haiyan Jia, and Hyang-Sook Kim. 2012. Interactivity as self-expression: A field experiment with customization and blogging. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’12). ACM Press, 395. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  220. Ben Swift, Henry Gardner, and Alistair Riddell. 2010. Engagement networks in social music-making. In Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction (OZCHI’10). ACM Press, 104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  221. Daniel Szafir and Bilge Mutlu. 2012. Pay attention&excl;: Designing adaptive agents that monitor and improve user engagement. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’12). ACM Press, 11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  222. Jay Shiro Tashiro and David Dunlap. 2007. The impact of realism on learning engagement in educational games. In Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Future Play (Future Play’07). ACM Press, 113. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  223. Nick Taylor, Justin Marshall, Alicia Blum-Ross, John Mills, Jon Rogers, Paul Egglestone, David M. Frohlich, Peter Wright, and Patrick Olivier. 2012. Viewpoint: Empowering communities with situated voting devices. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’12). ACM Press, 1361. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  224. Choo-Yee Ting, Wei-Nam Cheah, and Chiung Ching Ho. 2013. Student engagement modeling using bayesian networks. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. IEEE, 2939--2944. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  225. Holly Tootell, Melinda Plumb, Colin Hadfield, and Linda Dawson. 2013. Gestural interface technology in early childhood education: A framework for fully engaged communication. In Proceedings of the 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, 13--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  226. Phil Turner. 2010. The anatomy of engagement. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics (ECCE’10). ACM Press, 59. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  227. Jaime Urquiza-Fuentes and J. Ángel Velázquez-Iturbide. 2012. Comparing the effectiveness of different educational uses of program animations. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE’12). ACM Press, 174. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  228. Erik D. Van Der Spek. 2012. Towards designing for competence and engagement in serious games. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Serious Games Development and Applications (SGDA’12), Vol. 7528. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 98--109. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  229. H. C. van Vugt, E. A. Konijn, J. F. Hoorn, I. Keur, and A. Eliëns. 2007. Realism is not all&excl; User engagement with task-related interface characters. Interact. Comput. 19, 2 (Mar. 2007), 267--280. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  230. Henriette C. van Vugt, Johan F. Hoorn, Elly A. Konijn, and Athina de Bie Dimitriadou. 2006. Affective affordances: Improving interface character engagement through interaction. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 64, 9 (Sept. 2006), 874--888. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  231. Marynel Vázquez, Aaron Steinfeld, Scott E. Hudson, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2014. Spatial and other social engagement cues in a child-robot interaction: Effects of a sidekick. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot Interaction (HRI’14). ACM Press, 391--398. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  232. Jane Webster and Jaspreet S. Ahuja. 2006. Enhancing the design of web navigation systems: The influence of user disorientation on engagement and performance. MIS Quart. 30, 3 (Sept. 2006), 661--678. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  233. Jane Webster and Hayes Ho. 1997. Audience engagement in multimedia presentations. ACM SIGMIS Database 28, 2 (Apr. 1997), 63--77. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  234. Jennifer Whitson, Chris Eaket, Brian Greenspan, Minh Quang Tran, and Natalie King. 2008. Neo-immersion: Awareness and engagement in gameplay. In Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Future Play Research, Play, Share (Future Play ’08). ACM Press, 220. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  235. Jon Whittle, William Simm, Maria-Angela Ferrario, Katerina Frankova, Laurence Garton, Andrée Woodcock, Baseerit Nasa, Jane Binner, and Aom Ariyatum. 2010. VoiceYourView: Collecting real-time feedback on the design of public spaces. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (Ubicomp’10). ACM Press, 41. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  236. Eric N. Wiebe, Allison Lamb, Megan Hardy, and David Sharek. 2014. Measuring engagement in video game-based environments: Investigation of the user engagement scale. Comput. Hum. Behav. 32 (Mar. 2014), 123--132.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  237. Noortje Wiezer, Maartje Bakhuys Roozeboom, and Esther Oprins. 2013. Serious gaming used as management intervention to prevent work-related stress and raise work-engagement among workers. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Digital Human Modeling and Applications in Health, Safety, Ergonomics, and Risk Management: Human Body Modeling and Ergonomics (DHM’13), Vol. 8026. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 149--158. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  238. Alyssa Wise, Juyu Chang, Thomas Duffy, and Rodrigo del Valle. 2004. The effects of teacher social presence on student satisfaction, engagement, and learning. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 31, 3 (Jun. 2004), 247--271.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  239. Lesley Xie, Alissa N. Antle, and Nima Motamedi. 2008. Are tangibles more fun?: Comparing children’s enjoyment and engagement using physical, graphical and tangible user interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (TEI’08). ACM Press, 191. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  240. Qianli Xu, Liyuan Li, and Gang Wang. 2013. Designing engagement-aware agents for multiparty conversations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’13). ACM Press, 2233. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  241. Elad Yom-Tov, Mounia Lalmas, Georges Dupret, Ricardo Baeza-Yates, Pinard Donmez, and Janette Lehmann. 2012. The effect of links on networked user engagement. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference companion on World Wide Web (WWW’12 Companion). ACM Press, 641. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Engagement in HCI: Conception, Theory and Measurement

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Computing Surveys
      ACM Computing Surveys  Volume 51, Issue 5
      September 2019
      791 pages
      ISSN:0360-0300
      EISSN:1557-7341
      DOI:10.1145/3271482
      • Editor:
      • Sartaj Sahni
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 19 November 2018
      • Accepted: 1 June 2018
      • Revised: 1 May 2018
      • Received: 1 March 2017
      Published in csur Volume 51, Issue 5

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • survey
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format