skip to main content
10.1145/3229574.3229575acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free Access

Bridging the ICN Deployment Gap with IPoC: An IP-over-ICN protocol for 5G Networks

Published:07 August 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Information-centric networking (ICN) is a new networking model that addresses content directly rather than addressing end-hosts. An ICN-based networking layer aligns better with application needs; it provides content-centric security, caching, and intelligent packet forwarding making it useful to both users and service providers alike in terms of efficiency, security, and mobility. ICN has recently received considerable attention; researchers have explored its benefits for diverse use cases such as large-data applications, building automation systems, vehicular networks, and IoT applications. While ICN provides significant benefits to all these application areas, one significant challenge that remains to be addressed is real-world deployment. An ICN-only network will require all IP applications to be rewritten to use ICN natively, a tall order in a world with millions of applications connected to the Internet. Though this problem affects all IP applications, we use mobile applications as the driving example for this work. An ICN based network can benefit smartphone users with higher throughput and lower service interruptions and at the same time, allow mobile service providers to utilize their network better and reduce protocol complexity.

In this paper, we propose IPoC, a general purpose tunneling protocol that enables all IP applications to utilize ICN networks. We implement the IPoC protocol using Named Data Networking (NDN) semantics and using mobile communication as the driving example, compare our protocol performance with native IP. We show that the protocol overhead and performance degradation of IPoC is minimal which makes it suitable for immediate deployment. In return, we show how NDN and IPoC can bring ICN benefits to 5G mobile networks by simplifying the mobility plane, introducing intelligent functionality, and reducing network complexity.

References

  1. Alexander Afanasyev, Junxiao Shi, Lan Wang, Beichuan Zhang, and Lixia Zhang. 2015. Packet Fragmentation in NDN: Why NDN Uses Hop-By-Hop Fragmentation (NDN Memo). NDN Memo, Technical Report NDN-0032. NDN.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Marica Amadeo, Claudia Campolo, Antonio Iera, and Antonella Molinaro. 2014. Named data networking for IoT: An architectural perspective. In Networks and Communications (EuCNC), 2014 European Conference on. IEEE, 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Rabe Arshad, Hesham ElSawy, Sameh Sorour, Tareq Y Al-Naffouri, and Mohamed-Slim Alouini. 2016. Handover management in 5G and beyond: A topology aware skipping approach. IEEE Access 4 (2016), 9073--9081.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Emmanuel Baccelli, Christian Mehlis, Oliver Hahm, Thomas C Schmidt, and Matthias Wählisch. 2014. Information centric networking in the IoT: experiments with NDN in the wild. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on Information-Centric Networking. ACM, 77--86. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Chengyu Fan, Susmit Shannigrahi, Steve DiBenedetto, Catherine Olschanowsky, Christos Papadopoulos, and Harvey Newman. 2015. Managing scientific data with named data networking. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Network-Aware Data Management. ACM, 1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Mario Gerla, Eun-Kyu Lee, Giovanni Pau, and Uichin Lee. 2014. Internet of vehicles: From intelligent grid to autonomous cars and vehicular clouds. In Internet of Things (WF-IoT), 2014 IEEE World Forum on. IEEE, 241--246.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Giulio Grassi, Davide Pesavento, Giovanni Pau, Rama Vuyyuru, Ryuji Wakikawa, and Lixia Zhang. 2014. VANET via named data networking. In Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS), 2014 IEEE Conference on. IEEE, 410--415.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Geert Jan de Groot, Yakov Rekhter, Daniel Karrenberg, and Eliot Lear. 1996. Address Allocation for Private Internets. (1996).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Donghyuk Han and et al. 2015. Measurement and stochastic modeling of handover delay and interruption time of smartphone real-time applications on LTE networks. IEEE Communications Magazine 53, 3 (2015), 173--181.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Named Data Mailing List. {n. d.}. Producer taking initiative to "Push" content to network. http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/pipermail/ndn-interest/2015-December/000883.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Spyridon Mastorakis, Alexander Afanasyev, Ilya Moiseenko, and Lixia Zhang. 2015. ndnSIM 2.0: A new version of the NDN simulator for NS-3. NDN, Technical Report NDN-0028 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Ilya Moiseenko and Dave Oran. 2016. TCP/ICN: Carrying TCP over Content Centric and Named Data Networks. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Conference on Information-Centric Networking (ACM-ICN '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 112--121. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Binh Nguyen and et al. 2014. Towards understanding TCP performance on LTE/EPC mobile networks. In Proceedings of the 4th workshop on All things cellular: operations, applications, & challenges. ACM, 41--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Catherine Olschanowsky, Susmit Shannigrahi, and Christos Papadopoulos. 2014. Supporting climate research using named data networking. In Local & Metropolitan Area Networks (LANMAN), 2014 IEEE 20th International Workshop on. IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. OpenSignal. {n. d.}. The State of LTE - OpenSignal. https://opensignal.com/reports/2016/11/state-of-lte.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Ravi Ravindran, Prakash suthar, Guoqiang Wang, and Dirk Trossen. 2018. Enabling ICN in 3GPP's 5G NextGen Core Architecture. Internet-Draft draft-ravi-icnrg-5gc-icn-01. IETF Secretariat. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ravi-icnrg-5gc-icn-01.txt.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Tamer Refaei, Jamie Ma, Sean Ha, and Sarah Liu. 2017. Integrating IP and NDN Through an Extensible IP-NDN Gateway. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Information-Centric Networking (ICN '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 224--225. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Wentao Shang, Alex Afanasyev, and Lixia Zhang. 2016. The design and implementation of the NDN protocol stack for RIOT-OS. In Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps), 2016 IEEE. IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Wentao Shang, Qiuhan Ding, Alessandro Marianantoni, Jeff Burke, and Lixia Zhang. 2014. Securing building management systems using named data networking. IEEE Network 28, 3 (2014), 50--56.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Susmit Shannigrahi, Chengyu Fan, and Christos Papadopoulos. 2017. Request Aggregation, Caching, and Forwarding Strategies for Improving Large Climate Data Distribution with NDN: A Case Study. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Information-Centric Networking (ICN '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 54--65. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Susmit Shannigrahi, Chengyu Fan, and Christos Papadopoulos. 2018. Named Data Networking Strategies for Improving Large Scientific Data Transfers. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops): Information Centric Networking Solutions for Real World Applications (ICN-SRA) (ICC 2018 Workshop - ICN-SRA). Kansas City, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Susmit Shannigrahi, Chengyu Fan, and Greg White. {n. d.}. IP-Over-ICN. https://github.com/named-data/IPoC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Susmit Shannigrahi, Christos Papadopoulos, Edmund Yeh, et al. 2015. Named Data Networking in Climate Research and HEP Applications. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 664. IOP Publishing, 052033.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Dirk Trossen and et. al. 2015. Ip over icn-the better ip?. In Networks and Communications (EuCNC), 2015 European Conference on. IEEE, 413--417.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Gareth Tyson, Nishanth Sastry, Ruben Cuevas, Ivica Rimac, and Andreas Mauthe. 2013. A survey of mobility in information-centric networks. Commun. ACM 56, 12 (2013), 90--98. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Hua Wang, Claudio Rosa, and Klaus I Pedersen. 2016. Dual connectivity for LTE-advanced heterogeneous networks. Wireless Networks 22, 4 (2016), 1315--1328. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Greg White, Susmit Shannigrahi, and Chengyu Fan. 2017. Internet Protocol Tunneling over Content Centric Mobile Networks. Internet-Draft draft-white-icnrg-ipoc-00. IETF Secretariat.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Hao et. al Wu. 2017. On Incremental Deployment of Named Data Networking in Local Area Networks. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Architectures for Networking and Communications Systems. IEEE Press, 82--94. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Bridging the ICN Deployment Gap with IPoC: An IP-over-ICN protocol for 5G Networks

                  Recommendations

                  Comments

                  Login options

                  Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                  Sign in
                  • Published in

                    cover image ACM Conferences
                    NEAT '18: Proceedings of the 2018 Workshop on Networking for Emerging Applications and Technologies
                    August 2018
                    63 pages
                    ISBN:9781450359078
                    DOI:10.1145/3229574

                    Copyright © 2018 ACM

                    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

                    Publisher

                    Association for Computing Machinery

                    New York, NY, United States

                    Publication History

                    • Published: 7 August 2018

                    Permissions

                    Request permissions about this article.

                    Request Permissions

                    Check for updates

                    Qualifiers

                    • research-article
                    • Research
                    • Refereed limited

                    Acceptance Rates

                    Overall Acceptance Rate8of18submissions,44%

                  PDF Format

                  View or Download as a PDF file.

                  PDF

                  eReader

                  View online with eReader.

                  eReader