Same, Same, but Different: Algorithmic Diversification of Viewpoints in News

ABSTRACT

Recommender systems for news articles on social media select and filter content through automatic personalization. As a result, users are often unaware of opposing points of view, leading to informational blindspots and potentially polarized opinions. They may be aware of a topic, but only be exposed to one viewpoint on this topic. However, recommender systems have just as much potential to help users find a plurality of viewpoints. In this spirit, this paper introduces an approach to automatically identifying content that represents a wider range of opinions on a given topic. Our offline results show positive results for our distance measure with regard to diversification on topic and channel. However, our user study results confirm that user acceptance of this diversification also needs to be addressed in tandem to enable a complete solution.

References

1. Zeinab Abbassi, Vahab S. Mirrokni, and Mayur Thakur. 2012. Diversity Maximization Under Matroid Constraints. Technical Report. Department of Computer Science, Columbia University.
2. Gediminas Adomavicius and YoungOk Kwon. 2011. Improving Aggregate Recommendation Diversity Using Ranking-Based Techniques. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering Vol. 24 (2011), 896--911.
3. Eytan Bakshy, Solomon Messing, and Lada A. Adamic. 2015. Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science Vol. 348 (2015), 1130--1132.
4. Derek Bridge and John Paul Kelly. 2006. Ways of Computing Diverse Collaborative Recommendations Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-based Systems. 41--50.
5. Jaime G. Carbonell and Jade Goldstein. 1998. The Use of MMR and Diversity-Based Reranking for Reodering Documents and Producing Summaries Proceedings of the 21st meeting of International ACM SIGIR Conference. 335--336.
6. Michael A Cohn, Matthias R Mehl, and James W Pennebaker. 2004. Linguistic markers of psychological change surrounding September 11, 2001. Psychological science Vol. 15, 10 (2004), 687--693.
7. Seth Flaxman, Sharad Goel, and Justin M Rao. 2016. Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly Vol. 80, S1 (2016), 298--320.
8. R Kelly Garrett. 2009. Echo chambers online?: Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication Vol. 14, 2 (2009), 265--285.
9. R Kelly Garrett, Dustin Carnahan, and Emily K Lynch. 2013. A turn toward avoidance? Selective exposure to online political information, 2004--2008. Political Behavior, Vol. 35, 1 (2013), 113--134.
10. Shanto Iyengar and Kyu S Hahn. 2009. Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication Vol. 59, 1 (2009), 19--39.
11. Ewa Kacewicz, James W Pennebaker, Matthew Davis, Moongee Jeon, and Arthur C Graesser. 2014. Pronoun use reflects standings in social hierarchies. Journal of Language and Social Psychology Vol. 33, 2 (2014), 125--143.
12. Byungkyu Kang, Nava Tintarev, Tobias Hollerer, and John O'Donovan.. 2016. What am I not seeing? An Interactive Approach to Social Content Discovery in Microblogs SocInfo. 279--294.
13. Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick, Benjamin K Johnson, and Axel Westerwick. 2014. Confirmation bias in online searches: Impacts of selective exposure before an election on political attitude strength and shifts. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication Vol. 20, 2 (2014), 171--187.
14. Neal Lathia, Stephen Hailes, Licia Capra, and Xavier Amatriain. 2010. Temporal diversity in recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 33rd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. ACM, 210--217.
15. Miriam J Metzger, Ethan H Hartsell, and Andrew J Flanagin. 2015. Cognitive dissonance or credibility? A comparison of two theoretical explanations for selective exposure to partisan news. Communication Research (2015), 0093650215613136.
16. Sayooran Nagulendra and Julita Vassileva. 2014. Understanding and controlling the filter bubble through interactive visualization: a user study Conference on Hypertext and Social Media. ACM, 107--115.
17. Matthew L Newman, James W Pennebaker, Diane S Berry, and Jane M Richards. 2003. Lying words: Predicting deception from linguistic styles. Personality and social psychology bulletin Vol. 29, 5 (2003), 665--675.
18. Dimitar Nikolov, Diego FM Oliveira, Alessandro Flammini, and Filippo Menczer. 2015. Measuring online social bubbles. PeerJ Computer Science Vol. 1 (2015), e38.
19. John O'Donovan, Barry Smyth, Brynjar Gretarsson, Svetlin Bostandjiev, and Tobias Höllerer. 2008. PeerChooser: Visual Interactive Recommendation. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1085--1088.
20. Eli Pariser. 2011. The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. Penguin Books.
21. James W Pennebaker, Ryan L Boyd, Kayla Jordan, and Kate Blackburn. 2015. The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2015. Technical Report.
22. James W Pennebaker, Cindy K Chung, Joey Frazee, Gary M Lavergne, and David I Beaver. 2014. When small words foretell academic success: The case of college admissions essays. PloS one, Vol. 9, 12 (2014), e115844.
23. Barry Smyth and Paul McClave. 2001. Similarity vs. Diversity. In 4th International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning.
24. Nava Tintarev. 2017. Presenting Diversity Aware Recommendations: Making Challenging News Acceptable. (2017).
25. Nava Tintarev, Matt Dennis, and Judith Masthoff. 2013. Adapting recommendation diversity to openness to experience: A study of human behaviour International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization. Springer, 190--202.
26. Nava Tintarev, Byungkyu Kang, T. Höllerer, and John O'Donovan. 2015. Inspection Mechanisms for Community-based Content Discovery in Microblogs Recsys Workshop on Interfaces and Human Decision Making for Recommender Systems (IntRS).
27. Nava Tintarev, Shahin Rostami, and Barry Smyth. 2018. Knowing the Unknown: Visualising Consumption Blind-Spots in Recommender System ACM SIGAPP Symposium On Applied Computing.
28. Soroush Vosoughi, Deb Roy, and Sinan Aral. 2018. The spread of true and false news online. Science, Vol. 359, 6380 (2018), 1146--1151.
29. Axel Westerwick, Steven B Kleinman, and Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick. 2013. Turn a blind eye if you care: Impacts of attitude consistency, importance, and credibility on seeking of political information and implications for attitudes. Journal of Communication Vol. 63, 3 (2013), 432--453.
30. Cai-Nicolas Ziegler, Sean M. McNee, Joseph A. Konstan, and Georg Lausen. 2005. Improving Recommendation Lists Through Topic Diversification WWW'05. 22--32.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)

    • Empirical studies in HCI

• Information systems

  • Information retrieval

    • Retrieval models and ranking

      • Information retrieval diversity

      • Learning to rank

      • Similarity measures

    • Users and interactive retrieval

      • Personalization