skip to main content
10.1145/3226052.3226061acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescfiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Design and Implementation of Fault-Tolerant LISP Mapping System

Published:20 June 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

The network applications become more complex such that they need to integrate big data. An emerging problem in current networks is scalability, such as the size of BGP routing table or the multihoming problem. The Locator/Identifier Separation Protocol (LISP) is a protocol to solve such problems. The main concept underlying LISP is a separation between the identifier and the locator. However, few studies have focussed on fault management in LISP mapping system. In this study, we design a fault management system for LISP mapping system on the Software-Defined Network (SDN) controller and modifying the functionality of the tunnel router. We introduce new control messages and processes to check for the survival of LISP mapping system and create a backup of records among controllers. Furthermore, we design and implement functionalities to exchange controller information among the tunnel routers. We implement a scenario to test our fault management system.

References

  1. Pankaj Berde, Matteo Gerola, Jonathan Hart, Yuta Higuchi, Masayoshi Kobayashi, Toshio Koide, Bob Lantz, Brian O'Connor, Pavlin Radoslavov, William Snow, and Guru Parulkar. 2014. ONOS: Towards an Open, Distributed SDN OS. In Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Hot Topics in Software Defined Networking (HotSDN '14). 1--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. F. Botelho, A. Bessani, F. M. V. Ramos, and P. Ferreira. 2014. On the Design of Practical Fault-Tolerant SDN Controllers. In 2014 Third European Workshop on Software Defined Networks. 73--78. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. F. Botelho, T. A. Ribeiro, P. Ferreira, F. M. V. Ramos, and A. Bessani. 2016. Design and Implementation of a Consistent Data Store for a Distributed SDN Control Plane. In 2016 12th European Dependable Computing Conference (EDCC). 169--180.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Tian Bu, Lixin Gao, and D. Towsley. 2002. On characterizing BGP routing table growth. In Global Telecommunications Conference, 2002. GLOBECOM '02. IEEE, Vol. 3. 2185--2189 vol.3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. D. Farinacci, V. Fuller, D. Meyer, and D. Lewis. 2013. The Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP). RFC 6830. http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6830.txtGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Naga Katta, Haoyu Zhang, Michael Freedman, and Jennifer Rexford. 2015. Ravana: Controller Fault-tolerance in Software-defined Networking. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCOMM Symposium on Software Defined Networking Research (SOSR '15). Article 4, 12 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Teemu Koponen, Martin Casado, Natasha Gude, Jeremy Stribling, Leon Poutievski, Min Zhu Google, Rajiv Ramanathan, Yuichiro Iwata NEC, Hiroaki Inoue NEC, Takayuki Hama NEC, and Scott Shenker. 2010. Onix: a distributed control platform for large-scale production networks. In Proceedings of the 9th USENIX Conference on Operating Systems Design and Implementation. 351--364. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. D. Kreutz, F. M. V. Ramos, P. E. Verissimo, C. E. Rothenberg, S. Azodolmolky, and S. Uhlig. 2015. Software-Defined Networking: A Comprehensive Survey. Proc. IEEE 103, 1 (Jan 2015), 14--76.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Nick McKeown, Tom Anderson, Hari Balakrishnan, Guru Parulkar, Larry Peterson, Jennifer Rexford, Scott Shenker, and Jonathan Turner. 2008. OpenFlow: Enabling Innovation in Campus Networks. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 38, 2 (March 2008), 69--74. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. D. Meyer, L. Zhang, and K. Fall. 2007. Report from the IAB Workshop on Routing and Addressing. RFC 4984. http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4984.txtGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. B. A. A. Nunes, M. Mendonca, X. N. Nguyen, K. Obraczka, and T. Turletti. 2014. A Survey of Software-Defined Networking: Past, Present, and Future of Programmable Networks. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials 16, 3 (Third 2014), 1617--1634.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. ONOS. 2017. Open Networking Operating System. (2017). https://onosproject.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. OOR. 2017. OpenOverlayRouter. (2017). https://www.openoverlayrouter.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Amin Tootoonchian and Yashar Ganjali. 2010. HyperFlow: A Distributed Control Plane for OpenFlow. In Proceedings of the 2010 Internet Network Management Conference on Research on Enterprise Networking (INM/WREN'10). 3--3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Design and Implementation of Fault-Tolerant LISP Mapping System

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        CFI 2018: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Future Internet Technologies
        June 2018
        40 pages
        ISBN:9781450364669
        DOI:10.1145/3226052

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 20 June 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate29of55submissions,53%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader