Towards an Open Government Data Comparative Model

ABSTRACT

Governments around the world have been increasing their practices for open government data (OGD). After the launch of the initiative for the Open Government Partnership (OGP) many countries have developed legal arrangements, organizational transformations and cultural challenges in order to implement some practices of OGD in their Public Administrations. However very few have compared their results and experiences in a systematic way. The purpose of this paper is to introduce a first step to develop a comparative framework of OGD. Using the experience of Mexico and Russia governments on implementation we describe this experience of country comparison in order to foster the OGD implementation across the world.

References

1. Charalampos Alexopoulos, Vasiliki Diamantopoulou, and Yannis Charalabidis. 2017. Tracking the Evolution of OGD Portals: A Maturity Model. In lectronic Government. EGOV 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 10428, 287--300.
2. Peter Arzberger, Peter Schroeder, Anne Beaulieu, Geof Bowker, Kathleen Casey, Leif Laaksonen, David Moorman, Paul Uhlir, and Paul Wouters. 2004. An International Framework to Promote Access to Data. Science (80-.). 303, 5665 (2004), 1777--1778.
3. John Carlo Bertot and Heeyoon Choi. 2013. Big Data and e-Government: Issues, Policies, and Recommendations. Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, 1--10.
4. Andreiwid Sheffer Corrêa, Pedro Luiz Pizzigatti Corrêa, and Flávio Soares Corrêa da Silva. 2014. Transparency Portals Versus Open Government Data: An Assessment of Openness in Brazilian Municipalities. Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o 2014), 178--185.
5. Sharon S. Dawes, Lyudmila Vidiasova, and Olga Parkhimovich. 2016. Planning and designing open government data programs: An ecosystem approach. Gov. Inf. Q. (January 2016).
6. Li Ding, Timothy Lebo, John S. Erickson, Dominic Difranzo, Gregory Todd Williams, Xian Li, James Michaelis, Alvaro Graves, Jin Guang Zheng, Zhenning Shangguan, Johanna Flores, Deborah L. McGuinness, and James A. Hendler. 2011. TWC LOGD: A portal for linked open government data ecosystems. J. Web Semant. 9, 3 (2011), 325--333.
7. Li Ding, James R Michaelis, Deborah L McGuinness, and Jim Hendler. 2010. Making Sense of Open Government Data. Library (Lond). (2010), 1--4. Retrieved from http://journal.webscience.org/394/
8. Vicente Fox. 2002. Ley Federal de Transparencia y Acceso a la Información Pública Gubernamental. 15. Retrieved from http://fox.presidencia.gob.mx/transparencia/LFTAIPG.pdf
9. María de Lourdes Grimaldo-Funes. 2005. Qué es la Ley Federal de Transparencia y Acceso a la Información Pública Gubernamental. Retrieved February 1, 2017 from http://fox.presidencia.gob.mx/cambio/transparencia/?contenido=19482&pagina=1
10. Teresa M. Harrison, Theresa a. Pardo, and Meghan Cook. 2012. Creating Open Government Ecosystems: A Research and Development Agenda. Futur. Internet 4, 4 (2012), 900--928.
11. Martijn Hartog, Bert Mulder, Bart Spée, Ed Visser, and Antoine Gribnau. 2014. The Structural Adoption of Open Data in Governmental Organisations: Technology and Organisation in Practice. Proceedings of the 4th Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM 2014), 283--294.
12. M Janssen and E Estevez. 2013. Lean government and platform-based governance: Doing more with less. Gov. Inf. Q. 30, (2013), S1--S8.
13. Lucas N. Joppa, James Boyd, Clifford S. Duke, Stephanie Hampton, Stephen T Jackson, Katherine L. Jacobs, Karim-Aly S. Kassam, Harold Mooney, Laura a Ogden, Mary Ruckelshaus, and Jason F. Shogren. 2015. Government: Plan for ecosystem services. Science (80-.). 759, (2015), 7--8.
14. Evika Karamagioli, Eleni-Revekka Staiou, and Dimitris Gouscos. 2014. Can Open-Government Models Contribute to More Collaborative Ways of Governance? In Open Government, Mila Gascó-Hernández (ed.). Springer New York, New York, United States, 37--50.
15. S Koch and E Bernroider. 2009. Aligning ICT and Legal Frameworks in Austria's e-bureaucracy: From Mainframe to the Internet. In ICT and innovation in the public sector: European studies in the making of e-government, Francesco Contini and Giovan Francesco Lanzara (eds.). Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 147--173. Retrieved from http://tinyurl.com/y9olenko
16. Gwanhoo Lee and Young Hoon Kwak. 2011. Open government implementation model: a stage model for achieving increased public engagement. In 12th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o 2011) (dg.o '11), 254--261. Retrieved from
17. Sébastien Martin, Muriel Foulonneau, Slim Turki, and Madjid Ihadjadene. 2013. Open Data: Barriers, Risks and Opportunities. In 13th European Conference on eGovernment (ECEG 2013), 301--309.
18. Gianluca Misuraca and Gianluigi Viscusi. 2014. Digital Governance in the Public Sector: Challenging the Policy-maker's Innovation Dilemma. 8th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV 2014), 146--154.
19. Rininta Putri Nugroho, Anneke Zuiderwijk, Marijn Janssen, and Martin de Jong. 2015. A comparison of national open data policies: lessons learned. Transform. Gov. People, Process Policy 9, (2015), 286--308.
20. OECD. 2015. Open Government Analytical Framework. Paris, France.
21. M. A. Parsons, O. Godoy, E. LeDrew, T. F. de Bruin, B. Danis, S. Tomlinson, and D. Carlson. 2011. A conceptual framework for managing very diverse data for complex, interdisciplinary science. J. Inf. Sci. 37, 6 (2011), 555--569.
22. Enrique Peña. 2015. Ley General de Transparencia y Acceso a la Información Pública. 65. Retrieved February 1, 2017 from http://tinyurl.com/qzfwvfs
23. Rufus Pollock. 2011. Building the (Open) Data Ecosystem. Retrieved February 2, 2017 from https://blog.okfn.org/2011/03/31/building-the-open-data-ecosystem/
24. Lydia Marleny Prieto, Ana Carolina Rodríguez, and Johanna Pimiento. 2012. Implementation Framework for Open Data in Colombia. In (ICEGOV '12), 14--17.
25. Gabriel Puron-Cid, J Ramon Gil-Garcia, and Luis F Luna-Reyes. 2012. IT-enabled policy analysis: new technologies, sophisticated analysis and open data for better government decisions. In 13th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o '12) (dg.o '12), 97--106. Retrieved from
26. Richard Rose and W. J M Mackenzie. 1991. Comparing Forms of Comparative Analysis. Polit. Stud. 39, 3 (1991), 446--462.
27. Ahti Saarenpää. 2003. A Legal Framework for e-Government. Electronic Government: Proceedings of the 2nd {IFIP WG 8.5} International Conference, EGOV 2003 2739, 377--384. Retrieved from http://tinyurl.com/ycpfurq8
28. Igbal Safarov, Albert Meijer, and Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen. 2017. Utilization of open government data: A systematic literature review of types, conditions, effects and users. Inf. Polity 22, 1 (May 2017), 1--24.
29. Rodrigo Sandoval Almazàn. 2013. La larga marcha del Gobierno Abierto. Teoría, medición y futuro. (1s ed.). INAP, Mexico City, México. Retrieved from http://www.inap.mx/portal/images/pdf/book/larga_marcha.pdf
30. Axel Schmidt, Dennis Heinson, Lucie Langer, Zoi Opitz-Talidou, Philipp Richter, Melanie Volkamer, and Johannes Buchmann. Developing a Legal Framework for Remote Electronic Voting. In E-voting and identity: second international conference, VOTE-ID 2009, Luxembourg, September 7-8, 2009 proceedings (1st ed.), Peter Ryan and Berry Schoenmakers (eds.). Springer, Berlin; New York, 92--105.
31. Evgeny Styrin, Luis Felipe Luna-Reyes, and Teresa M Harrison. 2017. Open data ecosystems: an international comparison. Transform. Gov. People, Process Policy 11, 1 (2017), 132--156.
32. Iryna Susha, Åke Grönlund, and Marijn Janssen. 2015. Organizational measures to stimulate user engagement with open data. Transform. Gov. People, Process Policy 9, (2015), 181--206.
33. Efthimios Tambouris. 2016. Multidimensional Open Government Data. JeDEM - eJournal eDemocracy Open Gov. 8, 3 (2016), 1--11.
34. Efthimios Tambouris, Ann Macintosh, Efpraxia Dalakiouridou, Simon Smith, Eleni Panopoulou, Konstantinos Tarabanis, Jeremy Millard, and J Ramon Gil-Garcia. 2013. eParticipation in Europe: Current State and Practical Recommendations. In E-Government Success around the World: Cases, Empirical Studies, and Practical Recommendations. 341--357.
35. The World Bank. 2015. Open Data Readiness Assessment Tool (ODRA ver. 3). Retrieved February 2, 2017 from http://opendatatoolkit.worldbank.org/en/odra.html
36. United Nations. 2016. United Nations E-government Survey 2016. New York. Retrieved from https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2016
37. Neeta Verma and M P Gupta. 2012. Open Government Data: More than Eighty Formats. In 9th International Conference on E-Governance (ICEG 2012), 207--217.
38. Antonio Vetrò, Lorenzo Canova, Marco Torchiano, Camilo Orozco Minotas, Raimondo Iemma, and Federico Morando. 2016. Open data quality measurement framework: Definition and application to Open Government Data. Gov. Inf. Q. (February 2016).
39. T.-M. Yang, J. Lo, and J. Shiang. 2015. To open or not to open? Determinants of open government data. J. Inf. Sci. 1 (2015), 1--17.
40. Harlan Yu and David G. Robinson. 2012. The New Ambiguity of "Open Government." UCLA Law Rev. Discourse 59, 2012 (2012), 178--208.
41. Anneke Zuiderwijk and Marijn Janssen. 2014. Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A framework for comparison. Gov. Inf. Q. 31, (2014), 17--29.

Index Terms

• Applied computing

  • Computers in other domains

    • Computing in government

• Hardware

  • Emerging technologies