- Budden, et al. Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 23, 1 (Jan. 2008), 4--6.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gastroenterology, Bethesda, MD, USA. U.S. and non-U.S. submissions: An analysis of reviewer bias. JAMA 280, 3 (July 1998), 246--247.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Moss-Racusin, C.A. et al. Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students. PNAS 109, 41 (Apr. 2014), 16474--16479.Google Scholar
- Roberts, S.G. and Verhoef, T. Double-blind reviewing at EvoLang 11 reveals gender bias. J. of Language Evolution 1, 2 (Feb. 2016), 163--167.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Snodgrass, R. Single-versus double-blind reviewing: An analysis of the literature. SIGMOD Record 35, 3 (May 2006), 8--21. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tomkins, A., Zhang, M., and Heavlin, W.D. Single versus double-blind reviewing at WSDM 2017. CoRR, abs/1702.00502, 2017.Google Scholar
Index Terms
Effectiveness of anonymization in double-blind review
Recommendations
A novel anonymization algorithm: Privacy protection and knowledge preservation
In data mining and knowledge discovery, there are two conflicting goals: privacy protection and knowledge preservation. On the one hand, we anonymize data to protect privacy; on the other hand, we allow miners to discover useful knowledge from ...
New directions in anonymization
There are currently two approaches to anonymization: "utility first" (use an anonymization method with suitable utility features, then empirically evaluate the disclosure risk and, if necessary, reduce the risk by possibly sacrificing some utility) or "...
On Distributed k-Anonymization
When a database owner needs to disclose her data, she can k-anonymize her data to protect the involved individuals' privacy. However, if the data is distributed between two owners, then it is an open question whether the two owners can jointly k-...
Comments