skip to main content
10.1145/3208031.3208037acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Eye tracking in naturalistic badminton play: comparing visual gaze pattern strategy in world-rank and amateur player

Published:15 June 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

A professional player's expertise rests on the ability to predict action by optimally extracting the opponent's postural cues. Eye tracking (head-mounted system) data in a naturalistic singles badminton play was collected from one professional world-ranked player facing five amateur players (10 serves or 50 trials) and two amateurs playing against four other amateur players each (10 serves or 80 trials). The visual gaze on the opponent body, segregated into 3 areas-of-interest covering the feet, face/torso, and hand/racket of the opponent and the shuttle, was analysed for a) the period just before the serve, b) while receiving the serve and c) the entire rally. The comparative analysis shows the first area-of-interest for professional player as the opponent's feet while executing the serve and the hand/racket when receiving a serve. On the other hand, the amateur players show no particular strategy of fixation location either for the serve task or while facing a serve. The average fixation duration (just before serve) for the professional was 0.96s and for the amateurs it was 1.48s. The findings highlight the differences in the postural cue considered important and the preparatory time in professional and amateur players. We believe, analytical models from dynamic gaze behavior in naturalistic game conditions as applied in this study can be used for enhancing perceptual-cognitive skills during training.

References

  1. B. Abernethy. 1990. Anticipation in squash: Differences in advance cue utilization between expert and novice players. Journal of Sports Sciences. (1990), 8(1): 17--34.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. B. Abernethy and D. G. Russell. 1987a. Expert-novice differences in an applied selective attention task. J. Sport Psychol., 9 (1987a), 326--345.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. B. Abernethy and D. G. Russell. 1987b. The relationship between expertise and visual search strategy in a racquet sport. Hum. Mov. Sci. 6 (1987b), 283--319.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. D. Alder, P. R. Ford, J. Causer, and A. M. Williams. 2014. The coupling between gaze behavior and opponent kinematics during anticipation of badminton shots. Hum. Mov. Sci. 37 (2014), 167--179.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. X. Chen and G. J. Zelinsky. 2006. Real-world visual search is dominated by top-down guidance. Vision Res. 46 (2006), 4118--4133.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. A. Cheshin, M.W. Heerdink, J.J. Kossakowski, and G.A. Van Kleef. 2016. Pitching Emotions: The Interpersonal Effects of Emotions in Professional Baseball. Frontiers in psychology, 7, (2016), p.178.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. J. S. Chia, S. F. Burns, L. A. Barrett, and J. Y. Chow. 2017. Increased complexities in visual search behavior in skilled players for a self-paced aiming task. Frontiers in psychology, 8, (2017), 987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. F. Del Villar, L. Garcia Gonzalez, D. Iglesias, M. Perla Moreno, and E. M. Cervello. 2007. Expert-novice differences in cognitive and execution skills during tennis competition. VPercept. Mot. Skills 104, (2007), 355--365.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. A Klostermann, R. Kredel, and E. Hossner. 2013. The quiet eye and motor performance: task demands matter! J. Exp. Psychol. 39, (2013), 1270--1278.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. R. Kredel, C. Vater, A. Klostermann, and E.J. Hossner. 2017. Eye-Tracking Technology and the Dynamics of Natural Gaze Behavior in Sports: A Systematic Review of 40 Years of Research. Frontiers in psychology, 8, (2017), 1845.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. J. Kurz, M. Hegele, and J. Munzert. 2018. Gaze behavior in a natural environment with a task-relevant distractor: How the presence of a goalkeeper distracts the penalty taker. Frontiers in psychology, 9, (2018), p.19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. S.-M. Lee, S. Kim, and S.-H. Park. 2009. Self-paced sport events under temporal constraints: visual search, quiet eye, expertise and constrained performance time in far aiming tasks. Int. J. Appl. Sports Sci. 21, (2009), 146--161.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. H. Lex, K. Essig, A. Knoblauch, and T. Schack. 2015. Cognitive representations and cognitive processing of team-specific tactics in soccer. PLoS One, 10(2), (2015), p.e0118219.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. D. T. Mann, S. A. Coombes, M. B. Mousseau, and C. M. Janelle. 2011. Quiet eye and the Bereitschaftspotential: visuomotor mechanisms of expert motor performance. Cogn. Process. 12, (2011), 223--234.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. A. Mavalankar, S. Dagar, and K. Vemuri. 2015. Decoding (un)known opponent's game play, a real-life badminton eye tracking study. EAPCogsci 2015 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. S.L. McPherson and J.N. Vickers. 2004. Cognitive control in motor expertise. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2(3), (2004), pp.274--300.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. D. Memmert, D. J. Simons, and T. Grimme. 2009. The relationship between visual attention and expertise in sports. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 10, (2009), 146--151.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. A. Moran, A. Quinn, M. Campbell, B. Rooney, N. Brady, and C. Burke. 2016. Using pupillometry to evaluate attentional effort in quiet eye: A preliminary investigation. Sport, Exercise and Performance Psychology. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. N.P. Murray and M. Hunfalvay. 2017. A comparison of visual search strategies of elite and non-elite tennis players through cluster analysis. Journal of sports sciences, 35(3), (2017), pp.241--246.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. R.R.D. Oudejans, J.M. Koedijker, I. Bleijendaal, and F. C. Bakker. 2005. The education of attention in aiming at afar target: training visual control in basketball jump shooting. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 3, (2005), 197--221.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. R. R. Oudejans, R. W. van de Langenberg, and R. I. Hutter. 2002. Aiming at a far target under different viewing conditions: visual control in basketball jump shooting. Hum. Mov. Sci. 21 (2002), 457--480.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. A. Piras, E. Pierantozzi, and S. Squatrito. 2014. Visual Search Strategy in Judo Fighters during the Execution of the First Grip. International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching. 9(1), (2014), 185--198.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. G. Savelsbergh, J. Van der Kamp, A. Williams, and P. Ward. 2005. Anticipation and visual search behaviour in expert soccer goalkeepers. Ergonomics. 48(11-14): (2005), 1686--1697.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. G. J. Savelsbergh, A. M. Williams, J. Van der Kamp, and P. Ward. 2002. Visual search, anticipation and expertise in soccer goalkeepers. J. Sports Sci. 20, (2002), 279--287.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Y.L. Shih and C.Y. Lin. 2016. The relationship between action anticipation and emotion recognition in athletes of open skill sports. Cognitive processing, 17(3), (2016), pp.259--268.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. M.A. Timmis, K. Turner, and K.N. Van Paridon. 2014. Visual search strategies of soccer players executing a power vs. placement penalty kick. PloS one, 9(12), (2014), p.e115179.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. J. N. Vickers. 1996. Visual control when aiming at a far target. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 22, (1996), 342--354.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. J. N. Vickers. 2007. Perception, Cognition, and Decision Training: The Quiet Eye in Action. Champaign IL: Human Kinetics (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. J. N. Vickers. 2009. Advances in coupling perception and action: The quiet eye as a bidirectional link between gaze, attention, and action. In Raab M, Johnson J G, Heekeren H R. editors. Progress in brain research. Mind and motion: The bidirectional link between thought and action. Amsterdam: Elsevier. (2009), 279--288.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. J. N. Vickers. 2016a. Origins and current issues in quiet eye research. Current Issues in Sport Science (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. J. N. Vickers. 2016b. The quiet eye: origins, controversies, and future directions. Kinesiology Review, 5(2), (2016), 119--128.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. S. J. Vine and A. Klostermann. 2016. Success is in the eye of the beholder: a special issue on the quiet eye. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 17, (2016), 70--73.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. A. M. Williams, C. M. Janelle, and K. Davids. 2004. Constraints on the search for visual information in sport. Int. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2, (2004), 301--318.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. M. R. Wilson, J. Causer, and J. N. Vickers. 2015. Aiming for excellence: the quiet eye as a characteristic of expertise,. Routledge Handbook of Sport Expertise (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Eye tracking in naturalistic badminton play: comparing visual gaze pattern strategy in world-rank and amateur player

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      PETMEI '18: Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Pervasive Eye Tracking and Mobile Eye-Based Interaction
      June 2018
      50 pages
      ISBN:9781450357890
      DOI:10.1145/3208031

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 June 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader