The Refugee/Migrant Crisis Dichotomy on Twitter: A Network and Sentiment Perspective

ABSTRACT

Media reports, political statements, and social media debates on the refugee/migrant crisis shape the ways in which people and societies respond to those displaced people arriving at their borders world wide. These current events are framed and experienced as a crisis, entering the media, capturing worldwide political attention, and producing diverse and contradictory discourses and responses. The labels "migrant'' and "refugee'' are frequently distinguished and conflated in traditional as well as social media when describing the same groups of people. In this paper, we focus on the simultaneous struggle over meaning, legitimization, and power in representations of the refugee crisis, through the specific lens of Twitter. The 369,485 tweets analyzed in this paper cover two days after a picture of Alan Kurdi -- a three-year-old Syrian boy who drowned in the Mediterranean Sea while trying to reach Europe with his family -- made global headlines and sparked wide media engagement. More specifically, we investigate the existence of the dichotomy between the "deserving'' refugee versus the "undeserving'' migrant, as well as the relationship between sentiment expressed in tweets, their influence, and the popularity of Twitter users involved in this dichotomous characterization of the crisis. Our results show that the Twitter debate was predominantly focused on refugee related hashtags and that those tweets containing such hashtags were more positive in tone. Furthermore, we find that popular Twitter users as well as popular tweets are characterized by less emotional intensity and slightly less positivity in the debate, contrary to prior expectations. Co-occurrence networks expose the structure underlying hashtag usage and reveal a refugee-centric core of meaning, yet divergent goals of some prominent users. As social media become increasingly prominent venues for debate over a crisis, how and why people express their opinions offer valuable insights into the nature and direction of these debates.

References

1. Christiane Amanpour and Thom Patterson. 2015. Passport linked to terrorist complicates Syrian refugee crisis. (nov 2015). http://edition.cnn.com/2015/11/15/ europe/paris-attacks-passports/index.html
2. Younggue Bae and Hongchul Lee. 2012. Sentiment analysis of twitter audiences: Measuring the positive or negative influence of popular twitterers. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 63, 12 (2012), 2521--2535.
3. Nikita Basov, Ju-Sung Lee, and Artem Antoniuk. 2016. Social Networks and Construction of Culture: A Socio-Semantic Analysis of Art Groups. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Complex Networks and their Applications. Springer, 785--796.
4. Stephen P Borgatti and Martin G Everett. 1997. Network analysis of 2-mode data. Social networks 19, 3 (1997), 243--269.
5. Stephen P. Borgatti, Ajay Mehra, Daniel J. Brass, and Giuseppe Labianca. 2009. Network Analysis in the Social Sciences. Science 323, 5916 (2009), 892--895.
6. Benny Bornfeld, Sheizaf Rafaeli, and Daphne Ruth Raban. 2014. Electronic Wordof-mouth Spread in Twitter as a Function of the Message Sentiment. In Proceedings of The Fourth International Conference on Social Eco-Informatics. IARIA.
7. Dennis Chong and J James N. Druckman. 2007. Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science 10 (2007), 103--126.
8. Nicholas A. Diakopoulos and David A. Shamma. 2010. Characterizing debate performance via aggregated twitter sentiment. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1195--1198.
9. Jana Diesner, Amirhossein Aleyasen, Jinseok Kim, Shubhanshu Mishra, and Kiumars Soltani. 2013. Using socio-semantic network analysis for assessing the impact of documentaries. In Proceedings of theWorkshop of Information in Networks. New York, 1--5.
10. James N Druckman. 2011. What's it all about? Framing in political science. In Perspectives on framing, G Keren (Ed.). Psychology Press, New York, 279--302.
11. Robert M Entman. 1993. Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 43, 4 (1993), 50--58.
12. Marguerite Feitlowitz. 2011. A lexicon of terror: Argentina and the legacies of torture, revised and updated with a new epilogue. Oxford University Press, New York.
13. Linton C Freeman. 1979. Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1, 3 (1979), 215--239.
14. Erving Goffman. 1974. Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press, New York.
15. Alfonso Gonzales. 2013. Reform without justice: Latino migrant politics and the homeland security state. Oxford University Press, New York.
16. Kirk Hallahan. 1999. Seven Models of Framing: Implications for Public Relations. Journal of Public Relations Research 11, 3 (1999), 205--242.
17. Iina Hellsten and Loet Leydesdorff. 2017. Automated Analysis of Topic-Actor Networks on Twitter: New approach to the analysis of socio-semantic networks. (2017), 1--31. arXiv:1711.08387 http://arxiv.org/abs/1711.08387
18. Geraldine Henderson, Dawn Iacobucci, and Bobby J Calder. 1998. Brand diagnostics: mapping branding effects using consumer associative networks. European Journal of Operational Research 111, 1998 (1998), 306--327.
19. Seth M Holmes. 2011. Structural vulnerability and hierarchies of ethnicity and citizenship on the farm. Medical Anthropology 30, 4 (2011), 425--449.
20. Seth M. Holmes and Heide Castañeda. 2016. Representing the "European refugee crisis" in Germany and beyond: Deservingness and difference, life and death. American Ethnologist 43, 1 (2016), 12--24.
21. Justin Huggler. 2016. German mayor beaten up by mob after expressing support for asylum seekers. (sep 2016). http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/09/30/ german-mayor-beaten-up-by-mob-after-expressing-support-for-asylu/
22. Dawn Iacobucci, Geraldine Henderson, Alberto Marcati, and Jennifer Chang. 1996. Network analyses of brand switching behavior. International Journal of Research in Marketing 13 (1996), 415--429.
23. S Iyengar. 1987. Television News and Citizens' Explanations of National Affairs. American Political Science Review 81 (1987), 815--831. Issue 3
24. Silia Klepp. 2013. Europeanisation Spot. An Ethnography of the Frontex Nautilus II Mission. Journal of Peace and Conflict Research 2, 1 (2013), 36--69.
25. Ju-Sung Lee and Adina Nerghes. 2017. Labels and sentiment in social media: On the role of perceived agency in online discussions of the refugee crisis. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Social Media & Society. ACM, New York, 1--10.
26. Joel H Levine. 1979. Joint-space analysis of "pick-any" data: analysis of choices from an unconstrained set of alternatives. Psychometrika 44, 1 (1979), 85--92.
27. Brendan O'Connor, Ramnath Balasubramanyan, Bryan R Routledge, and Noah A Smith. 2010. From tweets to polls: Linking text sentiment to public opinion time series.. In Proceedings of the Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. AAAI, 122--129.
28. Tore Opsahl. 2013. Triadic closure in two-mode networks: Redefining the global and local clustering coefficients. Social Networks 35, 2 (2013), 159--167.
29. Zhongdang Pan and Gerald M Kosicki. 1993. Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication 10, 1 (1993), 55--75.
30. Chang Sup Park and Barbara K Kaye. 2017. The tweet goes on: Interconnection of Twitter opinion leadership, network size, and civic engagement. Computers in Human Behavior 69 (2017), 174--180.
31. Vanessa Peña-Araya, Mauricio Quezada, Barbara Poblete, and Denis Parra. 2017. Gaining historical and international relations insights from social media: spatiotemporal real-world news analysis using Twitter. EPJ Data Science (2017), 25.
32. James W Pennebaker, Martha E Francis, and Roger J Booth. 2001. Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC 2001. Technical Report 2001. Austin, TX. http: //www.LIWC.net
33. Meg J Rohan. 2000. A rose by any name? The values construct. Personality and Social Psychology Review 4, 3 (2000), 255--277.
34. Vala Ali Rohani, Shahid Shayaa, and Ghazaleh Babanejaddehaki. 2017. How Social Media Influencers Govern Sentiment Territory. International Journal of Applied Evolutionary Computation (IJAEC) 8, 1 (2017), 49--60.
35. Camille Roth. 2013. Socio-semantic frameworks. Advances in Complex Systems 16, 04n05 (2013), 1350013.
36. Camille Roth and Jean-Philippe Cointet. 2010. Social and semantic coevolution in knowledge networks. Social Networks 32, 1 (2010), 16--29.
37. Johanne Saint-Charles and Pierre Mongeau. 2018. Social influence and discourse similarity networks in workgroups. Social Networks 52 (2018), 228--237.
38. Stefan Stieglitz and Linh Dang-Xuan. 2011. The Role of Sentiment in Information Propagation on Twitter--An Empirical Analysis of Affective Dimensions in Political Tweets. In Proceedings of the 22nd Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS), Sydney (Australia). Retrieved from: http://aisel. aisnet. org/acis, Vol. 38.
39. Texifier. 2018. (2018). https://texifter.com
40. Mike Thelwall. 2013. Heart and soul: Sentiment strength detection in the social web with SentiStrength. Proceedings of the CyberEmotions (2013), 1--14.
41. Andranik Tumasjan, Timm Oliver Sprenger, Philipp G Sandner, and Isabell M Welpe. 2010. Predicting elections with twitter: What 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. In Proceedings of the Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Vol. 10. AAAI, 178--185.
42. Stanley Wasserman and Katherine Faust. 1994. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Vol. 24. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
43. Kristin Yarris and Heide Castaneda. 2014. Ethnographic insights on displacement, migration, and deservingness in contemporary global contexts. International Migration 53 (2014), 644--69. Issue 3.