skip to main content
10.1145/3201064.3201086acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebsciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Early Public Responses to the Zika-Virus on YouTube: Prevalence of and Differences Between Conspiracy Theory and Informational Videos

Published:15 May 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we analyze the content of the most popular videos posted on YouTube in the first phase of the Zika-virus outbreak in 2016, and the user responses to those videos. More specifically, we examine the extent to which informational and conspiracy theory videos differ in terms of user activity (number of comments, shares, likes and dislikes), and the sentiment and content of the user responses. Our results show that 12 out of the 35 videos in our data set focused on conspiracy theories, but no statistical differences were found in the number of user activity and sentiment between the two types of videos. The content of the user responses shows that users respond differently to sub-topics related to Zika-virus. The implications of the results for future online health promotion campaigns are discussed.

References

  1. Sharon Alane Abramowitz, Sarah Lindley McKune, Mosoka Fallah, Josepine Monger Kodjo Tehoungue, and Patricia A Omidian. 2017. The opposite of denial: Social learning at the onset of the Ebola emergency in Liberia. Journal of Health Communication 22, sup1 (2017), 59--65.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Laetitia Atlani-Duault, Arnaud Mercier, Cecile Rousseau, Paul Guyot, and JohnPaul Moatti. 2015. Blood libel rebooted: traditional scapegoats, online media, and the H1N1 epidemic. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry 39, 1 (2015), 43--61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Corey H Basch, Charles E Basch, Grace Clarke Hillyer, and Rachel Reeves. 2015. YouTube videos related to skin cancer: A missed opportunity for cancer prevention and control. Journal of Medical Internet Research Cancer 1, 1 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Corey H Basch, Charles E Basch, Kelly V Ruggles, and Rodney Hammond. 2015. Coverage of the Ebola virus disease epidemic on YouTube. Disaster medicine and public health preparedness 9, 5 (2015), 531--535.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Alessandro Bessi, Mauro Coletto, George Alexandru Davidescu, Antonio Scala, Guido Caldarelli, and Walter Quattrociocchi. 2015. Science vs Conspiracy: Collective narratives in the age of misinformation. PloS one 10, 2 (2015), e0118093.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. David M. Blei, Andrew Y Ng, and Michael I Jordan. 2003. Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research 3 (2003), 993--1022. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Rowena Briones, Xiaoli Nan, Kelly Madden, and Leah Waks. 2012. When vaccines go viral: an analysis of HPV vaccine coverage on YouTube. Health communication 27, 5 (2012), 478--85.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Karen M Douglas, Robbie M Sutton, and Aleksandra Cichocka. 2017. The psychology of conspiracy theories. Current Directions in Psychological Science 26, 6 (2017), 538--542.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Mark Dredze, David A Broniatowski, and Karen M Hilyardc. 2016. Zika vaccine misconceptions: A social media analysis. Vaccine 34, 30 (2016), 3441.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Adam G Dunn, Didi Surian, Julie Leask, Aditi Dey, Kenneth D Mandl, and Enrico Coiera. 2017. Mapping information exposure on social media to explain differences in HPV vaccine coverage in the United States. Vaccine 35, 23 (2017), 3033--3040.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Maria Espinola, James M. Shultz, Zelde Espinel, Benjamin M. Althouse, Janice L. Cooper, Florence Baingana, Louis Herns Marcelin, Toni Cela, Sherry Towers, Laurie Mazurik, M. Claire Greene, Alyssa Beck, Michelle Fredrickson, Andrew McLean, and Andreas Rechkemmer. 2016. Fear-related behaviors in situations of mass threat. Disaster Health 3, 4 (2016), 102--111.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. King-Wa Fu, Hai Liang, Nitin Saroha, Zion Tsz Ho Tse, Patrick Ip, and Isaac Chun-Hai Fung. 2016. How people react to Zika virus outbreaks on Twitter? A computational content analysis. American Journal of Infection Control 44, 12 (2016), 1700--1702.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Daniel Gruhl, Ramanathan Guha, David Liben-Nowell, and Andrew Tomkins. 2004. Information Diffusion Through Blogspace. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW '04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 491--501. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Eric W Hossler and Michael P Conroy. 2008. YouTube as a source of information on tanning bed use. Archives of Dermatology 144, 10 (2008), 1395--1396.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Jennifer Keelan, Vera Pavri-Garcia, George Tomlinson, and Kumanan Wilson. 2007. YouTube as a source of information on immunization: a content analysis. JAMA 298, 21 (2007), 2482--2484.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Elizabeth A Klonoff and Hope Landrine. 1999. Do blacks believe that HIV/AIDS is a government conspiracy against them? Preventive Medicine 28, 5 (1999), 451--457.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Kapil Chalil Madathil, A Joy Rivera-Rodriguez, Joel S Greenstein, and Anand K Gramopadhye. 2015. Healthcare Information on YouTube: A systematic review. Health Informatics Journal 21, 3 (2015), 173--194.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Jernej Mlakar, Misa Korva, Nataša Tul, Mara Popovic, Mateja Poljšak-Prijatelj, Jerica Mraz, Marko Kolenc, Katarina Resman Rus, Tina Vesnaver Vipotnik, Vesna Fabjan Vodušek, Alenka Vizjak, and Jože Pižem. 2016. Zika virus associated with microcephaly. New England Journal of Medicine 2016, 374 (2016), 951--958.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Sajan Jiv Singh Nagpal, Ahmadreza Karimianpour, Dhruvika Mukhija, Diwakar Mohan, and Andrei Brateanu. 2015. YouTube videos as a source of medical information during the Ebola hemorrhagic fever epidemic. Springer Plus 4, 1 (2015), 457.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Eric J Oliver and Thomas Wood. 2014. Medical conspiracy theories and health behaviors in the United States. JAMA internal medicine 174, 5 (2014), 817--818.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Roel Popping. 2003. Knowledge Graphs and Network Text Analysis. Social Science Information 42, 1 (2003), 91--106. http: //ssi.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0539018403042001798Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Amanda J Porter and Iina Hellsten. 2014. Investigating participatory dynamics through social media using a multideterminant frame approach: the case of Climategate on YouTube. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19, 4 (2014), 1024--1041. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Ralf Reintjes, Enny Das, Celine Klemm, Jan Hendrik Richardus, Verena Keßler, and Amena Ahmad. 2016. "Pandemic Public Health Paradox": time series analysis of the 2009/10 Influenza A/H1N1 epidemiology, media attention, risk perception and public reactions in 5 European countries. PloS one 11, 3 (2016), e0151258.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Bernhard Rieder. 2015. YouTube Data Tools. (2015). https://tools.digitalmethods. net/netvizz/youtube/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Abha G Singh, Siddharth Singh, and Preet Paul Singh. 2012. YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis -- A wakeup call? The Journal of Rheumatology 39, 5 (2012), 899--903.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Socialbakers.com. 2017. (2017). https://www.socialbakers.com/statistics/youtube/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Shabbir Syed-Abdul, Luis Fernandez-Luque, Wen-Shan Jian, Yu-Chuan Li, Steven Crain, Min-Huei Hsu, Yao-Chin Wang, Dorjsuren Khandregzen, Enkhzaya Chuluunbaatar, Phung Anh Nguyen, and Der-Ming Liou. 2013. Misleading healthrelated information promoted through video-based social media: anorexia on YouTube. Journal of Medical Internet Research 15, 2 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Mike Thelwall. 2013. Heart and soul: Sentiment strength detection in the social web with SentiStrength. Proceedings of the CyberEmotions (2013), 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Nees Jan van Eck and Ludo Waltman. 2013. VOSviewer manual. (2013). http: //www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.5.4.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. William N Venables and Brian D Ripley. 2002. Modern applied statistics with S. Springer. http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/MASS2/VR2stat.pdf Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Jay M Ver Hoef and Peter L Boveng. 2007. Quasi-Poisson vs. Negative Binomial Regression: How should we model overdispersed count data? Ecology 88, 11 (2007), 2766--2772.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Michela Del Vicario, Alessandro Bessi, Fabiana Zollo, Fabio Petroni, Antonio Scala, Guido Caldarelli, H Eugene Stanley, and Walter Quattrociocchi. 2016. The spreading of misinformation online. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113, 3 (2016), 554--559.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Soroush Vosoughi, Deb Roy, and Sinan Aral. 2018. The spread of true and false news online. Science 359, 6380 (2018), 1146--1151.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Joseph B Walther, David DeAndrea, Jinsuk Kim, and James C Anthony. 2010. The influence of online comments on perceptions of antimarijuana public service announcements on YouTube. Human Communication Research 36, 4 (2010), 469-- 492.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Stanley Wasserman and Katherine Faust. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Vol. 24. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Jina H Yoo and Junghyun Kim. 2012. Obesity in the new media: A content analysis of obesity videos on YouTube. Health Communication 27, 1 (2012), 86--97. Zika-virus on YouTube WebSci '18, May 27--30, 2018, Amsterdam, NetherlandsGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Fabiana Zollo, Petra Kralj Novak, Michela Del Vicario, Alessandro Bessi, Igor Mozeti?, Antonio Scala, Guido Caldarelli, and Walter Quattrociocchi. 2015. Emotional dynamics in the age of misinformation. PloS one 10, 9 (2015), e0138740.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Early Public Responses to the Zika-Virus on YouTube: Prevalence of and Differences Between Conspiracy Theory and Informational Videos

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Conferences
                WebSci '18: Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science
                May 2018
                399 pages
                ISBN:9781450355636
                DOI:10.1145/3201064

                Copyright © 2018 Owner/Author

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 15 May 2018

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • research-article

                Acceptance Rates

                WebSci '18 Paper Acceptance Rate30of113submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate218of875submissions,25%

                Upcoming Conference

                Websci '24
                16th ACM Web Science Conference
                May 21 - 24, 2024
                Stuttgart , Germany

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader