Ryan Calo
- Calo, R. Robotics and the lessons of cyberlaw. California Law Review 513, 103 (2015).Google Scholar
- Foster v. Preston Mill Co. 268 P.2d 645 (Wash. 1954).Google Scholar
- Hill, K. Who do we blame when a robot threatens to kill people? Spinter.com (Feb. 15, 2015); http://bit.ly/2FFKszlGoogle Scholar
- Hope, B. and Ackerman, A. 'Flash crash' overhaul is snarled in red tape. Wall Street Journal (May 5, 2015); http://on.wsj.com/2ph9w4DGoogle Scholar
- Price, R. Microsoft is deleting its AI chatbot's incredibly racist tweets. Business Insider (Mar. 24, 2016); http://read.bi/1ZwcFYZGoogle Scholar
- Walker Smith, B. Proximity-driven liability. Georgetown Law Journal 1777, 102 (2014).Google Scholar
- Vladeck, D.C. Machines without principles. Washington Law Review 117, 89 (2014).Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Is the law ready for driverless cars?
Recommendations
A framework for designing interactions between pedestrians and driverless cars: insights from a ride-sharing design study
OzCHI '18: Proceedings of the 30th Australian Conference on Computer-Human InteractionPrevious work has highlighted the need for human factors research to not only focus on the passengers inside driverless cars but also consider others who will interact with the car in an urban environment such as pedestrians. In this paper, we position ...
The ethics of driverless cars
Special Issue on EthicompThis paper critiques the idea of full autonomy, as illustrated by Oxford University's Robotcar. A fully autonomous driverless car relies on no external inputs, including GPS and solely learns from its environment using learning algorithms. These cars ...
Comments