skip to main content
research-article

An Energy-efficient and Lightweight Indoor Localization System for Internet-of-Things (IoT) Environments

Authors Info & Claims
Published:26 March 2018Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Each and every spatial point in an indoor space has its own distinct and stable fingerprint, which arises owing to the distortion of the magnetic field induced by the surrounding steel and iron structures. This phenomenon makes many indoor positioning techniques rely on the magnetic field as an important source of localization. Most of the existing studies, however, have leveraged smartphones that have a relatively high computational power and many sensors. Thus, their algorithmic complexity is usually high, especially for commercial location-based services. In this paper, we present an energy-efficient and lightweight system that utilizes the magnetic field for indoor positioning in Internet of Things (IoT) environments. We propose a new hardware design of an IoT device that has a BLE interface and two sensors (magnetometer and accelerometer), with the lifetime of one year when using a coin-size battery. We further propose an augmented particle filter framework that features a robust motion model and a localization heuristic with small sensory data. The prototype-based evaluation shows that the proposed system achieves a median accuracy of 1.62 m for an office building, while exhibiting low computational complexity and high energy efficiency.

References

  1. Michael Angermann, Martin Frassl, Marek Doniec, Brian J Julian, and Patrick Robertson. 2012. Characterization of the indoor magnetic field for applications in localization and mapping. In Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN), 2012 International Conference on. IEEE, 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Paramvir Bahl and Venkata N Padmanabhan. 2000. RADAR: An in-building RF-based user location and tracking system. In INFOCOM 2000. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. Proceedings., Vol. 2. IEEE, 775--784.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Stephane Beauregard and Harald Haas. 2006. Pedestrian dead reckoning: A basis for personal positioning. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Positioning, Navigation and Communication. 27--35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Donald J Berndt and James Clifford. 1994. Using dynamic time warping to find patterns in time series. In KDD workshop, Vol. 10. Seattle, WA, 359--370. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Stephen Butterworth. 1930. On the theory of filter amplifiers. Wireless Engineer 7, 6 (1930), 536--541.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Krishna Chintalapudi, Anand Padmanabha Iyer, and Venkata N Padmanabhan. 2010. Indoor localization without the pain. In Proceedings of the sixteenth annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking. ACM, 173--184. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. John Chon and Hojung Cha. 2011. Lifemap: A smartphone-based context provider for location-based services. IEEE Pervasive Computing 10, 2 (2011), 58--67. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Jaewoo Chung, Matt Donahoe, Chris Schmandt, Ig-Jae Kim, Pedram Razavai, and Micaela Wiseman. 2011. Indoor location sensing using geo-magnetism. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services. ACM, 141--154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Energizer. 2017. Energizer CR2450 Specification. http://data.energizer.com/pdfs/cr2450.pdf. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Andreas Ettlinger and Günther Retscher. 2016. Positioning using ambient magnetic fields in combination with Wi-Fi and RFID. In Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN), 2016 International Conference on. IEEE, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Dominik Gusenbauer, Carsten Isert, and Jens Krösche. 2010. Self-contained indoor positioning on off-the-shelf mobile devices. In Indoor positioning and indoor navigation (IPIN), 2010 international conference on. IEEE, 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Janne Haverinen and Anssi Kemppainen. 2009. Global indoor self-localization based on the ambient magnetic field. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 57, 10 (2009), 1028--1035. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Benjamin Kempke, Pat Pannuto, and Prabal Dutta. 2015. PolyPoint: Guiding indoor quadrotors with ultra-wideband localization. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Hot Topics in Wireless. ACM, 16--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Byunghun Kim, Myungchul Kwak, Jeongkeun Lee, and Ted Taekyoung Kwon. 2014. A multi-pronged approach for indoor positioning with WiFi, magnetic and cellular signals. In Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN), 2014 International Conference on. IEEE, 723--726.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Seong-Eun Kim, Yong Kim, Jihyun Yoon, and Eung Sun Kim. 2012. Indoor positioning system using geomagnetic anomalies for smartphones. In Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN), 2012 International Conference on. IEEE, 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kionix. 2016. KMX62-1031 Specification rev. 3.0. http://www.kionix.com/product/KMX62-1031. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Binghao Li, Thomas Gallagher, Andrew G Dempster, and Chris Rizos. 2012. How feasible is the use of magnetic field alone for indoor positioning?. In Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN), 2012 International Conference on. IEEE, 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Fan Li, Chunshui Zhao, Guanzhong Ding, Jian Gong, Chenxing Liu, and Feng Zhao. 2012. A reliable and accurate indoor localization method using phone inertial sensors. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 421--430. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Zhenguang Liu, Luming Zhang, Qi Liu, Yifang Yin, Li Cheng, and Roger Zimmermann. 2017. Fusion of Magnetic and Visual Sensors for Indoor Localization: Infrastructure-Free and More Effective. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 19, 4 (2017), 874--888. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Nesma Mohssen, Rana Momtaz, Heba Aly, and Moustafa Youssef. 2014. It's the human that matters: accurate user orientation estimation for mobile computing applications. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Computing, Networking and Services. ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering), 70--79. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Nordic. 2016. nRF52832 Product Specification 1.0. https://www.nordicsemi.com/eng/Products/Bluetooth-low-energy/nRF52832. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Talat Ozyagcilar. 2012. Calibrating an ecompass in the presence of hard and soft-iron interference. Freescale Semiconductor Ltd (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Karunakar Pothuganti and Anusha Chitneni. 2014. A comparative study of wireless protocols: Bluetooth, UWB, ZigBee, and Wi-Fi. Advance in Electronic and Electric Engineering 4, 6 (2014), 655--662.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Azkario Rizky Pratama, Risanuri Hidayat, et al. 2012. Smartphone-based pedestrian dead reckoning as an indoor positioning system. In System Engineering and Technology (ICSET), 2012 International Conference on. IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Anshul Rai, Krishna Kant Chintalapudi, Venkata N Padmanabhan, and Rijurekha Sen. 2012. Zee: Zero-effort crowdsourcing for indoor localization. In Proceedings of the 18th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking. ACM, 293--304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Yuanchao Shu, Cheng Bo, Guobin Shen, Chunshui Zhao, Liqun Li, and Feng Zhao. 2015. Magicol: Indoor localization using pervasive magnetic field and opportunistic WiFi sensing. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 33, 7 (2015), 1443--1457.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Yuanchao Shu, Kang G Shin, Tian He, and Jiming Chen. 2015. Last-mile navigation using smartphones. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking. ACM, 512--524. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Matti Siekkinen, Markus Hiienkari, Jukka K Nurminen, and Johanna Nieminen. 2012. How low energy is bluetooth low energy? comparative measurements with zigbee/802.15.4. In Wireless Communications and Networking Conference Workshops (WCNCW). IEEE, 232--237.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Bluetooth SIG. 2014. Bluetooth Specification version 4.2. https://www.bluetooth.org/DocMan/handlers/DownloadDoc.ashx?doc_id=286439. (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Bluetooth SIG. 2016. Bluetooth Specification version 5.0. https://www.bluetooth.org/DocMan/handlers/DownloadDoc.ashx?doc_id=4210438_ga=2.95164572.1071486365.1502719791-975213286.1502719791. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. SKT. 1997. SK Telecom Co., Ltd. http://www.sktelecom.com. (1997).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Kalyan Pathapati Subbu, Brandon Gozick, and Ram Dantu. 2013. Locateme: Magnetic-fields-based indoor localization using smartphones. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) 4, 4 (2013), 73. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. S Suksakulchai, S Thongchai, DM Wilkes, and K Kawamura. 2000. Mobile robot localization using an electronic compass for corridor environment. In Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 2000 IEEE International Conference on, Vol. 5. IEEE, 3354--3359.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Lorenzo Taponecco, AA D'amico, and Umberto Mengali. 2011. Joint TOA and AOA estimation for UWB localization applications. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 10, 7 (2011), 2207--2217.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Ilari Vallivaara, Janne Haverinen, Anssi Kemppainen, and Juha Röning. 2010. Simultaneous localization and mapping using ambient magnetic field. In Multisensor Fusion and Integration for Intelligent Systems (MFI). IEEE, 14--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Xian Wang, Paula Tarrío, Eduardo Metola, Ana Bernardos, and José Casar. 2012. Gesture recognition using mobile phone's inertial sensors. Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence (2012), 173--184.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Hongwei Xie, Tao Gu, Xianping Tao, Haibo Ye, and Jian Lu. 2016. A reliability-augmented particle filter for magnetic fingerprinting based indoor localization on smartphone. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 15, 8 (2016), 1877--1892.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Hai-Bo Ye, Tao Gu, Xian-Ping Tao, and Jian Lv. 2015. Infrastructure-free floor localization through crowdsourcing. Journal of Computer Science and Technology 30, 6 (2015), 1249--1273.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Moustafa Youssef and Ashok Agrawala. 2005. The Horus WLAN location determination system. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services. ACM, 205--218. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Cemin Zhang, Michael Kuhn, Brandon Merkl, Aly E Fathy, and Mohamed Mahfouz. 2006. Accurate UWB indoor localization system utilizing time difference of arrival approach. In Radio and Wireless Symposium, 2006. IEEE, 515--518.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Chi Zhang and Xinyu Zhang. 2016. LiTell: indoor localization using unmodified light fixtures. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking. ACM, 481--482. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Rui Zhang, Amir Bannoura, Fabian Höflinger, Leonhard M Reindl, and Christian Schindelhauer. 2013. Indoor localization using a smart phone. In Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS), 2013. IEEE, 38--42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Yiyang Zhao, Chen Qian, Liangyi Gong, Zhenhua Li, and Yunhao Liu. 2015. LMDD: Light-weight Magnetic-based Door Detection with Your Smartphone. In Parallel Processing (ICPP), 2015 44th International Conference on. IEEE, 919--928. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Pengfei Zhou, Mo Li, and Guobin Shen. 2014. Use it free: Instantly knowing your phone attitude. In Proceedings of the 20th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking. ACM, 605--616. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Shilin Zhu and Xinyu Zhang. 2017. Enabling High-Precision Visible Light Localization in Today's Buildings. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services. ACM, 96--108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Yuan Zhuang, Jun Yang, You Li, Longning Qi, and Naser El-Sheimy. 2016. Smartphone-based indoor localization with bluetooth low energy beacons. Sensors 16, 5 (2016), 596.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Kathryn Zickuhr. 2013. Location-based services. Pew Research (2013), 679--695.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. An Energy-efficient and Lightweight Indoor Localization System for Internet-of-Things (IoT) Environments

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
        Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies  Volume 2, Issue 1
        March 2018
        1370 pages
        EISSN:2474-9567
        DOI:10.1145/3200905
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 26 March 2018
        • Accepted: 1 January 2018
        • Revised: 1 November 2017
        • Received: 1 August 2017
        Published in imwut Volume 2, Issue 1

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader