skip to main content
10.1145/3184558.3191620acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free Access

Flood Relevance Estimation from Visual and Textual Content in Social Media Streams

Authors Info & Claims
Published:23 April 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Disaster monitoring based on social media posts has raised a lot of interest in the domain of computer science the last decade, mainly due to the wide area of applications in public safety and security and due to the pervasiveness not solely on daily communication but also in life-threating situations. Social media can be used as a valuable source for producing early warnings of eminent disasters. This paper presents a framework to analyse social media multimodal content, in order to decide if the content is relevant to flooding. This is very important since it enhances the crisis situational awareness and supports various crisis management procedures such as preparedness. Evaluation on a benchmark dataset shows very good performance in both text and image classification modules.

References

  1. Flavia Sofia Acerbo and Claudio Rossi. 2017. Filtering Informative Tweets During Emergencies: A Machine Learning Approach Proceedings of the First CoNEXT Workshop on ICT Tools for Emergency Networks and DisastEr Relief (I-TENDER '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Charu C Aggarwal and ChengXiang Zhai. 2012. Mining text data. Springer Science & Business Media. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Leo Breiman. 2001. Random forests. Machine learning, Vol. 45, 1 (2001), 5--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Joachim Daiber, Max Jakob, Chris Hokamp, and Pablo N Mendes. 2013. Improving efficiency and accuracy in multilingual entity extraction Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Semantic Systems. ACM, 121--124. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Muhammad Imran, Carlos Castillo, Fernando Diaz, and Sarah Vieweg. 2015. Processing social media messages in mass emergency: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) Vol. 47, 4 (2015), 67. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Yangqing Jia, Evan Shelhamer, Jeff Donahue, Sergey Karayev, Jonathan Long, Ross Girshick, Sergio Guadarrama, and Trevor Darrell. 2014. Caffe: Convolutional architecture for fast feature embedding Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Multimedia. ACM, 675--678. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Vijaymeena M K and Kavitha K. 2016. A Survey on Similarity Measures in Text Mining. Vol. 3 (03. 2016), 19--28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Foteini Markatopoulou, Vasileios Mezaris, and Ioannis Patras. 2015. Cascade of classifiers based on binary, non-binary and deep convolutional network descriptors for video concept detection. In Image Processing (ICIP), 2015 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 1786--1790.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Raina M Merchant, Stacy Elmer, and Nicole Lurie. 2011. Integrating social media into emergency-preparedness efforts. New England Journal of Medicine Vol. 365, 4 (2011), 289--291.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Stuart E Middleton, Lee Middleton, and Stefano Modafferi. 2014. Real-time crisis mapping of natural disasters using social media. IEEE Intelligent Systems Vol. 29, 2 (2014), 9--17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Tomas Mikolov, Ilya Sutskever, Kai Chen, Greg S Corrado, and Jeff Dean. 2013. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality Advances in neural information processing systems. 3111--3119. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Anastasia Moumtzidou, Symeon Papadopoulos, Stefanos Vrochidis, Ioannis Kompatsiaris, Konstantinos Kourtidis, George Hloupis, Ilias Stavrakas, Konstantina Papachristopoulou, and Christodoulos Keratidis. 2016. Towards Air Quality Estimation Using Collected Multimodal Environmental Data International Workshop on the Internet for Financial Collective Awareness and Intelligence. Springer, 147--156.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Nikiforos Pittaras, Foteini Markatopoulou, Vasileios Mezaris, and Ioannis Patras. 2017. Comparison of fine-tuning and extension strategies for deep convolutional neural networks International Conference on Multimedia Modeling. Springer, 102--114.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. MV Sangameswar, M Nagabhushana Rao, and S Satyanarayana. 2017. An algorithm for identification of natural disaster affected area. Journal of Big Data, Vol. 4, 1 (2017), 39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Hitoshi Sato, Kunihiro Takeda, Kazuhiro Matsumoto, Hirokazu Anai, and Yuzuru Yamakage. 2016. Efforts for Disaster Prevention/Mitigation to Protect Society from Major Natural Disasters. FUJITSU Sci. Tech. J, Vol. 52, 1 (2016), 107--113.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. P Selvaperumal and A Suruliandi. 2014. A short message classification algorithm for tweet classification Recent Trends in Information Technology (ICRTIT), 2014 International Conference on. IEEE, 1--3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Karen Simonyan and Andrew Zisserman. 2014. Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition. CoRR Vol. abs/1409.1556 (2014). {arxiv}1409.1556 http://arxiv.org/abs/1409.1556Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Ge Song, Yunming Ye, Xiaolin Du, Xiaohui Huang, and Shifu Bie. 2014. Short Text Classification: A Survey. Journal of Multimedia, Vol. 9, 5 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Christian Szegedy, Wei Liu, Yangqing Jia, Pierre Sermanet, Scott Reed, Dragomir Anguelov, Dumitru Erhan, Vincent Vanhoucke, and Andrew Rabinovich. 2015. Going deeper with convolutions. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Nataliya Tkachenko, Stephen Jarvis, and Rob Procter. 2017. Predicting floods with Flickr tags. PloS one, Vol. 12, 2 (2017), e0172870.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Brandon Truong, Cornelia Caragea, Anna Squicciarini, and Andrea H Tapia. 2014. Identifying valuable information from twitter during natural disasters. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 51, 1 (2014), 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Si Si Mar Win and Than Nwe Aung. 2017. Target oriented tweets monitoring system during natural disasters Computer and Information Science (ICIS), 2017 IEEE/ACIS 16th International Conference on. IEEE, 143--148.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Jun Yan. 2009. Text Representation. Springer US, Boston, MA, 3069--3072.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Jie Yin, Andrew Lampert, Mark Cameron, Bella Robinson, and Robert Power. 2012. Using social media to enhance emergency situation awareness. IEEE Intelligent Systems Vol. 27, 6 (2012), 52--59. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Flood Relevance Estimation from Visual and Textual Content in Social Media Streams

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        WWW '18: Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018
        April 2018
        2023 pages
        ISBN:9781450356404

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee

        Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland

        Publication History

        • Published: 23 April 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format