skip to main content
10.1145/3184558.3191531acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free Access

What is Gab: A Bastion of Free Speech or an Alt-Right Echo Chamber

Published:23 April 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Over the past few years, a number of new "fringe" communities, like 4chan or certain subreddits, have gained traction on the Web at a rapid pace. However, more often than not, little is known about how they evolve or what kind of activities they attract, despite recent research has shown that they influence how false information reaches mainstream communities. This motivates the need to monitor these communities and analyze their impact on the Web's information ecosystem. In August 2016, a new social network called Gab was created as an alternative to Twitter. It positions itself as putting "people and free speech first", welcoming users banned or suspended from other social networks. In this paper, we provide, to the best of our knowledge, the first characterization of Gab. We collect and analyze 22M posts produced by 336K users between August 2016 and January 2018, finding that Gab is predominantly used for the dissemination and discussion of news and world events, and that it attracts alt-right users, conspiracy theorists, and other trolls. We also measure the prevalence of hate speech on the platform, finding it to be much higher than Twitter, but lower than 4chan's Politically Incorrect board.

References

  1. Thor Benson. 2016. Inside the "Twitter for racists": Gab--the site where Milo Yiannopoulos goes to troll now. https://goo.gl/Yqv4Ue. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Eshwar Chandrasekharan, Mattia Samory, Anirudh Srinivasan, and Eric Gilbert. 2017. The Bag of Communities: Identifying Abusive Behavior Online with Preexisting Internet Data. In CHI. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Kitty Donaldson and Joshua Brustein. 2017. Twitter Bans Some White Supremacists and Other Extremists. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017--12--19/twitter-bans-some-white-supremacists-and-other-extremists. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Gab. 2017. Gab site. https://gab.ai. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Gabriel Emile Hine, Jeremiah Onaolapo, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Nicolas Kourtellis, Ilias Leontiadis, Riginos Samaras, Gianluca Stringhini, and Jeremy Blackburn. 2017. Kek, Cucks, and God Emperor Trump: A Measurement Study of 4chan's Politically Incorrect Forum and Its Effects on the Web. In ICWSM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. R. Killick, P. Fearnhead, and I. A. Eckley. 2012. Optimal Detection of Changepoints With a Linear Computational Cost. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. Vol. 107, 500 (2012), 1590--1598.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. What is Gab: A Bastion of Free Speech or an Alt-Right Echo Chamber

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Other conferences
              WWW '18: Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018
              April 2018
              2023 pages
              ISBN:9781450356404

              Copyright © 2018 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee

              Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland

              Publication History

              • Published: 23 April 2018

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader

            HTML Format

            View this article in HTML Format .

            View HTML Format