skip to main content
10.1145/3183713.3190661acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmodConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Pinot: Realtime OLAP for 530 Million Users

Published:27 May 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Modern users demand analytical features on fresh, real time data. Offering these analytical features to hundreds of millions of users is a relevant problem encountered by many large scale web companies.

Relational databases and key-value stores can be scaled to provide point lookups for a large number of users but fall apart at the combination of high ingest rates, high query rates at low latency for analytical queries. Online analytical databases typically rely on bulk data loads and are not typically built to handle nonstop operation in demanding web environments. Offline analytical systems have high throughput but do not offer low query latencies nor can scale to serving tens of thousands of queries per second.

We present Pinot, a single system used in production at Linkedin that can serve tens of thousands of analytical queries per second, offers near-realtime data ingestion from streaming data sources, and handles the operational requirements of large web properties. We also provide a performance comparison with Druid, a system similar to Pinot.

References

  1. Daniel Abadi, Samuel Madden, and Miguel Ferreira. 2006. Integrating compression and execution in column-oriented database systems Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data. ACM, 671--682. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Kevin Beyer and Raghu Ramakrishnan. 1999. Bottom-up computation of sparse and iceberg cube. In ACM SIGMOD Record, Vol. Vol. 28. ACM, 359--370. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. MKABV Bittorf, Taras Bobrovytsky, Casey Ching Alan Choi Justin Erickson, Martin Grund Daniel Hecht, Matthew Jacobs Ishaan Joshi Lenni Kuff, Dileep Kumar Alex Leblang, Nong Li Ippokratis Pandis Henry Robinson, David Rorke Silvius Rus, John Russell Dimitris Tsirogiannis Skye Wanderman, and Milne Michael Yoder. 2015. Impala: A modern, open-source SQL engine for Hadoop Proceedings of the 7th Biennial Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Peter A Boncz, Marcin Zukowski, and Niels Nes. 2005. MonetDB/X100: Hyper-Pipelining Query Execution. CIDR, Vol. Vol. 5. 225--237.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Samy Chambi, Daniel Lemire, Robert Godin, Kamel Boukhalfa, Charles R Allen, and Fangjin Yang. 2016 a. Optimizing druid with roaring bitmaps. In Proceedings of the 20th International Database Engineering & Applications Symposium. ACM, 77--86. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Samy Chambi, Daniel Lemire, Owen Kaser, and Robert Godin. 2016 b. Better bitmap performance with roaring bitmaps. Software: practice and experience Vol. 46, 5 (2016), 709--719. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. C. Chen. 2005. Top 10 unsolved information visualization problems. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE Vol. 25, 4 (july-aug.. 2005), 12--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Pinot: Realtime OLAP for 530 Million Users

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGMOD '18: Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Management of Data
        May 2018
        1874 pages
        ISBN:9781450347037
        DOI:10.1145/3183713

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 27 May 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        SIGMOD '18 Paper Acceptance Rate90of461submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate785of4,003submissions,20%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader