Satire or Fake News: Social Media Consumers' Socio-Demographics Decide

ABSTRACT

Ever since the surprising results from the 2016 U.S. presidential race, the subject of Fake News in our worldwide media consumption has grown steadily. On a smaller scale, mainstream media have taken a closer look at the relatively narrow genre of satirical news content. Ed Koltonski of Kent State, defines satirical news as designed specifically to entertain the reader, usually with irony or wit, to critique society or a social figure and invoke change or reform. Using field experiment, survey and focus group methods we sought to determine if media consumers' ability to differentiate between satirical news and fake news is tied to socio-demographic factors. We found that age, education, sex, and political affiliation predict understanding of "fake news" and satire. Furthermore, the ability to identify different types of misinformation when presented with screen shots from social media posts appears to be related to these variables. Focus group comments were also analyzed to gain a richer perspective on how participants interpreted the SMS screen shots. Using our primary research, we seek to determine if there is a correlation between social media consumers understanding of the difference between satirical news versus fake news and their varying socio-demographic factors

References

1. Media Matters Staff, "Understanding the fake news universe. A guide to fake news terminology," 14 December 2016. {Online}. Available: https://mediamatters.org/research/2016/12/15/understanding-fake-news-universe/214819. {Accessed 2017}.
2. R. L. Holbert, "A typology for the study of entertainment television and politics," American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 436--453, 2005.
3. E. Hunt, "What is fake news How to spot it and what you can do to stop it.," 17 March 2016. {Online}. Available: https://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/dec/18/what-is-fake-news-pizzagate. {Accessed 2017}.
4. National Tracking Poll, "National Tracking Poll 161201," 01 December 2016. {Online}. Available: https://morningconsult.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/161201_topline_Brands_fakenews_genpop_v1_TB.pdf. {Accessed 2017}.
5. L. H. Owen, "Two new polls try to see how Americans are dealing with fake news (Answer: not very well!)," 07 December 2016. {Online}. Available: http://www.niemanlab.org/2016/12/two-new-polls-try-to-see-how-americans-are-dealing-. {Accessed 2017}.
6. D. Foster, "Varieties of ridiculous experience," National Review, vol. 69, no. 1, p. 44, 2017.
7. K. Fallon, "Fooled by 'The Onion': 9 most embarrassing fails," 27 November 2012. {Online}. Available: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/09/29/fooled-by-the-onion-8-most-embarrassing-fails.html. {Accessed 2017}.
8. E. Rensin, "The Great Satirical-News Scam of 2014," 5 June 2014. {Online}. Available: https://newrepublic.com/article/118013/satire-news-websites-are-cashing-gullible-outraged-readers. {Accessed 2017}.
9. R. Chin, "The science of sarcasm Yeah, right.," 14 November 2011. {Online}. Available: http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/the-science-of-sarcasm-yeah-right-25038/. {Accessed 2017}.
10. M. Swayne, "Satire is shaping the next generation of American citizens," 25 August 2016. {Online}. Available: http://news.psu.edu/story/143606/2012/12/19/research/satire-shaping-next-generation-american-citizens.
11. M. Carlson, "The reality of a fake image: New norms, photojournalistic craft, and Brian Walski's fabricated photograph," Journalism Practice, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 125--139, 2009.
12. Media Literacy Council, "Facts vs fiction vs opinion: How to tell the difference," 2016. {Online}. {Accessed 2017}.
13. A. Senecat, "Macron and the 'dirty hands' of the workers: the intoxication that tainted the image," 27 April 2017. {Online}. Available: http://www.lemonde.fr/les-decodeurs/article/2017/04/27/macron-et-les-mains-sales-des-ouvriers-l-intox-qui-a-entache-l-image-du-candidat_5118677_4355770.htmlutm_source=All+Poynter+Subscribers&%20utm_campaign=e50e78d6c3-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2017_04_26&utm_medium. {Accessed 2017}.
14. O. Khazan, "Why Fake News targeted Trump supporters," 02 February 2017. {Online}. Available: https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/02/why-fake-news-targeted-trump-supporters/515433/. {Accessed 2017}.
15. F. Dean, "How satire failed," Maclean's, vol. 129, no. 47, pp. 56--58, 28 November 2016.
16. M. Barthel, A. Mitchell and J. Holcomb, "Many Americans believe fake news is sowing confusion," 15 December 2016. {Online}. Available: http://www.journalism.org/2016/12/15/many-americans-believe-fake-news-is-sowing-%20confusion/. {Accessed 2017}.
17. D. Berkowitz and D. A. Schwartz, "Miley, CNN and The Onion," Journalism Practice, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1--17, 2015.
18. E. Annett, "What is 'fake news,' and how can you spot it Try our quiz," 01 February 2017. {Online}. Available: https://beta.theglobeandmail.com/community/digital-lab/fake-news-quiz/article33821986/. {Accessed 2017}.
19. K. Bloomgarden-Smoke, "The New Yorker Clarifies: The Borowitz Report is 'Not the News'," 13 December 2016. {Online}. Available: http://wwd.com/business-news/media/the-new-yorker-clarifies-the-borowitz-report-is-not-the-news-fake-news-10726721/. {Accessed 2017}.
20. R. Wimmer and J. Dominick, Mass Media Research; an Introduction, 10 ed., Boston, MA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2014.
21. E. Koltonski, "Online satirical news: List of satirical news sites," 4 April 2017. {Online}. Available: http://libguides.library.kent.edu/c.phpg=278400&p=1854632. {Accessed 2017}.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

  • Collaborative and social computing

    • Collaborative and social computing theory, concepts and paradigms

      • Social content sharing

      • Social media

• Social and professional topics

  • Professional topics

    • Computing education

      • Adult education

  • User characteristics

    • Age

    • Cultural characteristics

    • Gender