- Ahmed, A., Aly, M., Gonzalez, J., Narayanamurthy, S., Smola, A.J. Scalable inference in latent variable models. In WSDM '12: Proceedings of the fifth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining (New York, NY, USA, 2012), ACM, 123--132. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anandkumar, A., Foster, D., Hsu, D., Kakade, S., Liu, Y. Two SVDs suffice: Spectral decompositions for probabilistic topic modeling and latent dirichlet allocation. In NIPS (2012). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Arora, S., Ge, R., Kannan, R., Moitra, A. Computing a nonnegative matrix factorization---Provably. In STOC (2012), 145--162. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Arora, S., Ge, R., Moitra, A. Learning topic models---Going beyond SVD. In FOCS (2012). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Blei, D. Introduction to probabilistic topic models. Commun. ACM (2012), 77--84. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Blei, D., Lafferty, J. A correlated topic model of science. Ann. Appl. Stat. (2007), 17--35.Google Scholar
- Blei, D., Ng, A., Jordan, M. Latent dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. (2003), 993--1022. Preliminary version in NIPS 2001. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Deerwester, S., Dumais, S., Landauer, T., Furnas, G., Harshman, R. Indexing by latent semantic analysis. JASIS (1990), 391--407.Google Scholar
- Dempster, A.P., Laird, N.M., Rubin, D.B. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B (1977), 1--38.Google Scholar
- Ding, W., Rohban, M.H., Ishwar, P., Saligrama, V. Efficient distributed topic modeling with provable guarantees. JMLR (2014), 167--175.Google Scholar
- Donoho, D., Stodden, V. When does non-negative matrix factorization give the correct decomposition into parts? In NIPS (2003). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ge, R., Zou, J. Intersecting faces: Non-negative matrix factorization with new guarantees. In Proceedings of The 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning (2015), 2295--2303. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Griffiths, T.L., Steyvers, M. Finding scientific topics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101 (2004), 5228--5235.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hoffman, M.D., Blei, D.M. Structured stochastic variational inference. In 18th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (2015).Google Scholar
- Kalai, A.T., Moitra, A., Valiant, G. Disentangling gaussians. Commun. ACM 55, 2 (Feb. 2012), 113--120. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kivinen, J., Warmuth, M.K. Exponentiated gradient versus gradient descent for linear predictors. Inform. and Comput. 132 (1995). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lee, M., Bindel, D., Mimno, D.M. Robust spectral inference for joint stochastic matrix factorization. In NIPS (2015). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lee, M., Mimno, D. Low-dimensional embeddings for interpretable anchor-based topic inference. In EMNLP (2014).Google Scholar
- Li, W., McCallum, A. Pachinko allocation: Dag-structured mixture models of topic correlations. In ICML (2007), 633--640. Google ScholarDigital Library
- McCallum, A. Mallet: A machine learning for language toolkit (2002). http://mallet.cs.umass.edu.Google Scholar
- Mimno, D., Wallach, H., Talley, E., Leenders, M., McCallum, A. Optimizing semantic coherence in topic models. In EMNLP (2011). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nguyen, T., Hu, Y., Boyd-Graber, J. Anchors regularized: Adding robustness and extensibility to scalable topic-modeling algorithms. In ACL (2014).Google Scholar
- Pearson, K. Contributions to the mathematical theory of evolution. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A. 185 (1894), 71--110.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D. Navigating the local modes of big data: The case of topic models. In Data Science for Politics, Policy and Government (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2014).Google Scholar
- Sontag, D., Roy, D. Complexity of inference in latent dirichlet allocation. In NIPS (2011), 1008--1016. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vavasis, S. On the complexity of nonnegative matrix factorization. SIAM J. Optim. (2009), 1364--1377.Google Scholar
- Zhou, T., Bilmes, J.A., Guestrin, C. Divide-and-conquer learning by anchoring a conical hull. In NIPS (2014), 1242--1250. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Learning topic models -- provably and efficiently
Recommendations
MOOC and Blended Learning Models: Analysis from a Stakeholders' Perspective
Interest is growing in educational designs that blend MOOCs with on-campus teaching and researchers are seeking to incorporate the spirit of a MOOC into a hybrid model. This article reports on the current experience of a higher education institution ...
Open Social Learner Models for Self-Regulated Learning and Learning Motivation
UMAP '16: Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on User Modeling Adaptation and PersonalizationOpen Learner Models (OLM) have demonstrated a multitude of benefits supporting metacognition and engaging learners. Although researchers have study different representations of OLM, a broader view that situates OLM in Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) is ...
Personalized E-learning system with self-regulated learning assisted mechanisms for promoting learning performance
With the rapid development of Internet technologies, the conventional computer-assisted learning (CAL) is gradually moving toward to web-based learning. Additionally, instructors typically base their teaching methods to simultaneously interact with all ...
Comments