skip to main content
10.1145/3178876.3186149acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free Access

Bayesian Models for Product Size Recommendations

Published:23 April 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Lack of calibrated product sizing in popular categories such as apparel and shoes leads to customers purchasing incorrect sizes, which in turn results in high return rates due to fit issues. We address the problem of product size recommendations based on customer purchase and return data. We propose a novel approach based on Bayesian logit and probit regression models with ordinal categories Small, Fit, Largeto model size fits as a function of the difference between latent sizes of customers and products. We propose posterior computation based on mean-field variational inference, leveraging the Polya-Gamma augmentation for the logit prior, that results in simple updates, enabling our technique to efficiently handle large datasets. Our Bayesian approach effectively deals with issues arising from noise and sparsity in the data providing robust recommendations. Offline experiments with real-life shoe datasets show that our model outperforms the state-of-the-art in 5 of 6 datasets. and leads to an improvement of 17-26% in AUC over baselines when predicting size fit outcomes.

References

  1. Adomavicius, G., and Tuzhilin, A. Context-aware recommender systems. In Recommender systems handbook. Springer, 2011, pp. 217--253.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Agarwal, D., and Chen, B.-C. Regression-based latent factor models. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (New York, NY, USA, 2009), KDD '09, ACM, pp. 19--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Aggarwal, C. C. Recommender systems. Springer, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Albert, J. H., and Chib, S. Bayesian analysis of binary and polychotomous response data. Journal of the American statistical Association 88, 422 (1993), 669--679.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bauer, J., and Nanopoulos, A. A framework for matrix factorization based on general distributions. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2014), RecSys '14, ACM, pp. 249--256. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bishop, C. M. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Charlin, L., Ranganath, R., McInerney, J., and Blei, D. M. Dynamic poisson factorization. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2015), RecSys '15, ACM, pp. 155--162. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Chen, M.-H., and Dey, D. K. Bayesian analysis for correlated ordinal data models. BIOSTATISTICS-BASEL- 5 (2000), 133--158.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Chu, W., and Park, S.-T. Personalized recommendation on dynamic content using predictive bilinear models. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web (New York, NY, USA, 2009), WWW '09, ACM, pp. 691--700. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Church, K., Smyth, B., Cotter, P., and Bradley, K. Mobile information access: A study of emerging search behavior on the mobile internet. ACM Trans. Web 1, 1 (May 2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Gopalan, P. K., Charlin, L., and Blei, D. Content-based recommendations with poisson factorization. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2014), pp. 3176--3184. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Greene, W. H., and Hensher, D. A. Modeling ordered choices: A primer. Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Grimmer, J. An introduction to bayesian inference via variational approximations. Political Analysis 19, 1 (2010), 32--47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Harvey, M., Carman, M. J., Ruthven, I., and Crestani, F. Bayesian latent variable models for collaborative item rating prediction. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (New York, NY, USA, 2011), CIKM '11, ACM, pp. 699--708. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Joshi, B., Iutzeler, F., and Amini, M.-R. Asynchronous distributed matrix factorization with similar user and item based regularization. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2016), RecSys '16, ACM, pp. 75--78. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Karatzoglou, A., Amatriain, X., Baltrunas, L., and Oliver, N. Multiverse recommendation: n-dimensional tensor factorization for context-aware collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on Recommender systems (2010), ACM, pp. 79--86. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Kawakatsu, H., and Largey, A. G. EM algorithms for ordered probit models with endogenous regressors. The Econometrics Journal 12, 1 (2009), 164--186.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Koren, Y., Bell, R., and Volinsky, C. Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems. Computer 42, 8 (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Liang, D., Altosaar, J., Charlin, L., and Blei, D. M. Factorization meets the item embedding: Regularizing matrix factorization with item co-occurrence. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on recommender systems (2016), ACM, pp. 59--66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. McAuley, J., and Leskovec, J. Hidden factors and hidden topics: understanding rating dimensions with review text. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Recommender systems (2013), ACM, pp. 165--172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. McKinley, T. J., Morters, M., Wood, J. L., et al. Bayesian model choice in cumulative link ordinal regression models. Bayesian Analysis 10, 1 (2015), 1--30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Narita, A., Hayashi, K., Tomioka, R., and Kashima, H. Tensor factorization using auxiliary information. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 25, 2 (2012), 298--324. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Palmisano, C., Tuzhilin, A., and Gorgoglione, M. Using context to improve predictive modeling of customers in personalization applications. IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering 20, 11 (2008), 1535--1549. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Panniello, U., Tuzhilin, A., Gorgoglione, M., Palmisano, C., and Pedone, A. Experimental comparison of pre-vs. post-filtering approaches in contextaware recommender systems. In Proceedings of the third ACM conference on Recommender systems (2009), ACM, pp. 265--268. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Polson, N. G., Scott, J. G., and Windle, J. Bayesian inference for logistic models using pólya--gamma latent variables. Journal of the American statistical Association 108, 504 (2013), 1339--1349.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Qin, Z., Rishabh, I., and Carnahan, J. A scalable approach for periodical personalized recommendations. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2016), RecSys '16, ACM, pp. 23--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Rafailidis, D., and Nanopoulos, A. Modeling the dynamics of user preferences in coupled tensor factorization. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2014), RecSys '14, ACM, pp. 321--324. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Salakhutdinov, R., and Mnih, A. Bayesian probabilistic matrix factorization using markov chain monte carlo. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Machine Learning (New York, NY, USA, 2008), ICML '08, ACM, pp. 880--887. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Salakhutdinov, R., and Mnih, A. Probabilistic matrix factorization. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2008), vol. 20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Sembium, V., Rastogi, R., Saroop, A., and Merugu, S. Recommending product sizes to customers. In Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2017), RecSys '17, ACM, pp. 243--250. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Vasile, F., Smirnova, E., and Conneau, A. Meta-prod2vec: Product embeddings using side-information for recommendation. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (2016), ACM, pp. 225--232 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Bayesian Models for Product Size Recommendations

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          WWW '18: Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference
          April 2018
          2000 pages
          ISBN:9781450356398

          Copyright © 2018 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee

          Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland

          Publication History

          • Published: 23 April 2018

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          WWW '18 Paper Acceptance Rate170of1,155submissions,15%Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format