skip to main content
10.1145/3178876.3186143acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Auditing the Personalization and Composition of Politically-Related Search Engine Results Pages

Published:23 April 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Search engines are a primary means through which people obtain information in today»s connected world. Yet, apart from the search engine companies themselves, little is known about how their algorithms filter, rank, and present the web to users. This question is especially pertinent with respect to political queries, given growing concerns about filter bubbles, and the recent finding that bias or favoritism in search rankings can influence voting behavior. In this study, we conduct a targeted algorithm audit of Google Search using a dynamic set of political queries. We designed a Chrome extension to survey participants and collect the Search Engine Results Pages (SERPs) and autocomplete suggestions that they would have been exposed to while searching our set of political queries during the month after Donald Trump»s Presidential inauguration. Using this data, we found significant differences in the composition and personalization of politically-related SERPs by query type, subjects» characteristics, and date.

References

  1. Ahmed Allam, Peter Johannes Schulz, and Kent Nakamoto. 2014. The impact of search engine selection and sorting criteria on vaccination beliefs and attitudes: two experiments manipulating Google output. Journal of Medical Internet Research 16, 4 (2014), e100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Hunt Allcott and Matthew Gentzkow. 2017. Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives 31, 2 (May 2017), 211--236.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Solomon E Asch. 1946. Forming impressions of personality. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 41, 3 (1946), 258--290.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Eytan Bakshy, Solomon Messing, and Lada A Adamic. 2015. Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science 348, 6239 (2015), 1130--1132.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Andrea Ballatore, Mark Graham, and Shilad Sen. 2017. Digital hegemonies: the localness of search engine results. Annals of the American Association of Geographers (2017), 1--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Adam J Berinsky, Gregory A Huber, and Gabriel S Lenz. 2012. Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon. com's Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis 20, 3 (2012), 351--368.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Edelman Berland. 2017. 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. http://www.edelman. com/trust2017/. (2017). Accessed: 2017-03-07.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. SEO Blog. 2014. How to Turn Off Google Personalized Search Results. http: //www.seoblog.com/2014/09/turn-google-personalized-search-results/. (2014). Accessed: 2017--10-01.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Michael Buhrmester, Tracy Kwang, and Samuel D Gosling. 2011. Amazon's Mechanical Turk a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science 6, 1 (2011), 3--5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Georg Buscher, Edward Cutrell, and Meredith Ringel Morris. 2009. What do you see when you're surfing?: using eye tracking to predict salient regions of web pages. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, 21--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Traffic Generation Cafe. 2017. Google Incognito: How to Search Google Without Being Tracked. https://trafficgenerationcafe.com/ search-engine-ranking-tip-incognito-search/. (2017). Accessed: 2017--10-01.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Le Chen, Alan Mislove, and Christo Wilson. 2015. Peeking Beneath the Hood of Uber. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on Internet Measurement. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Le Chen, Alan Mislove, and Christo Wilson. 2016. An Empirical Analysis of Algorithmic Pricing on Amazon Marketplace. In Proceedings of the 25th International World Wide Web Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Chitika. 2012. Ask.com Has The Most Long-Winded Searchers, Report Says. Technical Report. Chitika. http://searchengineland.com/ ask-com-has-the-most-long-winded-searchers-report-says-109202Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Inc comScore. 2017. comScore Explicit Core Search Query Report (Desktop Only). https://www.comscore.com/Insights/Rankings. (2017). Accessed: 2017-02--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Nick Diakopoulos. 2013. Algorithmic defamation: The case of the shameless autocomplete. http://www.nickdiakopoulos.com/2013/08/06/ algorithmic-defamation-the-case-of-the-shameless-autocomplete/. (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Nick Diakopoulos. 2013. Sex, Violence, and Autocomplete Algorithms: Methods and Context. http://www.nickdiakopoulos.com/2013/08/01/ sex-violence-and-autocomplete-algorithms-methods-and-context/. (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Nicholas Diakopoulos. 2014. Algorithmic accountability reporting: On the investigation of black boxes. Tow Center for Digital Journalism, Columbia University (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Dimitar Dimitrov, Philipp Singer, Florian Lemmerich, and Markus Strohmaier. 2016. Visual positions of links and clicks on wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 27--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Hermann Ebbinghaus. 1913. Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. Number 3. University Microfilms.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Robert Epstein and Ronald E Robertson. 2015. The search engine manipulation effect (SEME) and its possible impact on the outcomes of elections. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, 33 (2015), E4512--E4521.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Robert Epstein, Ronald E. Robertson, David Lazer, and Christo Wilson. 2017. Suppressing the search engine manipulation effect (SEME). Proceedings of the ACM: Human-Computer Interaction 1, 42 (2017). Issue 2. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Eyal Ert and Aliza Fleischer. 2016. Mere Position Effect in Booking Hotels Online. Journal of Travel Research 55, 3 (2016), 311--321.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Motahhare Eslami, Amirhossein Aleyasen, Karrie Karahalios, Kevin Hamilton, and Christian Sandvig. 2015. Feedvis: A path for exploring news feed curation algorithms. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference Companion on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Gallup. 2017. Presidential Approval Ratings -- Donald Trump. http://news.gallup. com/poll/203198/presidential-approval-ratings-donald-trump.aspx. (2017). Accessed: 2017--10-08.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Florian Geigl, Kristina Lerman, Simon Walk, Markus Strohmaier, and Denis Helic. 2016. Assessing the Navigational Effects of Click Biases and Link Insertion on the Web. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media. ACM, 37--47. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. David F Gleich, Paul G Constantine, Abraham D Flaxman, and Asela Gunawardana. 2010. Tracking the random surfer: empirically measured teleportation parameters in PageRank. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 381--390. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Google. 2017. Google Chrome Privacy Notice. https://www.google.com/chrome/ browser/privacy/#browser-modes. (2017). Accessed: 2017-04-01.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Google. 2017. Search using autocomplete. https://support.google.com/websearch/ answer/106230. (2017). Accessed: 2017-04-01.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Andrew Guess, Brendan Nyhan, and Jason Reifler. 2018. Selective Exposure to Misinformation: Evidence from the consumption of fake news during the 2016 US presidential campaign. (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Xunhua Guo, Mingyue Zhang, Chenyue Yang, et al. 2016. Order Effects in Online Product Recommendation: A Scenario-based Analysis. In Proceedings of the 22nd Americas Conference on Information Systems.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Aniko Hannak, Piotr Sapiezynski, Arash Molavi Kakhki, Balachander Krishnamurthy, David Lazer, Alan Mislove, and Christo Wilson. 2013. Measuring Personalization of Web Search. In Proceedings of the 22nd International World Wide Web Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Aniko Hannak, Gary Soeller, David Lazer, Alan Mislove, and Christo Wilson. 2014. Measuring Price Discrimination and Steering on E-commerce Web Sites. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM Conference on Internet Measurement. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Robin M Hogarth and Hillel J Einhorn. 1992. Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model. Cognitive Psychology 24, 1 (1992), 1--55.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Adrianne Jeffries. 2017. Google's featured snippets are worse than fake news. https://theoutline.com/post/1192/ google-s-featured-snippets-are-worse-than-fake-news. (2017). Accessed: 2017--10-08.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Chloe Kliman-Silver, Aniko Hannak, David Lazer, Christo Wilson, and Alan Mislove. 2015. Location, Location, Location: The Impact of Geolocation on Web Search Personalization. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on Internet Measurement. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Certified Knowledge. 2012. Ask.com Has The Most Long-Winded Searchers, Report Says. Technical Report. Certified Knowledge. http://certifiedknowledge.org/ blog/are-search-queries-becoming-even-more-unique-statistics-from-google/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Juhi Kulshrestha, Motahhare Eslami, Johnnatan Messias, Muhammad Bilal Zafar, Saptarshi Ghosh, Krishna P Gummadi, and Karrie Karahalios. 2017. Quantifying search bias: Investigating sources of bias for political searches in social media. In 20th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW 2017). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. David M. J. Lazer, Matthew A. Baum, Yochai Benkler, Adam J. Berinsky, Kelly M. Greenhill, Filippo Menczer, Miriam J. Metzger, Brendan Nyhan, Gordon Pennycook, David Rothschild, Michael Schudson, Steven A. Sloman, Cass R. Sunstein, Emily A. Thorson, Duncan J. Watts, and Jonathan L. Zittrain. 2018. The Science of Fake News. Science 359, 6380 (March 2018), 1094--1096.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Kristina Lerman and Tad Hogg. 2014. Leveraging position bias to improve peer recommendation. PloS one 9, 6 (2014), e98914.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Xiaolu Lu, Alistair Moffat, and J Shane Culpepper. 2016. The effect of pooling and evaluation depth on IR metrics. Information Retrieval Journal 19, 4 (2016), 416--445. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Ramona Ludolph, Ahmed Allam, and Peter J Schulz. 2016. Manipulating Google's Knowledge Graph box to counter biased information processing during an online search on vaccination: application of a technological debiasing strategy. Journal of Medical Internet research 18, 6 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Connor McMahon, Isaac Johnson, and Brent Hecht. 2017. The Substantial Interdependence of Wikipedia and Google: A Case Study on the Relationship Between Peer Production Communities and Information Technologies. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Nicco Mele, David Lazer, Matthew Baum, Nir Grinberg, Lisa Friedland, Kenneth Joseph, Will Hobbs, and Carolina Mattsson. 2017. Combating fake news: An agenda for research and action. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. P Takis Metaxas and Yada Pruksachatkun. 2017. Manipulation of Search Engine Results during the 2016 US Congressional Elections. In ICIW.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Peter J. Meyers. 2013. 101 Google Answer Boxes: A Journey into the Knowledge Graph. https://moz.com/blog/ 101-google-answer-boxes-a-journey-into-the-knowledge-graph. (2013). Accessed: 2017--10-08.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Jakub Mikians, László Gyarmati, Vijay Erramilli, and Nikolaos Laoutaris. 2012. Detecting price and search discrimination on the Internet. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Jakub Mikians, László Gyarmati, Vijay Erramilli, and Nikolaos Laoutaris. 2013. Crowd-assisted search for price discrimination in e-commerce: First results. In Proceedings of the Ninth ACM Conference on Emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Ronald B Mincy. 1993. The Urban Institute audit studies: their research and policy context. Clear and Convincing Evidence: Measurement of Discrimination in America (1993), 165--86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Amy Mitchell, Jeffrey Gottfried, Elisa Shearer, and Kristine Lu. 2017. How Americans Encounter, Recall and Act Upon Digital News. Technical Report. Pew Research Center.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Alistair Moffat and Justin Zobel. 2008. Rank-biased precision for measurement of retrieval effectiveness. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 27, 1 (2008), 2. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Motherboard. 2017. Go Ahead, Ask Google ?What Happened to the Dinosaurs?. https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/pga4wg/ go-ahead-ask-google-what-happened-to-the-dinosaurs. (2017). Accessed: 2017--10-08.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Moz. 2012. Face-off - 4 Ways to De-personalize Google. https://moz.com/blog/ face-off-4-ways-to-de-personalize-google. (2012). Accessed: 2017--10-01.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Sean A Munson, Stephanie Y Lee, and Paul Resnick. 2013. Encouraging Reading of Diverse Political Viewpoints with a Browser Widget.. In ICWSM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Bennet B Murdock. 1962. The serial position effect of free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology 64, 5 (1962), 482--488.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Jamie Murphy, Charles Hofacker, and Richard Mizerski. 2006. Primacy and recency effects on clicking behavior. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11, 2 (2006), 522--535.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Nic Newman, Richard Fletcher, Antonis Kalogeropoulos, David A. L. Levy, and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen. 2017. Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2017. Technical Report. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Helen Nissenbaum. 1996. Accountability in a computerized society. Science and Engineering Ethics 2, 1 (1996), 25--42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Alamir Novin and Eric Meyers. 2017. Making sense of conflicting science information: Exploring bias in the search engine result page. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval. ACM, 175--184. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Bing Pan, Helene Hembrooke, Thorsten Joachims, Lori Lorigo, Geri Gay, and Laura Granka. 2007. In google we trust: Users' decisions on rank, position, and relevance. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12, 3 (2007), 801--823.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Eli Pariser. 2011. The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. Penguin UK. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Parse.ly. 2017. The authority report: How audiences find articles, by topic. Technical Report. Parse.ly. http://learn.parsely.com/rs/314-EBB-255/images/ authority-report-13.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Frank Pasquale. 2015. The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Eyal Peer, Laura Brandimarte, Sonam Samat, and Alessandro Acquisti. 2017. Beyond the Turk: alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 70 (2017), 153--163.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Eyal Peer, Joachim Vosgerau, and Alessandro Acquisti. 2014. Reputation as a sufficient condition for data quality on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Behavior research methods 46, 4 (2014), 1023--1031.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Kristen Purcell, Joanna Brenner, and Lee Rainie. 2012. Search engine use 2012. Technical Report. Pew Research Center's Internet and American Life Project.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Advanced Web Ranking. 2017. CTR Study February 2017. https://www. advancedwebranking.com/cloud/ctrstudy. (2017). Accessed: 2017-04-01.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Christian Sandvig, Kevin Hamilton, Karrie Karahalios, and Cedric Langbort. 2014. Auditing algorithms: Research methods for detecting discrimination on internet platforms. In Proceedings of 'Data and Discrimination: Converting Critical Concerns into Productive Inquiry?, a Productivereconference at the 64th Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Gary Soeller, Karrie Karahalios, Christian Sandvig, and Christo Wilson. 2016. MapWatch: Detecting and Monitoring International Border Personalization on Online Maps. In Proceedings of the 25th International World Wide Web Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Lauren Starling. 2013. How to remove a word from Google autocomplete. (2013). http://www.laurenstarling.org/ how-to-remove-a-word-from-google-autocomplete/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Danny Sullivan. 2017. Google's 'One True Answer' problem when featured snippets go bad. https://searchengineland.com/ googles-one-true-answer-problem-featured-snippets-270549. (2017). Accessed: 2017--10-08.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Sander van der Linden, Anthony Leiserowitz, Seth Rosenthal, and Edward Maibach. 2017. Inoculating the public against misinformation about climate change. Global Challenges 1, 2 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Soroush Vosoughi, Deb Roy, and Sinan Aral. 2018. The Spread of True and False News Online. Science 359, 6380 (March 2018), 1146--1151.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. William Webber, Alistair Moffat, and Justin Zobel. 2010. A similarity measure for indefinite rankings. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 28, 4 (2010), 20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. Wiideman. 2010. Beat the autocomplete - A study of Google auto-suggest. (2010). https://www.wiideman.com/research/google-autocomplete/study-resultsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Auditing the Personalization and Composition of Politically-Related Search Engine Results Pages

                  Recommendations

                  Comments

                  Login options

                  Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                  Sign in
                  • Published in

                    cover image ACM Other conferences
                    WWW '18: Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference
                    April 2018
                    2000 pages
                    ISBN:9781450356398

                    Copyright © 2018 ACM

                    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                    Publisher

                    International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee

                    Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland

                    Publication History

                    • Published: 23 April 2018

                    Permissions

                    Request permissions about this article.

                    Request Permissions

                    Check for updates

                    Qualifiers

                    • research-article

                    Acceptance Rates

                    WWW '18 Paper Acceptance Rate170of1,155submissions,15%Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

                  PDF Format

                  View or Download as a PDF file.

                  PDF

                  eReader

                  View online with eReader.

                  eReader

                  HTML Format

                  View this article in HTML Format .

                  View HTML Format