Mile High WiFi: A First Look At In-Flight Internet Connectivity

ABSTRACT

In-Flight Communication (IFC), available on a growing number of commercial flights, is often received by consumers with both awe for its mere availability and harsh criticism for its poor performance. Indeed, IFC provides Internet connectivity in some of the most challenging conditions with aircraft traveling at speeds in excess of 500 mph at 30,000 feet above the ground. Yet, while existing services do provide basic Internet \em accessibility, anecdotal reports rank their quality of service as, at best, poor. In this paper, we present the first characterization of deployed IFC systems. Using over 45 flight-hours of measurements, we profile the performance of IFC across the two dominant access technologies -- direct air-to-ground communication (DA2GC) and mobile satellite service (MSS). We show that IFC QoS is in large part determined by the high latencies inherent to DA2GC and MSS, with RTTs averaging 200ms and 750ms, respectively, and that these high latencies directly impact the performance of common applications such as web browsing. While each IFC technology is based on well studied wireless communication technologies, our findings reveal that IFC links experience further degraded link performance than their technological antecedents. We find median loss rates of 7%, and nearly 40% loss at the 90th percentile for MSS, 6.8x larger than recent characterizations of residential satellite networks. We extend our IFC study exploring the potential of the newly released HTTP/2 and QUIC protocols in an emulated IFC environment, finding that QUIC is able to improve page load times by as much as 7.9 times. In addition, we find that HTTP/2»s use of multiplexing multiple requests onto a single TCP connection performs up to 4.8x \em worse than HTTP/1.1 when faced with large numbers of objects. We use network emulation to explore proposed technological improvements to existing IFC systems finding that high link losses, and not bandwidth, account for the largest factor of performance degradation with applications such as web browsing.

References

1. 2015. The Prefix WhoIs Project. http://www.pwhois.org. (2015). http://www. pwhois.org
2. Honeywell Aerospace. 2014. In Flight Connectivity Survey. https://aerospace. honeywell.com/press-release-listing. (July 2014).
3. Bernhard Ager, Wolfgang Mühlbauer, Georgios Smaragdakis, and Steve Uhlig. 2010. Comparing DNS Resolvers in the Wild. In Proc. IMC.
4. Serkan Ayaz, Christian Bauer, Christian Kissling, Frank Schreckenbach, Fabrice Arnal, Cedric Baudoin, Katia Leconte, Max Ehammer, and Thomas Graeupl. 2009. Architecture of an IP-based Aeronautical Network. In Proc. of ICNS. IEEE, 1--9.
5. Lets Fly Cheaper. {n. d.}. Airlines That Offer Inflight WiFi- The Definitive 2017 List. https://www.letsflycheaper.com/blog/airlines-2/ airlines-that-offer-inflight-wifi/. ({n. d.}).
6. Shun-Ping Chen. 2014. Perfomance analysis and optimization of DA2GC using LTE advanced technology. In Proc. VITAEw.
7. Paolo Chini, Giovanni Giambene, and Sastri Kota. 2010. A survey on mobile satellite systems. International Journal of Satellite Communications and Networking 28, 1 (2010), 29--57.
8. Electronics Communications Committee. 2014. Broadband Direct-Air-to-Ground Communications (DA2GC). Technical Report ECC-214. CEPT.
9. Euroconsult. 2016. Passenger Connectivity Services to Surpass $5 Billion by 2025. http://www.euroconsult-ec.com/4_February_2016. (February 2016).
10. FastCompany. {n. d.}. How Terrible In-Flight Wi-Fi Will Finally Become A Thing Of The Past. https://www.fastcompany.com/3042609/ how-terrible-in-flight-wi-fi-will-finally-become-a-thing-of-the-past. ({n. d.}).
11. FCC. {n. d.}. Measuring Broadband America. http://www.fcc.gov/ measuring-broadband-america. ({n. d.}).
12. GoGo. {n. d.}. GoGo Biz Wireless Network for Aircraft. https://business.gogoair. com/technology/north-american-broadband-network/gogo-biz/. ({n. d.}).
13. Google, QUIC. {n. d.}. QUIC, a multiplexed stream transport over UDP. https: //www.chromium.org/quic. ({n. d.}).
14. Inmarsat. {n. d.}. Inflight Connectivity Survey. https://www.inmarsat.com/ aviation/commercial-aviation/in-flight-connectivity-survey. ({n. d.}).
15. Kimon Karras, Theodore Kyritsis, Massimiliano Amirfeiz, and Stefano Baiotti. 2008. Aeronautical mobile ad hoc networks. In Proc. European Wireless Conference.
16. Ryan W. Kingsbury. 2009. Mobile Ad hoc networks for oceanic aircraft communications. Ph.D. Dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
17. Adam Langley, Alistair Riddoch, Alyssa Wilk, Antonio Vicente, Charles Krasic, Dan Zhang, Fan Yang, Fedor Kouranov, Ian Swett, Janardhan Iyengar, Jeff Bailey, Jeremy Dorfman, Jim Roskind, Joanna Kulik, Patrik Westin, Raman Tenneti, Robbie Shade, Ryan Hamilton, Victor Vasiliev, Wan-Teh Chang, and Zhongyi Shi. 2017. The QUIC Transport Protocol: Design and Internet-Scale Deployment. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM.
18. Oliver Lücke and Eriza Hafid Fazli. 2011. A Networking Testbed for IPv6-Based Future Air Traffic Management (ATM) Network.. In Personal Satellite Services. Springer.
19. M-Lab. {n. d.}. NDT (Network Diagnostic Test). http://www.measurementlab. net/tools/ndt. ({n. d.}).
20. Markets and Markets. 2015. Commercial Aviation In Flight Entertainment and Communications Market (2012 - 2017). http://www.marketsandmarkets.com/ Market-Reports/in-flight-entertainment-communications-market-860.html. (September 2015).
21. Daniel Medina, Felix Hoffmann, Serkan Ayaz, and C-H. Rokitansky. 2008. Feasibility of an aeronautical mobile ad hoc network over the north atlantic corridor. In Proc. of SECON.
22. Northern Sky Research. 2013. The In-Flight Connectivity Market. http://www.nsr.com/upload/presentations/NSR_Webinar-_The_In-Flight_Connectivity_Market-_A_Boom_for_the_Satellite_Industry.pdf. (October 2013).
23. PhantomJS. {n. d.}. PhantomJS | PhantomJS. http://phantomjs.org. ({n. d.}).
24. John P Rula, Fabián E Bustamante, and David R Choffnes. 2016. When IPs Fly: A Case for Redefining Airline Communication. In Proc. of HotMobile.
25. Ehssan Sakhaee and Abbas Jamalipour. 2006. The global in-flight Internet. IEEE JSAC 24, 9 (2006), 1748--1757.
26. The Linux Foundation, NETEM. {n. d.}. NETEM. http://www.linuxfoundation. org/collaborate/workgroups/networking/netem. ({n. d.}).
27. Xiao Sophia Wang, Aruna Balasubramanian, Arvind Krishnamurthy, and David Wetherall. 2014. How speedy is SPDY?. In Proc. USENIX NSDI.
28. William Wu, Edward Miller, Wilbur Pritchard, and Raymond Pickholtz. 1994. Mobile satellite communications. Proc. of the IEEE 82, 9 (1994), 1431--1448.

Index Terms

• Networks

  • Network performance evaluation

    • Network experimentation

    • Network measurement

  • Network types

    • Mobile networks