skip to main content
10.1145/3173574.3173737acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

GeoCoin: Supporting Ideation and Collaborative Design with Smart Contracts

Authors Info & Claims
Published:19 April 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Design and HCI researchers are increasingly working with complex digital infrastructures, such as cryptocurrencies, distributed ledgers and smart contracts. These technologies will have a profound impact on digital systems and their audiences. However, given their emergent nature and technical complexity, involving non-specialists in the design of applications that employ these technologies is challenging. In this paper, we discuss these challenges and present GeoCoin, a location-based platform for embodied learning and speculative ideating with smart contracts. In collaborative workshops with GeoCoin, participants engaged with location-based smart contracts, using the platform to explore digital 'debit' and 'credit' zones in the city. These exercises led to the design of diverse distributed-ledger applications, for time-limited financial unions, participatory budgeting, and humanitarian aid. These results contribute to the HCI community by demonstrating how an experiential prototype can support understanding of the complexities behind new digital infrastructures and facilitate participant engagement in ideation and design processes.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn2104-file5.mp4

mp4

18.6 MB

References

  1. Omari Akil. 2017. Warning: Pokemon GO is a Death Sentence if you are a Black Man. https: //medium.com/mobile-lifestyle/warning-pokemon-go-is-adeath-sentence-if-you-are-a-black-man-acacb4bdae7f. (2017). Accessed: 2017-09--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Cristina Ampatzidou, Matthijs Bouw, Froukje van de Klundert, Michiel de Lange, and Bastiaan Gerard Martijn Waal. 2014. The Hackable City: A Research Manifesto and Design Toolkit. Knowledge Mile.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. James Auger. 2013. Speculative design: crafting the speculation. Digital Creativity 24, 1 (2013), 11--35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Kamanashis Biswas and Vallipuram Muthukkumarasamy. 2016. Securing Smart Cities Using Blockchain Technology. In 2016 IEEE 18th International Conference on High Performance Computing & Communications; IEEE 14th International Conference on Smart City; IEEE 2nd International Conference on Data Science and Systems (HPCC/SmartCity/DSS). 1392--1393.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Julian Bleecker. 2009. Design fiction. A short essay on design, science, fact and fiction. Near Future Laboratory (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Marion Buchenau and Jane Fulton Suri. 2000. Experience Prototyping. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques (DIS '00). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 424--433. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Bill Buxton. 2010. Sketching user experiences: getting the design right and the right design. Morgan Kaufmann. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Ruth Catlow, Marc Garrett, Nathan Jones, and Sam Skinner (Eds.). 2017. Artists Re:thinking the Blockchain. Liverpool University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Alan Chamberlain, Andy Crabtree, Tom Rodden, Matt Jones, and Yvonne Rogers. 2012. Research in the Wild: Understanding 'in the Wild' Approaches to Design and Development. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 795--796. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Nazlı Cila and Gabriele Ferri. 2017. Centre for Design Informatics: Blockchain City. In A Lab of Labs. Methods and Approaches for a Human-Centered Design, Gabriele Ferri and Martijn de Waal (Eds.). Amsterdam Creative Industries Publishing, 59--67.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. The DAO. 2016. The DAO. https://archive.is/Ld33p. (2016). Accessed: 2017-09--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Michiel De Lange and Martijn De Waal. 2013. Owning the city: New media and citizen engagement in urban design. First Monday 18, 11 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Thomas Dickerson, Paul Gazzillo, Maurice Herlihy, and Eric Koskinen. 2017. Adding Concurrency to Smart Contracts. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 303--312. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Will Dunn. 2017. The rise and fall of The DAO, the first code-based company. http: //tech.newstatesman.com/feature/dao-code-based-company. (2017). Accessed: 2017-09--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Chris Elsden, Arthi Manohar, Jo Briggs, Mike Harding, Chris Speed, and John Vines. 2018. Making Sense of Blockchain Applications: A Typology for HCI. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Haakon Faste, Nir Rachmel, Russell Essary, and Evan Sheehan. 2013. Brainstorm, Chainstorm, Cheatstorm, Tweetstorm: New Ideation Strategies for Distributed HCI Design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1343--1352. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Batya Friedman and David Hendry. 2012. The Envisioning Cards: A Toolkit for Catalyzing Humanistic and Technical Imaginations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1145--1148. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Xianyi Gao, Gradeigh D. Clark, and Janne Lindqvist. 2016. Of Two Minds, Multiple Addresses, and One Ledger: Characterizing Opinions, Knowledge, and Perceptions of Bitcoin Across Users and Non-Users. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1656--1668. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Bill Gaver, Tony Dunne, and Elena Pacenti. 1999. Design: Cultural Probes. interactions 6, 1 (Jan. 1999), 21--29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. William W. Gaver, Jacob Beaver, and Steve Benford. 2003. Ambiguity As a Resource for Design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '03). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 233--240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Michael Golembewski and Mark Selby. 2010. Ideation Decks: A Card-based Design Ideation Tool. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 89--92. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Steve Huckle, Rituparna Bhattacharya, Martin White, and Natalia Beloff. 2016. Internet of Things, Blockchain and Shared Economy Applications. Procedia Computer Science 98, Supplement C (2016), 461 -- 466. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. George F. Hurlburt and Irena Bojanova. 2014. Bitcoin: Benefit or Curse? IT Professional 16, 3 (May 2014), 10--15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Hilary Hutchinson, Wendy Mackay, Bo Westerlund, Benjamin B. Bederson, Allison Druin, Catherine Plaisant, Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, Stéphane Conversy, Helen Evans, Heiko Hansen, Nicolas Roussel, and Björn Eiderbäck. 2003. Technology Probes: Inspiring Design for and with Families. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '03). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 17--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Simona Ibba, Andrea Pinna, Matteo Seu, and Filippo Eros Pani. 2017. CitySense: Blockchain-oriented Smart Cities. In Proceedings of the XP2017 Scientific Workshops (XP '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 12, 5 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. IDEO. 2003. IDEO Method Cards: 51 Ways to Inspire Design. https://www.ideo.com/post/method-cards. (2003). Accessed: 2017-09--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Caroline Jaffe, Cristina Mata, and Sepandar Kamvar. 2017. Motivating Urban Cycling Through a Blockchain-based Financial Incentives System. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (UbiComp '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 81--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Jiong Jin, Jayavardhana Gubbi, Slaven Marusic, and Marimuthu Palaniswami. 2014. An Information Framework for Creating a Smart City Through Internet of Things. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 1, 2 (April 2014), 112--121.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Joseph Lindley. 2015. Crypto Heater: A Design Fiction. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition (C&C '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 355--356. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Loi Luu, Duc-Hiep Chu, Hrishi Olickel, Prateek Saxena, and Aquinas Hobor. 2016. Making Smart Contracts Smarter. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 254--269. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Deborah Maxwell, Chris Speed, and Dug Campbell. 2015. 'Effing' the Ineffable: Opening Up Understandings of the Blockchain. In Proceedings of the 2015 British HCI Conference (British HCI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 208--209. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Deborah Maxwell, Chris Speed, and Larissa Pschetz. 2017. Story Blocks: Reimagining narrative through the blockchain. Convergence 23, 1 (2017), 79--97.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Sarah Meiklejohn, Marjori Pomarole, Grant Jordan, Kirill Levchenko, Damon McCoy, Geoffrey M. Voelker, and Stefan Savage. 2013. A Fistful of Bitcoins: Characterizing Payments Among Men with No Names. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Internet Measurement Conference (IMC '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 127--140. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Matthias Mettler. 2016. Blockchain technology in healthcare: The revolution starts here. In 2016 IEEE 18th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom). 1--3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Angela Monaghan. 2017. Bitcoin is a fraud that will blow up, says JP Morgan boss. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/sep/13/ bitcoin-fraud-jp-morgan-cryptocurrency-drug-dealers. (2017). Accessed: 2017-09--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Michael J. Muller. 2003. The Human-computer Interaction Handbook. (2003), 1051--1068. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=772072.772138Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Satoshi Nakamoto. 2008. Bitcoin: peer to peer electronic cash system. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf. (2008). Accessed: 2017-09--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Arvind Narayanan, Andrew Miller, and Song Han. 2016. Research for Practice: Cryptocurrencies, Blockchains, and Smart Contracts; Hardware for Deep Learning. Queue 14, 6, Article 60 (Dec. 2016), 43--55 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Bettina Nissen, Kate Symons, Ella Tallyn, Chris Speed, Deborah Maxwell, and John Vines. 2017. New Value Transactions: Understanding and Designing for Distributed Autonomous Organisations. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '17 Companion). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 352--355. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Gareth W. Peters and Efstathios Panayi. 2016. Understanding Modern Banking Ledgers Through Blockchain Technologies: Future of Transaction Processing and Smart Contracts on the Internet of Money. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 239--278.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Matthew Ponsford. 2017. Award-winning architect builds 'half houses', says slums should inspire. http://www.reuters.com/article/us-latam-housingarchitecture/award-winning-architect-builds-halfhouses-says-slums-should-inspire-idUSKCN0YI1JG. (2017). Accessed: 2017-09--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Larissa Pschetz, Ella Tallyn, Rory Gianni, and Chris Speed. 2017. Bitbarista: Exploring Perceptions of Data Transactions in the Internet of Things. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2964--2975. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Elizabeth B.-N. Sanders and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2014. Probes, toolkits and prototypes: three approaches to making in codesigning. CoDesign 10, 1 (2014), 5--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Paul Sawers. 2017. Spotify acquires Mediachain. https://venturebeat.com/2017/04/26/spotify-acquiresmediachain-to-develop-blockchain-technology-thatmatches-royalties-with-rightsowners/. (2017). Accessed: 2017-09--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Trebor Scholz. 2016. Platform cooperativism. Challenging the corporate sharing economy. New York, NY: Rosa Luxemburg Foundation (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Phoebe Sengers and Bill Gaver. 2006. Staying Open to Interpretation: Engaging Multiple Meanings in Design and Evaluation. In Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 99--108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Laura Shin. 2016. How The Blockchain Will Transform Everything From Banking To Government To Our Identities. https://www.forbes.com/sites/laurashin/2016/ 05/26/how-the-blockchain-will-transform-everythingfrom-banking-to-government-to-our-identities/. (2016). Accessed: 2017-09--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Los Silva. 2016. The Future Is Now: Smart Cities on the Ethereum Blockchain. https://www.ethnews.com/the-future-is-now-smartcities-on-the-ethereum-blockchain. (2016). Accessed: 2017-09--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Rasmus Svennson and Hanna Nilsson. 2017. The Block is the Successor to the Book: A publishing proposal. http://rhizome.org/editorial/2015/nov/17/the-block-isthe-successor-to-the-book-a-publishing-proposal/. (2017). Accessed: 2017-09--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Bas Van Abel, Lucas Evers, Peter Troxler, and Roel Klaassen. 2014. Open design now: Why design cannot remain exclusive. BIS Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Jayne Wallace, John McCarthy, Peter C. Wright, and Patrick Olivier. 2013. Making Design Probes Work. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3441--3450. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Andrea Zanella, Nicola Bui, Angelo Castellani, Lorenzo Vangelista, and Michele Zorzi. 2014. Internet of Things for Smart Cities. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 1, 1 (Feb 2014), 22--32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. GeoCoin: Supporting Ideation and Collaborative Design with Smart Contracts

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2018
      8489 pages
      ISBN:9781450356206
      DOI:10.1145/3173574

      Copyright © 2018 Owner/Author

      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial International 4.0 License.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 19 April 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate666of2,590submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader