skip to main content
10.1145/3173574.3173713acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Displaying Invisible Objects: Why People Rarely Re-read E-books

Published:19 April 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

This study of paper and e-books investigates how specific affordances of physical and digital objects relate to people's valuations and uses of those objects over time. We found that while the visibility of paper books amplified the meaningfulness of organizational and display actions taken with regards to those objects, the systems that supported interactions with e-books instead tended to make such actions less meaningful. We argue that these systems also discouraged re-uses of e-books for most participants -- the important exceptions being several participants who used the book-focused social networking site Goodreads. This paper details how the affordances and limitations that resulted from the material constructions of paper and e-books impacted participants' uses of and feelings towards those objects, and examines the implications of using a supplementary online system for displaying digital objects.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Deborah Barreau and Bonnie A. Nardi. 1995. Finding and Reminding: File Organization from the Desktop. SIGCHI Bull. 27, 3: 39--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Scott Carter and Jennifer Mankoff. 2005. When Participants Do the Capturing: The Role of Media in Diary Studies. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '05), 899--908. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Steven Chen and Neil Granitz. 2012. Adoption, rejection, or convergence: Consumer attitudes toward book digitization. Journal of Business Research 65, 8: 1219--1225.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Juliet Corbin and Anselm Strauss. 2008. Basics of Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications, Los Angeles, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Gillian Crampton-Smith. 1995. The hand that rocks the cradle. I.D. Magazine, 60--65.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Amber L. Cushing. 2013. "It's stuff that speaks to me": Exploring the characteristics of digital possessions. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology 64, 8: 1723--1734.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Mary Douglas and Baron C. Isherwood. 1979. The world of goods. Basic Books, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Erving Goffman. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. Anchor Books, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Connie Golsteijn, Elise van den Hoven, David Frohlich, and Abigail Sellen. 2012. Towards a More Cherishable Digital Object. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '12), 655--664. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Nicky Gregson. 2011. Living with Things: Ridding, Accommodation, Dwelling. Sean Kingston Publishing, Wantage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Jane Gruning. 2017. Models for Ownership: Implications for Long-term Relationships to Objects. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '17), 2607--2613. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Annika Hupfeld and Tom Rodden. 2014. Books As a Social Technology. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '14), 639--651. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Annika Hupfeld, Abigail Sellen, Kenton O'Hara, and Tom Rodden. 2013. Leisure-Based Reading and the Place of E-Books in Everyday Life. In HumanComputer Interaction -- INTERACT 2013, Paula Kotzé, et al. (eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Masumi Iida, Patrick E. Shrout, Jean-Phillipe Laurenceau, and Niall Bolger. 2012. Using Diary Methods in Psychological Research. In APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology. American Psychological Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Hiroshi Ishii and Brygg Ullmer. 1997. Tangible Bits: Towards Seamless Interfaces Between People, Bits and Atoms. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '97), 234--241. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Joseph "Jofish" Kaye, Janet Vertesi, Shari Avery, Allan Dafoe, Shay David, Lisa Onaga, Ivan Rosero, and Trevor Pinch. 2006. To Have and to Hold: Exploring the Personal Archive. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '06), 275--284. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. David S. Kirk and Abigail Sellen. 2010. On Human Remains: Values and Practice in the Home Archiving of Cherished Objects. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 17, 3: 10:1--10:43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Catherine C. Marshall. 2010. Reading and Writing the Electronic Book. Morgan & Claypool. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Michael Massimi, Rachelle Campigotto, Abbas Attarwala, and Ronald M. Baecker. 2013. Reading together as a Leisure Activity: Implications for Ereading. In Human-Computer Interaction -- INTERACT 2013, Paula Kotzé et al. (eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 19--36.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Joanne E. McNeish and Ummaha Hazra. 2014. Interpreting simultaneous use of an existing technology and its replacement innovation. International Journal of Technology Marketing 9, 4: 376--391.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Daniel Miller. 1987. Material culture and mass consumption. B. Blackwell, Oxford, OX, UK; New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Daniel Miller. 2010. Stuff. Polity Press, Cambridge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Nathan. 2016. The New Kindle Homescreen Sucks, It's Just One Big Ad. The E-book Reader.com. Retrieved June 7, 2017 from http://blog.the-ebookreader.com/2016/02/13/the-new-kindle-homescreensucks-its-just-one-big-ad/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. William Odom, Abi Sellen, Richard Harper, and Eno Thereska. 2012. Lost in Translation: Understanding the Possession of Digital Things in the Cloud. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12), 781--790. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. William Odom, John Zimmerman, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2011. Teenagers and Their Virtual Possessions: Design Opportunities and Issues. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11), 1491--1500. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. William Odom, John Zimmerman, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2014. Placelessness, Spacelessness, and Formlessness: Experiential Qualities of Virtual Possessions. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '14), 985--994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. William Odom, John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi, Hajin Choi, Stephanie Meier, and Angela Park. 2012. Investigating the Presence, Form and Behavior of Virtual Possessions in the Context of a Teen Bedroom. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12), 327--336. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Leysia Palen and Marilyn Salzman. 2002. Voice-mail Diary Studies for Naturalistic Data Capture Under Mobile Conditions. In Proceedings of the 2002 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '02), 87--95. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Daniela Petrelli and Steve Whittaker. 2010. Family memories in the home: contrasting physical and digital mementos. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 14, 2: 153--169. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Pew Research Center. 2016. Book Reading 2016. Retrieved October 7, 2017 from http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/09/01/book-reading2016/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. John Rieman. 1993. The Diary Study: A Workplaceoriented Research Tool to Guide Laboratory Efforts. In ACM INTERCHI '93, 321--326. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Jennifer A. Rode, Eleanor F. Toye, and Alan F. Blackwell. 2005. The Domestic Economy: A Broader Unit of Analysis for End User Programming. In CHI '05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '05), 1757--1760. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Mark Rouncefield and Peter Tolmie. 2011. Digital Words: Reading and the 21st Century Home. In The Connected Home: The Future of Domestic Life, Richard Harper (ed.). Springer London, 133--162.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Yin Zhang and Sonali Kudva. 2014. E-books versus print books: Readers' choices and preferences across contexts. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology 65, 8: 1695--1706. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Displaying Invisible Objects: Why People Rarely Re-read E-books

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2018
      8489 pages
      ISBN:9781450356206
      DOI:10.1145/3173574

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 19 April 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate666of2,590submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader