skip to main content
10.1145/3173225.3173307acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Tracking, Animating, and 3D Printing Elements of the Fine Arts Freehand Drawing Process

Published:18 March 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Dynamic elements of traditional drawing processes such as the order of compilation, and speed, length, and pressure of strokes can be as important as the final art piece because they can reveal the technique, process, and emotions of the artist. In this paper, we present an interactive system that unobtrusively tracks the freehand drawing process (movement and pressure of artist»s pencil) on a regular easel. The system outputs captured information using 2D video renderings and 3D-printed sculptures. We also present a summery of findings from a user study with 6 experienced artists who created multiple pencil drawings using our system. The resulting digital and physical outputs from our system revealed vast differences in drawing speeds, styles, and techniques. At TEI art track, the attendees will likely engage in lively discussion around the analog, digital, and tangible aspects of our exhibit. We believe that such a discussion will be critical not only in shaping the future of our work, but also in understanding novel research directions at the intersection of art and computation.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

arts1045.mp4

mp4

32.2 MB

References

  1. Jo Davies and Leo Duff. 2005. Drawing the process. Intellect Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Hisakazu Hada, Daisuke Tozuka, Sho Kamei, Tatsumi Hasegawa, Fuhito Morita, Shuntaro Ootsuki, and Akito Nakano. 2015. Sootoid: Generative Art Drawing by Flame of Candle. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 401--402. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Chris Harrison, Julia Schwarz, and Scott E. Hudson. 2011. TapSense: Enhancing Finger Interaction on Touch Surfaces. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 627--636. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Emmanuel Iarussi, Adrien Bousseau, and Theophanis Tsandilas. 2013. The Drawing Assistant: Automated Drawing Guidance and Feedback from Photographs. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 183--192. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Kazuhiro Jo. 2008. DrawSound: A Drawing Instrument for Sound Performance. In Proceedings of the 2Nd International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (TEI '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 59--62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Rubaiat Habib Kazi, Fanny Chevalier, Tovi Grossman, Shengdong Zhao, and George Fitzmaurice. 2014. Draco: Bringing Life to Illustrations with Kinetic Textures. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 351--360. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Younghui Kim, Geri Gay, Lindsay Reynolds, and Hyuns Hong. 2015. Mood.Cloud: Data As Art. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 347--350. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Sang-won Leigh, Harshit Agrawal, and Pattie Maes. 2016. A Flying Pantograph: Interleaving Expressivity of Human and Machine. In Proceedings of the TEI '16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 653--657. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Sang-won Leigh, Asta Roseway, Ann Paradiso, and Pattie Maes. 2015. Remnance of Form: Interactive Narratives Through Unexpected Behaviors of a Shadow. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 387--390. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Deborah Turnbull Tillman, Mari Velonaki, and Petra Gemeinboeck. 2015. Authenticating Experience: Curating Digital Interactive Art. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 429--432. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Barbara Tversky. 2011. Visualizing Thought. Topics in Cognitive Science 3, 3 (2011), 499--535.0.1145/2470654.2481361Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Tracking, Animating, and 3D Printing Elements of the Fine Arts Freehand Drawing Process

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            TEI '18: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction
            March 2018
            763 pages
            ISBN:9781450355681
            DOI:10.1145/3173225

            Copyright © 2018 Owner/Author

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 18 March 2018

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • abstract

            Acceptance Rates

            TEI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate37of130submissions,28%Overall Acceptance Rate393of1,367submissions,29%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader