ABSTRACT
Robot teleoperation can be a challenging task, often requiring a great deal of user training and expertise, especially for platforms with high degrees-of-freedom (e.g., industrial manipulators and aerial robots). Users often struggle to synthesize information robots collect (e.g., a camera stream) with contextual knowledge of how the robot is moving in the environment. We explore how advances in augmented reality (AR) technologies are creating a new design space for mediating robot teleoperation by enabling novel forms of intuitive, visual feedback. We prototype several aerial robot teleoperation interfaces using AR, which we evaluate in a 48-participant user study where participants completed an environmental inspection task. Our new interface designs provided several objective and subjective performance benefits over existing systems, which often force users into an undesirable paradigm that divides user attention between monitoring the robot and monitoring the robot»s camera feed(s).
- Ronald Azuma, Yohan Baillot, Reinhold Behringer, Steven Feiner, Simon Julier, and Blair MacIntyre. 2001. Recent Advances in Augmented Reality. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 21, 6 (2001), 34--47. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Maria Bualat, Jonathan Barlow, Terrence Fong, Christopher Provencher, Trey Smith, and Allison Zuniga. 2015. Astrobee: Developing a Free-flying Robot forthe International Space Station. In AIAA SPACE 2015 Conference and Exposition. 4643.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jessie YC Chen, Ellen C Haas, and Michael J Barnes. 2007. Human Performance Issues and User Interface Design for Teleoperated Robots. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews) 37, 6 (2007), 1231--1245. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mark Corcoran. 2014. Drone Journalism Takes Off. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-02--21/drone-journalism-takes-off/3840616. (February 2014). Accessed: 2018-01-05.Google Scholar
- Enrico Costanza, Samuel A Inverso, Elan Pavlov, Rebecca Allen, and Pattie Maes. 2006. Eye-q: Eyeglass Peripheral Display for Subtle Intimate Notifications. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. 211--218. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mike Daily, Youngkwan Cho, Kevin Martin, and Dave Payton. 2003. World embedded interfaces for human-robot interaction. In System Sciences (HICSS'03), 2003. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on. IEEE, 6--pp. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anca D Dragan and Siddhartha S Srinivasa. 2013. A Policy-blending Formalism for Shared Control. The International Journal of Robotics Research 32, 7 (2013), 790--805. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jill L Drury, Justin Richer, Nathan Rackliffe, and Michael A Goodrich. 2006. Comparing Situation Awareness for Two Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Human Interface Approaches. Technical Report. DTIC Document.Google Scholar
- Steven Feiner, Blair MacIntyre, Marcus Haupt, and Eliot Solomon. 1993. Windows on the World: 2D Windows for 3D Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of the 6th annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST'93). 145--155. Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. Fong, M. Micire, T. Morse, E. Park, C. Provencher, V. To, DW. Wheeler, D. Mittman, R. J. Torres, and E. Smith. 2013. Smart SPHERES: A Telerobotic Free-Flyer for Intravehicular Activities in Space. In Proceedings of AIAA Space'13.Google Scholar
- Foyle, David C and Andre, Anthony D and Hooey, Becky L. 2005. Situation Awareness in an Augmented Reality Cockpit: Design, Viewpoints and Cognitive Glue. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction. 3--9.Google Scholar
- Michael A Goodrich, Bryan S Morse, Damon Gerhardt, Joseph L Cooper, Morgan Quigley, Julie A Adams, and Curtis Humphrey. 2008. Supporting Wilderness Search and Rescue using a Camera-equipped Mini UAV. Journal of Field Robotics 25, 1--2 (2008), 89--110. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Scott A Green, Mark Billinghurst, XiaoQi Chen, and J Geoffrey Chase. 2008. Human-Robot Collaboration: A Literature Review and Augmented Reality Approach in Design. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems 5, 1 (2008), 1.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Scott A Green, J Geoffrey Chase, XiaoQi Chen, and Mark Billinghurst. 2009. Evaluating the Augmented Reality Human-Robot Collaboration System. International Journal of Intelligent Systems Technologies and Applications 8, 1--4 (2009), 130--143. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Drew Harwell. 2014. This government rule could cripple commercial drone flight. https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2014/11/25/this-government-rule-could-cripple-commercial-drone-flight/. (2014).Google Scholar
- Keita Higuchi, Katsuya Fujii, and Jun Rekimoto. 2013. Flying Head: A Headsynchronization Mechanism for Flying Telepresence. In International Conference on Artificial Reality and Telexistence (ICAT'13). 28--34.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yoshio Ishiguro and Jun Rekimoto. 2011. Peripheral Vision Annotation: Noninterference Information Presentation Method for Mobile Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of the ACM Augmented Human International Conference. 8. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J Richard Landis and Gary G Koch. 1977. The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics 33 (1977), 159--174. Issue 1.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Paula Lavigne. 2014. Eyes in the Sports Sky. ESPN website. (2014). Accessed: 2018-01-05.Google Scholar
- Li, Hua and Zhang, Xin and Shi, Guangwei and Qu, Hemeng and Wu, Yanxiong and Zhang, Jianping. 2013. Review and Analysis of Avionic Helmet-Mounted Displays. Optical Engineering 52, 11 (2013), 110901--110901.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jeffrey I Lipton, Aidan J Fay, and Daniela Rus. 2018. Baxter's Homunculus: Virtual Reality Spaces for Teleoperation in Manufacturing. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 3, 1 (2018), 179--186.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M Alejandra Menchaca-Brandan, Andrew M Liu, Charles M Oman, and Alan Natapoff. 2007. Influence of Perspective-taking and Mental Rotation Abilities in Space Teleoperation. In ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI'07). 271--278. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Paul Milgram and Fumio Kishino. 1994. A Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems 77, 12 (1994), 1321-- 1329.Google Scholar
- Paul Milgram, Shumin Zhai, David Drascic, and Julius Grodski. 1993. Applications of Augmented Reality for Human-Robot Communication. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS'93), Vol. 3. 1467--1472.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Masmoudi Mostefa, L Kaddour El Boudadi, A Loukil, Khelf Mohamed, and Dahane Amine. 2015. Design of Mobile Robot Teleoperation System based on Virtual Reality. In IEEE International Conference on Control, Engineering&Information Technology (CEIT'15). 1--6.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robin R Murphy. 2014. Disaster Robotics. MIT Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nicholl, Ryan. 2014. Airline Head-up Display Systems: Human Factors Considerations. Available at SSRN:https:// ssrn.com/ abstract=2384101 (2014).Google Scholar
- Curtis W Nielsen, Michael A Goodrich, and Robert W Ricks. 2007. Ecological Interfaces for Improving Mobile Robot Teleoperation. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 23, 5 (2007), 927--941. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shahin S Nudehi, Rohan Mukherjee, and Moji Ghodoussi. 2003. A Haptic Interface Design for Minimally Invasive Telesurgical Training and Collaboration in the Presence of Time Delay. In Proceedings. 42nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Vol. 5. 4563--4568.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Allison M Okamura. 2004. Methods for Haptic Feedback in Teleoperated Robotassisted Surgery. Industrial Robot: An International Journal 31, 6 (2004), 499--508.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Christos Papachristos and Kostas Alexis. 2016. Augmented Reality-Enhanced Structural Inspection Using Aerial Robots. In IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control (ISIC'16). IEEE, 1--6.Google Scholar
- FJ Perez-Grau, R Ragel, F Caballero, A Viguria, and A Ollero. 2017. Semiautonomous Teleoperation of UAVs in Search and Rescue Scenarios. In International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS'17). 1066--1074.Google Scholar
- David Pitman and Mary L Cummings. 2012. Collaborative exploration with a Micro Aerial Vehicle: A Novel Interaction Method for Controlling a MAV with a Hand-Held Device. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction 2012 (2012), 18. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Benjamin Poppinga, Niels Henze, Jutta Fortmann, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2012. AmbiGlasses-Information in the Periphery of the Visual Field. In Mensch&Computer. 153--162.Google Scholar
- Morgan Quigley, Michael A Goodrich, and Randal W Beard. 2004. Semiautonomous human-UAV interfaces for fixed-wing mini-UAVs. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS'04), Vol. 3. IEEE, 2457--2462.Google Scholar
- Emanuele Ruffaldi, Filippo Brizzi, Franco Tecchia, and Sandro Bacinelli. 2016. Third Point of View Augmented Reality for Robot Intentions Visualization. In International Conference on Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality and Computer Graphics. 471--478.Google Scholar
- Daniel Szafir. 2015. Human Interaction with Assistive Free-Flying Robots. Ph.D. Dissertation. The University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
- Daniel Szafir, Bilge Mutlu, and Terrence Fong. 2017. Designing Planning and Control Interfaces to Support User Collaboration with Flying Robots. The International Journal of Robotics Research 36, 5--7, 514--542. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Russell H Taylor, Arianna Menciassi, Gabor Fichtinger, Paolo Fiorini, and Paolo Dario. 2016. Medical Robotics and Computer-Integrated Surgery. In Springer Handbook of Robotics. 1657--1684.Google Scholar
- John Thomason, Photchara Ratsamee, Kiyoshi Kiyokawa, Pakpoom Kriangkomol, Jason Orlosky, Tomohiro Mashita, Yuki Uranishi, and Haruo Takemura. 2017. Adaptive View Management for Drone Teleoperation in Complex 3D Structures. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI'17). ACM, 419--426. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Improving Collocated Robot Teleoperation with Augmented Reality
Recommendations
Assisting Manipulation and Grasping in Robot Teleoperation with Augmented Reality Visual Cues
CHI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsTeleoperating industrial manipulators in co-located spaces can be challenging. Facilitating robot teleoperation by providing additional visual information about the environment and the robot affordances using augmented reality (AR), can improve task ...
Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed Reality for Human-Robot Interaction
HRI '18: Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot InteractionThe 1st International Workshop on Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed Reality for Human-Robot Interactions (VAM-HRI) will bring together HRI, Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, and Mixed Reality researchers to identify challenges in mixed reality interactions ...
Communicating Robot Motion Intent with Augmented Reality
HRI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot InteractionHumans coordinate teamwork by conveying intent through social cues, such as gestures and gaze behaviors. However, these methods may not be possible for appearance-constrained robots that lack anthropomorphic or zoomorphic features, such as aerial ...
Comments