skip to main content
10.1145/3167132.3167187acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Maximally informative k-itemset mining from massively distributed data streams

Authors Info & Claims
Published:09 April 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

We address the problem of mining maximally informative k-itemsets (miki) in data streams based on joint entropy. We propose PentroS, a highly scalable parallel miki mining algorithm. PentroS renders the mining process of large volumes of incoming data very efficient. It is designed to take into account the continuous aspect of data streams, particularly by reducing the computations of need for updating the miki results after arrival/departure of transactions to/from the sliding window. PentroS has been extensively evaluated using massive real-world data streams. Our experimental results confirm the effectiveness of our proposal which allows excellent throughput with high itemset length.

References

  1. Youssef Bassil. 2012. A Survey on Information Retrieval, Text Categorization, and Web Crawling. CoRR (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Moses Charikar, Kevin C. Chen, and Martin Farach-Colton. 2004. Finding frequent items in data streams. Theor. Comput. Sci. (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Thomas M. Cover and Joy A. Thomas. 2006. Elements of information theory (2. ed.). Wiley.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Jeffrey Dean and Sanjay Ghemawat. 2004. MapReduce: Simplified Data Processing on Large Clusters. In OSDI 2004. San Francisco, California, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Anna C. Gilbert, Yannis Kotidis, S. Muthukrishnan, and Martin Strauss. 2001. Surfing Wavelets on Streams: One-Pass Summaries for Approximate Aggregate Queries. In VLDB 2001. Roma, Italy. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Florin Gorunescu. 2011. Data Mining - Concepts, Models and Techniques. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Hannes Heikinheimo, Jouni K. Seppänen, Eino Hinkkanen, Heikki Mannila, and Taneli Mielikäinen. 2007. Finding low-entropy sets and trees from binary data. In ACM SIGKDD 2007. San Jose, California, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Cong-Rui Ji and Zhi-Hong Deng. 2007. Mining Frequent Ordered Patterns without Candidate Generation. In FSKD 2007. Haikou, Hainan, China. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Arno J. Knobbe and Eric K. Y. Ho. 2006. Maximally informative k-itemsets and their efficient discovery. In ACM SIGKDD 2006. Philadelphia, PA, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Hoang Thanh Lam and Toon Calders. 2010. Mining top-k frequent items in a data stream with flexible sliding windows. In ACM SIGKDD 2010. Washington, DC, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Sandy Moens, Emin Aksehirli, and Bart Goethals. 2013. Frequent Itemset Mining for Big Data. In IEEE BigData 2013. Santa Clara, CA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Odysseas Papapetrou, Minos N. Garofalakis, and Antonios Deligiannakis. 2015. Sketching distributed sliding-window data streams. The VLDB Journal (2015). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Thomas A. Runkler. 2016. Data Analytics - Models and Algorithms for Intelligent Data Analysis. Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Saber Salah, Reza Akbarinia, and Florent Masseglia. 2015. Fast Parallel Mining of Maximally Informative k-Itemsets in Big Data. In ICDM 2015. Atlantic City, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Wei-Guang Teng, Ming-Syan Chen, and Philip S. Yu. 2003. A Regression-Based Temporal Pattern Mining Scheme for Data Streams. In VLDB 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Matei Zaharia, Mosharaf Chowdhury, Michael J. Franklin, Scott Shenker, and Ion Stoica. 2010. Spark: Cluster Computing with Working Sets. In HotCloud 2010. Boston, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Chongsheng Zhang and Florent Masseglia. 2010. Discovering Highly Informative Feature Sets from Data Streams. In DEXA 2010. Bilbao, Spain. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Mehdi Zitouni, Reza Akbarinia, Sadok Ben Yahia, and Florent Masseglia. 2015. A Prime Number Based Approach for Closed Frequent Itemset Mining in Big Data. In DEXA 2015. Valencia, Spain. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Maximally informative k-itemset mining from massively distributed data streams

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SAC '18: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
        April 2018
        2327 pages
        ISBN:9781450351911
        DOI:10.1145/3167132

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 9 April 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader